20.10.2014 Views

review of non-cites amphibia species that are known or likely to be ...

review of non-cites amphibia species that are known or likely to be ...

review of non-cites amphibia species that are known or likely to be ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

This rep<strong>or</strong>t provides an analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>amphibia</strong>n <strong>species</strong> which <strong>are</strong> not listed in CITES but f<strong>or</strong><br />

which regional <strong>or</strong> international trade was considered <strong>to</strong> <strong>be</strong> a maj<strong>or</strong> threat in the 2007 IUCN<br />

Red List. In-depth <strong>review</strong>s were undertaken f<strong>or</strong> 13 <strong>species</strong> <strong>to</strong> see whether they meet the<br />

criteria f<strong>or</strong> listing in any <strong>of</strong> Annexes A, B <strong>or</strong> D 1 <strong>of</strong> Council Regulation 338/97.<br />

1.1. TRADE IN AMPHIBIANS<br />

Amphibians have <strong>be</strong>en traded f<strong>or</strong> food, the pet trade, medicinal products, etc. (Schlaepfer et<br />

al., 2005; AmphibiaWeb, 2006; Carpenter et al., 2007; Tyler et al. 2007). However, trade data <strong>are</strong><br />

not generally available f<strong>or</strong> most <strong>species</strong>, since only a small num<strong>be</strong>r <strong>of</strong> them <strong>are</strong> listed in<br />

CITES. It was noted by one auth<strong>or</strong> (Schlaepfer et al., 2005) <strong>that</strong> the maj<strong>or</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

heavily traded <strong>amphibia</strong>ns were not regulated by CITES (f<strong>or</strong> instance, <strong>non</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the 25<br />

<strong>amphibia</strong>n <strong>species</strong> most commonly traded by the US was listed).<br />

Unlike most countries, the United States rec<strong>or</strong>ds the imp<strong>or</strong>ts and exp<strong>or</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> all <strong>amphibia</strong>ns<br />

(Schlaepfer et al., 2005). Although data <strong>are</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten not collected at the <strong>species</strong> level, they can,<br />

however, provide an overview <strong>of</strong> the trade in one market. Over two million <strong>amphibia</strong>ns were<br />

<strong>known</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>be</strong> imp<strong>or</strong>ted in<strong>to</strong> the US during 1970-1971; leopard frogs (Rana pipiens), fire newts<br />

(Cynops pyrrogaster) and marine <strong>to</strong>ads (Bufo marinus) were imp<strong>or</strong>ted in the highest num<strong>be</strong>rs<br />

(Busack, 1974). An estimated 200 million pairs <strong>of</strong> frogs’ legs were imp<strong>or</strong>ted annually from<br />

Asia <strong>to</strong> the United States <strong>be</strong>f<strong>or</strong>e 1987 (Pough et al., 1998). During 1998-2002, the United States<br />

imp<strong>or</strong>ted 14.7 million wild-caught <strong>amphibia</strong>n specimens, and 5.2 million kg <strong>of</strong> wild-caught<br />

<strong>amphibia</strong>n meat. The most frequently traded <strong>species</strong> were the American bullfrog (Rana<br />

cates<strong>be</strong>iana) f<strong>or</strong> the food trade and the African dwarf frog (Hymenochirus curtipes) and the<br />

<strong>or</strong>iental fire-<strong>be</strong>llied newt and <strong>to</strong>ad (Cynops <strong>or</strong>ientalis and Bombina <strong>or</strong>ientalis) f<strong>or</strong> the pet trade<br />

(Schlaepfer et al., 2005).<br />

A broader view <strong>of</strong> the international trade is only possible f<strong>or</strong> those <strong>species</strong> listed in the CITES<br />

appendices. At present, 106 <strong>amphibia</strong>n <strong>species</strong> <strong>are</strong> listed in CITES. A <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>of</strong> 16 <strong>species</strong> <strong>are</strong><br />

listed in Appendix I and the remainder <strong>are</strong> listed in Appendix II, see Table 1. Recent trade<br />

(1994-2006) in CITES-listed <strong>amphibia</strong>ns is summarized in Table 3.<br />

Table 1. Summary table <strong>of</strong> CITES and/<strong>or</strong> EC-listed <strong>amphibia</strong>ns.<br />

Sources: Frost, 2004; EC Regulation No. 1332/2005.<br />

Order Family Species<br />

CITES<br />

Appendix<br />

EC<br />

Annex<br />

ANURA Bufonidae Altiphrynoides spp. I A<br />

Atelopus zeteki I A<br />

Bufo periglenes I A<br />

Bufo superciliaris I A<br />

Nec<strong>to</strong>phrynoides spp. I A<br />

Nimbaphrynoides spp. I A<br />

Spinophrynoides spp. I A<br />

Dendrobatidae Allobates fem<strong>or</strong>alis II B<br />

Allobates zaparo II B<br />

Dendrobates spp. II B<br />

Epipedobates spp. II B<br />

Minyobates spp. II B<br />

Phyllobates spp. II B<br />

Mantellidae Mantella spp. II B<br />

Microhylidae Dyscophus an<strong>to</strong>ngilii I A<br />

Scaphiophryne gottle<strong>be</strong>i II B<br />

Ranidae Conraua goliath - B<br />

Euphlyctis hexadactylus II B<br />

Hoplobatrachus tigerinus II B<br />

Rana cates<strong>be</strong>iana - B<br />

1<br />

Annex C was not considered relevant as it includes only <strong>species</strong> listed in CITES Appendices II <strong>or</strong> III.<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!