23.10.2014 Views

Downloaded - Journal of American Pharmacists Association

Downloaded - Journal of American Pharmacists Association

Downloaded - Journal of American Pharmacists Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annual Meeting Abstracts 2004<br />

FEATURE<br />

chronic pain patients by establishing a collaborative<br />

project via pharmacy and primary care providers.<br />

Methods: The Kaiser Permanente Cascade Park<br />

clinic is one <strong>of</strong> 22 ambulatory care locations in the<br />

Pacific Northwest Region. In the past years,<br />

improvements were needed to provide a more<br />

methodical approach to serve chronic pain patients<br />

who required therapy with controlled substances.<br />

The collaborative project created set out to decrease<br />

workload <strong>of</strong> providers and increase patient satisfaction.<br />

The new system operates on patient lists. One<br />

week before medications are due, a pharmacist sends<br />

a message to the provider stating the following: date<br />

medication is due, the last fill <strong>of</strong> the medication, the<br />

quantity that the prescription was filled for, last<br />

patient appointment, and any special requests or concerns.<br />

An order for the patient’s medication is also<br />

created. Once the provider receives the message, the<br />

order can be approved if continued therapy is intended,<br />

and a signed prescription is sent back to the pharmacy.<br />

Pharmacy staff then files the prescription for<br />

the date that the patient is due for medication and<br />

then on date in question, the prescription is processed<br />

by pharmacy staff.<br />

Results: All clinic providers who care for chronic<br />

pain patients on controlled substances have been<br />

participating in this project, and more than 250<br />

patients have been enrolled.<br />

Conclusions: Since this project began, provider,<br />

patient, and pharmacy satisfaction with the method<br />

<strong>of</strong> processing controlled substances for chronic pain<br />

patients has been overwhelming. A need for change<br />

was identified and satisfied with a technological<br />

update on method <strong>of</strong> service.<br />

92—STUDYING THE PROFESSIONAL<br />

INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COMMU-<br />

NITY PHARMACISTS AND PHARMACY<br />

TECHNICIANS. Akiyode O, Bullard W, Karodeh<br />

Y, Cao T, Howard University. E-mail: oakiyode@<br />

howard.edu<br />

Objective: To understand the pr<strong>of</strong>essional relationship<br />

between pharmacists and pharmacy technicians.<br />

To identify the supporting and inhibiting factors<br />

toward the pr<strong>of</strong>essional behaviors demonstrated<br />

by the two entities.<br />

Methods: Community pharmacists and pharmacy<br />

technicians will complete a survey tool that<br />

assesses their interaction with each other. The survey<br />

tool is designed to evaluate the attitudes, behaviors,<br />

perceptions, and expectations among the aforementioned<br />

entities. A total <strong>of</strong> 50 surveys will be randomly<br />

distributed to local community pharmacies.<br />

<strong>Pharmacists</strong> will receive one half <strong>of</strong> the surveys,<br />

while pharmacy technicians will receive the other<br />

half. Upon completion <strong>of</strong> the surveys, a pair <strong>of</strong> fivemember<br />

focus groups (one involving pharmacists,<br />

the other technicians) will convene to discuss the<br />

survey results and ways to improve the pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

relationship. The participants <strong>of</strong> the focus group discussions<br />

will be randomly selected from the pool <strong>of</strong><br />

the study participants. Upon completion <strong>of</strong> the focus<br />

group discussions, all participants will be asked to<br />

complete a postdiscussion questionnaire to assess<br />

what they have learned from the discussion session,<br />

and how they plan to improve their own pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

relationships.<br />

Results: The outcome <strong>of</strong> the surveys, focus<br />

group discussions, and postdiscussion questionnaires<br />

will be analyzed using descriptive statistics.<br />

The study is expected to educate participants and<br />

generate ideas to improve further the relationship<br />

between pharmacists and technicians, hopefully<br />

improving the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the pharmacy and overall<br />

patient care.<br />

Conclusions: NA<br />

93—SURVEY OF PHARMACISTS DESIRE<br />

AND READINESS FOR DISEASE STATE<br />

MANAGEMENT IN OHIO. Dorsch M, Riverside<br />

Methodist Hospital, Kier K, Mraz S, Ohio Northern<br />

University. E-mail: MDORSCH@OhioHealth.com<br />

Objective: Prescription drugs remained the<br />

fastest growing health expenditure, increasing by<br />

15.7%. The state <strong>of</strong> Ohio follows a similar trend.<br />

Currently medications account for 15.1% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ohio Medicaid budget, while physician billing only<br />

comprises 6%. Due to the increasing cost <strong>of</strong> health<br />

care and medications, the Ohio <strong>Pharmacists</strong><br />

<strong>Association</strong> (OPA) started discussions with the state<br />

about the concept <strong>of</strong> disease state management<br />

(DSM). The objective was to determine pharmacists<br />

desire and readiness to start DSM programs within<br />

the state.<br />

Methods: OPA put together a task force to discuss<br />

issues relevant to starting a statewide program<br />

in DSM. Based on task force discussions, a survey<br />

was designed and pilot tested to look at DSM issues.<br />

The survey was sent to a random selection <strong>of</strong><br />

licensed pharmacists within the state <strong>of</strong> Ohio. The<br />

survey asked questions relating to demographics,<br />

current practice settings, current DSM practices, and<br />

preparation and desire to provide DSM services.<br />

Descriptive statistics will be used to analyze the data.<br />

Results: Initial results from the survey provided<br />

interesting feedback, especially in the area <strong>of</strong> pharmacist<br />

training and preparation for DSM. In general,<br />

pharmacists were most comfortable with the area<br />

<strong>of</strong> diabetes management. Most pharmacists indicated<br />

a willingness to take more training or certification<br />

in areas <strong>of</strong> DSM. Data analysis is ongoing.<br />

Conclusions: The results will be used by the task<br />

force to make decisions relating to pharmacist interest,<br />

training, and potentially areas for reimbursement.<br />

94—THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PAIN<br />

SERVICE BY THE PHARMACY DEPART-<br />

MENT IN A UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CLIN-<br />

IC. Jacobson S, Massachusetts College <strong>of</strong><br />

Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Debay G,<br />

Massachusetts Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology. E-mail:<br />

deba@med.mit.edu<br />

Objective: To provide pain management education<br />

and reference information to health care<br />

providers and patients in an outpatient ambulatory<br />

clinic and inpatient unit.<br />

Methods: A pharmacist was identified to lead an<br />

educational initiative helping pharmacists, nursing<br />

staff, physicians and other health care providers<br />

learn about effective pain management. All pharmacists<br />

were required to read and successfully complete<br />

posttests associated with journal articles. Case<br />

study discussions were also an integral part <strong>of</strong> their<br />

pain management competency training. Ongoing<br />

education for the pharmacists helped to ensure consistent<br />

communication in their clinical assistance to<br />

the medical staff and in patient counseling. Health<br />

care practitioners were provided pain management<br />

information and guidance on how to identify and<br />

refer patients to the pain service. Assessment tools<br />

such as flow sheets and narcotic conversion charts<br />

were developed by the pharmacy for use in both the<br />

inpatient and outpatient setting. Frequent meetings<br />

with the inpatient and outpatient clinical staff<br />

regarding up-to-date pain management information,<br />

assistance on the proper use <strong>of</strong> pain management<br />

assessment tools, approved formulary medications<br />

for pain, appropriate prescribing, outpatient prescription<br />

and inpatient order writing for medications,<br />

and documentation in the medical chart were<br />

imperative for the success <strong>of</strong> this service. The pharmacy<br />

department is beginning to collect data in both<br />

the inpatient and outpatient records to monitor the<br />

proper use <strong>of</strong> pain assessment tools, appropriate prescribing,<br />

and patient compliance.<br />

Results: The medical and nursing staffs have<br />

reported a positive outcome for patients involved<br />

with the pharmacy pain service. The pharmacists are<br />

finding that providing clinical information to health<br />

care providers and counseling patients receiving<br />

pain medications is a rewarding experience.<br />

Conclusions: A pharmacy-centered pain management<br />

program is beneficial to the university<br />

health system.<br />

95—THE PHARMACIST’S ROLE IN PUB-<br />

LIC HEALTH: A SURVEY OF HEALTH<br />

DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS. Cottrell J, Albany<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy, Blumenschein K, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kentucky, Paavola F, None. E-mail:<br />

cottrelj@acp.edu<br />

Objective: To examine services provided by state<br />

and local health departments, determine areas into<br />

which health departments would like to expand, and<br />

examine the public health <strong>of</strong>ficials’ perceptions <strong>of</strong><br />

partnering with community pharmacists.<br />

Methods: In December 1999, 25 state health<br />

department Web sites were reviewed to determine<br />

the areas <strong>of</strong> focus that public health agents were<br />

attempting to address. From this assessment, a<br />

three-page survey was developed and sent to directors<br />

<strong>of</strong> 300 health departments, randomly selected<br />

from the National <strong>Association</strong> <strong>of</strong> County and City<br />

Health Officials (NACCHO) mailing list. Each<br />

packet contained a cover letter, a survey, and a selfaddressed<br />

stamped envelope. Surveys were<br />

approved under expedited review by the University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kentucky Medical Institutional Review Board<br />

and contained 13 questions: 4 addressing staff composition<br />

and responsibilities, 4 addressing current<br />

and future programs, and 5 concerning perceptions<br />

<strong>of</strong> partnering with pharmacists and pharmacy ser-<br />

2004 Abstracts <strong>of</strong> Contributed Papers<br />

Vol. 44, No. 2 March/April 2004 www.japha.org <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Pharmacists</strong> <strong>Association</strong> 249<br />

<strong>Downloaded</strong> From: http://japha.org/ on 01/25/2014

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!