[ED04] Process design of hydro-distillation in ginger oil ... - USM
[ED04] Process design of hydro-distillation in ginger oil ... - USM
[ED04] Process design of hydro-distillation in ginger oil ... - USM
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The 4th Annual Sem<strong>in</strong>ar <strong>of</strong> National Science Fellowship 2004<br />
The same experimental procedure was also applied.<br />
Vacuum<br />
Cold trap<br />
Temperature<br />
display<br />
Cumulative Yield (%)<br />
0.30<br />
0.25<br />
0.20<br />
0.15<br />
0.10<br />
0.05<br />
0.00<br />
0 2 4 6 8<br />
Extraction time (hr)<br />
Sliced dried g<strong>in</strong>ger<br />
FIGURE 1 Vapour pressure measurement set up.<br />
Quality analysis<br />
The Refractometer is the fastest and<br />
reliable technique <strong>in</strong> quality control<br />
assessments and conformation <strong>in</strong> this study.<br />
The literature value for refractive <strong>in</strong>dex (RI)<br />
<strong>of</strong> g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> is <strong>in</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> 1.4880 to<br />
1.4950. In this study, a Seiko heat flux DSC<br />
was also used as a method <strong>of</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the<br />
degradation temperature <strong>of</strong> the g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong>.<br />
Results and Discussions<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> extraction time on yield<br />
Figure 2 shows the g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> collected<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the 6 hours <strong>of</strong> water <strong>distillation</strong>. The<br />
graph shows that there was no g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong><br />
collected dur<strong>in</strong>g the first hour <strong>of</strong> extraction.<br />
This occurs s<strong>in</strong>ce the energy supplied <strong>in</strong>to the<br />
system, was used to heat the water and sample<br />
<strong>in</strong>side the b<strong>oil</strong>er. G<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> and water can<br />
only be seen condensed after the first hour <strong>of</strong><br />
extraction time. It was also observed that most<br />
<strong>of</strong> the g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> distilled out dur<strong>in</strong>g the next 2<br />
hours. Prolong<strong>in</strong>g the extraction time will<br />
achieve a constant value <strong>of</strong> the g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong><br />
collected. Therefore, <strong>in</strong> order to have<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imum energy consumption, 4 hours <strong>of</strong><br />
extraction is enough to do the extraction.<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> pressure on yield<br />
The effects <strong>of</strong> varied absolute pressure on<br />
the yield <strong>of</strong> the g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> was carried out<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g sliced dried g<strong>in</strong>ger (Figure 3). From the<br />
figure, it can be concluded that higher<br />
pressure resulted <strong>in</strong> higher yield. In this case,<br />
extraction done at 2.2 bar gave an average <strong>oil</strong><br />
FIGURE 2 The cumulative g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong><br />
recovery over the extraction time at<br />
atmospheric pressure.<br />
yield <strong>of</strong> 0.34 percent. Nevertheless, the yield<br />
achieved through this extraction is considered<br />
to be low s<strong>in</strong>ce it is lower than the literature<br />
value. Results show that it is not practical to<br />
extract g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> at excess pressure.<br />
Yield (%)<br />
0.40<br />
0.35<br />
0.30<br />
0.25<br />
0.20<br />
0.15<br />
0.10<br />
1.3 bar<br />
1.6 bar<br />
1.9 bar<br />
2.2 bar<br />
0 1 2 3 4<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> runs<br />
FIGURE 3 The yield <strong>of</strong> the g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> collected by<br />
steam <strong>distillation</strong> at excess pressure for sliced<br />
g<strong>in</strong>ger.<br />
Figure 4 showed the results for yield <strong>of</strong><br />
g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> extracted by water <strong>distillation</strong> and<br />
steam <strong>distillation</strong> <strong>of</strong> ground dried g<strong>in</strong>ger at<br />
atmospheric pressure. From this study, it<br />
seemed that water <strong>distillation</strong> <strong>of</strong> ground dried<br />
g<strong>in</strong>ger gave the highest recovery <strong>of</strong> the g<strong>in</strong>ger<br />
<strong>oil</strong> (1.53%) whilst the steam <strong>distillation</strong> gave<br />
only 1.42% <strong>of</strong> g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong>. Even though a<br />
higher g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> recovery was achieved by<br />
528