28.09.2014 Views

June edition - The Police Association Victoria

June edition - The Police Association Victoria

June edition - The Police Association Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IR News<br />

Members win on excess<br />

travel and BOCC<br />

Chris KennEDy ><br />

INDuSTRIAL RELATIONS<br />

MANAGER<br />

Excess Travel<br />

Fair Work Australia has agreed with a <strong>Police</strong><br />

<strong>Association</strong> submission that members<br />

must be reimbursed when they are forced<br />

to drive their own vehicle when there is<br />

no direct transport available when attending<br />

a training course.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Association</strong> recently took the Force<br />

before Fair Work Australia after it refused<br />

to pay excess travel time and costs to a<br />

member attending a training course, despite<br />

the current Agreement clearly stating that<br />

members have a right to be reimbursed for<br />

using their own vehicle where no direct rail<br />

or bus service is reasonably available.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Force argued that a direct rail service<br />

could comprise multiple forms of transport<br />

and that members need authorisation to<br />

take their own vehicle, even where there is<br />

no direct service available for the member to<br />

get to training or a temporary work location.<br />

In Fair Work Australia’s view a direct service<br />

is defined as a single journey on a single<br />

mode of transport and a single taxi trip. In<br />

this case, the member can be reimbursed<br />

by a first class fare and a taxi voucher. If a<br />

direct service is not available, the member is<br />

entitled to use their own vehicle and receive<br />

the kilometre rate.<br />

For example, a member travelling from<br />

Ballarat to the Academy could be given a rail<br />

fare from Ballarat to Southern Cross and a<br />

taxi voucher for the trip from Southern Cross<br />

Station to the Academy should these modes<br />

allow the member to arrive at the Academy<br />

in time for the course. If it does not, the<br />

member is entitled to use their private<br />

vehicle or could be rostered to travel during<br />

work time on the previous day.<br />

In all cases, excess travel time is also<br />

payable if it meets the criteria set out in the<br />

current employment agreement.<br />

Excess travel is payable where the training<br />

or temporary work location is more than<br />

24 km (as the crow flies) from your station<br />

in metropolitan areas or more than 50 km<br />

or 40 minutes drive in country areas.<br />

If you have any questions or require<br />

assistance, please contact the Industrial<br />

Relations Section at the <strong>Association</strong>.<br />

BOCC successes<br />

A sworn police presence has been retained in<br />

the <strong>Victoria</strong> <strong>Police</strong> Force’s Welfare and Multimedia<br />

Units following a successful bid by the<br />

<strong>Police</strong> <strong>Association</strong> to avoid these areas from<br />

further civilianisation by the BOCC project.<br />

Under BOCC project plans, the Welfare<br />

Unit was earmarked to lose three sworn<br />

members to civilians. Moreover, the decision<br />

was made without consultation with the<br />

members or managers concerned<br />

With the assistance of the <strong>Police</strong><br />

<strong>Association</strong>, affected members submitted<br />

grievances, arguing that it was essential for<br />

welfare officers to be sworn so as to better<br />

connect with members and to gain access<br />

to crime scenes and areas where members<br />

would require assistance.<br />

When <strong>Victoria</strong> <strong>Police</strong> rejected these<br />

arguments, the matter was then referred to<br />

retired police superintendent Trevor Parks to<br />

arbitrate the matter.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Association</strong>’s principle argument in this<br />

case was that sworn members that occupy<br />

positions at Welfare are required to possess<br />

expertise, which can be acquired only<br />

through actual field experience as a sworn<br />

police officer. This is in line with Force policy.<br />

Members in need of Welfare assistance<br />

need to be able to talk to a member<br />

who has shared their experiences and<br />

can understand without having to have<br />

policing explained to them. It is why<br />

members at the Welfare unit have always<br />

mainly been sworn. If the BOCC proposal<br />

was implemented, the high quality<br />

service provided by the Welfare Officers<br />

would be lost.<br />

<strong>The</strong> arbitrator agreed with the <strong>Police</strong><br />

<strong>Association</strong>. <strong>The</strong> win will ensure that the<br />

Force will continue to provide a robust<br />

and relevant welfare response staffed<br />

by members who have experienced<br />

police work.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Association</strong> was also successful in<br />

the BOCC arbitration for the Multimedia<br />

Unit. Again, we demonstrated that<br />

members need to have experienced being<br />

a sworn member to be able to create<br />

training materials about the roles and<br />

responsibilities of sworn members.<br />

Unfortunately our submissions in the<br />

Academy Security and Field catering units<br />

were unsuccessful because the positions<br />

within these units no longer required the<br />

use of police powers.<br />

At the time of writing, there are still<br />

several BOCC arbitration hearing still<br />

to be determined.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Association</strong> <strong>Victoria</strong> Journal <strong>June</strong> 2011<br />

07

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!