24.10.2014 Views

[ED04] Process design of hydro-distillation in ginger oil ... - USM

[ED04] Process design of hydro-distillation in ginger oil ... - USM

[ED04] Process design of hydro-distillation in ginger oil ... - USM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The 4th Annual Sem<strong>in</strong>ar <strong>of</strong> National Science Fellowship 2004<br />

The same experimental procedure was also applied.<br />

Vacuum<br />

Cold trap<br />

Temperature<br />

display<br />

Cumulative Yield (%)<br />

0.30<br />

0.25<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

0.05<br />

0.00<br />

0 2 4 6 8<br />

Extraction time (hr)<br />

Sliced dried g<strong>in</strong>ger<br />

FIGURE 1 Vapour pressure measurement set up.<br />

Quality analysis<br />

The Refractometer is the fastest and<br />

reliable technique <strong>in</strong> quality control<br />

assessments and conformation <strong>in</strong> this study.<br />

The literature value for refractive <strong>in</strong>dex (RI)<br />

<strong>of</strong> g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> is <strong>in</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> 1.4880 to<br />

1.4950. In this study, a Seiko heat flux DSC<br />

was also used as a method <strong>of</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the<br />

degradation temperature <strong>of</strong> the g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong>.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> extraction time on yield<br />

Figure 2 shows the g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> collected<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the 6 hours <strong>of</strong> water <strong>distillation</strong>. The<br />

graph shows that there was no g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong><br />

collected dur<strong>in</strong>g the first hour <strong>of</strong> extraction.<br />

This occurs s<strong>in</strong>ce the energy supplied <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

system, was used to heat the water and sample<br />

<strong>in</strong>side the b<strong>oil</strong>er. G<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> and water can<br />

only be seen condensed after the first hour <strong>of</strong><br />

extraction time. It was also observed that most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> distilled out dur<strong>in</strong>g the next 2<br />

hours. Prolong<strong>in</strong>g the extraction time will<br />

achieve a constant value <strong>of</strong> the g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong><br />

collected. Therefore, <strong>in</strong> order to have<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum energy consumption, 4 hours <strong>of</strong><br />

extraction is enough to do the extraction.<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> pressure on yield<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> varied absolute pressure on<br />

the yield <strong>of</strong> the g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> was carried out<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g sliced dried g<strong>in</strong>ger (Figure 3). From the<br />

figure, it can be concluded that higher<br />

pressure resulted <strong>in</strong> higher yield. In this case,<br />

extraction done at 2.2 bar gave an average <strong>oil</strong><br />

FIGURE 2 The cumulative g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong><br />

recovery over the extraction time at<br />

atmospheric pressure.<br />

yield <strong>of</strong> 0.34 percent. Nevertheless, the yield<br />

achieved through this extraction is considered<br />

to be low s<strong>in</strong>ce it is lower than the literature<br />

value. Results show that it is not practical to<br />

extract g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> at excess pressure.<br />

Yield (%)<br />

0.40<br />

0.35<br />

0.30<br />

0.25<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

1.3 bar<br />

1.6 bar<br />

1.9 bar<br />

2.2 bar<br />

0 1 2 3 4<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> runs<br />

FIGURE 3 The yield <strong>of</strong> the g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> collected by<br />

steam <strong>distillation</strong> at excess pressure for sliced<br />

g<strong>in</strong>ger.<br />

Figure 4 showed the results for yield <strong>of</strong><br />

g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> extracted by water <strong>distillation</strong> and<br />

steam <strong>distillation</strong> <strong>of</strong> ground dried g<strong>in</strong>ger at<br />

atmospheric pressure. From this study, it<br />

seemed that water <strong>distillation</strong> <strong>of</strong> ground dried<br />

g<strong>in</strong>ger gave the highest recovery <strong>of</strong> the g<strong>in</strong>ger<br />

<strong>oil</strong> (1.53%) whilst the steam <strong>distillation</strong> gave<br />

only 1.42% <strong>of</strong> g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong>. Even though a<br />

higher g<strong>in</strong>ger <strong>oil</strong> recovery was achieved by<br />

528

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!