22.10.2014 Views

EFA Goal 1: Early childhood care and education; Asia ... - Unicef

EFA Goal 1: Early childhood care and education; Asia ... - Unicef

EFA Goal 1: Early childhood care and education; Asia ... - Unicef

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Even when countries have st<strong>and</strong>ards, there is rarely the necessary budget to see them fulfilled.<br />

Nepal, for example, developed a 40-page document outlining high st<strong>and</strong>ards for ECD centres; but<br />

there was no increase in the budget or any budget sharing to enforce the st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

Across the region, there is variation in the types of early screening programme <strong>and</strong> referral system<br />

that countries have in place. In Thail<strong>and</strong>, the 2008 <strong>EFA</strong> mid-decade assessment country report<br />

indicates that the Ministry of Public Health uses indicators of physical health <strong>and</strong> brain disorder for<br />

screening children before they enrol into the school system; clinics provide constant health <strong>care</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> health watch for all children (Ministry of Education, Thail<strong>and</strong>, 2008a).<br />

In Malaysia, the child health services policies (per Article 24 of the Convention on the Rights of<br />

the Child) promote routine visits <strong>and</strong> examinations for children, immunization, healthy nutritional<br />

status, growth monitoring <strong>and</strong> evaluation as well as health <strong>education</strong> for parents; the national<br />

nutrition policy formulated in 2003 promotes breastfeeding campaigns <strong>and</strong> healthy <strong>and</strong><br />

appropriate diets <strong>and</strong> lifestyles.<br />

It is clear that a greater public impetus for early screening programmes is needed in the region.<br />

There is a need for increased use of disaggregated, subnational data in addressing progress on this<br />

indicator, given the wide range of disparities between rural-urban areas, between privileged <strong>and</strong><br />

disadvantaged backgrounds <strong>and</strong> across provinces.<br />

Advocacy for early screening should be formulated as a collaborative venture with partnerships<br />

from multiple sectors: ministries <strong>and</strong> government agencies, international NGOs, community actors,<br />

grass-roots groups, health centres <strong>and</strong> the private sector. On this indicator, South <strong>Asia</strong> appears to<br />

be lagging <strong>and</strong> will likely take a long time to put in place functional referral systems. International<br />

NGOs, such as Save the Children, have been advocating for collaborative assessments with parents<br />

that lead to more parental engagement <strong>and</strong> stronger support for children at home rather than<br />

referrals (considering services are often nonexistent).<br />

4.6 The quality imperative in ECCE services<br />

The General Comment (GC) 7 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) affirms the right<br />

of young children to be active <strong>and</strong> engaged participants in daily life routines. In addition, the CRC<br />

requires that “children, including the very youngest children, be respected as persons in their<br />

own right. Young children should be recognized as active members of families, communities <strong>and</strong><br />

societies, with their own concerns, interests <strong>and</strong> points of view. For the exercise of their rights,<br />

young children have particular requirements for physical nurturance, emotional <strong>care</strong> <strong>and</strong> sensitive<br />

guidance, as well as for time <strong>and</strong> space for social play, exploration <strong>and</strong> learning” (United Nations,<br />

GC 7 on the CRC, 2006).<br />

Inherently, this comment addresses the issue of quality. The term ‘quality’ has been subject to great<br />

scrutiny <strong>and</strong> has been the focus of several debates in the <strong>education</strong> field in general <strong>and</strong> in ECCE in<br />

particular (see the EDN on quality for a more detailed discussion).<br />

Quality is a multilevel <strong>and</strong> multidimensional construct that includes various programme <strong>and</strong><br />

classroom features (Mashburn et al., 2008). In the literature, the general agreement of ECCE<br />

quality reflects components of the environment that are related to positive child outcomes in<br />

the academic <strong>and</strong> social domains (Pianta et al., 2005). Two broad dimensions are often used to<br />

capture ECCE quality. These include features of programme infrastructure <strong>and</strong> children’s direct<br />

experience in classrooms. The former dimension is commonly referred to as the ‘structural quality’<br />

or the regulatable classroom environment, such as space <strong>and</strong> furnishings, activities offered in a<br />

programme <strong>and</strong> services available for children <strong>and</strong> families. It also includes regulatable features of<br />

the programme, such as a class size, child-to-teacher ratio, teachers’ <strong>education</strong>al backgrounds <strong>and</strong><br />

years of teaching experiences (NICHD ECCRN, 2002).<br />

<strong>EFA</strong> <strong>Goal</strong> 1: <strong>Early</strong> Childhood Care <strong>and</strong> Education<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!