21.10.2014 Views

EMPLOYMENT IN THE MARKET ECONOMY IN ... - Eurostat - Europa

EMPLOYMENT IN THE MARKET ECONOMY IN ... - Eurostat - Europa

EMPLOYMENT IN THE MARKET ECONOMY IN ... - Eurostat - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3 — Labour costs and value-added<br />

The aim here is, first, to examine the variation in average<br />

labour costs per employee both between sectors and<br />

across the enlarged EU and, secondly, to relate average<br />

labour costs to value-added per person employed, or<br />

productivity.<br />

Industry<br />

Average annual labour costs<br />

In the EU15, annual labour costs per employee in industry<br />

were highest in Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Austria<br />

and Sweden in 2001, in all cases, close to or just over<br />

40 thousand euros per employee. They were lowest in<br />

Portugal at only 13 thousand euros per employee. In the<br />

EU15 countries together, they averaged some 35 thousand<br />

euros (30 thousand euros in EU25) (Table 24).<br />

In the new Member States, they were just under half the<br />

EU15 average in terms of euros in Cyprus (on the basis of<br />

the data available for manufacturing), Malta and Slovenia<br />

(in the last, much the same as in Portugal). In the other<br />

new Member States, they were only around a quarter or<br />

less of the EU15 average, again in euro terms. (It should<br />

be noted that the figures adjusted to purchasing power<br />

parity terms would give a better indication of the true cost<br />

of labour.) In Bulgaria and Romania, labour costs were<br />

under 10% of the EU15 average.<br />

Labour costs in manufacturing were much the same or<br />

slightly higher than in industry as a whole, while in mining,<br />

Adjusting labour costs for the self-employed<br />

An allowance needs to be made for the self-employed<br />

when computing labour costs in order both to give an accurate<br />

indication of their scale and to improve the comparability<br />

of the data across sectors of activity and<br />

Member States. The assumption made is that the earnings<br />

of the self-employed are the same as those of employees,<br />

which is the most neutral assumption to make in<br />

the absence of data. The scale of the adjustment, therefore,<br />

varies in proportion to the share of the self-employed<br />

in the work force (ie making no allowance for the<br />

self-employed tends to understate labour costs by a<br />

larger amount the greater the number of self-employed<br />

relative to employees).<br />

The adjustment in question is relatively small in most Member<br />

States in respect of manufacturing where those recorded<br />

as self-employed in the SBS data represented only<br />

around 6% of the work force in the EU15 in 2001. It is, however,<br />

larger in construction where 18% of those in work<br />

were self-employed. The proportion in manufacturing varied,<br />

however, from only around 1% in Luxembourg to 17%<br />

in Italy. In the new Member States, it varied from under<br />

0.5% in Latvia, Slovakia and Hungary (in the last two reflecting<br />

the incomplete data on small firms) to 10% in the<br />

Czech Republic. In market services, on the other hand, the<br />

adjustment required is much larger since some 16% of the<br />

total in the work force in the EU15 were self-employed in<br />

2001 according to the SBS. This proportion varied from<br />

only around 6% in France to 23% in Spain and 45% in Italy.<br />

In the new Member States and candidate countries it varied<br />

between 1% in Latvia to 28% in the Czech Republic,<br />

though in most countries, it was under 10%, apart from in<br />

Malta (25%). It was also high in Bulgaria (32%), while in Romania,<br />

it was 10%.<br />

Unit labour costs — and the share of labour in value-added<br />

— can, therefore, be estimated by the equation:<br />

(Total employed/Employees) x (Labour costs/Value-added)<br />

which can be rearranged as:<br />

(Labour costs/Employees)/(Value-added/Total employed)<br />

which is equivalent to the ratio of average labour costs per<br />

employee to labour productivity, expressed in terms of the<br />

number employed rather than hours worked.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!