EFA Goal 1: Early childhood care and education; Asia ... - Unicef
EFA Goal 1: Early childhood care and education; Asia ... - Unicef
EFA Goal 1: Early childhood care and education; Asia ... - Unicef
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Even when countries have st<strong>and</strong>ards, there is rarely the necessary budget to see them fulfilled.<br />
Nepal, for example, developed a 40-page document outlining high st<strong>and</strong>ards for ECD centres; but<br />
there was no increase in the budget or any budget sharing to enforce the st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />
Across the region, there is variation in the types of early screening programme <strong>and</strong> referral system<br />
that countries have in place. In Thail<strong>and</strong>, the 2008 <strong>EFA</strong> mid-decade assessment country report<br />
indicates that the Ministry of Public Health uses indicators of physical health <strong>and</strong> brain disorder for<br />
screening children before they enrol into the school system; clinics provide constant health <strong>care</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> health watch for all children (Ministry of Education, Thail<strong>and</strong>, 2008a).<br />
In Malaysia, the child health services policies (per Article 24 of the Convention on the Rights of<br />
the Child) promote routine visits <strong>and</strong> examinations for children, immunization, healthy nutritional<br />
status, growth monitoring <strong>and</strong> evaluation as well as health <strong>education</strong> for parents; the national<br />
nutrition policy formulated in 2003 promotes breastfeeding campaigns <strong>and</strong> healthy <strong>and</strong><br />
appropriate diets <strong>and</strong> lifestyles.<br />
It is clear that a greater public impetus for early screening programmes is needed in the region.<br />
There is a need for increased use of disaggregated, subnational data in addressing progress on this<br />
indicator, given the wide range of disparities between rural-urban areas, between privileged <strong>and</strong><br />
disadvantaged backgrounds <strong>and</strong> across provinces.<br />
Advocacy for early screening should be formulated as a collaborative venture with partnerships<br />
from multiple sectors: ministries <strong>and</strong> government agencies, international NGOs, community actors,<br />
grass-roots groups, health centres <strong>and</strong> the private sector. On this indicator, South <strong>Asia</strong> appears to<br />
be lagging <strong>and</strong> will likely take a long time to put in place functional referral systems. International<br />
NGOs, such as Save the Children, have been advocating for collaborative assessments with parents<br />
that lead to more parental engagement <strong>and</strong> stronger support for children at home rather than<br />
referrals (considering services are often nonexistent).<br />
4.6 The quality imperative in ECCE services<br />
The General Comment (GC) 7 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) affirms the right<br />
of young children to be active <strong>and</strong> engaged participants in daily life routines. In addition, the CRC<br />
requires that “children, including the very youngest children, be respected as persons in their<br />
own right. Young children should be recognized as active members of families, communities <strong>and</strong><br />
societies, with their own concerns, interests <strong>and</strong> points of view. For the exercise of their rights,<br />
young children have particular requirements for physical nurturance, emotional <strong>care</strong> <strong>and</strong> sensitive<br />
guidance, as well as for time <strong>and</strong> space for social play, exploration <strong>and</strong> learning” (United Nations,<br />
GC 7 on the CRC, 2006).<br />
Inherently, this comment addresses the issue of quality. The term ‘quality’ has been subject to great<br />
scrutiny <strong>and</strong> has been the focus of several debates in the <strong>education</strong> field in general <strong>and</strong> in ECCE in<br />
particular (see the EDN on quality for a more detailed discussion).<br />
Quality is a multilevel <strong>and</strong> multidimensional construct that includes various programme <strong>and</strong><br />
classroom features (Mashburn et al., 2008). In the literature, the general agreement of ECCE<br />
quality reflects components of the environment that are related to positive child outcomes in<br />
the academic <strong>and</strong> social domains (Pianta et al., 2005). Two broad dimensions are often used to<br />
capture ECCE quality. These include features of programme infrastructure <strong>and</strong> children’s direct<br />
experience in classrooms. The former dimension is commonly referred to as the ‘structural quality’<br />
or the regulatable classroom environment, such as space <strong>and</strong> furnishings, activities offered in a<br />
programme <strong>and</strong> services available for children <strong>and</strong> families. It also includes regulatable features of<br />
the programme, such as a class size, child-to-teacher ratio, teachers’ <strong>education</strong>al backgrounds <strong>and</strong><br />
years of teaching experiences (NICHD ECCRN, 2002).<br />
<strong>EFA</strong> <strong>Goal</strong> 1: <strong>Early</strong> Childhood Care <strong>and</strong> Education<br />
27