24.10.2014 Views

The quantitative study of marked individuals in ecology, evolution ...

The quantitative study of marked individuals in ecology, evolution ...

The quantitative study of marked individuals in ecology, evolution ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EURING Technical Meet<strong>in</strong>g 2003:<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>quantitative</strong> <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>marked</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>ecology</strong>, <strong>evolution</strong> and conservation biology<br />

hosted by<br />

Max Planck Research Centre for Ornithology<br />

Vogelwarte Radolfzell<br />

06 – 11 October 2003 <strong>in</strong> Radolfzell<br />

scientific committee<br />

Juan Carlos Senar (chair)<br />

Mike Conroy, André Dhondt (co-chairs)<br />

Neil Arnason, Stephen Baillie, Franz Bairle<strong>in</strong>,<br />

Charles Brown, Ken Burnham, Eammanuelle Cam,<br />

Jean Clobert, Mike Conroy, Evan Cooch,<br />

Paul Doherty, Charles Francis, Jim H<strong>in</strong>es, Darryl<br />

MacKenzie, Jean-Dom<strong>in</strong>ique Lebreton, Danny Lee,<br />

Jim Nichols, Ken Pollock, Carl Schwarz,<br />

David Thomson, Gary White<br />

supported by: head <strong>of</strong> local organiz<strong>in</strong>g team<br />

Wolfgang Fiedler


Radolfzell (Germany)<br />

Contents<br />

welcome ............................................................................................................. 2<br />

program ............................................................................................................. 3<br />

oral sessions<br />

short courses .......................................................................................... 5<br />

<strong>evolution</strong>ary biology & life histories ......................................................... 6<br />

random effects ..................................................................................... 11<br />

multi-state models ................................................................................ 13<br />

standardiz<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>ology (roundtable) ................................................. 16<br />

methodological advances ..................................................................... 17<br />

comput<strong>in</strong>g & s<strong>of</strong>tware ........................................................................... 21<br />

population dynamics & monitor<strong>in</strong>g applied to decision mak<strong>in</strong>g ............. 24<br />

dispersal & migration ............................................................................ 27<br />

analysis us<strong>in</strong>g large-scale r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g data ................................................. 32<br />

abundance estimation and conservation biology .................................. 36<br />

population dynamics ............................................................................. 39<br />

Honor Speaker (James Nichols) ........................................................... 42<br />

poster abstracts ................................................................................................ 43<br />

list <strong>of</strong> participants ............................................................................................. 57<br />

1


Technical Meet<strong>in</strong>g 2003<br />

Welcome<br />

Dear EURING 2003 participants,<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce many years now EURING (<strong>The</strong> European Union for Bird R<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g) is active <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> bird r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g as a tool for science and wildlife conservation. Among<br />

the most important results EURING has obta<strong>in</strong>ed, the so called ‘technical meet<strong>in</strong>gs’ rank<br />

surely high. Follow<strong>in</strong>g the idea put forward by the past President Pertti Saurola, it is now s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

1986 that EURING could attract top scientists to discuss and develop statistical tools for<br />

the analysis <strong>of</strong> mark-recapture data.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se meet<strong>in</strong>gs are fairly unique venues, where biostatisticians and ornithologists <strong>in</strong>teract<br />

and exchange their experiences to set up priorities for the next steps to be undertaken for the<br />

best use <strong>of</strong> data derived from r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g and mark<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> our birds.<br />

<strong>The</strong> truly <strong>in</strong>ternational pr<strong>of</strong>ile ga<strong>in</strong>ed by the EURING technical meet<strong>in</strong>gs is also confirmed by<br />

what has now become a tradition <strong>of</strong> hold<strong>in</strong>g them alternatively <strong>in</strong> Europe and the U.S. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>gs have also <strong>in</strong>variably produced volumes <strong>of</strong> proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the highest scientific level<br />

and contents, which is a further reason <strong>of</strong> their success. And beyond the proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, new<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware has been produced also thanks to the analytical opportunities <strong>of</strong>fered by unique<br />

data sets orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Presently much <strong>of</strong> this s<strong>of</strong>tware is free, allow<strong>in</strong>g scientists from all over the world to benefit<br />

from these analytical tools produced by famous biostatisticians who deserve all our appreciation<br />

for their positive availability to support research on <strong>marked</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>.<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>gly dur<strong>in</strong>g the years the need for a detailed knowledge <strong>of</strong> the demographic<br />

processes affect<strong>in</strong>g bird populations has become an important component <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

policies. <strong>The</strong> <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>marked</strong> birds contributes to applied aspects <strong>of</strong> the management, harvest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and conservation <strong>of</strong> their populations, which belong to the <strong>in</strong>ternational community<br />

and represent the subject <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational directives.<br />

<strong>The</strong> contribution that also the EURING technical meet<strong>in</strong>gs have <strong>of</strong>fered to the uderstand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mech<strong>in</strong>isms govern<strong>in</strong>g bird populations have <strong>in</strong>fluenced the design <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

most important r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g projects coord<strong>in</strong>ated by EURING and devoted to bird monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

across Europe, like our Constant Effort Site project.<br />

This meet<strong>in</strong>g is k<strong>in</strong>dly hosted by the good friends <strong>of</strong> Vogelwarte Radolfzell, an Istitute which<br />

has <strong>of</strong>fered so much to the understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the adaptive roots <strong>of</strong> bird migration and to longterm<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> migratory birds. I’m sure this will be a most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g conference, and I<br />

wish all participants a stimulat<strong>in</strong>g work<strong>in</strong>g week, full <strong>of</strong> contacts and new ideas.<br />

Fernando Sp<strong>in</strong>a<br />

EURING Chairman<br />

2


Radolfzell (Germany)<br />

EURING Technical Meet<strong>in</strong>g 2003<br />

06 – 11 October 2003 <strong>in</strong> Radolfzell<br />

PROGRAM<br />

All sessions are held <strong>in</strong> the small hall (“Kle<strong>in</strong>er Saal”) at the conference centre<br />

“Tagungs und Kulturzentrum Milchwerk” (TKM). Posters are displayed <strong>in</strong> the foyer.<br />

Monday, October 6<br />

08:45 AM - 05:15 PM short courses (see separate schedule p. 5)<br />

06:00 PM - 07:00 PM d<strong>in</strong>ner (only for those who registered for the short course)<br />

Tuesday, October 7<br />

08:00 AM - 08:15 AM Open<strong>in</strong>g and Welcome<br />

08:15 AM - 10:10 AM <strong>evolution</strong>ary biology & life histories<br />

10:10 AM - 10:25 AM break<br />

10:25 AM - 11:45 AM <strong>evolution</strong>ary biology & life histories (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)<br />

11:45 AM - 01:15 PM break (lunch)<br />

01:15 PM - 03:35 PM random effects<br />

03:35 PM - 03:50 PM break<br />

03:50 PM - 06:10 PM multi-state models<br />

06:10 PM - 07:30 PM reak (d<strong>in</strong>ner)<br />

07:30 PM - 09:30 PM roundtable: standardiz<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>ology<br />

Wednesday, October 8<br />

08:15 AM - 10:10 AM methodological advances<br />

10:10 AM - 10:30 AM break<br />

10:30 AM - 11:45 AM methodological advances (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)<br />

11:45 AM - 01:15 PM break (lunch)<br />

01:15 PM - 03:35 PM comput<strong>in</strong>g & s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

03:35 PM - 03:50 PM break<br />

03:50 PM - 06:10 PM population dynamics & monitor<strong>in</strong>g applied to decision<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

06:10 PM - 07:30 PM break (d<strong>in</strong>ner)<br />

07:30 PM - 09:30 PM poster session<br />

3


Technical Meet<strong>in</strong>g 2003<br />

Thursday, October 9<br />

Departure <strong>of</strong> busses from „Messeplatz“ (100 m from TKM) – see city map<br />

08:00 AM - 03:30 PM field trip 1: Wetland „Wollmat<strong>in</strong>ger Ried“, Vogelwarte Radolfzell<br />

07:00 AM - 08:00 PM field trip 2: alps<br />

Friday, October 10<br />

08:15 AM - 11:45 AM dispersal & migration<br />

10:10 AM - 10:25 AM break<br />

08:15 AM - 11:45 AM dispersal & migration (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)<br />

11:45 AM - 01-15 PM break (lunch)<br />

01:15 PM - 03:35 PM analysis us<strong>in</strong>g large-scale r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g data<br />

03:35 PM - 03:50 PM break<br />

03:50 PM - 06:10 PM abundance estimation & conservation biology<br />

06:15 PM - 10:00 PM conference d<strong>in</strong>ner, discussion about next meet<strong>in</strong>g etc.<br />

Saturday, October 11<br />

08:15 AM - 10:35 AM population dynamics<br />

10:35 AM - 11:00 AM break<br />

11:00 AM - 12:00 AM Honor Speaker (Jim Nichols)<br />

12:00 AM - 13:30 AM lunch, poster removal, departure<br />

4


Radolfzell (Germany)<br />

Short courses (organizer: Evan Cooch)<br />

For the EURING 2003 short-courses, we will focus on 3 topics: (i) parameter count<strong>in</strong>g & redundancy,<br />

(ii) goodness-<strong>of</strong>-fit test<strong>in</strong>g, and (ii) Bayesian <strong>in</strong>ference. All three <strong>of</strong> these topics are<br />

<strong>of</strong> considerable <strong>in</strong>terest: the first 2 for very practical reasons, regardless <strong>of</strong> the approach you<br />

take <strong>in</strong> your analyses, and the latter reflect<strong>in</strong>g a grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> Bayesian methods<br />

for complex problems. While many attend<strong>in</strong>g EURING 2003 will have some level <strong>of</strong><br />

familiarity with one or more <strong>of</strong> these topics, the design and <strong>in</strong>tent <strong>of</strong> the short-courses is to<br />

ensure some common level <strong>of</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g, as much as possible, <strong>in</strong> advance <strong>of</strong> the formal<br />

papers later <strong>in</strong> the week (many <strong>of</strong> which make use <strong>of</strong>, or rely upon, one or more <strong>of</strong> these<br />

subjects).<br />

08:45 AM - 09:00 AM Open<strong>in</strong>g and Welcome Evan Cooch<br />

09:00 AM - 10:00 AM Goodness <strong>of</strong> Fit test<strong>in</strong>g Roger Pradel & Darryl Mackenzie<br />

10:00 AM - 10:15 AM break<br />

10:15 AM - 11:15 AM Parameter redundancy Olivier Gim<strong>in</strong>ez, Anne Viallefont<br />

& count<strong>in</strong>g<br />

& Ted Catchpole<br />

11:15 AM - 11:30 AM Introduction to Bayesian Steve Brooks, Ruth K<strong>in</strong>g<br />

short-course<br />

& Byron Morgan<br />

11:30 AM - 12:30 PM Introduction to Bayesian Steve Brooks, Ruth K<strong>in</strong>g<br />

methods<br />

& Byron Morgan<br />

12:30 PM - 01:30 PM break (lunch)<br />

01:30 PM - 02:00 PM Introduction to W<strong>in</strong>BUGS Steve Brooks, Ruth K<strong>in</strong>g<br />

& Byron Morgan<br />

02:30 PM - 03:00 PM Case studies I & II Steve Brooks, Ruth K<strong>in</strong>g<br />

& Byron Morgan<br />

03:00 PM - 03:30 PM break<br />

03:30 PM - 04:00 PM Case <strong>study</strong> III Steve Brooks, Ruth K<strong>in</strong>g<br />

& Byron Morgan<br />

04:00 PM - 05:00 PM Introduction to Bayesian Steve Brooks, Ruth K<strong>in</strong>g<br />

model selection<br />

& Byron Morgan<br />

05:00 PM - 05:15 PM Summary overview Steve Brooks, Ruth K<strong>in</strong>g<br />

& Byron Morgan<br />

06:00 PM - 07:00 PM d<strong>in</strong>ner<br />

5


Evolutionary biology & life histories<br />

Evolutionary biology & life histories (chairs: David Thomson & Charles Brown)<br />

Plenary Address 08:15 AM - 08:55 AM<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g Mark-Recapture to Study Social Behavior: A Case Study <strong>of</strong> Cliff Swallows<br />

Charles R. Brown<br />

Mark-recapture methods are be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly applied to problems <strong>in</strong> <strong>ecology</strong>, <strong>evolution</strong>,<br />

and behavior. <strong>The</strong>se methods and the analytical tools associated with them<br />

can provide important <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to issues that field biologists have grappled with for<br />

decades, such as estimat<strong>in</strong>g population size, survival probabilities as a component <strong>of</strong><br />

fitness, dispersal, and recruitment and the likelihood <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g. But effective use <strong>of</strong><br />

mark-recapture methods usually requires a long-term data set, with animals followed<br />

over multiple capture periods, and a relatively large number <strong>of</strong> <strong>marked</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> for<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> multiple parameters and the effects upon them. <strong>The</strong>se constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

limit the application <strong>of</strong> these methods, especially <strong>in</strong> behavioral <strong>ecology</strong>. Us<strong>in</strong>g a 22-<br />

year field project on colonially nest<strong>in</strong>g cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) that<br />

has <strong>in</strong>cluded over 148,000 <strong>marked</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>, I illustrate the <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to social behavior<br />

and coloniality that have been made possible by mark-recapture. Specifically,<br />

I will explore how annual survival probability has <strong>in</strong>creased our understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> fitness<br />

associated with different clutch sizes, lay<strong>in</strong>g dates, and alternative reproductive<br />

strategies; how estimat<strong>in</strong>g the presence <strong>of</strong> transient birds from mark-recapture has<br />

been applied to studies <strong>of</strong> between-group parasite transmission; and how daily survival<br />

probability dur<strong>in</strong>g the breed<strong>in</strong>g season can <strong>in</strong>tegrate the disparate costs and benefits<br />

<strong>of</strong> coloniality. Future work for both swallows and other species should emphasize<br />

multistate analyses so that between-year survival and movement as a function <strong>of</strong><br />

a bird’s group size <strong>in</strong> different years can be estimated.<br />

Individual Papers<br />

88:55 AM - 9:20 AM<br />

Effects <strong>of</strong> Spr<strong>in</strong>g conditions on breed<strong>in</strong>g propensity <strong>of</strong> Greater Snow Goose females<br />

Eric Reed, Gilles Gauthier & Jean-Francois Giroux<br />

Breed<strong>in</strong>g propensity, the probability that a sexually mature adult will breed <strong>in</strong> a given<br />

year, is an important determ<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>of</strong> annual productivity. It is also one <strong>of</strong> the least<br />

known demographic parameters <strong>in</strong> vertebrates. Although recent methodological<br />

advances <strong>in</strong> mark-recapture methods have allowed the estimation <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g propensity<br />

for some bird species, little is known about factors responsible for temporal<br />

variation <strong>in</strong> this parameter. We studied the relationship between breed<strong>in</strong>g propensity<br />

and conditions encountered on the spr<strong>in</strong>g stag<strong>in</strong>g areas and the breed<strong>in</strong>g grounds <strong>in</strong><br />

Greater Snow Geese (Chen caerulescens atlantica), a long distance migrant that<br />

breeds <strong>in</strong> the High Arctic. We used an Robust Design approach where classic capture<br />

histories were comb<strong>in</strong>ed with auxiliary <strong>in</strong>formation from radio-<strong>marked</strong> birds and nest<br />

survey data to estimate breed<strong>in</strong>g propensity over a 7-year period. More specifically,<br />

mark-recapture data was used to estimate probabilities <strong>of</strong> capture if alive and present<br />

<strong>in</strong> the superpopulation, and <strong>in</strong>formation from radio-<strong>marked</strong> birds was used to estimate<br />

probabilities <strong>of</strong> capture given presence <strong>in</strong> the sampled area. We also had to correct<br />

our estimates for nest success, because failed nesters emigrated from the sampled<br />

area, and <strong>in</strong>complete fidelity to brood rear<strong>in</strong>g areas (i.e. sampl<strong>in</strong>g area). We tested<br />

6


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

the effects <strong>of</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g snow cover and a spr<strong>in</strong>g conservation hunt on breed<strong>in</strong>g propensity<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g a weighted least squares approach. We also used an empirical variancecomponents<br />

approach and determ<strong>in</strong>ed that true temporal variation <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g propensity<br />

was considerable (mean breed<strong>in</strong>g propensity: 0.574 [95% CI consider<strong>in</strong>g only<br />

process variation: 0.13 to 1]). Spr<strong>in</strong>g snow cover was negatively related to breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

propensity (βsnow = -2.05 ± 0.96 SE) and tended to be reduced <strong>in</strong> years with a spr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

hunt (β = -0.78 ± 0.35). Nest densities on the breed<strong>in</strong>g colony and fall young/adult ratio<br />

were good <strong>in</strong>dices <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g propensity, with nest densities be<strong>in</strong>g slightly more<br />

precise. <strong>The</strong>se results suggest that environmental conditions and disturbance encountered<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the pre-breed<strong>in</strong>g period can have a significant impact on productivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> Arctic-nest<strong>in</strong>g birds.<br />

09:20 - 09:45 AM<br />

Earlier recruitment or earlier death? On assumptions <strong>of</strong> homogeneous survival rates<br />

<strong>in</strong> capture-recapture models to estimate recruitment<br />

Emmanuelle Cam, Evan Cooch & Jean-Yves Monnat<br />

Realized patterns <strong>of</strong> age <strong>of</strong> recruitment observed <strong>in</strong> the breed<strong>in</strong>g segment <strong>of</strong> populations<br />

are governed by the product <strong>of</strong> two demographic components: [survival probability<br />

from birth to age ]*[transition probability from state prebreeder to state first-time<br />

breeder at age ]. To aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to selective pressures shap<strong>in</strong>g age <strong>of</strong> recruitment,<br />

one may address temporal variation <strong>in</strong> age <strong>of</strong> first breed<strong>in</strong>g and covariation with population<br />

size or social and environmental factors. This <strong>in</strong>volves comparison among<br />

"groups" (e.g., cohorts) <strong>of</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> encounter<strong>in</strong>g different environmental conditions<br />

when they reach a given age as prebreeders.<br />

However, measures <strong>of</strong> recruitment based exclusively on data from the breed<strong>in</strong>g segment<br />

<strong>of</strong> the population ignore the size <strong>of</strong> the pool <strong>of</strong> prebreeders (as opposed to transition<br />

probability). However, <strong>in</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> species with deferred breed<strong>in</strong>g, <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong><br />

are not encountered prior to breed<strong>in</strong>g. Approaches to estimat<strong>in</strong>g age-specific<br />

recruitment probability <strong>in</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> data from prebreeders us<strong>in</strong>g mark-recapture<br />

have been developed (Pradel and Lebreton 1999, Schwarz and Arnasson 2001, Williams<br />

et al. 2002). Unless the survival component <strong>of</strong> realized age-specific recruitment<br />

rates is known to be identical among the groups compared, <strong>in</strong>ferences about the<br />

"cause" <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>in</strong> realized age <strong>of</strong> first breed<strong>in</strong>g among groups are difficult: such<br />

differences may <strong>in</strong> fact result from differences <strong>in</strong> survival probability before <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong><br />

make the transition between states. Inferences about differences <strong>in</strong> realized recruitment<br />

rates among groups exclusively based on data from the breed<strong>in</strong>g segment <strong>of</strong><br />

the population reflect differences <strong>in</strong> recruitment probability under the assumption that<br />

there is no difference <strong>in</strong> prebreeder survival among these groups.<br />

We assessed the consequences <strong>of</strong> violations <strong>of</strong> this assumption on our perception <strong>of</strong><br />

age-specific realized recruitment rates us<strong>in</strong>g numerical simulations; the scenarios<br />

considered correspond to various biological hypotheses about group-specific variation<br />

<strong>in</strong> survival and transition probabilities. Data were simulated under regular multistate<br />

models (Nichols and Kendall 1995) and truncated <strong>in</strong>dividual histories were then analyzed<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g the reverse-time approach (Pradel 1996) and the approach developed by<br />

Schwarz and Arnasson (2001). Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the scenario, realized recruitment was<br />

delayed or advanced compared to the underly<strong>in</strong>g pattern <strong>of</strong> age-specific transition<br />

probabilities. We also addressed age-specific recruitment probability <strong>in</strong> a long-lived<br />

seabird species, the kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla) us<strong>in</strong>g a data set <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g data from<br />

prebreeders. We compared results from the reverse-time approach and the multistate<br />

approach, and showed that transition probability directly estimated or derived from<br />

7


Evolutionary biology & life histories<br />

measures <strong>of</strong> recruitment based on the breed<strong>in</strong>g segment <strong>of</strong> the population are different.<br />

09:45 AM - 10:10 AM<br />

Predictors <strong>of</strong> reproductive costs <strong>in</strong> Soay sheep: a multistate capture-recapture analysis<br />

Giacomo Tavecchia, T. Coulson, B.J.T. Morgan, J. Pemberton, J. Pilk<strong>in</strong>gton<br />

& T.H. Clutton-Brock<br />

We <strong>in</strong>vestigate factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the shape <strong>of</strong> the trade-<strong>of</strong>f between survival and reproduction<br />

<strong>in</strong> female Soay sheep (Ovis aries). Multistate capture-recapture models<br />

are used to <strong>in</strong>corporate the state-specific recapture probability and to model the cost<br />

function directly from data on <strong>marked</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>. <strong>The</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> reproduction is identified<br />

as a quadratic function <strong>of</strong> the mother's age, be<strong>in</strong>g greatest for females breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

at the end <strong>of</strong> their first year and when more than 7 years old. Furthermore, the cost is<br />

only present dur<strong>in</strong>g severe environmental conditions, when wet and cold w<strong>in</strong>ters<br />

co<strong>in</strong>cide with high population density. Population density and w<strong>in</strong>ter severity negatively<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence the probability <strong>of</strong> successfully breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the first year <strong>of</strong> life. F<strong>in</strong>ally,<br />

the recapture probability depends on the breed<strong>in</strong>g state: breed<strong>in</strong>g females are virtually<br />

always recaptured while non-breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> are not. <strong>The</strong> significant <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>teraction between age and time on the phenotypic trade-<strong>of</strong>f function<br />

might be responsible for ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g cohort differences <strong>in</strong> demographic parameters.<br />

<strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> multi-state capture-recapture analysis has allowed us to draw broader<br />

conclusions than earlier work, which was based on conditional methods <strong>of</strong> analysis<br />

10:10 AM -10:25 AM - break<br />

10:25 AM - 10:45 AM<br />

Breed<strong>in</strong>g cycles and reproductive <strong>in</strong>vestment: the case <strong>of</strong> the Leatherback sea turtle<br />

Philippe Rivalan, R. Pradel, R. Choquet, J.-P. Briane, M. Girondot & A.C. Prevot-Julliard<br />

An important demographic parameter is the trade-<strong>of</strong>f between current and future reproduction.<br />

A particular case is the relation between the number <strong>of</strong> years without reproduction<br />

and reproductive <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> years with reproduction.. We studied this<br />

trade-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>in</strong> a long-lived species with <strong>in</strong>termittent breed<strong>in</strong>g, the leatherback sea turtle,<br />

<strong>in</strong> French Guiana. Leatherback sea turtles lay several clutches with<strong>in</strong> a reproductive<br />

year but reproduce every two or more years. Female leatherback sea turtles were<br />

captured, <strong>marked</strong> and recaptured when they lay eggs on nest<strong>in</strong>g beach, from 1990 to<br />

2002 (60,000 CMR events divided <strong>in</strong> two parts: (1) females <strong>marked</strong> from 1990 to<br />

1994 with monel tags and subject to high tag-loss rate; (2) females <strong>marked</strong> from 1995<br />

to 2002 with permanent pit-tags). We modeled <strong>in</strong>termittent breed<strong>in</strong>g and reproductive<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment as follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

(1) We estimated the number <strong>of</strong> years without reproduction by us<strong>in</strong>g multistate models<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g several non-observable states us<strong>in</strong>g the s<strong>of</strong>tware M-Surge (Choquet<br />

et al. 2003). We <strong>in</strong>cluded tag-loss probabilities <strong>in</strong> transition matrices for females<br />

<strong>marked</strong> from 1990 to 1994.<br />

(2) We assessed <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> reproduction (i.e., number <strong>of</strong> clutches) by estimat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the duration <strong>of</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> females on the beach. This duration is equivalent to a<br />

stopover duration <strong>of</strong> migrat<strong>in</strong>g birds. We estimated this annual stopover duration <strong>of</strong><br />

females on the beach us<strong>in</strong>g the s<strong>of</strong>tware SODA (Schaub et al. 2001).<br />

8


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

We found two breed<strong>in</strong>g strategies which have the same fitness, characterized by the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> years without reproduction (2 or 3) and the number <strong>of</strong> clutches with<strong>in</strong> reproductive<br />

years. However, such strategies are not fixed for a given female.<br />

10:45 AM - 11:05 AM<br />

Modell<strong>in</strong>g senility and dispersal <strong>of</strong> Red deer<br />

Ted Catchpole, T.N. Coulson, Y. Fan, & B.J.T. Morgan<br />

Red deer (Cervus elaphus) on the island <strong>of</strong> Rum have been closely studied for many<br />

years. In particular, this has resulted <strong>in</strong> an extensive mark-recapture-recovery (mrr)<br />

data set. Models for these data need an elaborate age-structure for survival, because<br />

deer react differently to environmental factors at different stages <strong>of</strong> their lives. An additional<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g feature <strong>of</strong> the data is that animals may leave the <strong>study</strong> area. Thus<br />

we are <strong>in</strong>terested not only <strong>in</strong> modell<strong>in</strong>g deer survival, but also deer dispersal. Our<br />

model<strong>in</strong>g approach is a classical statistical one. <strong>The</strong> two sexes need to be considered<br />

separately. With<strong>in</strong> each sex, we use standard likelihood tools and <strong>in</strong>formation criteria<br />

to identify age-classes, separately for survival and dispersal. With<strong>in</strong> each age-class,<br />

the relevant probability does not vary over the ages desribed by that class, with the<br />

exception <strong>of</strong> the oldest age-class for survival. This then allows us to undertake logistic<br />

regressions <strong>of</strong> the relevant age-class probabilities on a mixture <strong>of</strong> environmental and<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual covariates. Senility, a gradual decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> survival probability with age, is described<br />

by means <strong>of</strong> a logistic regression on age with<strong>in</strong> the oldest survival ageclasses<br />

for males and females. <strong>The</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al models that we select for males and for females<br />

have an attractive simplicity. <strong>The</strong>y demostrate clearly the differences that exist<br />

between males and females, and may be used for predict<strong>in</strong>g future behaviour, and<br />

the effects <strong>of</strong> alternative management policies.<br />

<strong>The</strong> work <strong>of</strong> this paper is a natural extension <strong>of</strong> the models and model-selection<br />

procedures that have been developed for Soay sheep (Ovis aries) <strong>in</strong> Catchpole et al<br />

(2000) and Coulson et al (2001). <strong>The</strong> present work builds on the modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> male<br />

red-deer alone by Catchpole et al (2002), and the modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> both sexes <strong>in</strong> Fan et al<br />

(2002).<br />

11:05-11:25 AM<br />

Assess<strong>in</strong>g senescence patterns <strong>in</strong> populations <strong>of</strong> large mammals<br />

Jean-Michel Gaillard & Anne Viallefont<br />

<strong>The</strong>oretical models such as Gompertz and Weibull models are commonly used to<br />

<strong>study</strong> senescence <strong>in</strong> survival for humans (Olshansky & Carnes 1997) and laboratory<br />

or captive animals (Ricklefs 2000) for which a complete follow up <strong>of</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> is<br />

available. For wild populations <strong>of</strong> vertebrates, senescence <strong>in</strong> survival has more commonly<br />

been assessed by fitt<strong>in</strong>g simple l<strong>in</strong>ear or quadratic relationships between survival<br />

and age (e. g., McDonald et al. 1996, Newton and Rothery 1997, Nichols et al.<br />

1997, Loison et al. 1999). By us<strong>in</strong>g appropriate constra<strong>in</strong>ts on survival parameters <strong>in</strong><br />

Capture-Mark-Recapture (CMR) models, we propose a first analysis <strong>of</strong> the suitability<br />

<strong>of</strong> Gompertz and Weibull models for describ<strong>in</strong>g ag<strong>in</strong>g-related mortality <strong>in</strong> free-rang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> ungulates. We first show how to handle Gompertz and Weibull models<br />

<strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> CMR analyses. <strong>The</strong>n we perform a comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> senescence<br />

patterns <strong>in</strong> both sexes <strong>of</strong> two ungulate species highly contrasted accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> sexual selection. Evolutionary implications <strong>of</strong> our results are<br />

discussed.<br />

9


Evolutionary biology & life histories<br />

11:25 AM - 11:45 AM<br />

Breed<strong>in</strong>g site-fidelity and survival estimation <strong>of</strong> a migratory songbird: implications for<br />

conservation, life-history and <strong>study</strong> designs<br />

Duane Diefenbach, M.R. Marshall, L. Wood, & R. Cooper<br />

We used data from a 5-year band<strong>in</strong>g <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> 423 Prothonotary Warblers (Protonotaria<br />

citrea) from the White River National Wildlife Refuge, Arkansas, USA to estimate<br />

annual apparent survival rates <strong>of</strong> adults. Also, we documented <strong>in</strong>ter-annual changes<br />

<strong>in</strong> the placement <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g territories to estimate emigration rates and distances<br />

moved. Recogniz<strong>in</strong>g that the apparent survival estimates <strong>in</strong>cluded both survival and<br />

permanent emigration, and possibly temporary emigration, we simulated these movement<br />

patterns over a range <strong>of</strong> true survival rates (0.3 - 0.9) to estimate the bias <strong>in</strong>troduced<br />

by emigration if apparent survival estimates were used as true survival rate<br />

estimates. <strong>The</strong> simulations suggested that the observed warbler movements resulted<br />

<strong>in</strong> apparent survival estimates, compared to true survival rates, be<strong>in</strong>g 25% and 34%<br />

less (percent relative bias) for males and females, respectively. <strong>The</strong>refore, our observed<br />

apparent survival rates <strong>of</strong> 0.52 and 0.39 for male and female warblers, respectively,<br />

may represent true survival rates <strong>of</strong> 0.69 and 0.60. Differential emigration rates<br />

confound <strong>in</strong>ferences regard<strong>in</strong>g differences <strong>in</strong> apparent survival between sexes and<br />

among species. Moreover, the bias <strong>in</strong>troduced by us<strong>in</strong>g apparent survival rates for<br />

true survival rates can have pr<strong>of</strong>ound effects on the predictions <strong>of</strong> population persistence<br />

through time, source/s<strong>in</strong>k dynamics, and other aspects <strong>of</strong> life-history theory.<br />

For <strong>in</strong>stance, we demonstrate with a stochastic population persistence model that if<br />

apparent survival rate estimates are used as true survival estimates, the underestimate<br />

<strong>of</strong> true survival because <strong>of</strong> emigration results <strong>in</strong> the misclassification <strong>of</strong> a local<br />

"source" population as a "s<strong>in</strong>k".<br />

We <strong>in</strong>vestigated two <strong>study</strong> designs and analysis approaches that may result <strong>in</strong> apparent<br />

survival estimates that are closer to true survival estimates. <strong>The</strong> first <strong>in</strong>volved a<br />

smaller "core" area where all mark<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> birds takes place and progressively larger<br />

"resight<strong>in</strong>g" areas surround<strong>in</strong>g the core where researchers search for <strong>marked</strong> birds.<br />

We demonstrate that as the resight<strong>in</strong>g areas get progressively larger, and therefore<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporate more "emigrants," apparent survival estimates beg<strong>in</strong> to approximate true<br />

survival rates. Second, we <strong>in</strong>vestigated us<strong>in</strong>g a Robust Design data collection and<br />

analysis approach to estimate emigration rates directly. Both approaches are limited<br />

by logistical difficulties <strong>of</strong> data collection, but provide less biased estimates <strong>of</strong> survival.<br />

10


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Random effects (chairs: Jean Clobert & Ken Burnham)<br />

Plenary Address - 01:15 PM -01:55 PM<br />

Random Effects: Present and future<br />

Carl Schwarz<br />

Random effects models have been typically used <strong>in</strong> capture-recapture sett<strong>in</strong>gs as an<br />

<strong>in</strong>termediate model between fully time dependent and constant over time models. We<br />

review the approaches to fitt<strong>in</strong>g these models and discuss the advantages and disadvantages<br />

<strong>of</strong> each. <strong>The</strong>n extensions <strong>of</strong> random effect models to <strong>in</strong>corporate autocorrelation<br />

over time, to model classical design-<strong>of</strong>-experiments random effects, and to<br />

model other phenomena will be discussed.<br />

Individual Papers<br />

01:55 PM - 02:20 PM<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> some Bayesian MCMC random effects <strong>in</strong>ference applicable to bird r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />

data<br />

Ken Burnham & Gary White<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>study</strong> design used to evaluate a method <strong>of</strong> moments random effects analysis for<br />

CJS data with per-occasion survival probability as a beta-distributed random variable<br />

(Burnham and White, 2002, Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Statistics 29:245-264) is here<strong>in</strong> repeated<br />

to evaluate a fully Bayesian MCMC random effects analysis. <strong>The</strong> design has 5<br />

factors: occasions (t=7, 15, 23, 31), new releases per occasion (u=25, 100, 400),<br />

capture probabilities (p=0.4, 0.6, 0.8; no time effects), expected survival probability<br />

(E(S)=0.4, 0.6, 0.8; no time effects), and process variation, var(S)=σ2 (s=0, 0.025,<br />

0.05, 0.1). At each <strong>of</strong> these 432 design po<strong>in</strong>ts we generated 500 <strong>in</strong>dependent (Monte<br />

Carlo) data sets. <strong>The</strong>n MCMC <strong>in</strong>ference was used, based on 1,000 nearly <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

samples from the Bayesian posterior for uniform marg<strong>in</strong>al priors on p, E(S) and<br />

σ2 (0 to 0.25). We look at properties <strong>of</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t and <strong>in</strong>terval <strong>in</strong>ference on per-occasion<br />

S, E(S) and σ2 based on the posterior sample. Some issues considered: coverage <strong>of</strong><br />

equal tailed versus shortest 95% credibility <strong>in</strong>tervals, and po<strong>in</strong>t estimation, especially<br />

<strong>of</strong> σ2 (mean versus mode). <strong>The</strong> simulations are done, basic results are known. Comparisons<br />

to Burnham and White (2002) will be made; the Bayesian approach did well.<br />

02:20 PM - 2:45 PM<br />

Test<strong>in</strong>g the additive versus compensatory mortality hypothesis us<strong>in</strong>g a random effects<br />

model<br />

Michael Schaub & Jean-Dom<strong>in</strong>ique Lebreton<br />

We propose a new way to test whether a specific cause <strong>of</strong> mortality (say cause A) is<br />

additive to the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g mortality or whether it is compensated for by other forms <strong>of</strong><br />

mortality. In contrary to the exist<strong>in</strong>g tests, our approach does not require an <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

estimate <strong>of</strong> the "<strong>in</strong>tensity" that caused mortality due to a specific reason (e.g.<br />

hunt<strong>in</strong>g effort). It is enough to have r<strong>in</strong>g-recovery data, where the cause <strong>of</strong> death <strong>of</strong><br />

the recovered animals is known. First we estimate the mortality probability due to<br />

11


Random effects<br />

cause A and due to all other causes <strong>of</strong> death with a time-dependent multi-state model<br />

where the states are "alive", "newly dead because <strong>of</strong> A" and "newly dead because <strong>of</strong><br />

another reason than A." Second, we test the two oppos<strong>in</strong>g hypotheses by us<strong>in</strong>g random<br />

effects methodology. If the "additive mortality hypothesis" would be true, the correlation<br />

between the two mortalities over time is zero. If there would be some form <strong>of</strong><br />

compensation, there is a negative correlation between the two sources <strong>of</strong> mortality<br />

over time. To extract this temporal correlation from the overall correlation we used<br />

random effects model. We illustrate the method with a case <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> White Storks,<br />

where the two oppos<strong>in</strong>g sources <strong>of</strong> mortalities are natural and electrocution mortality.<br />

It appears that the two sources <strong>of</strong> mortality are partially compensatory <strong>in</strong> the adults,<br />

but additive <strong>in</strong> the first year birds.<br />

02:45 PM - 3:10 PM<br />

Random effects and <strong>in</strong>dividual differences: look<strong>in</strong>g for trees <strong>in</strong> the 'life history' forest<br />

Emmanuelle Cam, Bill L<strong>in</strong>k, Evan Cooch, Jean-Yves Monnat, & Etienne Danch<strong>in</strong><br />

We <strong>in</strong>vestigated the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> age on survival and breed<strong>in</strong>g rates <strong>in</strong> a long-lived<br />

species Rissa tridactyla us<strong>in</strong>g models with <strong>in</strong>dividual random effects permitt<strong>in</strong>g variation<br />

and covariation <strong>in</strong> fitness components among <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>. Differences <strong>in</strong> survival<br />

or breed<strong>in</strong>g probabilities among <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> are substantial, and there was positive<br />

covariation between survival and breed<strong>in</strong>g probability; birds that were more likely to<br />

survive were also more likely to breed, given that they survived. <strong>The</strong> pattern <strong>of</strong> agerelated<br />

variation <strong>in</strong> these rates detected at the <strong>in</strong>dividual level differed from that observed<br />

at the population level. Our results provided confirmation <strong>of</strong> what has been<br />

suggested by other <strong>in</strong>vestigators: with<strong>in</strong>-cohort phenotypic selection can mask senescence.<br />

Although this phenomenon has been extensively studied <strong>in</strong> humans and captive<br />

animals, conclusive evidence <strong>of</strong> the discrepancy between population-level and<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuallevel patterns <strong>of</strong> age-related variation <strong>in</strong> life-history traits is extremely rare <strong>in</strong><br />

wild animal populations. Evolutionary studies <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> age on life-history<br />

traits should use approaches differentiat<strong>in</strong>g population level from the genu<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

<strong>of</strong> age: only the latter is relevant to theories <strong>of</strong> life-history <strong>evolution</strong>. <strong>The</strong> development<br />

<strong>of</strong> models permitt<strong>in</strong>g access to <strong>in</strong>dividual variation <strong>in</strong> fitness is a promis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

advance for the <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> senescence and <strong>evolution</strong>ary processes.<br />

03:10 PM - 3:45 PM<br />

Nonidentifiability <strong>of</strong> population size from capture-recapture data with heterogeneous<br />

detection probabilities<br />

Bill L<strong>in</strong>k<br />

Heterogeneity <strong>in</strong> detection probabilities has long been recognized as problematic <strong>in</strong><br />

mark-recapture studies, and numerous models developed to accommodate its effects.<br />

Individual heterogeneity is especially problematic, <strong>in</strong> that reasonable alternative<br />

models may predict essentially identical observations from populations <strong>of</strong> substantially<br />

different sizes. Thus even with very large samples, the analyst will not be able to<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guish among reasonable models <strong>of</strong> heterogeneity, even though these yield quite<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ct <strong>in</strong>ferences about population size. I illustrate the problem us<strong>in</strong>g the simple<br />

closed population model<br />

12


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Multi-state models (chairs: Emmanuelle Cam & Neil Arnason)<br />

Plenary Address - 03:50 PM - 04:30 PM<br />

Cop<strong>in</strong>g with unobservable and misclassified states <strong>in</strong> multi-state capture-recapture<br />

studies<br />

Bill Kendall<br />

Multi-state capture-recapture models have proven to be very useful <strong>in</strong> the <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> animal<br />

population and meta-population dynamics. Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal parameters <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

state-specific survival and transition probabilities. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the <strong>study</strong>, transition<br />

probabilities can refer to movement between sub-populations (e.g., breed<strong>in</strong>g colonies)<br />

or transitions between life history stages (e.g., size classes, breed<strong>in</strong>g states). Inherent<br />

to traditional multi-state models are the assumptions that <strong>in</strong> each capture period each<br />

animal <strong>in</strong> the population or meta-population is observable (i.e., subject to detection),<br />

and the state <strong>of</strong> each captured animal is known with certa<strong>in</strong>ty. In fact violations <strong>of</strong> these<br />

assumptions are not uncommon. Examples <strong>of</strong> temporary movement <strong>of</strong> <strong>marked</strong> animals<br />

out <strong>of</strong> the <strong>study</strong> area can <strong>in</strong>clude roam<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> a home range, movement underground<br />

(e.g., transition <strong>in</strong>to torpor), and transition from breed<strong>in</strong>g to non-breed<strong>in</strong>g state<br />

where the <strong>study</strong> areas consist <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g colonies. Misclassification <strong>of</strong> the state <strong>of</strong> an<br />

animal can occur when a cue that determ<strong>in</strong>es state is missed or mis<strong>in</strong>terpreted. Breeders<br />

can be misclassified as non-breeders when young are present but not observed.<br />

Diseased animals can be misclassified as healthy because symptoms are absent or<br />

not observed. In other cases (e.g., sexually monomorphic bird species) sex can rema<strong>in</strong><br />

undeterm<strong>in</strong>ed for several or all encounters because sex-specific behavioral cues are<br />

not observed.<br />

I will outl<strong>in</strong>e the impact <strong>of</strong> unobservable and misclassified states on estimators for survival<br />

and transition, derived from models that ignore these phenomena. I will then describe<br />

approaches for cop<strong>in</strong>g with biases associated with unobservable and misclassified<br />

states. <strong>The</strong>se approaches will <strong>in</strong>clude both design (to m<strong>in</strong>imize the nuisance aspect<br />

<strong>of</strong> these phenomena) and model<strong>in</strong>g (to adjust for these phenomena) elements.<br />

<strong>The</strong> latter will <strong>of</strong>ten require the collection <strong>of</strong> extra <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g capture data<br />

from subsamples (i.e., the robust design), telemetry, band recoveries, or ancillary observations.<br />

Individual Papers<br />

04:30 PM - 04:50 PM<br />

Costs <strong>of</strong> first reproduction <strong>in</strong> a long-lived bird: effects <strong>of</strong> environmental and <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

covariates<br />

Christophe Barbraud & Henri Weimerskirch<br />

How animals balance their <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> young aga<strong>in</strong>st their own chances to survive<br />

and reproduce <strong>in</strong> the future? This life-history trade-<strong>of</strong>f, referred to as the cost <strong>of</strong> reproduction,<br />

holds a central place <strong>in</strong> life-history theory. Long-lived birds are good candidates<br />

to be used as models to detect these costs. <strong>The</strong>y should be more restrictive than<br />

short-lived birds <strong>in</strong> the degree to which they exhibit <strong>in</strong>creased effort, because even a<br />

small reduction <strong>in</strong> adult survival would reduce the number <strong>of</strong> subsequent breed<strong>in</strong>g attempts,<br />

thereby greatly lower<strong>in</strong>g lifetime reproductive success. However, at least two<br />

13


Multi-state models<br />

factors are likely to confound the measurement <strong>of</strong> this trade-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>in</strong> the wild. First, there<br />

could be differences <strong>in</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> energy <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> acquire and allocate to various<br />

functions. In that case we might expect that some <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> would perform well <strong>in</strong><br />

both reproduction and survival, whereas low quality <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> would die sooner. Second,<br />

there could be variations <strong>in</strong> resource availability affect<strong>in</strong>g energy acquisition and<br />

allocation. <strong>The</strong>oretical models exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the optimal phenotypic balance between reproduction<br />

and adult survival under variable breed<strong>in</strong>g conditions have recently <strong>in</strong>vestigated<br />

the second issue. However, very little is known on the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

quality on the costs <strong>of</strong> reproduction. Here, we use a capture-recapture dataset on blue<br />

petrels to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the costs <strong>of</strong> first reproduction. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> multi-state models with<br />

three states (non-breeder, first time breeder, and experienced breeder) allowed us to<br />

show that first time breeders have a lower probability <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g year<br />

than experienced breeders, and that <strong>in</strong> some years, first time breeders have a lower<br />

survival probability that experienced and non-breeders. <strong>The</strong>se results suggest that first<br />

time breed<strong>in</strong>g may act as a filter, select<strong>in</strong>g good quality <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>. Us<strong>in</strong>g environmental<br />

and <strong>in</strong>dividual covariates, we further show that the costs <strong>of</strong> first reproduction are<br />

particularly acute <strong>in</strong> years when environmental conditions are poor, and that <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

body condition affects both survival and breed<strong>in</strong>g probabilities.<br />

04:50 PM - 5:10 PM<br />

Density dependence <strong>in</strong> North American ducks<br />

Steve.P. Brooks and Lara E. Jamieson<br />

<strong>The</strong> existence or otherwise <strong>of</strong> density dependence with<strong>in</strong> a population can have important<br />

implications for the management <strong>of</strong> that population. Here, we use estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

abundance obta<strong>in</strong>ed from annual aerial counts on the major breed<strong>in</strong>g grounds <strong>of</strong> a variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> North American duck species and use a state space model to separate the observation<br />

and ecological system processes. This state space approach allows us to<br />

impose a density dependence structure upon the true underly<strong>in</strong>g population rather than<br />

on the estimates and we demonstrate the improved robustness <strong>of</strong> this procedure for<br />

detect<strong>in</strong>g density dependence <strong>in</strong> the population. We also show how the <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> time-vary<strong>in</strong>g<br />

covariates such as the number <strong>of</strong> May ponds provides additional descriptive<br />

power with<strong>in</strong> the model and that their omission may sometimes lead to erroneous<br />

conclusions as to the presence <strong>of</strong> density dependence. We adopt a Bayesian approach<br />

to model fitt<strong>in</strong>g, us<strong>in</strong>g Markov cha<strong>in</strong> Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods and use a reversible<br />

jump MCMC scheme to calculate posterior model probabilities which assign probabilities<br />

to the presence <strong>of</strong> density dependence with<strong>in</strong> the population, for example. We<br />

show how these probabilities can be used either to discrim<strong>in</strong>ate between models or to<br />

provide model-averaged predictions which fully account for both parameter and model<br />

uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty.<br />

05:10 PM - 05:30 PM<br />

Demographic estimation methods for plants <strong>in</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> dormancy<br />

Marc Kery & Kathy B. Gregg<br />

Demographic analysis seems straightforward <strong>in</strong> plants due to their sessile nature. Problems<br />

arise when there is an unobservable dormant state that stays belowground for one or more<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g seasons. Conventional analysis methods make strong assumptions about the duration<br />

<strong>of</strong> dormancy and obta<strong>in</strong> estimates <strong>of</strong> demographic parameters, which, however, will be<br />

biased to an unknown degree. In contrast, we use capture-recapture (CR) methods to obta<strong>in</strong><br />

unbiased estimates <strong>of</strong> the fraction <strong>of</strong> a population that is <strong>in</strong> the dormant state, and <strong>of</strong> survival<br />

and transition rates between life-states. As an illustration, we analyze a 10-year data set on<br />

14


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Cleistes bifaria, a terrestrial orchid with frequent dormancy, us<strong>in</strong>g both s<strong>in</strong>gle- and multi-state<br />

CR models as well as five conventional methods for comparison. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>study</strong> period,<br />

35% <strong>of</strong> ramets were dormant at least once, for between 1 and 4 (mean 1.4) years. Capturerecapture<br />

models estimated ramet survival rate at 0.86 (SE ~0.01), rang<strong>in</strong>g 0.77-0.94<br />

(SE


Notation and term<strong>in</strong>ology<br />

Notation and term<strong>in</strong>ology (organizer: David Thomson)<br />

Roundtable Discussion<br />

David Thomson<br />

This will be a discussion session about notation and term<strong>in</strong>ology. EURING technical<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>gs typically <strong>in</strong>volve collaboration between scientists from diverse backgrounds<br />

along the spectrum from field biologists to theoretical statisticians. <strong>The</strong> success <strong>of</strong> this<br />

<strong>in</strong>ter-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary collaboration largely depends on the quality <strong>of</strong> the communication<br />

and comprehension. In an effort to enhance this, we aim to highlight and discuss ambiguities<br />

which have arisen <strong>in</strong> term<strong>in</strong>ology and notation and we aim through discussion<br />

to strive towards standards and consensus.<br />

Participants were encouraged to report ambiguities which they would like to see<br />

discussed. Also views on particular notation and term<strong>in</strong>ology which should or should<br />

not be used, were gathered. <strong>The</strong>se contributions will form the basis for an agenda,<br />

and through <strong>in</strong>teractive discussion on each topic we will try to work towards standards<br />

which will be acceptable to all.<br />

16


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Methodological advances (chairs: Jean-Dom<strong>in</strong>ique Lebreton & Ken Pollock)<br />

Plenary Address - 08:15 AM - 08:55 AM<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>of</strong> GOF tests for multistate models<br />

Roger Pradel, Olivier Gimenez & Jean-Dom<strong>in</strong>ique Lebreton<br />

<strong>The</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> the fit <strong>of</strong> multistate models has until now been available only as the<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> the expected and observed values <strong>in</strong> the m-array provided by program<br />

MSSURVIV. This test is partial and omnibus. An alternative approach based on cont<strong>in</strong>gency<br />

tables has been proposed recently for the JMV model, a generalization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Arnason-Schwarz model (Brownie et al. 1993). Although this test is for just one model,<br />

we exam<strong>in</strong>e whether it could nonetheless provide a good <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the data. It has<br />

two ma<strong>in</strong> components: Test 3G which compares the future <strong>of</strong> animals released simultaneously<br />

and <strong>in</strong> the same state accord<strong>in</strong>g to their past capture histories, and Test M<br />

which compares the pattern <strong>of</strong> recaptures <strong>of</strong> animals previously released and not captured<br />

at a given occasion to that <strong>of</strong> animals released at this occasion. A likely departure<br />

from the assumptions <strong>of</strong> both the JMV and the AS models is memory <strong>of</strong> past locations.<br />

A suitable partition<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Test 3G leads to a subcomponent Test WBWA which can be<br />

used to detect memory. We exam<strong>in</strong>e which statistics to employ to test efficiently for<br />

memory. <strong>The</strong> AS model is <strong>of</strong>ten biologically more relevant than the JMV model. To assess<br />

the fit <strong>of</strong> the AS model one can supplement the GOF test to the JMV model with<br />

the likelihood ratio test between JMV and AS. Here we exam<strong>in</strong>e an alternative solution:<br />

replac<strong>in</strong>g Test M with a comparison <strong>of</strong> observed and expected values <strong>in</strong> the m-array<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g a parametric bootstrap procedure.<br />

Individual Papers<br />

08:55 AM - 09:20 AM<br />

Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: III. <strong>The</strong> robust design<br />

Shirley Pledger, Kenneth H. Pollock, & James L. Norris<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ite mixture methods may be used <strong>in</strong> capture-recapture studies to allow for heterogeneity<br />

<strong>of</strong> survival. Follow<strong>in</strong>g the methods <strong>of</strong> Norris and Pollock (1996), Pledger (2000) and Pledger<br />

and Schwarz (2002), animals are assumed to belong to one <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>itely many groups, each <strong>of</strong><br />

which has its own survival rates and capture rates. <strong>The</strong> group to which a specific animal belongs<br />

is not known, so its survival and capture probabilities are random vectors from a f<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

mixture. <strong>The</strong> promis<strong>in</strong>g results from the papers above have led to a series <strong>of</strong> three proposed<br />

papers by Pledger, Pollock and Norris. <strong>The</strong> first, "Open Capture-Recapture Models with Heterogeneity:<br />

I. Cormack-Jolly-Seber Model" is almost ready for submission to Biometrics.It<br />

deals with analyses which condition on first capture, allow<strong>in</strong>g the modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> heterogeneous<br />

capture and survival probabilities. <strong>The</strong> second, "Open Capture-Recapture Models with Heterogeneity:<br />

II. Jolly-Seber Model" deals with abundance estimates and their sensitivity to the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> heterogeneity. <strong>The</strong> paper is partly written, with the computer programs function<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

This will be submitted to Biometrics <strong>in</strong> 2003. This third <strong>in</strong> the series, "Open Capture-<br />

Recapture Models with Heterogeneity: III. <strong>The</strong> robust design", will summarise and tie together<br />

the series <strong>of</strong> three papers, and give details and examples <strong>of</strong> these methods with the robust<br />

design sampl<strong>in</strong>g scheme. This paper complements and completes the development <strong>of</strong><br />

likelihood-based models <strong>in</strong> Kendall, Pollock and Brownie (1995).<br />

17


Methodological advances<br />

09:20 AM - 09:45 AM<br />

Multiple Species Capture-Recapture and Removal Models<br />

Kenneth H. Pollock, James L. Norris, & Shirley Pledger<br />

A large body <strong>of</strong> literature exists for estimat<strong>in</strong>g species richness. <strong>The</strong>se models allow<br />

for uncerta<strong>in</strong> detection <strong>of</strong> each species (Boul<strong>in</strong>ier et al. 1998a). Statistical methods<br />

adapted from capture-recapture and removal sampl<strong>in</strong>g, orig<strong>in</strong>ally used to estimate <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

species abundance can be applied here. (See for example, Burnham and<br />

Overton 1979; Nichols and Conroy 1996; Boul<strong>in</strong>ier et al. 1998a). <strong>The</strong>se methods<br />

have begun gradually to be used <strong>in</strong> the ecological literature, but progress has been<br />

slow, consider<strong>in</strong>g that the methodology has been around s<strong>in</strong>ce 1979. In this paper,<br />

we shall beg<strong>in</strong> with a detailed description <strong>of</strong> the estimation <strong>of</strong> species richness <strong>in</strong> the<br />

literature and then develop general removal and capture-recapture sampl<strong>in</strong>g models<br />

where multiple species are removed or <strong>marked</strong> and recaptured and the objective is to<br />

estimate species richness and the species abundance curve.<br />

09:45 AM - 10:10 AM<br />

Time Vary<strong>in</strong>g, Cont<strong>in</strong>uous Covariates <strong>in</strong> the Cormack-Jolly-Seber Model<br />

Simon Bonner & Carl Schwarz<br />

One area <strong>of</strong> research <strong>in</strong>to capture-recapture methodology has focused on techniques<br />

to <strong>study</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> different covariates on the population parameters. Straightforward<br />

methods have been developed for cases where the covariates are either discrete,<br />

constant over time, or apply to the population as a whole, but the problem has<br />

not been solved for the case <strong>of</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous, time dependent covariates unique to each<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual (e.g. body mass).<br />

Because it is impossible to measure such variables on occasions where an <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

was not captured, estimation can be considered a miss<strong>in</strong>g data problem. In this project,<br />

a model was constructed us<strong>in</strong>g a diffusion process to describe changes <strong>in</strong> the<br />

covariate. Logistic functions were used to l<strong>in</strong>k the covariate to capture and survival<br />

rates and <strong>in</strong>corporate the data <strong>in</strong>to the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model. Two methods <strong>of</strong><br />

parameter estimation were developed based on techniques commonly used to handle<br />

miss<strong>in</strong>g data: namely the EM-algorithm and Gibb's sampl<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong>se methods were<br />

both applied to simulated and real data sets, and comparison <strong>of</strong> the results is provided.<br />

In short, though both methods gave similar results the Gibb's sampl<strong>in</strong>g technique<br />

was much easier to implement, more efficient to compute, and yielded estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

the standard errors more readily than the EM-algorithm.<br />

10:10 AM -10:30 AM - break<br />

10:30 AM - 10:55 AM<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> Bayesian Statistical Inference to Capture-Recapture Data, us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

W<strong>in</strong>BUGS<br />

Howard Stauffer<br />

I will describe Bayesian statistical analysis model<strong>in</strong>g solutions for capture-recapture<br />

data. <strong>The</strong> solutions are based upon Monte Carlo Markov Cha<strong>in</strong> (MCMC) iteration<br />

methods available with the Bayesian s<strong>of</strong>tware W<strong>in</strong>BUGS. This analysis approach <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

an alternative to the maximum likelihood estimation approach available with the<br />

frequentist capture-recapture s<strong>of</strong>tware MARK. <strong>The</strong> capture-recapture analysis is illu-<br />

18


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

strated with data from a hen clam pollution experiment and compared with results<br />

from previous analysis by Anderson, Burnham, and White, us<strong>in</strong>g MARK. For non<strong>in</strong>formative<br />

priors, the Bayesian and frequentist statistical results are comparable. For<br />

<strong>in</strong>formative priors, however, results may differ. Bayesian <strong>in</strong>ference <strong>of</strong>fers a sequential<br />

approach to analysis, based upon multiple datasets obta<strong>in</strong>ed from population monitor<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g periodic reassessments <strong>of</strong> parameters along with estimates <strong>of</strong> risk.<br />

Such reassessments are useful for adaptive management decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g. Bayesian<br />

models can also be compared, analogous to frequentist models, us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formationtheoretic<br />

methods based upon AIC and DIC weights, for their relative competitiveness<br />

at fitt<strong>in</strong>g population sample data, and model averag<strong>in</strong>g techniques can be applied to<br />

provide robust estimates <strong>of</strong> parameters.<br />

10:55 AM - 11:20 AM<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> ultrastructure and random effects band recovery models for estimat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

relationships between survival and harvest rates <strong>in</strong> exploited populations<br />

Dave Otis & Gary White<br />

<strong>The</strong> functional relationship between vital rates and harvest rates <strong>of</strong> exploited populations<br />

is a fundamental <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>of</strong> population biologists. Despite the development by<br />

many authors <strong>of</strong> a collection <strong>of</strong> density- dependent population models and functional<br />

representations <strong>of</strong> the relationship between annual survival and harvest rates, statistical<br />

analysis techniques for empirical <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>of</strong> these phenomena are extremely<br />

limited. In the case <strong>of</strong> band recovery data from harvested species, standard practice<br />

has been to <strong>in</strong>corporate ultrastructure functions <strong>of</strong> the form Si = S0 ( 1 - b*Ki) or Si =<br />

S0 ( 1 - Ki)b <strong>in</strong>to band recovery models and use the estimated parameter b as a <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

for the relative evidence for additive or compensatory harvest mortality. Satisfactory<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> this approach has been <strong>in</strong>consistent, and limited Monte Carlo simulations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the statistical performance <strong>of</strong> the estimator have revealed some problematic<br />

distributional and bias properties. Furthermore, the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the estimator for detect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

annual survival rate and harvest rate relationships is unknown.<br />

An alternative approach to the use <strong>of</strong> fixed effect ultrastructure models is possible if<br />

we consider annual harvest rates and survival rates as random effects. We envision<br />

an underly<strong>in</strong>g process covariation between these 2 rates, which represents the parameter<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest, that is randomly perturbed by a collection <strong>of</strong> additional biotic and<br />

abiotic factors. <strong>The</strong> perturbation could be temporal, as <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> released banded<br />

cohorts from s<strong>in</strong>gle population for a series <strong>of</strong> years. Alternatively, if band<strong>in</strong>g is done <strong>in</strong><br />

multiple populations, we might consider survival and harvest as fixed effects <strong>in</strong> a given<br />

population, and assume random spatial perturbation <strong>in</strong> the parameters.<br />

We construct underly<strong>in</strong>g models that <strong>in</strong>corporate specified additive, l<strong>in</strong>ear compensatory,<br />

and nonl<strong>in</strong>ear compensatory functional relationships between harvest and<br />

natural mortality <strong>in</strong> a seasonally exploited population, and use Monte Carlo simulation<br />

to generate annual samples <strong>of</strong> band recovery data. <strong>The</strong>se datasets are then analyzed<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g fixed effect ultrastructure models and random effects models. Parameter estimation<br />

is accomplished by us<strong>in</strong>g customized SAS code <strong>in</strong> PROC NLMIXED. Summary<br />

statistics <strong>of</strong> performance the alternative techniques are presented and compared,<br />

design considerations are discussed, and recommendations are made for further development.<br />

19


Methodological advances<br />

11:20 AM - 11:45 AM<br />

Integrated analysis <strong>of</strong> wildlife population dynamics<br />

B. Morgan, P. Besbeas, L. Thomas, S. Buckland, J. Harwood, C. Duck, & P. Pomeroy<br />

We describe two related methods for the comb<strong>in</strong>ed analysis <strong>of</strong> mark-recapture and<br />

census data, us<strong>in</strong>g data for British grey seals as our motivat<strong>in</strong>g example. <strong>The</strong> first<br />

method is based on maximum likelihood: the likelihood for the mark-recapture data is<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed with a likelihood from Kalman filter theory applied to a state-space model<br />

for the census data. We show that this approach can allow estimation <strong>of</strong> state parameters<br />

(such as fecundity) that would not be estimable us<strong>in</strong>g either dataset separately.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Kalman filter works well for normal l<strong>in</strong>ear models, but more complex models<br />

require more complex analysis methods. As an example, we demonstrate the use <strong>of</strong><br />

a Bayesian nonl<strong>in</strong>ear particle filter called sequential importance sampl<strong>in</strong>g (SIS) to fit<br />

nonl<strong>in</strong>ear models <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g density dependence and movement between breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

colonies. In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, these approaches could be extended to provide an <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> many diverse types <strong>of</strong> data.<br />

20


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Comput<strong>in</strong>g & s<strong>of</strong>tware (chairs: Jim H<strong>in</strong>es & Gary White)<br />

Plenary Address - 01:15 PM - 01:55 PM<br />

<strong>The</strong> "Mother <strong>of</strong> All Models"<br />

Richard Barker<br />

With an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g proliferation <strong>of</strong> mark-recapture models and studies collect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mark-recapture data, s<strong>of</strong>tware and analysis methods are be<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>ually revised.<br />

We consider the construction <strong>of</strong> the likelihood for a general model that <strong>in</strong>corporates<br />

all the features <strong>of</strong> the recently developed models: it is a multistate robust-design<br />

mark-recapture model that <strong>in</strong>cludes dead recoveries and resight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>marked</strong> animals<br />

and is parameterised <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> state-specific recruitment, survival and capture<br />

probabilities, state-specific abundances, and state-specific recovery and resight<strong>in</strong>g<br />

probabilities. <strong>The</strong> construction that we outl<strong>in</strong>e is based on a factorisation <strong>of</strong> the likelihood<br />

function with each factor correspond<strong>in</strong>g to a different component <strong>of</strong> the data.<br />

Such a construction would allow the likelihood function for a mark-recapture analysis<br />

to be customized accord<strong>in</strong>g to the components that are actually present <strong>in</strong> the dataset.<br />

Individual Papers<br />

01:55 PM - 02:20 PM<br />

Comput<strong>in</strong>g issues concern<strong>in</strong>g hierarchical models<br />

Ken Burnham<br />

<strong>The</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> capture-recapture (CR) data analysis is <strong>in</strong>complete without welldeveloped,<br />

user capable s<strong>of</strong>tware (such as MARK) that can fit models <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

random effects as well as fixed effects. <strong>The</strong> MCMC (i.e., Bayesian) model fitt<strong>in</strong>g approach<br />

provides a sound theory for fitt<strong>in</strong>g all CR models. Why not just use it? Answer:<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware suitable for all potential users, and the relative slowness <strong>of</strong> MCMC<br />

analysis (there are reasons why speed still matters). Pragmatically I ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> that likelihood<br />

analysis, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>ile likelihood <strong>in</strong>tervals, as needed, is em<strong>in</strong>ently adequate<br />

for CR data analysis when models have all fixed effects: the <strong>in</strong>ferential results<br />

are virtually the same as those from MCMC with vague priors; but the analyses are<br />

much faster. This talk considers what we might be able to do to obta<strong>in</strong> CR random<br />

effects <strong>in</strong>ferences, say <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to MARK, that are suitable approximations to<br />

MCMC <strong>in</strong>ferences at a fraction <strong>of</strong> the comput<strong>in</strong>g time.<br />

<strong>The</strong> technical issue is simple. If all effects are considered fixed, numerical likelihood<br />

<strong>in</strong>ference only requires function evaluations over a K dimensional space. Exact <strong>in</strong>ference<br />

for a set <strong>of</strong> K random parameters requires <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> an even more complex<br />

function (than the likelihood) over a K dimensional space. Such <strong>in</strong>tegration is computationally<br />

more demand<strong>in</strong>g than function maximization. MCMC analysis has complexity<br />

at the same level as the <strong>in</strong>tegration approach. <strong>The</strong> random effects method <strong>in</strong><br />

MARK can be reformulated and extended. So do<strong>in</strong>g has value, even though I accede<br />

to the MCMC approach as the gold standard for rigor and generality.<br />

<strong>The</strong> talk will note several possible approximate analyses approaches for some types<br />

<strong>of</strong> random effects (along with fixed effects, so technically mixed models). Under any<br />

<strong>in</strong>ference computations we will augment the fixed effects likelihood with a model for<br />

21


Comput<strong>in</strong>g & s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

the "randomly" vary<strong>in</strong>g parameters, a model which <strong>in</strong>cludes fixed hyperparameters.<br />

Focus is usually on survival probabilities. In some sense the resultant analysis is either<br />

a type <strong>of</strong> penalized likelihood for <strong>in</strong>ference about random effects, or a smoothed<br />

likelihood for <strong>in</strong>ference about fixed effects, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g hyperparameters. Thus, the issue<br />

can be thought <strong>of</strong> more as a comput<strong>in</strong>g issue than as a model<strong>in</strong>g issue: the same<br />

model underlies all <strong>in</strong>ference methods for random effects.<br />

02:20 PM - 02:45 PM<br />

Estimation <strong>of</strong> nest success rates and compar<strong>in</strong>g methods avaialbe <strong>in</strong> SAS GLM, SAS<br />

NLMIXED, and MARK<br />

Jay Rotella, Steve D<strong>in</strong>smore & Terry Shaffer<br />

Estimat<strong>in</strong>g nest<strong>in</strong>g success and evaluat<strong>in</strong>g factors potentially related to nest survival<br />

are key aspects <strong>of</strong> many studies <strong>of</strong> avian populations. A strong <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> nest survival<br />

has led to a rich literature detail<strong>in</strong>g a variety <strong>of</strong> estimation methods for this vital<br />

rate. In recent years, model<strong>in</strong>g approaches have undergone especially rapid development.<br />

Despite these advances, most recent field studies still employ Mayfield's adhoc<br />

method (1961) or, <strong>in</strong> some cases, the maximum-likelihood estimator <strong>of</strong> Johnson<br />

(1979) and Bart and Robson (1982). Such methods allow for analyses <strong>of</strong> stratified<br />

data but do not allow for more complex and realistic models <strong>of</strong> survival data that <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

covariates that vary by <strong>in</strong>dividual, nest age, time, etc. and that may be cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

rather than categorical. Methods that allow researchers to rigorously assess<br />

the importance <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> biological factors that might affect nest survival can now<br />

be readily implemented <strong>in</strong> Program MARK and <strong>in</strong> SAS's Proc GENMOD and Proc<br />

NLMIXED. In this paper, we first describe the likelihood used for these models and<br />

then consider the question <strong>of</strong> what the effective sample size is for computation <strong>of</strong><br />

AICc. Next, we consider the advantages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> these different programs<br />

<strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> ease <strong>of</strong> data <strong>in</strong>put and model construction; utility/flexibility <strong>of</strong> generated<br />

estimates and predictions; ease <strong>of</strong> model selection; and ability to estimate variance<br />

components. F<strong>in</strong>ally, we discuss improvements that would, if they became<br />

available, promote a better general understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> nest survival.<br />

2:45-3:10 PM<br />

M-SURGE: an <strong>in</strong>tegrated s<strong>of</strong>tware for multistate recapture models<br />

Remi Choquet, Anne-Marie Reboulet, Roger Pradel, Olivier Gimenez &<br />

Jean-Dom<strong>in</strong>ique Lebreton<br />

M-SURGE (along with its companion program U_CARE) has been written specifically<br />

to handle multistate capture-recapture models (Lebreton and Pradel 2002) with the<br />

ultimate concern to alleviate their <strong>in</strong>herent difficulties (model specification, quality <strong>of</strong><br />

convergence, flexibility <strong>of</strong> parameterization, assessment <strong>of</strong> fit…). In its doma<strong>in</strong>,<br />

MSURGE covers a broader range <strong>of</strong> models than a general program like MARK<br />

(White and Burnham 1999), while be<strong>in</strong>g more user-friendly than a research program<br />

like MS-SURVIV (H<strong>in</strong>es 1994).<br />

Among the ma<strong>in</strong> features <strong>of</strong> MSURGE is a wide class <strong>of</strong> models and a variety <strong>of</strong> parameterizations:<br />

• M-SURGE <strong>in</strong>tegrates conditional models with probability <strong>of</strong> recapture depend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on the current state (Arnason-Schwarz type models) but also on the current and<br />

previous state (Jolly-MoVement type models; (Brownie, H<strong>in</strong>es et al. 1993)). In<br />

both cases, age and/or time-dependence and multiple groups can be considered.<br />

22


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

• Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Survival-Transition probabilities can be represented as such or decomposed<br />

<strong>in</strong>to transition and survival probabilities (Hestbeck, Nichols et al. 1991).<br />

• Among the transition probabilities with the same state <strong>of</strong> departure, the one to be<br />

computed as 1 m<strong>in</strong>us the others can be freely picked by the user. User-friendl<strong>in</strong>ess is<br />

enhanced by the eas<strong>in</strong>ess with which constra<strong>in</strong>ed models are built, us<strong>in</strong>g a language,<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpreted by a generator <strong>of</strong> design matrices called GEMACO. This language is alike<br />

those <strong>in</strong> general statistical s<strong>of</strong>tware such as SAS or GLIM, i.e., a formula such as t+g<br />

generates a model with additive effects <strong>of</strong> time and group, thus avoid<strong>in</strong>g tedious and<br />

error-prone matrix manipulations us<strong>in</strong>g an editor or a spread-sheet. Examples <strong>of</strong> various<br />

types <strong>of</strong> multistate models are developed and presented.<br />

You can download M-Surge freely from ftp.cefe.cnrs-mop.fr/biom/S<strong>of</strong>t-CR.<br />

03:10 PM - 03:45 PM<br />

DENSITY: s<strong>of</strong>tware for fitt<strong>in</strong>g spatial detection functions to data from passive<br />

sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Murray Efford & Deanna Dawson<br />

Rigorous sampl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> bird populations to estimate density raises the problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>complete<br />

detection (e.g., Pollock et al. 2002). Vary<strong>in</strong>g detectability is widely acknowledged,<br />

but variation <strong>in</strong> its spatial component (how detection decl<strong>in</strong>es with distance) is<br />

considered less <strong>of</strong>ten. Active methods (double sampl<strong>in</strong>g and distance sampl<strong>in</strong>g) require<br />

an observer to determ<strong>in</strong>e the <strong>in</strong>stantaneous distance between the sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t and each animal. Passive methods (mistnets or traps) rely on animals mov<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

the detector: <strong>in</strong>stantaneous locations are unknown, and movement is an important<br />

unmeasured component <strong>of</strong> detectability.<br />

New methods have been developed to fit spatial detection functions to capturerecapture<br />

data from passive detectors. <strong>The</strong> methods are computer-<strong>in</strong>tensive and depend<br />

on specialised s<strong>of</strong>tware ('DENSITY'), available for download at<br />

www.landcareresearch.co.nz. DENSITY provides a graphical <strong>in</strong>terface for the analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> closed-population capture-recapture data from arrays <strong>of</strong> passive detectors. Its<br />

simulation capability enables users to perform power analysis <strong>of</strong> different sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

designs before go<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to the field.<br />

We demonstrate the use <strong>of</strong> DENSITY to estimate bird population density from mist<br />

nett<strong>in</strong>g data. Nett<strong>in</strong>g was conducted over 1992 to 1996 on a forest-pasture ecotone <strong>in</strong><br />

Mexico. In each <strong>of</strong> 16 nett<strong>in</strong>g sessions, six local arrays <strong>of</strong> 20 nets were run for 2-3<br />

consecutive days. Despite the large number <strong>of</strong> captures <strong>in</strong> total, with<strong>in</strong>-session recaptures<br />

were rare for most species. This restricted application <strong>of</strong> the method to a few<br />

common species (e.g. Sporophila torqueola) and to species aggregates (e.g. 'w<strong>in</strong>ter<br />

residents'). Although the use <strong>of</strong> the method for mist nett<strong>in</strong>g data was experimental, it<br />

may lead through simulation <strong>in</strong> DENSITY to improved design <strong>of</strong> mist net arrays where<br />

density estimation is a <strong>study</strong> goal.<br />

<strong>The</strong> spatially explicit framework <strong>of</strong> DENSITY opens up new possibilities and we expect<br />

the s<strong>of</strong>tware to evolve. An excit<strong>in</strong>g prospect is the direct fitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> simple density<br />

surfaces dur<strong>in</strong>g estimation, given suitable spatial covariates.<br />

23


Population dynamics and monitor<strong>in</strong>g applied to decision mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Population dynamics and monitor<strong>in</strong>g applied to decision mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(Chairs: Mike Conroy & Danny Lee)<br />

Plenary Address - 03:50 PM - 04:30 PM<br />

Ecosystem Management via Interact<strong>in</strong>g Models <strong>of</strong> Political and Ecological Processes<br />

Timothy C. Haas<br />

<strong>The</strong> decision to implement environmental protection options is a political one. Depend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on the political mechanisms operat<strong>in</strong>g, a country may or may not heed the most<br />

persuasive scientific analysis <strong>of</strong> an ecosystem's future health. A predictive understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> the political processes that result <strong>in</strong> ecosystem management decisions may<br />

help guide the formulation <strong>of</strong> ecosystem management policy. To this end, this article<br />

develops a stochastic, temporal model <strong>of</strong> how political processes <strong>in</strong>fluence and are<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluenced by ecosystem processes. This model is realized <strong>in</strong> a system <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence diagrams that model the decision mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a country's president, environmental<br />

protection agency, legislature, and rural <strong>in</strong>habitants. <strong>The</strong>se with<strong>in</strong>-country decisions<br />

<strong>in</strong>teract with models <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational environmental protection organizations<br />

and the ecosystem enclosed by the country. As an example, this model<strong>in</strong>g framework<br />

is used to represent the decisions made to manage the cheetah population <strong>in</strong> the<br />

countries <strong>of</strong> Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. <strong>The</strong> model is fitted to both political decision<br />

and ecological data from these countries. This estimated model is then used to<br />

predict which management decisions will be the most politically acceptable to these<br />

countries. F<strong>in</strong>ally, cheetah ext<strong>in</strong>ction probabilities are computed under these decisions.<br />

All s<strong>of</strong>tware for build<strong>in</strong>g such a model <strong>of</strong> other managed ecosystems is freely<br />

available from www.uwm.edu/~haas/ems-cheetah/.<br />

Individual Papers<br />

04:30 PM - 04:55 PM<br />

A Bayesian <strong>in</strong>tegrated population dynamics model to analyze data for the eastern Pacific<br />

Ocean spotted dolph<strong>in</strong><br />

Mark Maunder & Simon Hoyle<br />

Restrictions on fish<strong>in</strong>g operations have been <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an effort to protect at-risk<br />

species taken as bycatch. With the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g popularity <strong>of</strong> the precautionary approach,<br />

these restrictions are <strong>of</strong>ten conservative, because there is <strong>in</strong>sufficient <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

about the effects <strong>of</strong> bycatch on many protected species. Informed decisionmak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

requires <strong>quantitative</strong> analyses <strong>of</strong> both the effects <strong>of</strong> bycatch on these species<br />

and the effect <strong>of</strong> regulations on the fisheries. Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty pervades management <strong>of</strong><br />

protected species and, to be consistent with the precautionary approach, the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty<br />

<strong>in</strong> analyses <strong>of</strong> these species must be described if the appropriate decisions are<br />

to be made. Bayesian analysis is an ideal framework for consider<strong>in</strong>g uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g process. Bayesian analysis also allows expert judgment or<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation from other populations or species to be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the analysis if appropriate.<br />

Integrated analysis attempts to <strong>in</strong>clude all relevant data for a population <strong>in</strong>to<br />

one analysis by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g analyses, shar<strong>in</strong>g parameters, and simultaneously estimat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

all parameters, us<strong>in</strong>g a comb<strong>in</strong>ed objective function. Integrated analysis ensures<br />

that model assumptions and parameter estimates are consistent throughout the analysis,<br />

that uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty is propagated through the analysis, and that the correlations<br />

24


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

among parameters are preserved. We comb<strong>in</strong>e Bayesian analysis and <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

analysis to develop a population dynamics model for the eastern Pacific Ocean (EPO)<br />

spotted dolph<strong>in</strong>. <strong>The</strong> model is developed to <strong>in</strong>clude the various types <strong>of</strong> data that are<br />

available for this population. Informative priors are <strong>in</strong>cluded for several model parameters.<br />

Forward projections are used to <strong>in</strong>vestigate different management options.<br />

04:55 PM - 05:20 PM<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> Bayesian decision mak<strong>in</strong>g and MCMC to the conservation <strong>of</strong> a harvested<br />

species<br />

Chris Fonnesbeck & Mike Conroy<br />

When endeavor<strong>in</strong>g to make <strong>in</strong>formed decisions, conservation biologists must frequently<br />

contend with disparate sources <strong>of</strong> data and compet<strong>in</strong>g hypotheses about the<br />

likely impacts <strong>of</strong> proposed decisions on the resource's status. Frequently, statistical<br />

analyses, model<strong>in</strong>g (e.g., for population projection) and optimization or simulation to<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigate candidate alternative decisions, are conducted as separate exercises. For<br />

example, a population model might be constructed, whose parameters are then estimated<br />

from data (e.g., r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g studies, population surveys); f<strong>in</strong>ally, the parameterized<br />

model might then be used to <strong>in</strong>vestigate alternative candidate decisions, via simulation,<br />

optimization, or both. This approach, while effective, does not take full advantage<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> data and model components for prediction and updat<strong>in</strong>g; we propose<br />

a Bayesian context to provide this <strong>in</strong>tegration.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> American black ducks (Anas rubripes) managers are simultaneously<br />

faced with try<strong>in</strong>g to extract a susta<strong>in</strong>able harvest from the species, while ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual stocks above acceptable thresholds. <strong>The</strong> problem is complicated by spatial<br />

heterogeneity <strong>in</strong> the growth rates and carry<strong>in</strong>g capacity <strong>of</strong> black ducks stocks, movement<br />

between stocks, regional differences <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> harvest pressure, and<br />

heterogeneity <strong>in</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> competition from a close congener, mallards (Anas<br />

platyrynchos) among stocks. We have constructed a population life cycle model that<br />

takes these components <strong>in</strong>to account and simultaneously performs parameter estimation<br />

and population prediction <strong>in</strong> a Bayesian framework. R<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g data are used to<br />

develop posterior predictive distributions for harvest mortality rates, given as <strong>in</strong>put<br />

decisions about harvest regulations. Population surveys <strong>of</strong> black ducks and mallards<br />

are used to obta<strong>in</strong> stock-specific estimates <strong>of</strong> population size for both species, for <strong>in</strong>puts<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the population life-cycle model. <strong>The</strong>se estimates are comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the posterior<br />

distributions for harvest mortality, to obta<strong>in</strong> posterior predictive distributions <strong>of</strong><br />

future population status for candidate sets <strong>of</strong> regional harvest regulations, under alternative<br />

biological hypotheses for black duck population dynamics. <strong>The</strong>se distributions<br />

are then used both for the exploration <strong>of</strong> optimal harvest policies and for sequential<br />

updat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> model posteriors, via comparison <strong>of</strong> predictive distributions to future<br />

survey estimates <strong>of</strong> stock-specific abundance. Our approach illustrates advantages <strong>of</strong><br />

MCMC for <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g disparate data sources <strong>in</strong>to a common predictive framework, for<br />

use <strong>in</strong> conservation decision mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

05:20 PM - 05:45 PM<br />

Decision models for the optimal management <strong>of</strong> biodiversity trust fund<br />

Mart<strong>in</strong> Drechler & Frank Wätzold<br />

<strong>The</strong> conservation <strong>of</strong> species generally requires long-last<strong>in</strong>g commitments over many<br />

years or decades. Even though technically, management plans can be designed for<br />

such long timeframes their practical implementation is constra<strong>in</strong>ed by the future<br />

25


Population dynamics and monitor<strong>in</strong>g applied to decision mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

available f<strong>in</strong>ancial budget which may vary <strong>in</strong> time. A possibility to deal with the problem<br />

<strong>of</strong> variable future budgets is the employment <strong>of</strong> trust funds. At any po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> time<br />

the decision maker can pay a certa<strong>in</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> the currently available money <strong>in</strong>to<br />

the fund (with the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g money be<strong>in</strong>g spent for conservation) or alternatively,<br />

draw a certa<strong>in</strong> amount from the fund to add to the currently available budget. <strong>The</strong> optimal<br />

decision depends on various ecological and economic factors and state variables<br />

which may vary <strong>in</strong> time. We present two types <strong>of</strong> conservation problems: the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> an endangered population and the selection <strong>of</strong> nature reserves which<br />

are described by mathematical models <strong>in</strong> a general manner. Us<strong>in</strong>g a stochastic dynamic<br />

programm<strong>in</strong>g approach we derive analytical solutions for these two decision<br />

problems and deduce general guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the efficient use <strong>of</strong> trust funds <strong>in</strong> the conservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> biodiversity.<br />

5:45-6:10 PM<br />

Costs <strong>of</strong> population measurement uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex-based monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Cl<strong>in</strong>t Moore & Bill Kendall<br />

Managers <strong>of</strong> wildlife populations commonly rely on <strong>in</strong>direct measures <strong>of</strong> the population<br />

<strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g decisions regard<strong>in</strong>g conservation, harvest, or control. <strong>The</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> appeal<br />

<strong>in</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> such measures, or "<strong>in</strong>dices," is their low material expense compared to<br />

methods that directly measure the population. Implicit <strong>in</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dices is the assumption<br />

that they proportionately reflect population size. However, this assumption<br />

is rarely affirmed <strong>in</strong> practice, and decisions based on <strong>in</strong>dices may or may not be the<br />

same as those that would be made if population status were known. <strong>The</strong>refore, if the<br />

relationship between population size and its <strong>in</strong>direct measurement is unknown, then<br />

management based on <strong>in</strong>dices <strong>in</strong>curs expected costs beyond the directly measurable<br />

costs <strong>of</strong> the monitor<strong>in</strong>g program itself. Here, we analyze the mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> optimal silvicultural<br />

decisions at the Piedmont National Wildlife Refuge (USA) for the jo<strong>in</strong>t benefit<br />

<strong>of</strong> two bird populations: the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis)<br />

and a shrub-nest<strong>in</strong>g neotropical migrant, the wood thrush (Hylocichla mustel<strong>in</strong>a).<br />

Response <strong>of</strong> the wood thrush population to management actions is largely unknown,<br />

therefore the degree to which management for the woodpecker conflicts with management<br />

for the wood thrush is uncerta<strong>in</strong>. In our dynamic optimization model, we specifically<br />

address this form <strong>of</strong> structural uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty. We also address uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> the<br />

relationship <strong>of</strong> wood thrush population status to an <strong>in</strong>direct measurement <strong>of</strong> abundance.<br />

In the model, state variables available to the manager at any decision opportunity are:<br />

(1) amounts <strong>of</strong> forest <strong>in</strong> each <strong>of</strong> three seral classes, (2) the <strong>in</strong>direct measure <strong>of</strong> wood<br />

thrush population size <strong>in</strong> each seral class, and (3) class-specific estimates <strong>of</strong> wood<br />

thrush population growth rate (8) obta<strong>in</strong>ed from values <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>direct population measures<br />

at successive decision opportunities. If the <strong>in</strong>direct measure <strong>of</strong> population size<br />

is a true <strong>in</strong>dex, then estimates <strong>of</strong> lambda should be unbiased, and decisions based on<br />

such <strong>in</strong>dices would be exactly the same as those that would be made had the correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

population abundances been known; that is, management based on such<br />

<strong>in</strong>dices is optimal. Otherwise, management based on an <strong>in</strong>correct belief <strong>in</strong> the strict<br />

proportionality <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dex is suboptimal. Through analysis <strong>of</strong> the expected value <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>formation, we calculate the expected cost <strong>of</strong> uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> the relationship between<br />

the monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dex and population size, and we do so <strong>in</strong> currency units <strong>of</strong> woodpekker<br />

habitat and wood thrush population growth. Thus, f<strong>in</strong>ancial sav<strong>in</strong>gs achieved by<br />

forego<strong>in</strong>g surveys that yield unbiased estimates <strong>of</strong> abundance may be balanced<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st expected resource costs <strong>in</strong>curred under simpler monitor<strong>in</strong>g programs <strong>in</strong> which<br />

the relationship between the <strong>in</strong>dex and population size is not established.<br />

26


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Dispersal & migration (Chairs: Carl Schwarz & Franz Bairle<strong>in</strong>)<br />

Plenary Address - 08:15 AM - 08:55 AM<br />

Quantify<strong>in</strong>g variation <strong>in</strong> migratory strategies us<strong>in</strong>g r<strong>in</strong>g-recoveries<br />

G.M. Siriwardena, C.V. Wernham & S.R. Baillie<br />

Bird populations have traditionally been labelled as “migrant” or “resident” on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> field observations and qualitative <strong>in</strong>terpretations <strong>of</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> r<strong>in</strong>g-recoveries.<br />

However, even such a non-systematic approach has identified many <strong>in</strong>termediate<br />

species where only part <strong>of</strong> the population migrates (partial migrants) or where different<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the population migrate to different extents (differential migrants).<br />

A method that would allow a <strong>quantitative</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> migratory tendency to be derived<br />

for many species would facilitate <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>in</strong>to the ecological causes and<br />

life-history consequences <strong>of</strong> migratory behaviour. Species or populations could then<br />

be placed objectively <strong>in</strong>to the cont<strong>in</strong>uum between true residency and an obligate,<br />

long-distance migratory habit.<br />

We present a novel method for the analysis <strong>of</strong> r<strong>in</strong>g-recovery data sets that produces<br />

just such a <strong>quantitative</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>of</strong> migratory tendency for British birds, developed as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the BTO's Migration Atlas project. <strong>The</strong> method uses distributions <strong>of</strong> r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g-torecovery<br />

distances to classify <strong>in</strong>dividual species' patterns <strong>of</strong> movement relative to<br />

those <strong>of</strong> other species. <strong>The</strong> areas between species' cumulative distance distributions<br />

are treated as <strong>in</strong>ter-species dissimilarities and a one-dimensional map is then constructed<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g multi-dimensional scal<strong>in</strong>g. We have used the method <strong>in</strong> example analyses<br />

to show how it could be used to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the factors that affect the migratory<br />

strategies that species adopt, such as diet, territoriality and distribution, and <strong>in</strong> studies<br />

<strong>of</strong> their consequences for demographic parameters such as annual survival and the<br />

tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g. We have also conducted <strong>in</strong>itial analyses to show how temporal<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dices could reveal otherwise unmeasured population consequences<br />

<strong>of</strong> environmental change and thus have an important application <strong>in</strong> conservation science.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, we discuss how our approach to produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dices <strong>of</strong> migratory tendency<br />

could be enhanced to reduce the bias that follows from spatial or temporal variation<br />

<strong>in</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g rates and how they could be made more broadly valuable by <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

other data sets and recovery data from other countries.<br />

Individual Papers<br />

08:55 AM - 09:20 AM<br />

How do geometric constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong>fluence migration patterns?<br />

K. Thorup & C. Rahbek<br />

Null models exclusively <strong>in</strong>vok<strong>in</strong>g geometric constra<strong>in</strong>ts have recently been demonstrated<br />

to provide new <strong>in</strong>sight as to what expla<strong>in</strong>s geographic patterns <strong>of</strong> species<br />

richness and range size distribution. Analyses <strong>of</strong> migration patterns have traditionally<br />

been conducted <strong>in</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> appropriate simulations and analytical models. Here<br />

we present a null model exclusively <strong>in</strong>vok<strong>in</strong>g geometric constra<strong>in</strong>ts and a more<br />

advanced analytical model <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g spread along a migration direction that allow<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> physiographical and physiological boundaries for terrestrial<br />

taxa, with ocean and sea as geometric constra<strong>in</strong>ts, <strong>in</strong> relation to observed<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> migration. Our models take <strong>in</strong>to account the low recovery probability <strong>of</strong> terrestrial<br />

taxa over sea. <strong>The</strong> null model was not found to expla<strong>in</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the directional<br />

27


Dispersal & migration<br />

variation <strong>in</strong> the r<strong>in</strong>g-recoveries, but when compar<strong>in</strong>g the distribution <strong>of</strong> data modeled<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g a simple clock-and-compass model with distributions <strong>of</strong> r<strong>in</strong>g-recoveries, geometric<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts were found to expla<strong>in</strong> up to 22% <strong>of</strong> the variation <strong>in</strong> r<strong>in</strong>g-recoveries.<br />

However, the assumed directional concentrations per step used <strong>in</strong> the model were<br />

much higher than expected, and the qualitative fit <strong>of</strong> the model was rather poor even<br />

when non-terrestrial sites <strong>of</strong> recoveries were excluded.<br />

09:20 AM - 09:45 AM<br />

Estimat<strong>in</strong>g dispersal <strong>in</strong> birds: tam<strong>in</strong>g the unknown<br />

A.J. van Noordwijk<br />

A fundamental problem <strong>in</strong> measur<strong>in</strong>g dispersal is that the observations made are restricted<br />

by the observations that could possibly be made. This quickly leads to a situation<br />

where the distribution <strong>of</strong> observers <strong>in</strong> time and space determ<strong>in</strong>es the observations<br />

more than the behaviour <strong>of</strong> the species studied. Although we will never know<br />

where <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> lost out <strong>of</strong> sight went to, or where immigrants came from, it is possible<br />

to obta<strong>in</strong> estimates <strong>of</strong> dispersal distances that have been corrected for distance<br />

specific observation probabilities (Thomson, van Noordwijk & Hagemeijer, J. Appl<br />

Stat <strong>in</strong> press). Here I want to explore a complementary approach, we can use the frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> immigrants <strong>of</strong> unknown orig<strong>in</strong> as an estimate <strong>of</strong> the unknown part <strong>of</strong> a 'dispersal<br />

as a function <strong>of</strong> distance' curve. Gett<strong>in</strong>g a number for how much we don't know<br />

allows us to get a better perspective on what we do know. In nearly all data sets, we<br />

will have a short range <strong>of</strong> distances <strong>in</strong> which nearly all potential recruits were <strong>marked</strong>,<br />

a further range <strong>of</strong> distances <strong>in</strong> which a proportion <strong>of</strong> all potential recruits were <strong>marked</strong><br />

and a furthest range <strong>of</strong> distances <strong>in</strong> which no potential recruits were <strong>marked</strong>. Where<br />

we can get an estimate <strong>of</strong> the proportion <strong>marked</strong> <strong>in</strong> the middle range, from population<br />

densities or distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat, we can derive estimates for the numbers<br />

<strong>of</strong> immigrants com<strong>in</strong>g from these distances. Although we cannot know where the rest<br />

<strong>of</strong> the immigrants came from, we do have an estimate <strong>of</strong> "the total area under the<br />

curve" <strong>of</strong> the furthest distances. I will apply these ideas to data on natal dispersal <strong>in</strong><br />

Swallows, Blue Tits and Great Tits. This approach will allow us to compare dispersal<br />

curves between groups (e.g. sexes), but also curves for the same species among<br />

areas differ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat (differ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> fragmentation).<br />

09:45 AM - 10:10 AM<br />

Multistate model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> movement and philopatry <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g ross's geese<br />

K. Drake & R. Alisauskas<br />

We estimated rates <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g philopatry and dispersal with<strong>in</strong> the Queen Maud Gulf<br />

metapopulation <strong>of</strong> Ross's Geese (Chen rossii) us<strong>in</strong>g multistate model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> neckband<br />

observations at five breed<strong>in</strong>g colonies, 1999-2002. Philopatry was female-biased, but<br />

probability <strong>of</strong> philopatry varied among colonies. Despite probabilities <strong>of</strong> =0.62 for<br />

breed<strong>in</strong>g philopatry to a given colony by either sex, this <strong>study</strong> demonstrates that annual<br />

movement among breed<strong>in</strong>g colonies was substantial, and greater than previously<br />

assumed. We provide behavioral evidence (consistent with genetic studies<br />

which suggested little or no phylogeographic structure <strong>in</strong> the closely-related lesser<br />

snow goose, Chen caerulescens) for extensive <strong>in</strong>terconnectedness among breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

populations. High likelihood <strong>of</strong> annual movements among colonies emphasize (1) the<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> dispersal on changes <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g distribution, and (2) provides <strong>in</strong>sight<br />

about the contributions <strong>of</strong> emigration and immigration to colony-specific population<br />

growth rates. Although movement was the primary parameter <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest, estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

male survival from multistate model<strong>in</strong>g differed from survival estimates from band re-<br />

28


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

covery models, whereas female survival estimates were consistent with those from<br />

band recovery models. We suspect the difference between sexes <strong>in</strong> survival estimated<br />

from multistate models was due to higher rates <strong>of</strong> neckband loss <strong>in</strong> males compared<br />

to females, as has been found <strong>in</strong> numerous other studies, and/or higher rates <strong>of</strong><br />

permanent emigration by males from sampled areas. <strong>The</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> violat<strong>in</strong>g model<br />

assumptions depends upon the biological parameter <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest, and whether <strong>in</strong>ference<br />

is restricted to the sample population or extended to the entire metapopulation.<br />

10:10 AM - 10:25 AM break<br />

10:25 AM - 10:45 AM<br />

Modell<strong>in</strong>g Dolph<strong>in</strong> Behaviour us<strong>in</strong>g Multi-State Models with Time-Vary<strong>in</strong>g Covariates<br />

S. Brooks & R. K<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Effective management is the key to the protection <strong>of</strong> many endangered species.<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> the primary factors affect<strong>in</strong>g survival will <strong>of</strong>ten lead to the <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> strategies to improve survival rates. In this talk, we consider a small population <strong>of</strong><br />

Hector's dolph<strong>in</strong>s located <strong>of</strong> the coast <strong>of</strong> New Zealand and the impact that the establishment<br />

<strong>of</strong> a seasonal sanctuary has on their survival and migration rates. We use a<br />

multi-state model to describe the movement <strong>of</strong> the dolph<strong>in</strong>s around the habitat and<br />

adopt a Bayesian approach us<strong>in</strong>g reversible jump Markov cha<strong>in</strong> Monte to dist<strong>in</strong>guish<br />

between a wide range <strong>of</strong> compet<strong>in</strong>g models. We also exam<strong>in</strong>e the impact <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>clusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> time-vary<strong>in</strong>g covariates such as catch-effort <strong>in</strong>formation and demonstrate<br />

the added value that these data provide <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> both model discrim<strong>in</strong>ation and parameter<br />

estimation. In particular, we f<strong>in</strong>d a whole class <strong>of</strong> models that provide a far<br />

better fit to the data (and therefore better prediction and ultimately better management)<br />

than those adopted <strong>in</strong> previous analyses.<br />

10:45 AM - 11:05 AM<br />

Spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca <strong>in</strong> respect to<br />

their natal sites<br />

L. Sokolov, N. Chernetsov, V. Kosarev, D. Leoke, M. Markovets, A. Tsvey, A. Shapoval<br />

Research project on the <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> philopatry and dispersal <strong>of</strong> Pied Flycatchers Ficedula<br />

hypoleuca has been underway on the Courish Spit on the Baltic s<strong>in</strong>ce 1980. A<br />

total <strong>of</strong> 8006 nestl<strong>in</strong>gs were r<strong>in</strong>ged <strong>in</strong> the Russian part <strong>of</strong> the Courish Spit. In subsequent<br />

years, 512 <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> (6,4%) were recaptured <strong>in</strong> the whole <strong>study</strong> plot, 300 males<br />

and 212 females. <strong>The</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> this <strong>study</strong> was to test two alternative hypotheses<br />

proposed to expla<strong>in</strong> the distribution <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g Pied Flycatchers <strong>in</strong> respect to their<br />

natal site. <strong>The</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g area impr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g hypothesis (Löhrl 1959, Berndt & W<strong>in</strong>kel<br />

1979, Sokolov et al. 1984) assumes that <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g, migrants try to return to a relatively<br />

small area, with a radius <strong>of</strong> one to several km. <strong>The</strong> other hypothesis forwarded by Vysotsky<br />

(2001) suggests that all first-year birds and many adults <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g arrive randomly<br />

to an area much larger than the <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>study</strong> area. In 2000, some 800 nestboxes<br />

were added so that their overall number reached 1340 and the length <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>study</strong> plot reached 44 km. To <strong>study</strong> natal dispersal, we compared the observed distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> natal dispersal distances with the distribution derived from the model assum<strong>in</strong>g<br />

random arrival to the <strong>study</strong> area. Significantly more Pied Flycatchers were recaptured<br />

with<strong>in</strong> several km from the natal site that at larger distance, and this was not<br />

a function <strong>of</strong> the control effort. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is concluded that the home area impr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

29


Dispersal & migration<br />

by juvenile Pied Flycatchers has a diameter <strong>of</strong> several kilometres and not several dozens<br />

<strong>of</strong> kilometres.<br />

11:05 AM - 11:25 AM<br />

Tim<strong>in</strong>g and routes <strong>of</strong> migration based on r<strong>in</strong>g recoveries and randomization methods<br />

H. Lokki & P. Saurola<br />

In the first EURING Technical Meet<strong>in</strong>g we recommended randomization tests for<br />

compar<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>ter<strong>in</strong>g areas <strong>of</strong> different species or cohorts <strong>of</strong> birds on the basis <strong>of</strong> r<strong>in</strong>g<br />

recoveries. In this contribution we will use randomization methods when try<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

answer the follow<strong>in</strong>g important questions <strong>of</strong> migration studies: Do the tim<strong>in</strong>g and/or<br />

routes <strong>of</strong> migration <strong>of</strong> different species, sexes or age classes differ from each other?<br />

Can anyth<strong>in</strong>g statistically sound be <strong>in</strong>ferred from r<strong>in</strong>g recoveries? As a rule, the data<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> non-normally distributed recovery records (ti, x(ti), y(ti)) where x(ti) are<br />

longitudes, y(ti) latitudes <strong>of</strong> birds recorded <strong>in</strong> N dates ti, i = 1, 2, … , N. We assume<br />

that these records constitute a representative sample <strong>of</strong> places where the birds have<br />

been found dur<strong>in</strong>g their lives. At first, <strong>in</strong> order to sum up the <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong><br />

the recovery locations <strong>in</strong> an "average route", we create a time-w<strong>in</strong>dow and slide it<br />

through the set <strong>of</strong> recoveries. In each time-w<strong>in</strong>dow we sample the records with replacement<br />

and compute the average <strong>of</strong> the records <strong>in</strong> the sample. By repeat<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

procedure many times we obta<strong>in</strong> an empirical distribution <strong>of</strong> the average. <strong>The</strong>n we<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>e these distributions computed for each time-w<strong>in</strong>dow to get the average route<br />

<strong>of</strong> the birds. For compar<strong>in</strong>g two routes, we compute the difference <strong>of</strong> the averages <strong>of</strong><br />

the records <strong>of</strong> the two groups <strong>in</strong> each time-w<strong>in</strong>dow. <strong>The</strong>n we compute the sum <strong>of</strong> the<br />

differences. In order to f<strong>in</strong>d out whether or not the observed sum <strong>of</strong> differences is statistically<br />

significant we compute the empirical distribution <strong>of</strong> the sum <strong>of</strong> differences as<br />

follows. In each time-w<strong>in</strong>dow we randomize many times the <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> records <strong>in</strong>to<br />

the two groups. <strong>The</strong>n we compute differences <strong>of</strong> the averages <strong>of</strong> the randomized<br />

groups and accord<strong>in</strong>gly the sums <strong>of</strong> the differences. <strong>The</strong> rank<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the observed sum<br />

<strong>in</strong> the empirical distribution <strong>of</strong> the sums <strong>of</strong> differences determ<strong>in</strong>es whether or not the<br />

two routes are similar geographically and <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g. F<strong>in</strong>ally we illustrate the<br />

methods with data sets extracted from the F<strong>in</strong>nish recovery database.<br />

11:25-11:45 AM<br />

Multistate model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> brood amalgamation <strong>in</strong> white-w<strong>in</strong>ged scoters (Melanitta fusca<br />

deglandi)<br />

Joshua J. Traylor, Ray T. Alisauskas, and F. Patrick Kehoe<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a proclivity for female North American waterfowl to lose or abandon <strong>of</strong>fspr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

after hatch. Often these abandoned duckl<strong>in</strong>gs are subsequently brooded by foster<br />

hens giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to the phenomena <strong>of</strong> post-hatch brood amalgamation (PHBA). <strong>The</strong><br />

potential fitness implications that arise from this behavior has brought about considerable<br />

debate on physiological or ecological motivations for PHBA <strong>of</strong> young, and<br />

potential costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> duckl<strong>in</strong>gs brooded <strong>in</strong> amalgamated broods. Few studies<br />

have estimated the effects <strong>of</strong> PHBA on <strong>of</strong>fspr<strong>in</strong>g survival and have not followed<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividually <strong>marked</strong> <strong>of</strong>fspr<strong>in</strong>g: most studies have been restricted to <strong>study</strong><strong>in</strong>g PHBA<br />

based on maternal characteristics because only broods have been <strong>in</strong>dividually color<br />

<strong>marked</strong>. Here, we explore relationships between probabilities <strong>of</strong> movements from<br />

maternal to amalgamated broods by us<strong>in</strong>g a population <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividually <strong>marked</strong> whitew<strong>in</strong>ged<br />

scoters (i.e., females and <strong>of</strong>fspr<strong>in</strong>g) (Melanitta fusca deglandi) and pert<strong>in</strong>ent<br />

ecological covariates utiliz<strong>in</strong>g multistate model<strong>in</strong>g. We tested hypotheses about movement<br />

probabilities and 1) hatch date, 2) brood size, 3) female size and condition, 4)<br />

30


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

duckl<strong>in</strong>g size and condition, and 5) weather. We def<strong>in</strong>ed duckl<strong>in</strong>gs as belong<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

one <strong>of</strong> 3 social strata: (A) natal mother with no foster duckl<strong>in</strong>gs, (B) foster mother and<br />

conspecific non-sibl<strong>in</strong>gs, (C) natal mother with conspecific non-sibl<strong>in</strong>gs and limited<br />

our <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> movement probabilities to two weeks after hatch because this period is<br />

when most mortality and movement occurred. Thus, we estimated probabilities <strong>of</strong><br />

survival, recapture, and movement for each stratum focus<strong>in</strong>g on covariates for movement.<br />

We evaluate hypotheses suggested to motivate PHBA (e.g., accidental mix<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

brood size and brood success, and energetic stress hypotheses) and evaluate<br />

the <strong>in</strong>fluence on duckl<strong>in</strong>g survival. Because the importance <strong>of</strong> predation <strong>in</strong> motivat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

abandonment or adoption <strong>of</strong> duckl<strong>in</strong>gs rema<strong>in</strong>s equivocal, we discuss how duckl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

traits, <strong>in</strong> a population located near high gull densities, may provide <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

relative importance <strong>of</strong> predation to PHBA.<br />

31


Analysis us<strong>in</strong>g large-scale r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g data<br />

Analysis us<strong>in</strong>g large-scale r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g data (chairs: Paul Doherty & Stephen Baillie)<br />

Plenary Address - 01:15 PM - 01:55 PM<br />

Spatial Po<strong>in</strong>t Process Models for Waterfowl Band Recoveries<br />

J. Andrew Royle<br />

Estimation <strong>of</strong> the recovery distribution <strong>of</strong> bands is an important problem <strong>in</strong> waterfowl<br />

management. <strong>The</strong> recovery distribution is fundamental to characteriz<strong>in</strong>g the distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> harvest, derivation <strong>of</strong> harvest, and geographic variation <strong>in</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g rate. <strong>The</strong><br />

classical view <strong>of</strong> this problem is to stratify the recovery doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>to a small number <strong>of</strong><br />

discrete strata (harvest areas). Conventional mult<strong>in</strong>omial band recovery models (e.g.,<br />

"Brownie models") can be used to estimate the stratum-specific recovery probabilities.<br />

In order to estimate recovery probabilities, a small number <strong>of</strong> strata are required to<br />

ensure that sufficient recoveries occur <strong>in</strong> each stratum. This stratification is subjective<br />

and limits the ability to characterize variation <strong>in</strong> recovery rates. <strong>The</strong> spatial <strong>in</strong>dex<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

the mult<strong>in</strong>omial cell probabilities suggests an alternative view <strong>of</strong> this problem, one <strong>in</strong><br />

which the assumed mult<strong>in</strong>omial model conta<strong>in</strong>s a very large number <strong>of</strong> cell probabilities<br />

that are spatially correlated. This treatment <strong>of</strong> the problem is equivalent to view<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the locations <strong>of</strong> band recoveries as a spatial po<strong>in</strong>t process. Efforts are then<br />

focused on estimat<strong>in</strong>g the spatially vary<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity function describ<strong>in</strong>g the relative<br />

occurrence probability <strong>of</strong> recoveries. Restatement <strong>of</strong> the problem <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a po<strong>in</strong>t process <strong>in</strong>tensity function avoids the need for stratification and provides<br />

for harvest distribution estimates at arbitrary scales. In this talk I give a brief <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />

to spatial po<strong>in</strong>t process models and elaborate on their use for model<strong>in</strong>g waterfowl<br />

band recovery data with the goal <strong>of</strong> characteriz<strong>in</strong>g the harvest distribution and geographic<br />

variation <strong>in</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g rate. Data from a recent reward band<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiative are<br />

analyzed.<br />

Individual Papers<br />

01:55 PM - 02:20 PM<br />

Population dynamics <strong>of</strong> the White Stork <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands: assess<strong>in</strong>g life-history and<br />

behavioural traits us<strong>in</strong>g data collected at large spatial scales<br />

Bland<strong>in</strong>e Doligez, David L. Thomson & Arie van Noordwijk<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g the decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> its populations all over Europe after 1945, the White Stork<br />

Ciconia ciconia has been the object <strong>of</strong> several successful re<strong>in</strong>troduction programs. As<br />

a consequence <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> these programs, White Stork populations have<br />

been monitored over large spatial scales. Despite these <strong>in</strong>tense efforts, very few reliable<br />

estimates <strong>of</strong> life-history traits <strong>of</strong> the White Stork are however currently available,<br />

<strong>in</strong> particular very little is known about their variation with age. Such general knowledge<br />

however constitutes a prerequisite for <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the consequences <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

measures <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> population biology. Ultimately, this knowledge is required<br />

to assess population dynamics expected under different scenarios, allow<strong>in</strong>g adequate<br />

further conservation measures to be taken.<br />

In the Netherlands, the re<strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> the White Stork consisted <strong>of</strong> a captive breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

program coupled with <strong>in</strong>tensive supplementary feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> captive and free-fly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

birds throughout the year. Identification <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g adults and r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> young <strong>in</strong> the<br />

32


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g population has been performed over the last 20 years throughout the country<br />

by many volunteers. Us<strong>in</strong>g this large-scale and long-term r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g and resight<strong>in</strong>g data<br />

set, we constructed capture-recapture models to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the variation <strong>of</strong> lifehistory<br />

traits underly<strong>in</strong>g the dynamics <strong>of</strong> this population, and the consequences <strong>of</strong> the<br />

re<strong>in</strong>troduction program on these traits.<br />

In a first step, we fully describe the effects <strong>of</strong> age, time, cohort and trap-dependence<br />

on White stork survival and resight<strong>in</strong>g rates, thus provid<strong>in</strong>g precise estimates <strong>of</strong> these<br />

traits. A gradual <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> both survival and resight<strong>in</strong>g rates with age is described<br />

for the first time <strong>in</strong> this long-lived species. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, survival rate decreases with<br />

time, parallel<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the proportion <strong>of</strong> free-fly<strong>in</strong>g <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> <strong>in</strong> the population.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se results also allow us to account for time and age effects <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the consequences <strong>of</strong> supplementary feed<strong>in</strong>g on life-history traits, while keep<strong>in</strong>g capture-recapture<br />

models tractable <strong>in</strong> these further analyses.<br />

<strong>The</strong> exact causes <strong>of</strong> the White Stork population decl<strong>in</strong>e were not clear, but mortality<br />

on migration is thought to have <strong>in</strong>creased (exacerbated by the proliferation <strong>of</strong> highvoltage<br />

power l<strong>in</strong>es across Europe). Adverse weather on the w<strong>in</strong>ter<strong>in</strong>g grounds could<br />

also have depressed survival. Supplementary feed<strong>in</strong>g may then have ameliorated<br />

survival either by giv<strong>in</strong>g the birds a better body condition prior to migration, or by encourag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

them to stay beh<strong>in</strong>d, surviv<strong>in</strong>g the European w<strong>in</strong>ter on artificial food supplements.<br />

In a second step, we thus used detailed data on the location <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

attempts with respect to the food sources over the country (food was provided at the<br />

breed<strong>in</strong>g stations) to assess the consequences <strong>of</strong> supplementary feed<strong>in</strong>g on survival,<br />

resight<strong>in</strong>g rate and migratory behaviour. More specifically, we <strong>in</strong>vestigate whether<br />

survival rate to the next year, resight<strong>in</strong>g rate and migrat<strong>in</strong>g probability depend on food<br />

availability dur<strong>in</strong>g the breed<strong>in</strong>g season. Food availability was considered to decrease<br />

with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g distance from the nest to the nearest breed<strong>in</strong>g station. Further, we<br />

analyse potential differences <strong>in</strong> survival rate accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>dividual migratory status<br />

(i.e. migratory vs. resident <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>). This status is def<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g resight<strong>in</strong>g data<br />

collected all over Europe and Africa. Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary analyses suggest that survival does<br />

not differ accord<strong>in</strong>g to food availability, but the probability <strong>of</strong> migrat<strong>in</strong>g decreases with<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g food availability.<br />

Overall, our results emphasize the importance <strong>of</strong> the large scale population monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g life-history trait estimates that will prove useful for managers to make<br />

efficient decisions for future strategies <strong>of</strong> conservation for the White stork <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Netherlands. Build<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>tegrated demographic population model with the precise<br />

estimates obta<strong>in</strong>ed via our analyses, based on data collected at large spatial scales,<br />

will <strong>in</strong>deed eventually allow reliable predictions on the long-term population dynamics<br />

to be made under different conservation scenarios.<br />

02:20 PM - 02:45 PM<br />

Estimat<strong>in</strong>g correlates <strong>of</strong> survival rates from nationally coord<strong>in</strong>ated r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g data on<br />

owls <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Pertti Saurola & Charles Francis<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce 1974, bird r<strong>in</strong>gers <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land have been encouraged to r<strong>in</strong>g both nestl<strong>in</strong>gs and<br />

adults <strong>of</strong> many species <strong>of</strong> birds <strong>of</strong> prey, especially owls. This coord<strong>in</strong>ated effort, <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

several hundred r<strong>in</strong>gers, now results <strong>in</strong> more than 30,000 potential nest sites for<br />

owls be<strong>in</strong>g checked annually, and has led to over 200,000 owls be<strong>in</strong>g r<strong>in</strong>ged <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

up until 2002. Many <strong>of</strong> these owls are subsequently recaptured as breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

adults, by the same or different r<strong>in</strong>gers, while others are recovered dead by the general<br />

public. All <strong>of</strong> the r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g and encounter data, as well as many biometric data are<br />

centrally computerized, allow<strong>in</strong>g for large-scale analyses <strong>of</strong> geographic and temporal<br />

33


Analysis us<strong>in</strong>g large-scale r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g data<br />

variation <strong>in</strong> such parameters as survival and dispersal rates. <strong>The</strong>se can then be related<br />

to external covariates, such as w<strong>in</strong>ter snow depth and prey abundance, as well as<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual covariates such as biometrics. In this presentation, we illustrate both the<br />

potential and the challenges <strong>of</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g with these types <strong>of</strong> data, us<strong>in</strong>g data from<br />

9000 recaptures and recoveries from over 30,000 Tawny Owls r<strong>in</strong>ged as nestl<strong>in</strong>gs or<br />

adults. Average survival rates <strong>of</strong> this species <strong>in</strong>creased from 30% over the first year<br />

post-fledg<strong>in</strong>g, to 60% <strong>in</strong> the second year, and 74% <strong>in</strong> subsequent years, but varied<br />

among years <strong>in</strong> response to w<strong>in</strong>ter severity and vole abundance. Survival rates were<br />

lowest after w<strong>in</strong>ters with deep snow accumulations, and <strong>in</strong> years when vole populations<br />

crashed. Similar variation occurred <strong>in</strong> dispersal, with greater dispersal distances<br />

<strong>in</strong> years when voles crashed just after the breed<strong>in</strong>g season. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g data from<br />

many different contributors to the national scheme, <strong>in</strong> addition to greatly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the sample size, allows one to address questions that could not be addressed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

data from a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>study</strong> area. For example, it is possible to exam<strong>in</strong>e the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

dispersal on survival rate estimates, and the relative <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> survival and dispersal<br />

on population dynamics <strong>of</strong> this species. It is also possible to test for geographic<br />

variation, such as north-south cl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> demographic parameters. However, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

data from many sources also presents some challenges, such as deal<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

geographic variation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> coverage.<br />

02:45 PM - 03:10 PM<br />

Population dynamic and temporal variation <strong>in</strong> recruitment and survival <strong>of</strong> 14 common<br />

passer<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Roma<strong>in</strong> Julliard<br />

At large spatial scale, variation <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g abundance <strong>of</strong> a given species results from<br />

variation <strong>of</strong> survival <strong>of</strong> established adults and variation <strong>of</strong> recruitment <strong>of</strong> new <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>.<br />

Which <strong>of</strong> these two parameters is the most variable and the best predictor <strong>of</strong><br />

variation <strong>of</strong> abundance is a central issue <strong>of</strong> population dynamic (Saether et al. Science<br />

2002). Yet the problem looks simple, an important pitfalls is the difficulty to obta<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent estimates <strong>of</strong> the different parameters.<br />

In many countries, large scale breed<strong>in</strong>g bird monitor<strong>in</strong>g based on counts are established<br />

to monitor population abundance at the scale <strong>of</strong> the country. <strong>The</strong>y are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

coupled with standardized mist-nett<strong>in</strong>g scheme set up for the specific purpose <strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

demographic parameters for the same populations. From these capturerecapture<br />

data, variation <strong>of</strong> survival and recruitment (us<strong>in</strong>g Pradel's approach) may be<br />

estimated, <strong>in</strong>dependently <strong>of</strong> population size variation estimated from count survey. In<br />

addition, captures <strong>of</strong> young <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> are used to estimate variation <strong>of</strong> reproductive<br />

success (us<strong>in</strong>g the young adult ratio as an <strong>in</strong>dex). Because survival and recruitment<br />

are not <strong>in</strong>dependently estimated, their temporal variation may not be compared directly.<br />

Rather, the amount <strong>of</strong> temporal variation as well as the synchronization <strong>of</strong><br />

temporal variation across sites, and how temporal variation were correlated with<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> abundance and productivity <strong>in</strong>dex were compared between survival and<br />

recruitment for a given species. This was done for 14 species with high enough recapture<br />

rate to estimate demographic parameters. <strong>The</strong> data comes from the French<br />

common bird monitor<strong>in</strong>g scheme settled <strong>in</strong> 1989, and <strong>in</strong>cluded capture-recapture data<br />

from 20 to 40 sites per year for 13 years (about 35,000 captures).<br />

34


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

03:10 PM - 03:35 PM<br />

Population dynamics <strong>of</strong> small mammals at three spatial scales: a 5-years <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> 122<br />

trapp<strong>in</strong>g grids<br />

Nigel Yoccoz & Rolf Ims<br />

Small mammals are known to exhibit a large variety <strong>of</strong> dynamics, both <strong>in</strong> time (multiannual<br />

cycles vs. seasonal variation only) and space (regional synchrony, travell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

waves). Small mammals have therefore been the focus <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> studies,<br />

that used mostly trapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dices. <strong>The</strong>se studies do not therefore take <strong>in</strong>to account<br />

differences <strong>in</strong> trappability that may <strong>in</strong>deed be confounded with the phenomenon we<br />

want to expla<strong>in</strong> (for example, that trappability is lower <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>crease than <strong>in</strong> the decrease<br />

phase <strong>of</strong> the cycle). In this paper, we use our own <strong>study</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g population<br />

dynamics and demography <strong>of</strong> small mammals at three spatial scales (0.1, 10 and<br />

100 kms) to address some methodological and practical issues. <strong>The</strong> <strong>study</strong> is based<br />

on an unusually large sampl<strong>in</strong>g effort (122 grids trapped twice a year <strong>in</strong> 5 years, <strong>in</strong><br />

spr<strong>in</strong>g and fall, each trapp<strong>in</strong>g session be<strong>in</strong>g 4 days long), with more than 10,000 <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong><br />

captured <strong>of</strong> three different species. <strong>The</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> methodological issue we<br />

address is: what is the consequence <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g a too simple/complex model for capture<br />

probabilities on the estimates <strong>of</strong> spatial patterns <strong>in</strong> population densities, growth rates<br />

and demography, and how should we model these probabilities <strong>in</strong> practice. We explore<br />

<strong>in</strong> particular the use <strong>of</strong> Bayesian models that <strong>in</strong>clude hierarchical random effects.<br />

35


Abundance estimation & conservation biology<br />

Abundance estimation & conservation biology<br />

(chairs: Jim Nichols & Darryl MacKenzie)<br />

Plenary Address - 03:50 PM - 04:30 PM<br />

Hierarchical mark-recapture models: A framework for <strong>in</strong>ference about demographic<br />

processes<br />

Bill L<strong>in</strong>k & Richard Barker<br />

<strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> sophisticated mark-recapture models over the last four decades has<br />

provided fundamental tools for the <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> wildlife populations, allow<strong>in</strong>g reliable <strong>in</strong>ference<br />

about population sizes and demographic rates based on clearly formulated models for the<br />

sampl<strong>in</strong>g processes. Mark-recapture models are now rout<strong>in</strong>ely described by large numbers<br />

<strong>of</strong> parameters. <strong>The</strong>se large models provide the next challenge to wildlife modelers: the extraction<br />

<strong>of</strong> signal from noise <strong>in</strong> collections <strong>of</strong> parameters.<br />

Pattern among parameters can be described by strong, determ<strong>in</strong>istic relations (as <strong>in</strong> ultrastructural<br />

models) but is more flexibly and credibly modeled us<strong>in</strong>g weaker, stochastic relations.<br />

Trend <strong>in</strong> survival rates is not likely to be manifest by a sequence <strong>of</strong> values fall<strong>in</strong>g precisely<br />

on a given parametric curve; rather, if we could somehow know the true values, we<br />

might anticipate a regression relation between parameters and explanatory variables, <strong>in</strong><br />

which true value = signal plus noise.<br />

Hierarchical models provide the appropriate framework for <strong>in</strong>ference about collections <strong>of</strong> related<br />

parameters. Instead <strong>of</strong> regard<strong>in</strong>g parameters as fixed but unknown quantities, we regard<br />

them as realizations <strong>of</strong> stochastic processes governed by hyperparameters. Inference<br />

about demographic processes is based on <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>of</strong> these hyperparameters.<br />

We describe analysis <strong>of</strong> capture-recapture data from an open population based on hierarchical<br />

extensions <strong>of</strong> the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model. In addition to recaptures <strong>of</strong> <strong>marked</strong> animals,<br />

we model first captures <strong>of</strong> animals and losses on capture, allow<strong>in</strong>g estimation <strong>of</strong> survival<br />

and birth rates. We present analyses for covariation between survival and birth rates. For<br />

example, years that are poor for survival may also be poor years for reproduction. In this<br />

case we would expect the survival parameters and birth rate parameters to be related.<br />

<strong>The</strong> hierarchical approach that we describe provides the framework needed for exploit<strong>in</strong>g<br />

structural relationships between parameters, improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual estimates by consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the parameters <strong>in</strong> context <strong>of</strong> groups <strong>of</strong> related parameters. In addition it provides a mechanism<br />

for summariz<strong>in</strong>g a large number <strong>of</strong> parameters <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> hyperparameters that characterize<br />

higher-order distributions.<br />

We believe that hierarchical models should represent an entirely natural mode <strong>of</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

biologists. Were it possible for biologists to dispense with mark-recapture estimation and <strong>in</strong>stead<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> exact values <strong>of</strong> parameters they would be unlikely to be satisfied with the parameters<br />

as a summary <strong>of</strong> the population processes that generated them. Instead we would<br />

expect them to treat the parameter values as data <strong>in</strong> some type <strong>of</strong> analysis.<br />

Standard methods for analyz<strong>in</strong>g mark-recapture data are poorly suited to hierarchical model<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> deviance based on restricted models, as described by Lebreton et al. (1992),<br />

can be used to explore determ<strong>in</strong>istic relationships between parameters. However, methods<br />

for fitt<strong>in</strong>g random effects models that allow for stochastic higher-order relationships between<br />

parameters are relatively crude. For example, the variance components procedure <strong>in</strong>corporated<br />

<strong>in</strong> program MARK uses method <strong>of</strong> moments, a procedure that can result <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>admissible<br />

estimates and that relies on asymptotic sampl<strong>in</strong>g properties for <strong>in</strong>ference. We describe<br />

flat-prior Bayesian analyses us<strong>in</strong>g Markov cha<strong>in</strong> Monte Carlo as a useful solution to these<br />

problems.<br />

36


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Individual Papers<br />

04:30 PM - 04:55 PM<br />

Components <strong>of</strong> population growth rate for white-w<strong>in</strong>ged scoters <strong>in</strong> Saskatchewan<br />

Ray T. Alisauskas, Joshua J. Traylor, C<strong>in</strong>dy J. Swoboda, & F. Patrick Kehoe<br />

<strong>The</strong>re have been considerable decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g range and abundance <strong>of</strong> White-w<strong>in</strong>ged<br />

scoters (Melanitta fusca deglandi) <strong>in</strong> northwestern North America. Consequently, we began<br />

<strong>study</strong><strong>in</strong>g population biology <strong>of</strong> scoters <strong>in</strong> 2000 at Redberry, Saskatchewan, Canada, where<br />

long-term had been done previously. Krementz et al (1997) estimated apparent survival rates<br />

for this population us<strong>in</strong>g capture-recapture <strong>of</strong> birds from 1975-1985. S<strong>in</strong>ce then, there<br />

have been developments <strong>in</strong> the direct estimation <strong>of</strong> population growth rate us<strong>in</strong>g reversetime,<br />

capture-recapture <strong>of</strong> animals. We used the same capture histories used by Krementz<br />

et al (1997) to directly estimate survival, seniority and capture probabilities. Seniority probability<br />

is a parameter useful for understand<strong>in</strong>g the proportion <strong>of</strong> population growth rate composed<br />

<strong>of</strong> survival, i.e., seniority = survival/population growth. Thus, if seniority and survival probabilities<br />

are estimable, then population growth rate, lambda, can be estimated by substitution.<br />

Values <strong>of</strong> seniority approach<strong>in</strong>g 1.0 suggest that there is very little recruitment contribut<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to population growth rate. We used Program Mark to compare 9 candidate models for<br />

estimat<strong>in</strong>g survival, seniority and capture probabilities; the 9 models were comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong><br />

different time constra<strong>in</strong>ts (time-specific, time trend and time-<strong>in</strong>variant) imposed on each <strong>of</strong><br />

the three latent parameters. We then used model-averag<strong>in</strong>g to derive a annual estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

each <strong>of</strong> the three latent parameters. Estimates <strong>of</strong> population size, derived us<strong>in</strong>g estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

capture probability, decl<strong>in</strong>ed over the course <strong>of</strong> the <strong>study</strong>. Calculation <strong>of</strong> population growth<br />

rate suggested that this population was <strong>in</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e (lambda = 0.78±0.02 SE) over the 11 years<br />

<strong>of</strong> previous <strong>in</strong>vestigation; because survival probability was constant, and seniority was<br />

very close to one, the results further suggest that population decl<strong>in</strong>es were the result <strong>of</strong> virtually<br />

no local recruitment (neither through immigration nor local production <strong>of</strong> young). <strong>The</strong>se<br />

historical f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs provide context for current local population dynamics <strong>of</strong> White-w<strong>in</strong>ged<br />

scoters at Redberry Lake studied more recently (s<strong>in</strong>ce 2000); they also have conservation<br />

implications for scoters over their range <strong>in</strong> North America.<br />

04:55 PM - 05:20 PM<br />

Statistical Aspects <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g genetic markers for <strong>in</strong>dividual identification <strong>in</strong> capturerecapture<br />

studies<br />

Paul Lukacs & Ken Burnham<br />

We describe analysis issues <strong>in</strong> which genetic markers differ from bird r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> applicability<br />

for use <strong>in</strong> capture-recapture studies. Identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual birds based on genetic<br />

markers, <strong>of</strong>ten mircosatellites, <strong>in</strong>volves some uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty. <strong>The</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty depends<br />

on many factors <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the number <strong>of</strong> loci used <strong>in</strong> the genetic analysis, number <strong>of</strong><br />

alleles per locus, allele frequencies, degree <strong>of</strong> relatedness <strong>of</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>, etc. <strong>The</strong> uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty<br />

can be quantified based on the probability <strong>of</strong> two genotypes be<strong>in</strong>g identical (match<strong>in</strong>g) given<br />

they belong to different <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>. Given the match probabilities, all possible capture histories<br />

and their probability <strong>of</strong> occurrence can be determ<strong>in</strong>ed. We present a likelihood based<br />

method for the analysis <strong>of</strong> capture-recapture data us<strong>in</strong>g genetic markers as <strong>in</strong>dividual identification<br />

which <strong>in</strong>corporates potential uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> identification. <strong>The</strong> capture histories and<br />

their associated probabilities <strong>of</strong> occurrence are then used <strong>in</strong> the capture-recapture analysis<br />

to estimate parameters such as population size or survival. This method also applies to situations<br />

where physical marks <strong>of</strong> birds are only partially read.<br />

37


Abundance estimation and conservation biology<br />

05:20 PM - 05:45 PM<br />

Occupancy as a surrogate for abundance estimation<br />

Darryl MacKenzie & Jim Nichols<br />

In many monitor<strong>in</strong>g programmes it may be prohibitively expensive to estimate the actual<br />

abundance <strong>of</strong> a bird species <strong>in</strong> a def<strong>in</strong>ed area, particularly at large spatial scales, or where<br />

birds occur at very low densities. Often it may be appropriate to consider the proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

area occupied by the species as an alternative state variable. However, as with abundance<br />

estimation, issues <strong>of</strong> detectability must be taken <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong> order to make accurate <strong>in</strong>ferences:<br />

the non-detection <strong>of</strong> the species does not imply the species <strong>in</strong> genu<strong>in</strong>ely absent. Here<br />

we review some recent modell<strong>in</strong>g developments that permit unbiased estimation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> area occupied, colonization and local ext<strong>in</strong>ction probabilities; allow for unequal<br />

sampl<strong>in</strong>g effort; and enable covariate <strong>in</strong>formation on sampl<strong>in</strong>g locations to be <strong>in</strong>corporated.<br />

We also describe how these models could be extended to <strong>in</strong>corporate <strong>in</strong>formation from <strong>marked</strong><br />

<strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>, which would enable f<strong>in</strong>er questions <strong>of</strong> population dynamics (such as turnover<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> nest sites by specific breed<strong>in</strong>g pairs) to be addressed. We believe these models may<br />

be very applicable to a wide range <strong>of</strong> bird species, and may also be useful for <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

questions about habitat quality. For example, the species is more likely to have higher local<br />

ext<strong>in</strong>ction probabilities, or higher turnover rates <strong>of</strong> specific breed<strong>in</strong>g pairs, <strong>in</strong> poor quality habitats.<br />

05:45 PM - 06:10 PM<br />

Model<strong>in</strong>g population dynamics with r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g, age ratio, and breed<strong>in</strong>g population sample<br />

surveys<br />

Mark Otto<br />

We modeled mid-cont<strong>in</strong>ent North American mallard population dynamics while account<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for the sampl<strong>in</strong>g error <strong>in</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the demographic time series. We used survey sample estimates<br />

and covariances from all vital statistics: hunt<strong>in</strong>g and non-hunt<strong>in</strong>g survival from the<br />

USGS Bird Band<strong>in</strong>g Laboratory's r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g data, reproduction <strong>in</strong>dexed by the ratio <strong>of</strong> juveniles<br />

to adults <strong>in</strong> the USFWS Harvest Survey Section's parts collection survey, and breed<strong>in</strong>g population<br />

data from the USFWS May aerial waterfowl breed<strong>in</strong>g ground survey. Model<strong>in</strong>g all<br />

surveys with their sampl<strong>in</strong>g error simultaneously was a multivariate approach <strong>in</strong> which all the<br />

component demograpic series were treated equally to obta<strong>in</strong> the best estimates <strong>of</strong> the population<br />

process over time.<br />

<strong>The</strong> model was a two-level hierarchical mixed effects model. <strong>The</strong> secondary level used a<br />

Leslie-matrix population model to comb<strong>in</strong>e the series and nonstationary signal extraction to<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> true value. <strong>The</strong> true values were compromises between the population dynamics and<br />

the survey estimates. <strong>The</strong> moethod change less precise survey estimates to m<strong>in</strong>imize the<br />

differernces between the breed<strong>in</strong>g population true values and their predictions, given past<br />

data.<br />

<strong>The</strong> primary hierarchical level consisted <strong>of</strong> random effects, the survey sample estimates and<br />

their covariances. <strong>The</strong> r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g data estimates had a mult<strong>in</strong>omial sampl<strong>in</strong>g distribution where<br />

the hunt<strong>in</strong>g and non-hunt<strong>in</strong>g survival rates varied over time. <strong>The</strong> reproduction and breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

population estimates had normal sampl<strong>in</strong>g distributions with known and fixed variance estimates.<br />

Hav<strong>in</strong>g data from all vital statistics exposed <strong>in</strong>consistencies among the series and allowed<br />

us to estimate biases.<br />

38


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Population dynamics (chairs: Evan Cooch & André Dhondt)<br />

Plenary Address - 08:15 AM - 8:55 AM<br />

Beyond survival estimation: mark-recapture, matrix population models, and population<br />

dynamics<br />

Hal Caswell<br />

Survival probability is <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest primarily as a component <strong>of</strong> population dynamics. Only<br />

when survival estimates are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> a demographic model can their population implications<br />

be calculated. Survival describes the transition between liv<strong>in</strong>g and dead.<br />

Biologically important as this transition is, it is only <strong>of</strong> many transitions <strong>in</strong> the life cycle.<br />

Others <strong>in</strong>clude transitions between immature and mature, unmated and mated, larva<br />

and adult, small and large, and location x and location y. <strong>The</strong> demographic consequences<br />

<strong>of</strong> these transitions can be captured by matrix population models, and such models<br />

provide a natural l<strong>in</strong>k connect<strong>in</strong>g multi-stage mark-recapture methods and population<br />

dynamics.<br />

I will explore some <strong>of</strong> those connections <strong>in</strong> this talk, with examples taken from an ongo<strong>in</strong>g<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the endangered North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis). Formulat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

problems <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> a matrix population model provides an easy way to compute<br />

the likelihood <strong>of</strong> capture histories. It extends the list <strong>of</strong> demographic parameters<br />

for which mark-recapture methods provide maximum likelihood estimates to <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

population growth rate, the sensitivity and elasticity <strong>of</strong> population growth rate, the net<br />

reproductive rate, generation time, and measures <strong>of</strong> transient dynamics. In the future,<br />

multi-stage mark-recapture methods, l<strong>in</strong>ked to matrix population models, will become<br />

an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important part <strong>of</strong> demography.<br />

Individual Papers<br />

08:55 AM - 09:15 AM<br />

Exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g compet<strong>in</strong>g hypotheses for mechanisms <strong>of</strong> Cass<strong>in</strong>'s Auklet population trajectory<br />

Nadav Nur, Derek Lee & Bill Sydeman<br />

Cass<strong>in</strong>s Auklet (Ptycoramphus aleuticus) numbers are considered to be at their lowest<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> history throughout their range, and breed<strong>in</strong>g populations are currently <strong>in</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

at Triangle Island, British Columbia, and Southeast Farallon Island (SEFI), California,<br />

the only large colonies with long term data available. Us<strong>in</strong>g data from 21 years <strong>of</strong><br />

mark-recapture, breed<strong>in</strong>g performance, diet, chick growth rates, and oceanographic<br />

conditions at a Cass<strong>in</strong>'s Auklet colony on SEFI, we exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>terannual and decadal<br />

scales <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>in</strong> the population's vital rates and how they can expla<strong>in</strong> population<br />

trends for this isolated population. Thanks to the depth and breadth <strong>of</strong> our data on this<br />

population, we were able to exam<strong>in</strong>e variation on multiple time scales, and with the aim<br />

<strong>of</strong> uncover<strong>in</strong>g processes at work with<strong>in</strong> this population, both ultimate factors (e.g., related<br />

to climate change and physical forc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the mar<strong>in</strong>e environment) and proximal<br />

factors (reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dices <strong>of</strong> prey availability, <strong>in</strong>dices <strong>of</strong> predation, and variation <strong>in</strong><br />

chick growth rates).<br />

39


Population dynamics<br />

09:15 AM - 09:35 AM<br />

Constra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> cyclic environmental variability on population dynamics <strong>of</strong> Antarctic<br />

predators.<br />

Stephanie Jenouvrier, Cristophe Barbraud, Bernard Cazelles & Henri Weimerskirch<br />

Ecological and population processes are affected by climatic fluctuations, and top predators<br />

such as seabirds can provide an <strong>in</strong>tegrative view on the consequences <strong>of</strong> environmental variability<br />

on ecosystems. Over the Southern Ocean cyclic fluctuations <strong>of</strong> physical environment<br />

such as pression, sea surface temperature or sea ice are l<strong>in</strong>ked to large scale climatic oscillations<br />

like the southern oscillation. White and Peterson (1996) described also an Antarctic<br />

Circumpolar Wave (ACW) that propagates eastward coupled warm anomalies <strong>of</strong> sea surface<br />

temperature and sea ice extent with a period <strong>of</strong> 4-5 years. In this <strong>study</strong> we exam<strong>in</strong>e the cyclic<br />

dynamics <strong>of</strong> several seabirds population (southern fulmar, emperor pengu<strong>in</strong> and snow petrel)<br />

<strong>in</strong> Antarctica, to evaluate the impact <strong>of</strong> environmental variability on the demographic parameters<br />

and to model the dynamics <strong>of</strong> populations.<br />

Population dynamics <strong>of</strong> southern fulmar, emperor pengu<strong>in</strong> and snow petrel show cyclic fluctuations<br />

with a period <strong>of</strong> 2-4 years. By us<strong>in</strong>g wavelet analysis we po<strong>in</strong>ted out that southern<br />

fulmar showed a period <strong>of</strong> 2-4 years after the eighties, whereas snow petrel and emperor<br />

pengu<strong>in</strong>s showed a similar period before the eighties. A regime shift occurred dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

eighties and appear to synchronise the populations <strong>of</strong> these 3 species, which were not synchronised<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the greater part <strong>of</strong> the forty years <strong>study</strong>.<br />

Long term monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>marked</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 3 species enabled us to estimate demographics<br />

parameters such as breed<strong>in</strong>g success or survival with capture-recapture analysis.<br />

We studied the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> several environmental parameters (sea surface temperature, sea<br />

ice) on these life history traits and showed that species have constrated responses to climatic<br />

variations. For example, the survival rate <strong>of</strong> emperor pengu<strong>in</strong>s and southern fulmars <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

when sea ice extent <strong>in</strong>creases, while the survival rate <strong>of</strong> snow petrels decreases.<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g these long- term series on demographic parameters together with their relationships<br />

with climatic factors, we model the population dynamics with Leslie matrices <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

cyclicity <strong>in</strong> the variation <strong>of</strong> the demographics parameters. <strong>The</strong>se modelled population trajectories<br />

were then compared with the observed cyclicity <strong>in</strong> the population size surveys.<br />

09:35 AM - 09:55 AM<br />

Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the effects <strong>of</strong> fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g prey on demographic parameters <strong>of</strong> tawny owls<br />

Charles Francis & Pertti Saurola<br />

Breed<strong>in</strong>g populations and demographic parameters <strong>of</strong> many species <strong>of</strong> owls have been<br />

shown to vary <strong>in</strong> response to fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g prey populations. For example, breed<strong>in</strong>g success<br />

and emigration patterns <strong>of</strong> several European owl species fluctuate <strong>in</strong> response to the 3-4 year<br />

cycle <strong>of</strong> many rodents (Saurola 1997), while breed<strong>in</strong>g propensity, clutch size, nest<strong>in</strong>g success,<br />

movement patterns and survival rates <strong>of</strong> Great Horned Owls vary <strong>in</strong> relation to the ~10-<br />

year cycle <strong>in</strong> Snowshoe Hare abundance (Houston & Francis 1995). However, little is known<br />

<strong>of</strong> the relative importance <strong>of</strong> these different factors on the population dynamics <strong>of</strong> owls.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce 1974, over 30,000 <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> <strong>of</strong> both young and breed<strong>in</strong>g adult Tawny Owls have been<br />

r<strong>in</strong>ged <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land, generat<strong>in</strong>g over 9,000 live recaptures and dead recoveries. In addition,<br />

many territories are monitored each year, provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation on breed<strong>in</strong>g propensity,<br />

clutch size, and nest<strong>in</strong>g success. We used mark-recapture-recovery models to estimate variation<br />

<strong>in</strong> survival rates <strong>in</strong> relation to lemm<strong>in</strong>g cycles, as well as the severity <strong>of</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter weather.<br />

By comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g recapture and recovery data, we can estimate the relative importance <strong>of</strong> emigration<br />

and mortality on variation <strong>in</strong> apparent survival rates. We then use these estimates,<br />

together with productivity and nest<strong>in</strong>g propensity data <strong>in</strong> a stage-based matrix model, to de-<br />

40


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

term<strong>in</strong>e the relative <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>in</strong> these different demographic parameters on variation<br />

<strong>in</strong> population size <strong>of</strong> the species. F<strong>in</strong>ally, we compare the model predictions with direct<br />

estimates <strong>of</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> population size derived from censuses and mark-recapture analyses.<br />

09:55 AM - 10:15 AM<br />

Population models <strong>in</strong> greater snow geese: a comparison <strong>of</strong> different approaches<br />

Gilles Gauthier & Jean-Dom<strong>in</strong>ique Lebreton<br />

Population model is a powerful tool to guide decision mak<strong>in</strong>g when manag<strong>in</strong>g wildlife populations.<br />

We will compare different model<strong>in</strong>g approaches that we used to evaluate the effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

harvest on the population growth <strong>of</strong> Greater Snow Geese. For this population, we benefit<br />

<strong>of</strong> two unique datasets. On one hand, fecundity and survival data come from a long-term<br />

capture-recapture <strong>study</strong> conducted s<strong>in</strong>ce 1990 at the breed<strong>in</strong>g colony <strong>of</strong> Bylot Island <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Canadian Arctic. On the other hand, accurate estimates <strong>of</strong> the total size <strong>of</strong> the population come<br />

from an annual spr<strong>in</strong>g photo <strong>in</strong>ventory conducted s<strong>in</strong>ce 1970 <strong>in</strong> southern Quebec. Harvest<br />

data can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the national hunter surveys. In a first approach, we <strong>in</strong>cluded environmental<br />

stochasticity <strong>in</strong> a matrix projection model by simulat<strong>in</strong>g good, average and bad years<br />

to account for the large <strong>in</strong>ter-annual variation <strong>in</strong> fecundity and first-year survival, a common<br />

feature <strong>of</strong> birds nest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Arctic. However, caution must be used with this approach because<br />

different stochastic growth rates can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the model formulation used<br />

(post-breed<strong>in</strong>g vs pre-breed<strong>in</strong>g census) when covariance among matrix elements is present,<br />

as this was the case here. A second approach that we developed is based on the functional<br />

relationships between generation time and elasticity on one hand, and harvest rate and survival<br />

on the other hand. Generation time was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the mean transition matrix based on<br />

the observed proportion <strong>of</strong> good, average and bad years between 1985-98. <strong>The</strong> model assumes<br />

that hunt<strong>in</strong>g mortality is additive to natural mortality, for which we have good evidence.<br />

This yielded a simple formula that can predict changes <strong>in</strong> lambda as a function <strong>of</strong> changes <strong>in</strong><br />

harvest. A third, and potentially more robust approach, consists <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g different sources<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the same model, that is demographic data (i.e. transition matrix) and census<br />

data (i.e. annual survey). <strong>The</strong> Kalman Filter is a technique that precisely allows that. <strong>The</strong><br />

advantage <strong>of</strong> this approach is that it attempts to m<strong>in</strong>imize both uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties associated with<br />

the survey and demographic parameters based on the variance <strong>of</strong> each estimate. We will use<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> the greater snow goose to illustrate this newest approach.<br />

10:15 AM - 10:35 AM<br />

A Bayesian Approach to Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Animal Abundance and Demographic Data<br />

Steven Brooks, Ruth K<strong>in</strong>g & Byron Morgan<br />

In studies <strong>of</strong> wild animals, one frequently encounters both census and mark-recapture recovery<br />

data. In this talk we consider a Bayesian analysis <strong>of</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t r<strong>in</strong>g-recovery and census data us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a state-space model allow<strong>in</strong>g for the fact that not all members <strong>of</strong> the population are directly observable.<br />

We then impose a Leslie-matrix-based model on the true population counts describ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the natural birth-death and age transition processes.<br />

We use Markov cha<strong>in</strong> Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods to perform the analysis, remov<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

need to use the Kalman filter and thereby allow<strong>in</strong>g us to avoid the need for the potentially restrictive<br />

normality assumptions commonly assumed for analyses <strong>of</strong> this sort. We illustrate our<br />

approach on two important British bird species, the lapw<strong>in</strong>g and the heron. In both cases, we<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduce additional time-vary<strong>in</strong>g covariates such as the number <strong>of</strong> frost days each year <strong>in</strong> order<br />

to better expla<strong>in</strong> the annual variability <strong>in</strong> the population. We use reversible jump MCMC<br />

to discrim<strong>in</strong>ate between alternative models describ<strong>in</strong>g the underly<strong>in</strong>g population dynamics.<br />

41


Honour speaker<br />

Honour speaker<br />

11:00 AM - 12:00 AM<br />

Quantitative Methods for the Study and Management <strong>of</strong> Avian Populations: Evolution,<br />

Current State and Prognosis<br />

James D. Nichols<br />

<strong>The</strong> tradition <strong>of</strong> the EURING meet<strong>in</strong>gs has been to focus on <strong>quantitative</strong> methods for<br />

use <strong>in</strong> the <strong>study</strong> and management <strong>of</strong> bird populations. <strong>The</strong> EURING meet<strong>in</strong>gs have<br />

emphasized estimation methods, an important component <strong>of</strong> a scientific process that<br />

also <strong>in</strong>cludes development <strong>of</strong> models <strong>of</strong> ecological processes and, <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> management<br />

and conservation, development <strong>of</strong> decision-theoretic methods. I will<br />

discuss the <strong>evolution</strong>, current state and prognosis for 3 classes <strong>of</strong> estimation methods<br />

(band-recovery analysis, capture-recapture analysis, and distance sampl<strong>in</strong>g), as well<br />

as for two more general issues <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g estimation methodology, model selection<br />

and dissem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> new data-analytic methods to biological users. In order to emphasize<br />

the role <strong>of</strong> estimation methods as components <strong>of</strong> larger processes requir<strong>in</strong>g<br />

use <strong>of</strong> other classes <strong>of</strong> methods, I also discuss the <strong>evolution</strong> <strong>of</strong> process model<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

decision-theoretic methods used <strong>in</strong> the <strong>study</strong> and management <strong>of</strong> avian populations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> EURING meet<strong>in</strong>gs and their attendees have played an important role <strong>in</strong> the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>quantitative</strong> methods. I illustrate this po<strong>in</strong>t by claim<strong>in</strong>g that the rapid<br />

<strong>evolution</strong> over the past few decades <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the discussed topics can be traced<br />

back to sem<strong>in</strong>al work by a EURING contributor who retired recently. In fact the sensitivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the growth rate <strong>of</strong> methodological knowledge to the contributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

researchers has been extremely large for this person. Retrospective considerations <strong>of</strong><br />

the work <strong>of</strong> this <strong>in</strong>dividual lead to a posteriori hypotheses about factors associated<br />

with "high-sensitivity" <strong>in</strong>vestigators and teams. Although experimental tests <strong>of</strong> these<br />

hypotheses are unlikely, some <strong>in</strong>ference may be possible based on predictions and<br />

eventual contributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigators us<strong>in</strong>g different approaches to the conduct <strong>of</strong><br />

science and management.<br />

42


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Poster abstracts (organizer: Charles Francis)<br />

Population dynamics <strong>of</strong> radio-<strong>marked</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>: A case <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> wild turkey <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Virg<strong>in</strong>ias<br />

Russell Alpizar-Jara, Elizabeth N. Brooks, Kenneth H. Pollock, David E. Steffen, James C.<br />

Pack & Gary W. Norman<br />

Wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) hunt<strong>in</strong>g is a popular sport <strong>in</strong> the United<br />

States, with broad regional and national significance. A 2-sex Leslie-type matrix<br />

model was developed to understand the effect <strong>of</strong> hunt<strong>in</strong>g on the dynamics <strong>of</strong> wild turkey<br />

populations <strong>in</strong> Virg<strong>in</strong>ia and West Virg<strong>in</strong>ia (Alpizar-Jara et al. 2001). A unique aspect<br />

<strong>of</strong> this model is that it <strong>in</strong>corporates recruitment and survival parameters derived<br />

from a large-scale radio telemetry <strong>study</strong>. About 1543 hens were radio-tagged and<br />

monitored weekly dur<strong>in</strong>g a period <strong>of</strong> 5 years to determ<strong>in</strong>e causes <strong>of</strong> mortality and to<br />

estimate survival and recruitment rates (Pack et al. 1999, Norman et al. 2001). <strong>The</strong><br />

model provides projections <strong>of</strong> population size and harvest for Spr<strong>in</strong>g-Summer and<br />

Fall-W<strong>in</strong>ter periods, as well as <strong>in</strong>formation about population growth rate and age/sex<br />

structure. Determ<strong>in</strong>istic and stochastic versions <strong>of</strong> the model are available onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

(www4.stat.ncsu.edu/~pollock/turkey/turkeymod.html) to facilitate evaluation <strong>of</strong> important<br />

hypotheses concern<strong>in</strong>g turkey populations with similar structural and biological<br />

features (Brooks et al. 2002). This should enable managers to address questions<br />

related to sett<strong>in</strong>g seasonal harvest levels, to make comparisons among various<br />

strategies for rehabilitat<strong>in</strong>g decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g populations and to determ<strong>in</strong>e appropriate harvest<br />

regulations. We illustrate how the model can be used to explore a series <strong>of</strong><br />

hunt<strong>in</strong>g strategies and to evaluate the consequences <strong>of</strong> process variation <strong>in</strong> the dynamics<br />

<strong>of</strong> the population. Of particular <strong>in</strong>terest is the impact <strong>of</strong> cause-specific mortality<br />

(illegal, natural and hunt<strong>in</strong>g) and recruitment components <strong>in</strong> the population growth<br />

rate. Our analyses show that fall hunt<strong>in</strong>g has the strongest negative effect on the<br />

population growth rate, and that the proportion <strong>of</strong> males <strong>in</strong> the population was more<br />

sensitive to fall rather than spr<strong>in</strong>g hunt<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Senescence <strong>in</strong> the great tit<br />

Eduardo J. Belda & Markku Orell<br />

<strong>The</strong>ories <strong>of</strong> age<strong>in</strong>g propose that age<strong>in</strong>g evolves as the necessary cost <strong>of</strong> processes<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g early reproductive success or because <strong>of</strong> weaker selection aga<strong>in</strong>st lateact<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mutations. <strong>The</strong>y predict that the rate <strong>of</strong> age<strong>in</strong>g should <strong>in</strong>crease with the <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> age and condition <strong>in</strong>dependent (i.e. extr<strong>in</strong>sic) mortality. In<br />

this <strong>study</strong> we used 488 <strong>in</strong>dividual capturerecapture histories from a 20-year <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the great tit (Parus major) breed<strong>in</strong>g at Oulu, northern F<strong>in</strong>land (65o N). We compared<br />

our age-specific survival pattern with results from a great tit population <strong>in</strong> southern<br />

England (52o N). Our observation <strong>of</strong> lower survival probability from age 1 to age 2 <strong>in</strong><br />

northern F<strong>in</strong>land than <strong>in</strong> southern England suggests higher extr<strong>in</strong>sic mortality <strong>in</strong> the<br />

North. We found that <strong>in</strong> Northern F<strong>in</strong>land, the survival probability improved at age 1,<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed constant at age 2 and age 3 and decl<strong>in</strong>ed at age 4. For great tits <strong>in</strong> southern<br />

England McCleery et al. (1996) found senescence <strong>in</strong> the survival probability but<br />

the effect appeared at an older age (5 years). Thus, our results support the prediction<br />

from <strong>evolution</strong>ary theories that the rate <strong>of</strong> age<strong>in</strong>g should <strong>in</strong>crease with the <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong><br />

the risk <strong>of</strong> extr<strong>in</strong>sic mortality.<br />

43


Poster abstracts<br />

Daily survival probabilities <strong>of</strong> adult and juvenile cliff swallows vary with colony size<br />

and ectoparasite load<br />

Charles R. Brown & Mary Bomberger Brown<br />

One potential benefit <strong>of</strong> colonial nest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> birds is <strong>in</strong>creased survival <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

adults and/or fledged juveniles due to improved predator avoidance or better food<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> groups. <strong>The</strong> cliff swallow (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) <strong>of</strong> western North<br />

America breeds <strong>in</strong> colonies rang<strong>in</strong>g from a few pairs to sometimes thousands at a<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle site, and a number <strong>of</strong> separate costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> coloniality have been<br />

identified <strong>in</strong> this species. Yet it is unknown how these <strong>in</strong>teract to affect fitness components<br />

such as survival <strong>of</strong> birds <strong>in</strong> different sized groups. Us<strong>in</strong>g mark-recapture data<br />

from 213 different colonies from 1983-2002 and a total sample size <strong>of</strong> 129,995 adults<br />

and 19,584 juveniles, we estimated with<strong>in</strong>-season daily survival probabilities <strong>of</strong> adult<br />

and recently fledged juvenile cliff swallows at breed<strong>in</strong>g colonies rang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> size from<br />

15 to 3000 active nests at our <strong>study</strong> site <strong>in</strong> southwestern Nebraska, USA. Because<br />

transient swallows were present at some colonies, we used “age”-dependent models<br />

to estimate only the survival <strong>of</strong> resident birds. Some colonies had been fumigated to<br />

remove ectoparasitic bugs, and these allowed us to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the effect <strong>of</strong> ectoparasitism<br />

on daily survival. Across all years, with<strong>in</strong>season daily survival probabilities <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

as colony size <strong>in</strong>creased for both adults and juveniles <strong>in</strong> both fumigated and<br />

non-fumigated colonies, although the pattern was statistically stronger for fumigated<br />

colonies, and there was annual variation <strong>in</strong> the pattern among nonfumigated colonies.<br />

Birds <strong>in</strong> the parasite-free colonies had significantly higher daily survival probabilities,<br />

on average, than those occupy<strong>in</strong>g naturally <strong>in</strong>fested colonies. <strong>The</strong> results reveal a<br />

previously unknown advantage <strong>of</strong> colonial nest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this species, document another<br />

apparent cost <strong>of</strong> ectoparasitism, and represent the first measurement <strong>of</strong> daily adult<br />

survival dur<strong>in</strong>g the breed<strong>in</strong>g season <strong>in</strong> relation to colony size for any bird.<br />

Apply<strong>in</strong>g band recovery models to an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the demographic impacts <strong>of</strong> exceptional<br />

conservation measures<br />

Anna M. Calvert & Gilles Gauthier<br />

In response to extremely rapid population growth <strong>in</strong> recent years, unusual conservation<br />

measures were implemented for greater snow geese <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g 1999 with the <strong>in</strong>tention<br />

<strong>of</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g adult survival and ultimately stabilis<strong>in</strong>g abundance. <strong>The</strong>se <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

the liberalisation <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g sport hunt regulations <strong>in</strong> autumn and w<strong>in</strong>ter and,<br />

most significantly, the <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> a spr<strong>in</strong>g hunt<strong>in</strong>g season on stag<strong>in</strong>g grounds <strong>in</strong><br />

Québec. Long-term band<strong>in</strong>g and recovery data cover<strong>in</strong>g the periods before and after<br />

regulation changes provided us with an opportunity to evaluate the effects <strong>of</strong> these<br />

exceptional conservation measures, serv<strong>in</strong>g as a k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> large-scale natural experiment.<br />

We use band recovery models <strong>in</strong> MARK based on a comprehensive dataset <strong>of</strong><br />

hunter-recovered birds (approximately 4,000 recoveries <strong>of</strong> 42,000 geese banded from<br />

1990- 2001) to determ<strong>in</strong>e how the changes <strong>in</strong> harvest regulations may have differentially<br />

affected age groups and sexes, and to compare the magnitude <strong>of</strong> these effects<br />

to base-l<strong>in</strong>e temporal variability <strong>in</strong> survival and recovery rates. Models <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

annual harvest rate (determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>dependently from hunter surveys) as an external<br />

covariate are also tested <strong>in</strong> order to determ<strong>in</strong>e whether harvest trends <strong>in</strong>terpreted<br />

from survey data accurately reflect demographic impacts. We use a simplified report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rate estimate based on the recovery rate <strong>of</strong> radiocollared birds (assumed to be<br />

100%) and on literature values to calculate annual hunt<strong>in</strong>g mortality rates from recovery<br />

rates for each component <strong>of</strong> the population, for comparison with changes <strong>in</strong> sport<br />

harvest regulations. As expected, we found an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> recovery rates for all agesex<br />

groups after the <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> conservation measures, but did not note any correspond<strong>in</strong>gdecl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>in</strong> survival rates, though this may be due to the low power <strong>of</strong> detec-<br />

44


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

tion implicit <strong>in</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> band-recovery data. Given migratory route changes observed<br />

<strong>in</strong> the population dur<strong>in</strong>g the period <strong>of</strong> abundance <strong>in</strong>crease, we also explore<br />

different methodological options available for an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the variation <strong>in</strong> survival<br />

and recovery rates due to kill-location and season, and discuss the additional <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

but also the biases that arise from these analyses.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Possible Effects <strong>of</strong> Contam<strong>in</strong>ants on the Survival, Breed<strong>in</strong>g Dispersal, and Natal<br />

Dispersal <strong>of</strong> Red-tailed Tropicbirds Nest<strong>in</strong>g on Johnston Atoll<br />

Paul F. Doherty, Jr., E. A. Schreiber & Gary A. Schenk<br />

Annual survival and dispersal rates <strong>of</strong> adult and juvenile red-tailed tropicbirds were<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> connection with exposure to heavy metals. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration <strong>of</strong> a U.S.<br />

stockpile <strong>of</strong> chemical weapons stored at Johnston Atoll, <strong>in</strong> the central Pacific Ocean,<br />

exposed tropicbirds nest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> the plant to <strong>in</strong>creased levels <strong>of</strong> human<br />

disturbance, smoke stack emissions and potential leaks. Birds nest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this site<br />

(downw<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> the plant) were compared to those nest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a reference site (upw<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong><br />

the plant) with less human disturbance, and no exposure to smoke stack emissions or<br />

other potential <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration emissions. We did not f<strong>in</strong>d any effect <strong>of</strong> the weapons <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration<br />

on survival <strong>of</strong> adults or juveniles between the two sites. Adult breed<strong>in</strong>g dispersal<br />

rates did not differ between the sites but we did f<strong>in</strong>d differences <strong>in</strong> the<br />

agespecific natal dispersal rates. Birds fledged from downw<strong>in</strong>d areas were less likely<br />

to return to their natal area to nest and more likely to immigrate to the upw<strong>in</strong>d area<br />

than vice-versa. This asymmetry <strong>in</strong> natal dispersal rates could be caused by many<br />

factors, but we believed it is most likely due to differ<strong>in</strong>g vegetation densities and disturbance<br />

regimes. <strong>The</strong>se results have implications for vegetation management <strong>in</strong> relation<br />

to tropicbird nest success and population size.<br />

Assess<strong>in</strong>g and Correct<strong>in</strong>g for Effects <strong>of</strong> Bias on Manatee Aerial Survey Counts at the<br />

TECO Big Bend Power plant <strong>in</strong> Tampa Bay, Florida<br />

Holly H. Edwards, Bruce B. Ackerman, John E. Reynolds, James A. Powell & Kenneth H.<br />

Pollock<br />

In w<strong>in</strong>ter, Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris) aggregate <strong>in</strong> the warmwater<br />

outflows <strong>of</strong> power plants and natural spr<strong>in</strong>gs seek<strong>in</strong>g refuge from colder ambient<br />

waters temperatures. Aerial surveys that cover manatee habitat <strong>in</strong> small, welldef<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

areas (usually at w<strong>in</strong>ter aggregation sites) are useful for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

population estimates and for assess<strong>in</strong>g effects <strong>of</strong> cold weather on manatees. However,<br />

obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g accurate population estimates from these surveys are problematic because<br />

imperfect detection is not taken <strong>in</strong>to account. To identify how environmental<br />

conditions affect manatee aerial detection probability, an <strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>study</strong> was conducted<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>ters 1999-2000 through 2002-2003 at the Tampa Electric Company’s<br />

(TECO) Big Bend power plant discharge canal <strong>in</strong> Tampa Bay, Florida. Flights<br />

were flown on mostly consecutive days (4-10 days) follow<strong>in</strong>g the passage <strong>of</strong> cold<br />

fronts. To estimate components <strong>of</strong> detection probability we <strong>marked</strong> manatees by attach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

colored flags to their tail-stocks. Marked animals helped: (1) determ<strong>in</strong>e the<br />

overall probability <strong>of</strong> detect<strong>in</strong>g manatees from the air via the use <strong>of</strong> <strong>marked</strong> animals<br />

and aerial observers (p); (2) determ<strong>in</strong>e the probability <strong>of</strong> detect<strong>in</strong>g an animal, given<br />

that it is available to the observer us<strong>in</strong>g ground (p2) and aerial observers (p1); (3)<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e the probability, from <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> 1 and 2 EURING 2003 – Poster Session<br />

4 above, <strong>of</strong> a manatee be<strong>in</strong>g available for observation, (pa). Overall probability <strong>of</strong><br />

detect<strong>in</strong>g manatees for 6 surveys ranged from p = 0.41 to 0.83 and the probability <strong>of</strong><br />

detection, given available, for air and ground observers ranged from p1 = 0.61 to 0.75<br />

and p2 = 0.60 to 0.76 respectively. <strong>The</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> a manatee be<strong>in</strong>g available to the<br />

45


Poster abstracts<br />

observer was pa = 0.46 to 0.76. We will use these detection probabilities to develop<br />

better population estimates for manatees.<br />

Predict<strong>in</strong>g the effect <strong>of</strong> shellfish fishery on mortality <strong>in</strong> Oystercatchers Haematopus<br />

ostralegus<br />

B.J. Ens & C. Rappoldt<br />

In the Netherlands, mechanized fish<strong>in</strong>g for shellfish occurs <strong>in</strong> several <strong>in</strong>tertidal areas,<br />

whose prime function is that <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g a nature reserve. <strong>The</strong> fishery is hotly debated,<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce conservationists are conv<strong>in</strong>ced that decl<strong>in</strong>es observed <strong>in</strong> Oystercatcher populations<br />

are due to the fishermen tak<strong>in</strong>g away the food <strong>of</strong> the birds. To address this dispute,<br />

we developed a model that predicts how the Oystercatchers will deplete the<br />

stock <strong>of</strong> shellfish <strong>in</strong> the course <strong>of</strong> the w<strong>in</strong>ter. For the Oosterschelde, the first area for<br />

which we tested the model, the predicted amount <strong>of</strong> shellfish left at the end <strong>of</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter<br />

co<strong>in</strong>cided closely with the stock estimate <strong>of</strong> the fishery <strong>in</strong>stitute. <strong>The</strong> model also calculates<br />

a measure which we call food stress and which <strong>in</strong>dicates the difficulty the<br />

birds experience <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g their daily energy needs. <strong>The</strong> model does not dist<strong>in</strong>guish<br />

between <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>, because we wanted to stay as close to the available measurements<br />

as possible. However, the food stress <strong>in</strong> a given year can be related to the<br />

mortality <strong>of</strong> the birds. We estimated mortality us<strong>in</strong>g r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g recoveries and found a<br />

close correlation between mortality and food stress. <strong>The</strong> higher the food stress dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a given w<strong>in</strong>ter, the higher the overw<strong>in</strong>ter mortality <strong>of</strong> the birds. <strong>The</strong> highest stress and<br />

overw<strong>in</strong>ter mortality occurred dur<strong>in</strong>g very cold w<strong>in</strong>ters when the <strong>in</strong>tertidal mudflats<br />

froze over and the birds could not reach their food. We were also able to estimate the<br />

extra food stress caused by the fishery. It turns out that <strong>in</strong>itially the policy <strong>of</strong> food reservation<br />

for the birds, which forbids shellfish fishery when shellfish stocks are low, did<br />

not provide sufficient guarantees for the birds. Recently, m<strong>in</strong>imum stocks were set<br />

higher and prelim<strong>in</strong>ary calculations suggest that the new levels do provide sufficient<br />

guarantees for the birds.<br />

Estimat<strong>in</strong>g Overdispersion us<strong>in</strong>g a Conditional Bootstrap<br />

David Fletcher & Richard Barker<br />

For large samples, the deviance <strong>of</strong> a mark-recapture model has a chi-squared distribution<br />

(when the model is correct). This result has lead to the standard measure <strong>of</strong><br />

overdispersion known as c-hat, which is the deviance divided by its degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom.<br />

In order to avoid us<strong>in</strong>g this large-sample approximation, Program Mark now has<br />

a parametric bootstrap procedure for estimat<strong>in</strong>g c-hat. This procedure <strong>in</strong>volves generat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a large number <strong>of</strong> bootstrap samples and estimat<strong>in</strong>g c-hat by divid<strong>in</strong>g the observed<br />

deviance by the mean <strong>of</strong> the deviances from these samples. We suggest that<br />

this procedure should be made conditional, <strong>in</strong> the sense that we only consider bootstrap<br />

samples with the same m<strong>in</strong>imal sufficient statistics as the orig<strong>in</strong>al data. We present<br />

the results <strong>of</strong> a simulation <strong>study</strong> compar<strong>in</strong>g the conditional and unconditional<br />

bootstrap procedures, focuss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> particular on the coverage rates <strong>of</strong> confidence <strong>in</strong>tervals<br />

for survival rates obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g the correspond<strong>in</strong>g value <strong>of</strong> c-hat.<br />

What is the significance <strong>of</strong> the F parameter <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed models <strong>of</strong> live and dead encounters:<br />

site fidelity, colour-r<strong>in</strong>g retention or correction for heterogeneity?<br />

Morten Frederiksen<br />

In the framework <strong>of</strong> the comb<strong>in</strong>ed model <strong>of</strong> live and dead encounters <strong>of</strong> <strong>marked</strong> animals<br />

developed by Burnham (1993), the parameter denoted F is def<strong>in</strong>ed as an esti-<br />

46


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

mate <strong>of</strong> fidelity to the <strong>study</strong> area. It is obvious that if live encounters concern colour<strong>marked</strong><br />

<strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> observed at a distance, whereas dead encounters occur irrespective<br />

<strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> a colour-r<strong>in</strong>g, F will estimate the compound probability <strong>of</strong> reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

the colour marker and rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>study</strong> area. However, <strong>in</strong> many<br />

studies <strong>of</strong> this type, e.g. <strong>of</strong> geese, resight<strong>in</strong>g probability will not be homogeneous<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>study</strong> area, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> sometimes pronounced resight<strong>in</strong>g heterogeneity. If<br />

some animals show fidelity to locations where they are unlikely to be observed, this<br />

heterogeneity takes the form <strong>of</strong> “trap-dependence”, which <strong>in</strong> pure live-encounter<br />

studies can cause negative bias <strong>in</strong> estimated survival. How does resight<strong>in</strong>g heterogeneity<br />

affect survival estimates under Burnham’s comb<strong>in</strong>ed model? Through a simulation<br />

<strong>study</strong> I showed that as long as dead encounters occur <strong>in</strong>dependently <strong>of</strong> how<br />

likely an <strong>in</strong>dividual is to be observed alive, Burnham’s model provides unbiased estimates<br />

<strong>of</strong> survival. Even <strong>in</strong> simulations with no permanent emigration from the <strong>study</strong><br />

area, F is estimated as less than 1 if resight<strong>in</strong>gs are heterogeneous. This means that<br />

whenever resight<strong>in</strong>g heterogeneity occurs <strong>in</strong> a <strong>study</strong> population, the F parameter becomes<br />

very difficult to <strong>in</strong>terpret and should probably most <strong>of</strong>ten be regarded as a correction<br />

factor which allows unbiased estimation <strong>of</strong> survival.<br />

Estimat<strong>in</strong>g true age-dependence <strong>in</strong> survival from long-lived birds only resighted as<br />

adults<br />

Morten Frederiksen, Michael P. Harris & Sarah Wanless<br />

In many long-lived birds with delayed recruitment, such as most seabirds, most <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

on survival comes from adult breeders. Pre-breeders are <strong>of</strong>ten more or less<br />

unobservable, and even though a proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>marked</strong> adults may have been<br />

<strong>marked</strong> as chicks and therefore be <strong>of</strong> known age, the estimation <strong>of</strong> age-specific survival<br />

is complicated by the absence <strong>of</strong> observations dur<strong>in</strong>g the first years <strong>of</strong> life. As a<br />

result, many published studies have used “time s<strong>in</strong>ce first observation as breeder” as<br />

a surrogate for true age, mak<strong>in</strong>g tests for e.g. senescent decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> survival less<br />

powerful. New developments <strong>in</strong> MARK now allow modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> agedependence <strong>in</strong><br />

survival through an automatically updated <strong>in</strong>dividual covariate, thus obviat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

need for modell<strong>in</strong>g the capture history between r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g as chick and first observation<br />

as breeder. We used this powerful approach to model age-dependence <strong>in</strong> survival <strong>of</strong><br />

black-legged kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla at a North Sea colony. Although only 69<br />

breeders were <strong>of</strong> known age (out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 471 colour-r<strong>in</strong>ged adults), there was<br />

strong evidence for a quadratic relationship between true age and survival, with an<br />

<strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>crease followed by a pronounced decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> old age. In contrast, an analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the complete data set us<strong>in</strong>g “time s<strong>in</strong>ce first observation as breeder” as a surrogate<br />

showed a l<strong>in</strong>ear decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> survival with this parameter. We believe that this simple<br />

but powerful approach could be implemented for many long-lived species and could<br />

provide improved estimates <strong>of</strong> how survival changes with age, a central theme <strong>in</strong> life<br />

history theory.<br />

Population dynamics <strong>of</strong> Starl<strong>in</strong>gs Sturnus vulgaris breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong>: an <strong>in</strong>tegratedanalysis<br />

S.N. Freeman, R.A.Rob<strong>in</strong>son, J.A.Clark, B.M.Griff<strong>in</strong>, S.Y.Adams & S.R.Baillie<br />

We describe a population model fitted to census data on the Starl<strong>in</strong>g at UK Common<br />

Birds Census (CBC) plots <strong>in</strong> 1965-2000. <strong>The</strong> demographic features <strong>of</strong> the model<br />

(survival and components <strong>of</strong> productivity) are calculated beforehand from national<br />

r<strong>in</strong>g-recoveries and nest record data. In the most general form <strong>of</strong> the model, all parameters<br />

are assumed to vary between years, and survival rates <strong>of</strong> first-year and<br />

older birds are permitted to differ. We fit the model not to a s<strong>in</strong>gle population <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

47


Poster abstracts<br />

derived from the CBC data, as has been done <strong>in</strong> earlier Integrated Population Analyses<br />

<strong>of</strong> complete sets <strong>of</strong> CBC data, but to the site-based CBC counts themselves, thus<br />

better account<strong>in</strong>g for sampl<strong>in</strong>g covariances <strong>of</strong> annual abundance <strong>in</strong>dices. Counts are<br />

assumed Poisson distributed, with expected values determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the population<br />

model. Parameters are estimated by maximum likelihood and the method is readily<br />

applied via any Generalized L<strong>in</strong>ear Modell<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>of</strong>tware. By remov<strong>in</strong>g temporal fluctuations<br />

<strong>in</strong> demographic model parameters <strong>in</strong> turn, we attempt to identify which <strong>of</strong><br />

them have the most pr<strong>of</strong>ound <strong>in</strong>fluence upon changes <strong>in</strong> abundance for this species<br />

<strong>of</strong> conservation concern. It is shown that changes <strong>in</strong> mortality rates <strong>of</strong> first-year birds<br />

have probably been the major cause <strong>of</strong> the substantial national decl<strong>in</strong>e witnessed<br />

over this period. A regional population model however – the first constructed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

CBC data for any species – suggest a greater role for adult mortality <strong>in</strong> the largely arable<br />

Eastern region, the species’ UK stronghold. Population trends were similar <strong>in</strong><br />

Northern and Western Brita<strong>in</strong>, where farm<strong>in</strong>g is largely pastoral, and <strong>in</strong> each case<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> first-year survival rema<strong>in</strong> the best candidate to expla<strong>in</strong> the population<br />

changes. This difference might reflect differences <strong>in</strong> habitat availability and juvenile<br />

dispersal.<br />

Generalized Least Square Estimators for Arnason-Schwarz Capture-Recapture Models<br />

Olivier Gimenez, Rémi Choquet & Jean-Dom<strong>in</strong>ique Lebreton<br />

In the analysis <strong>of</strong> multistate capture-recapture data (Williams et al., 2002, section<br />

17.3; Lebreton and Pradel, 2003), Maximum Likelihood Estimates (Maximum Likelihood<br />

Estimates/Estimators, MLEs) are obta<strong>in</strong>ed by m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the deviance. Most<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten, iterative algorithms (Newton or Quasi-Newton methods; e.g., Dennis and<br />

Schnabel, 1983, sections 5 and 6) have to be used. Unfortunately, the success <strong>of</strong> this<br />

type <strong>of</strong> algorithm <strong>in</strong> reach<strong>in</strong>g MLEs is frequently hampered by the presence <strong>of</strong> local<br />

m<strong>in</strong>ima and/or saddle po<strong>in</strong>ts (Lebreton and Pradel, 2003). We propose to provide<br />

classical optimization algorithms with <strong>in</strong>itial values that are “good” <strong>in</strong> the sense that<br />

they belong to the attraction region <strong>of</strong> the global m<strong>in</strong>imum, <strong>in</strong> order to speed up and<br />

ensure the convergence towards the global m<strong>in</strong>imum (Dennis and Schnabel, 1983).<br />

To this aim, we considered first a saturated parameterization <strong>of</strong> the JMV capturerecapture<br />

model (Brownie et al., 1993), a simple generalization <strong>of</strong> the Arnason-<br />

Schwarz model, <strong>in</strong>spired by the r<strong>in</strong>g-recovery models (Schwarz et al., 1993). Us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the Generalized Least Squares theory (e.g., Rao, 1973, section 4i.4), we derived explicit<br />

estimates (Generalized Least Squares Estimates/Estimators, GLSEs) for the Arnason-Schwarz<br />

and other related models derived from our saturated model by l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts, that are asymptotically equivalent to MLEs EURING 2003 – Poster Session<br />

7 (Gimenez, 2003). To illustrate our approach, GLSEs and MLEs were derived<br />

on a real example about the reproductive status <strong>of</strong> Sooty shearwaters (Sc<strong>of</strong>ield et al.,<br />

2001). We then performed a general evaluation <strong>of</strong> the relative merits <strong>of</strong> GLSEs <strong>in</strong> two<br />

steps: 1) based on relative bias, relative efficiency and mean square error, we performed<br />

a sequence <strong>of</strong> simulations <strong>in</strong> order to compare GLSEs and MLEs for f<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

sample size data sets; 2) based on six data sets from the literature, we compared the<br />

quality and the speed <strong>of</strong> convergence when <strong>in</strong>itial values are a) the GLSEs for the<br />

model considered, b) default <strong>in</strong>itial values <strong>in</strong> MSURGE (Choquet et al., 2003) and<br />

MARK (White and Burnham, 1999) and c) random numbers distributed uniformly over<br />

the acceptable <strong>in</strong>terval for each parameter. Although our approach - when it is used<br />

to get po<strong>in</strong>t estimates - seems to be overcome by the MLE, particularly <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

precision, we advocate the use <strong>of</strong> GLSE as <strong>in</strong>itial values s<strong>in</strong>ce, regard<strong>in</strong>g the examples<br />

we deal with, its direct computation speeds up and guarantees the convergence<br />

to the global m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>of</strong> the deviance.<br />

48


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Estimat<strong>in</strong>g albatross survival: deal<strong>in</strong>g with unobservable states<br />

Christ<strong>in</strong>e M. Hunter & Hal Caswell<br />

Survival estimation for <strong>in</strong>termittently-breed<strong>in</strong>g seabirds has previously been problematic<br />

because mark-recapture methods could not account for the unobservability <strong>of</strong><br />

non-breed<strong>in</strong>g adults. New methods us<strong>in</strong>g multi-state mark-recapture frameworks<br />

have been proposed by Fujiwara and Caswell (2002) and Kendall and Nichols (2002)<br />

to deal with unobservable states. <strong>The</strong> estimability <strong>of</strong> relevant parameters for these<br />

models requires either extra <strong>in</strong>formation (e.g. by use <strong>of</strong> Pollock’s robust design) or<br />

model constra<strong>in</strong>ts (e.g. time constancy) and has been <strong>in</strong>vestigated for a number <strong>of</strong><br />

simple model structures. Here we exam<strong>in</strong>e a series <strong>of</strong> more complicated models that<br />

differ <strong>in</strong> the distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter-breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervals and that dist<strong>in</strong>guish between successful<br />

and failed breeders. For each model we determ<strong>in</strong>e sets <strong>of</strong> assumptions sufficient<br />

to make the relevant parameters estimable. Estimability <strong>of</strong> parameters for these<br />

models is <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest for many albatross species because the length <strong>of</strong> time they rema<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> the unobservable non-breed<strong>in</strong>g state depends on the outcome <strong>of</strong> the last<br />

breed<strong>in</strong>g attempt. We will identify a series <strong>of</strong> models applicable to estimat<strong>in</strong>g adult<br />

survival probability and <strong>in</strong>ter-breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervals for Wander<strong>in</strong>g Albatross (Diomedea<br />

exulans).<br />

Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the chick survival <strong>of</strong> colour r<strong>in</strong>ged gulls<br />

Risto Juvaste & Jari Valkama<br />

We present a method to estimate the chick survival <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividually colour r<strong>in</strong>ged gulls.<br />

It is based on large scale colour r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Herr<strong>in</strong>g Gulls (Larus argentatus) (HG) and<br />

Lesser Black-backed Gulls (Larus fuscus) (LBBG) <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land dur<strong>in</strong>g 1993-2000. Altogether<br />

7,636 chicks <strong>of</strong> Herr<strong>in</strong>g Gulls and 6,045 chicks <strong>of</strong> Lesser Black-backed Gulls<br />

were r<strong>in</strong>ged with <strong>in</strong>dividually coded colour r<strong>in</strong>gs (cr). By 14 February 2003, there were<br />

42,646 sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> 4,342 HG <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> (57%) and 21,827 sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> 1,669 LBBG<br />

<strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> (27%) <strong>in</strong> the database <strong>of</strong> Hels<strong>in</strong>ki R<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g Centre. Because most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

birds were aged dur<strong>in</strong>g r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g by measur<strong>in</strong>g the w<strong>in</strong>g length, the estimate for survival<br />

after r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g can be calculated from classified EURING 2003 – Poster Session 8 percentages<br />

<strong>of</strong> total sight<strong>in</strong>gs. <strong>The</strong> method has been tested with HG and LBBG populations<br />

<strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land. It was found that due to the high percentage <strong>of</strong> cr-sight<strong>in</strong>gs, the survival<br />

<strong>of</strong> HG chicks can be estimated even <strong>in</strong> small populations. An example is a cohort<br />

<strong>of</strong> 178 chicks r<strong>in</strong>ged near Lappeenranta (SE F<strong>in</strong>land), w<strong>in</strong>gs 55 mm-335 mm,<br />

median 200 mm. Altogether there are 370 sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> 72 <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> from these birds.<br />

By simple analysis <strong>of</strong> cr-sight<strong>in</strong>gs based on l<strong>in</strong>ear regression we estimated that about<br />

125 chicks fledged. <strong>The</strong> survival <strong>of</strong> chicks dur<strong>in</strong>g the last 3- 4 weeks before fledg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

was about 50%. By use <strong>of</strong> population analysis (Popan5/Jolly- Seber/full/birth) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sight<strong>in</strong>g data (57 sight<strong>in</strong>gs/37 gulls) from a nearby dump it was estimated that 104 <strong>of</strong><br />

the fledged birds (83%) came to the dump. Estimate is however rough. Based on the<br />

yearly sight<strong>in</strong>gs we estimate that 24 birds (SD=5.2) were still alive <strong>in</strong> the year 2001<br />

(Popan5/Jolly-Seber/dead only). In a similar analysis <strong>of</strong> LBBG-chicks r<strong>in</strong>ged at F<strong>in</strong>nish<br />

lakes dur<strong>in</strong>g years 1993-2000 (n=3,457) there was an unexpected decrease <strong>in</strong><br />

survival <strong>in</strong> the group <strong>of</strong> nearly fledged chicks. <strong>The</strong> average survival decreased nearly<br />

10% from the group 250-300 mm to the group 300-380 mm. <strong>The</strong> percentages <strong>of</strong><br />

sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> these groups were 54% and 45% (χ2=5,9 df=1 P=0.015 n=940). <strong>The</strong> reason<br />

for this decrease, which is aga<strong>in</strong>st the expected trend and found <strong>in</strong> all year cohorts,<br />

will be studied by analys<strong>in</strong>g the sub-cohorts, us<strong>in</strong>g both resight<strong>in</strong>gs and recoveries<br />

<strong>of</strong> metal r<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

49


Poster abstracts<br />

Estimat<strong>in</strong>g population sizes <strong>of</strong> Herr<strong>in</strong>g Gulls at Joensuu dump by mark-resight<strong>in</strong>g<br />

data<br />

Risto Juvaste<br />

<strong>The</strong> populations <strong>of</strong> Herr<strong>in</strong>g Gulls (Larus argentatus) at the rubbish dump <strong>of</strong> Joensuu<br />

were studied by population analysis based on mark-resight<strong>in</strong>g data <strong>of</strong> 5,624 daysight<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>of</strong> 657 colour-r<strong>in</strong>ged Herr<strong>in</strong>g Gull <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> <strong>in</strong> the year 2000. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

breed<strong>in</strong>g season the total weekly numbers <strong>of</strong> gull <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> visit<strong>in</strong>g the dump were<br />

almost ten times higher than the maximum numbers <strong>of</strong> gulls seen present at any one<br />

time. <strong>The</strong> peak estimate at the end <strong>of</strong> April was over 12,000 <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> <strong>in</strong> a week<br />

(Popan5/Jolly-Seber/full). <strong>The</strong> counts <strong>of</strong> the birds present at the dump showed maximum<br />

numbers <strong>in</strong> October, when 2,000 Herr<strong>in</strong>g Gulls were seen at a time. However,<br />

the estimate for that week was only about 3,000 <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>. <strong>The</strong> total number <strong>of</strong> Herr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Gulls visit<strong>in</strong>g the Joensuu dump dur<strong>in</strong>g the year 2000 was estimated to have<br />

been over 20,000 birds. In addition, the residence times and the tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> migration <strong>of</strong><br />

different age groups and sub-populations <strong>of</strong> Herr<strong>in</strong>g Gulls were studied. <strong>The</strong> results<br />

have been used <strong>in</strong> the management <strong>of</strong> gulls at the dumps. <strong>The</strong> population dynamics<br />

<strong>of</strong> Herr<strong>in</strong>g Gulls at the Joensuu dump will be analysed more thoroughly by us<strong>in</strong>g neural<br />

comput<strong>in</strong>g to analyse over 50,000 cr-sight<strong>in</strong>gs from the years 1997 - 2003.<br />

First use <strong>of</strong> a capture-recapture model for savannah tree demographics<br />

G. Lahoreau, J. Gignoux & R. Julliard<br />

Fire and graz<strong>in</strong>g are the major determ<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>of</strong> the dynamic equilibrium between trees<br />

and grasses <strong>in</strong> African savannas. But the impact <strong>of</strong> fire on tree mortality is poorly understood.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Lamto research station <strong>in</strong> central Ivory Coast provides a model system<br />

to <strong>study</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> fire given the relative absence <strong>of</strong> large herbivores. S<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

1962, burn<strong>in</strong>gs have also been carried out every January, at the height <strong>of</strong> the dry<br />

season. From 1991 to 1994, demographic censuses <strong>of</strong> trees were conducted every<br />

June and December. All <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g seedl<strong>in</strong>gs) were tagged and mapped.<br />

<strong>The</strong> status <strong>of</strong> some <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>, particularly small ones, was sometimes EURING<br />

2003 – Poster Session 9 unknown because: (i) 10cm-high seedl<strong>in</strong>gs can be difficult to<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> grass layers that <strong>of</strong>ten exceed 2m at the end <strong>of</strong> the wet season; (ii) <strong>in</strong> December,<br />

some <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> have already shed their leaves, mak<strong>in</strong>g it impossible to judge<br />

their viability. As estimated survival rates derived only from the number <strong>of</strong> known survivors<br />

could cause bias (Lebreton, 1992), we attempted to reanalyse the data us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

capture-recapture models. We used the 1993 Burnham model and MARK s<strong>of</strong>tware to<br />

estimate age/time-dependent survival <strong>of</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> n<strong>in</strong>e tree species. Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

results showed up to a 4-fold <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> mortality for one-year seedl<strong>in</strong>gs dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

dry season, presumably due to fire, with significant differences between species. <strong>The</strong><br />

use <strong>of</strong> capture-recapture models, common used <strong>in</strong> animal populations, appears very<br />

promis<strong>in</strong>g to analyse this plant ecosystem.<br />

Decompos<strong>in</strong>g population growth rate: importance <strong>of</strong> adult survival, local recruitment<br />

and immigration <strong>in</strong> Willow Tits Parus montanus<br />

Satu Lampila, Markku Orell, Eduardo Belda & Kari Koivula<br />

We studied population growth rate and its components (adult survival, local juvenile<br />

survival and immigration) <strong>in</strong> Willow Tit <strong>in</strong> Northern F<strong>in</strong>land. We used capturerecapture<br />

modell<strong>in</strong>g to achieve unbiased estimates <strong>of</strong> the population parameters and<br />

a components <strong>of</strong> variation analysis to partition sampl<strong>in</strong>g variation from process variation.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the 12-year <strong>study</strong> from 1991 to 2002 the population growth rate (λ) was<br />

close to one with considerable variation ( x = 0.99, coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation, CV = 0.20).<br />

50


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Population projections, consider<strong>in</strong>g time spans <strong>of</strong> vary<strong>in</strong>g lengths, imply that if conditions<br />

rema<strong>in</strong> as present the population is most likely decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g; i.e. the impact <strong>of</strong> large<br />

variation. We used multi-strata models to uncover the relative contributions <strong>of</strong> the vital<br />

rates to λ. Adult survival had the highest contribution to the population growth rate<br />

and it was also the least variable trait studied ( x = 0.59, CV = 0.067). Partition<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

total recruitment <strong>in</strong>to local juveniles and immigrants revealed that the highest contribution<br />

to the variation <strong>in</strong> λ was due to local juveniles. Indeed, the local juvenile survival<br />

was the most variable <strong>of</strong> the studied traits ( x = 0.06, CV = 0.61). Survival <strong>of</strong> willow<br />

tits after establish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the breed<strong>in</strong>g population show low temporal variation and<br />

sets the relative lower limit for population change. Thus we argue that variation <strong>in</strong> local<br />

recruitment determ<strong>in</strong>es the variation <strong>in</strong> λ above its relative magnitude set by adult<br />

survival. We implemented a set <strong>of</strong> a priori hypotheses to test if environmental factors<br />

expla<strong>in</strong> the observed temporal process variation <strong>in</strong> the vital rates. Models suggested<br />

that adult survival was positively affected by p<strong>in</strong>e cone abundance. However, we<br />

cannot rule out the possibility that p<strong>in</strong>e cone abundance is correlated with other<br />

source <strong>of</strong> food such as <strong>in</strong>vertebrates that is <strong>in</strong>tensely hoarded for the upcom<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>ter.<br />

For juvenile survival and immigration p<strong>in</strong>e cone abundance did not expla<strong>in</strong> the<br />

temporal variation.<br />

Long-term <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> a k<strong>in</strong>g pengu<strong>in</strong> population us<strong>in</strong>g an automatic identification system<br />

C. Le Bohec, M. Gauthier-Clerc, J.-P. Gendner, N. Chatela<strong>in</strong> & Y. Le Maho<br />

Birds microtagged with transponders under the sk<strong>in</strong> can be identified for life and detection<br />

antennas allow the automatic identification <strong>of</strong> the birds with m<strong>in</strong>imal human<br />

disturbance and presence <strong>in</strong> the field. <strong>The</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g pengu<strong>in</strong> cycle is unusual because it<br />

lasts more than one year and birds are not synchronised <strong>in</strong> their cycle. In addition,<br />

birds that failed <strong>in</strong> their reproduction still frequent the colony throughout the year. We<br />

have employed an automatic identification setup EURING 2003 – Poster Session 10<br />

for the detection <strong>of</strong> the passage <strong>of</strong> free-liv<strong>in</strong>g microtagged k<strong>in</strong>g pengu<strong>in</strong>s at Possession<br />

Island (46°25'S, 51°45'E), Crozet Archipelago. A breed<strong>in</strong>g area with about<br />

10,000 pairs is connected to the sea by three natural pathways, where antennas for<br />

bird identification were <strong>in</strong>stalled. From February 1998, 900 breed<strong>in</strong>g adults and 1600<br />

one-year old chicks were fitted with transponders without any external marks. Cohorts<br />

<strong>of</strong> chicks will be implanted with transponders each year. This system allows estimation<br />

and comparison among years <strong>of</strong> variables such as arrival date for courtship, forag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

trip duration at sea dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cubation, brood<strong>in</strong>g and w<strong>in</strong>ter periods, feed<strong>in</strong>g frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> chicks, duration <strong>of</strong> chick rear<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>terannual return rates <strong>of</strong> adults and immatures<br />

and reproductive success. Additional studies allow determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> variation<br />

<strong>in</strong> body condition <strong>of</strong> adults, <strong>of</strong> tick parasitism and predation <strong>in</strong> relation to year and bird<br />

location <strong>in</strong> the colony. <strong>The</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> this long-term population <strong>study</strong> is to determ<strong>in</strong>e the<br />

reproductive strategy <strong>of</strong> these long-lived birds and the effects <strong>of</strong> age and climatic<br />

changes on their breed<strong>in</strong>g performance.<br />

AD Model Builder: A tool for fitt<strong>in</strong>g custom built highly parameterized nonl<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

models<br />

Mark Maunder<br />

AD Model Builder (ADMB, Otter Research, http://otter-rsch.com/admodel.htm) is becom<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the predom<strong>in</strong>ant programm<strong>in</strong>g environment for produc<strong>in</strong>g complex, highlyparameterized<br />

fisheries stock assessment models. It has been used to fit complex<br />

nonl<strong>in</strong>ear models with thousands <strong>of</strong> parameters simultaneously to multiple types <strong>of</strong><br />

data and to fit nonl<strong>in</strong>ear models with fewer parameters to hundreds <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong><br />

51


Poster abstracts<br />

data po<strong>in</strong>ts. ADMB is the comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> a code template and a set <strong>of</strong> libraries for<br />

C++. <strong>The</strong> code template and specific ADMB keywords reduce the amount <strong>of</strong> cod<strong>in</strong>g<br />

needed to implement a model. <strong>The</strong> C++ libraries supply a set <strong>of</strong> rout<strong>in</strong>es that are<br />

used to fit models to data. <strong>The</strong> features <strong>of</strong> ADMB <strong>in</strong>clude an efficient function m<strong>in</strong>imizer,<br />

a MCMC algorithm for Bayesian <strong>in</strong>tegration, matrix algebra, automated likelihood<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles, parallel process<strong>in</strong>g, and random effects parameters. ADMB uses automatic<br />

differentiation for exact derivatives, which makes the m<strong>in</strong>imization procedure<br />

more efficient and stable than other packages that use f<strong>in</strong>ite difference approximation.<br />

ADMB provides a flexible stepwise process to sequentially estimate the parameters,<br />

and allows the plac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> bounds on all estimated parameters that restrict the range <strong>of</strong><br />

possible parameter values. <strong>The</strong> MCMC algorithm implemented <strong>in</strong> ADMB has jump<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rules that are based on the variancecovariance estimates at the mode <strong>of</strong> the posterior<br />

distribution and starts at the mode <strong>of</strong> that distribution, which makes the algorithm<br />

more efficient (i.e. reduces the burn-<strong>in</strong> time). Randomeffect parameters are implemented<br />

with Laplace’s approximation with automatic second derivatives. All the underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

code used to def<strong>in</strong>e the model and objective function is coded <strong>in</strong> C++ (ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

C). <strong>The</strong>refore, ADMB is very flexible, and is useful for custom-built models. ADMB <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

parallel process<strong>in</strong>g to make computationally <strong>in</strong>tense models more practical.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> log-l<strong>in</strong>ear models to analyse habitat selection <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividually <strong>marked</strong> song<br />

thrushes Turdus philomelos<br />

Will J. Peach<br />

Understand<strong>in</strong>g habitat utilisation and selection patterns at different scales cont<strong>in</strong>ues<br />

to be a fundamental objective <strong>of</strong> many applied biologists. Compositional analysis<br />

(Aebischer et al., 1993, Ecology 74, 131-1325) is now widely used but can be problematic<br />

to implement when habitats are not available with<strong>in</strong> some home ranges. Logl<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

models <strong>of</strong>fer great flexibility <strong>in</strong> EURING 2003 – Poster Session 11 analys<strong>in</strong>g<br />

habitat selection data and test<strong>in</strong>g covariate effects (Manley et al. 1993, Resource<br />

Selection by Animals. Chapman & Hall; Green et al. 2000, J. Zool. 250, 161-184) but<br />

have not been widely adopted by biologists. Here I use log-l<strong>in</strong>ear models to analyse<br />

habitat selection patterns <strong>of</strong> radio-tagged song thrushes Turdus philomelos, a species<br />

that is red-listed <strong>in</strong> the UK follow<strong>in</strong>g a population decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> approximately 70%.<br />

Thrushes were located dur<strong>in</strong>g two successive breed<strong>in</strong>g seasons <strong>in</strong> two farmland<br />

populations – one stable and one rapidly decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Four thousand fixes were available<br />

from 86 tagged <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong>. We used log-l<strong>in</strong>ear models to analyse variation <strong>in</strong> fix<br />

density across habitats. <strong>The</strong> model accounted for differences <strong>in</strong> rang<strong>in</strong>g behaviour<br />

between nest<strong>in</strong>g and non-nest<strong>in</strong>g periods and <strong>in</strong> the numbers <strong>of</strong> available fixes per<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual. It also tested the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> potential covariates on the pattern<br />

<strong>of</strong> fix density <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g tag attachment method, year, season, landscape and <strong>study</strong><br />

area. Randomisation tests <strong>in</strong> which the <strong>in</strong>dividual bird was the unit <strong>of</strong> replication were<br />

used to assess statistical significance. Fix density varied significantly across habitats<br />

but not between <strong>study</strong> areas or any <strong>of</strong> the other covariates. Large differences <strong>in</strong><br />

habitat utilisation between <strong>study</strong> areas ma<strong>in</strong>ly reflect differences <strong>in</strong> habitat availability.<br />

Numerical problems arose when there are no fixes <strong>in</strong> one covariate level. Log-l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

models provide an efficient and flexible means <strong>of</strong> analys<strong>in</strong>g habitat selection data.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a press<strong>in</strong>g need to compare the performance <strong>of</strong> compositional analysis and<br />

log-l<strong>in</strong>ear models, and to develop user-friendly s<strong>of</strong>tware that <strong>in</strong>cludes randomisation<br />

significance test<strong>in</strong>g and the test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> covariate effects.<br />

52


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Demographic mechanisms <strong>of</strong> the population decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the song thrush Turdus<br />

philomelos <strong>in</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong><br />

R A Rob<strong>in</strong>son, R E Green, S R Baillie & W J Peach<br />

In Brita<strong>in</strong>, the song thrush Turdus philomelos is categorized as a species <strong>of</strong> high national<br />

conservation concern because <strong>of</strong> a large population decl<strong>in</strong>e dur<strong>in</strong>g the last<br />

three decades. We used survey data to calculate a series <strong>of</strong> annual national population<br />

estimates for woodland and farmland habitats comb<strong>in</strong>ed for the period 1964-<br />

2000. We then used turn<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts analysis to identify seven blocks <strong>of</strong> years with<strong>in</strong><br />

the period <strong>of</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e (1968-2000) with uniform rates <strong>of</strong> population change <strong>in</strong> the<br />

smoothed trend. Six <strong>of</strong> the seven blocks showed decl<strong>in</strong>es. We used recoveries <strong>of</strong><br />

song thrushes r<strong>in</strong>ged by participants <strong>in</strong> the national r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g scheme as nestl<strong>in</strong>gs, juveniles<br />

and adults <strong>in</strong> April-September to estimate survival rates and modeled survival<br />

rates separately for the post-fledg<strong>in</strong>g period, the rema<strong>in</strong>der <strong>of</strong> the first year and for<br />

adults. Daily survival probability was much lower dur<strong>in</strong>g the post-fledg<strong>in</strong>g period than<br />

<strong>in</strong> the rema<strong>in</strong>der <strong>of</strong> the first year or for older birds. <strong>The</strong>re was evidence <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>in</strong><br />

survival rates among blocks <strong>of</strong> years with different rates <strong>of</strong> population change and <strong>in</strong><br />

particular for first year survival. <strong>The</strong>re were significant positive correlations across<br />

blocks between mean population multiplication rate and both post fledg<strong>in</strong>g and first<br />

year survival. <strong>The</strong> demographic mechanism underly<strong>in</strong>g the song thrush population<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>e appears to be changes <strong>in</strong> survival <strong>in</strong> the first year and perhaps also the postfledg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

period. <strong>The</strong> environmental causes <strong>of</strong> these changes <strong>in</strong> survival are not<br />

known. Adverse weather conditions contributed, but were not sufficient on their own.<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g practice, land dra<strong>in</strong>age, pesticides and changes <strong>in</strong> predator numbers<br />

are all candidates.<br />

Estimat<strong>in</strong>g demographic contributions to population growth and decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> a<br />

salamander: a multistate model with a unobservable state<br />

Benedikt R. Schmidt, Ra<strong>in</strong>er Feldmann & Michael Schaub<br />

Amphibian populations are decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g worldwide. <strong>The</strong> reasons for the decl<strong>in</strong>es and the<br />

factors that govern population dynamics are poorly understood. Efficient conservation<br />

action requires that we understand which stage(s) <strong>in</strong> the complex life cycle contribute<br />

most to population growth (or decl<strong>in</strong>e) and which stage(s) are most sensitive to environmental<br />

change. Here, we <strong>study</strong> the demography <strong>of</strong> a stationary and a decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

population (based on unadjusted counts) <strong>of</strong> the salamander Salamandra salamandra,<br />

and assess whether an observed decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> one population is due to a change <strong>in</strong> recruitment<br />

or adult survival. <strong>The</strong> two populations were studied for c. 20 years and all<br />

salamanders were known <strong>in</strong>dividually. We use a multistate capture-mark-recapture<br />

model with an unobservable state to estimate both recruitment and adult survival<br />

probabilities. Our analysis shows constant adult survival <strong>in</strong> the stationary population,<br />

and decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g adult survival and constant recruitment <strong>in</strong> the decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g population. <strong>The</strong><br />

analysis also shows that the population growth rate <strong>of</strong> the decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g population was<br />

not only negative but also steadily decreas<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> results suggest that the population<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>e is due to a change <strong>in</strong> adult survival, which was probably caused by a change<br />

<strong>in</strong> forest management. Our results provide a counterexample to the usual paradigm <strong>in</strong><br />

amphibian population <strong>ecology</strong>, which states that population growth is determ<strong>in</strong>ed at<br />

the larval stage. Our analysis also highlights the value <strong>of</strong> capture-mark-recapture<br />

analysis for understand<strong>in</strong>g population dynamics and decl<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

53


Poster abstracts<br />

Toll-free bands and erroneous report<strong>in</strong>g behavior: effects on survival estimation<br />

Joel A.Schmutz<br />

Previous simulation <strong>study</strong> by Anderson and Burnham (1980) exam<strong>in</strong>ed the bias <strong>in</strong><br />

survival estimation when there is a "delay" <strong>in</strong> the report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> bands - that is, report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bands with an erroneous and later recovery date than when they were truly recovered.<br />

<strong>The</strong>ir conclusion was that the bias was small and negligible compared to the<br />

precision <strong>of</strong> estimates. Recent analyses <strong>of</strong> band recovery data from Greater Whitefronted<br />

Geese suggest that bias may exceed 5%, and this large and biologically relevant<br />

level <strong>of</strong> bias may be exacerbated by the advent <strong>of</strong> band report<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g toll-free<br />

telephone numbers. Specifically, when analyz<strong>in</strong>g recoveries <strong>of</strong> birds banded dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1990-1995, estimated survival rates were approximately 5% greater when us<strong>in</strong>g recoveries<br />

through 2000 (a "non-triangular" data matrix, where years <strong>of</strong> recovery exceed<br />

years <strong>of</strong> band<strong>in</strong>g) than when us<strong>in</strong>g recoveries through 1995 (a "triangular" data<br />

matrix). Broad scale toll-free band report<strong>in</strong>g started <strong>in</strong> 1996, and I hypothesized that<br />

many previously recovered but unreported bands would now get reported by this new<br />

toll-free system, and importantly, that many would be reported with an <strong>in</strong>accurate year<br />

<strong>of</strong> recovery. Data simulations us<strong>in</strong>g hypothesized amounts <strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle and multi-year<br />

"delay" <strong>in</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g were able to replicate the results seen with the Greater Whitefronted<br />

Geese. Band recovery data from other waterfowl also demonstrated this pattern.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bias <strong>in</strong>duced by this report<strong>in</strong>g process is expected to be greater <strong>in</strong> nontriangular<br />

than <strong>in</strong> triangular data sets. Compar<strong>in</strong>g results from triangular vs. nontriangular<br />

data sets over a long time period will elucidate whether bias from this band report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

behavior is relegated just to the advent <strong>of</strong> toll-free band report<strong>in</strong>g or, alternatively,<br />

it has been a long term source <strong>of</strong> bias <strong>in</strong> band recovery data sets.<br />

On the use <strong>of</strong> Capture-Recapture data <strong>in</strong> parameteris<strong>in</strong>g a Population Viability<br />

Analysis model for the Bog Fritillary butterfly<br />

Nicolas Schtickzelle & Michel Baguette<br />

In the context <strong>of</strong> a species-based conservation strategy, Population Viability Analysis<br />

(PVA) is used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the habitat network configuration ensur<strong>in</strong>g the highest<br />

persistence <strong>of</strong> a species <strong>in</strong> a given landscape. Structured population models tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

local population dynamics <strong>in</strong>to account are effective tools for the conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

threatened species at the very end <strong>of</strong> the fragmentation process. Nevertheless, they<br />

require estimates <strong>of</strong> various parameters at the population level, which may be obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

from capture-recapture data. This poster details how Capture-Recapture data<br />

have been used to parameterise a PVA model designed for a viability analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Bog Fritillary butterfly (Proclossiana eunomia). <strong>The</strong> <strong>study</strong> system is a metapopulation<br />

located <strong>in</strong> a highly fragmented landscape <strong>in</strong> southern Belgium, where this butterfly is<br />

used as a surrogate species for wet meadow communities. This metapopulation consists<br />

<strong>of</strong> 20 suitable habitat patches spread on 6 km along the Lienne river. Daily<br />

Capture-Recapture data dur<strong>in</strong>g 10 generations provided <strong>in</strong>formation to estimate the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g parameters:<br />

• Survival, catchability, recruitment, daily and total (per generation) population size<br />

were obta<strong>in</strong>ed by live-recapture CJS and JS models, fitted us<strong>in</strong>g MARK (White &<br />

Burnham 1999) and POPAN (Arnason & Schwarz 1999) s<strong>of</strong>tware respectively. <strong>The</strong><br />

sequence <strong>of</strong> population sizes dur<strong>in</strong>g the 10 generations was used to derive estimates<br />

<strong>of</strong> density dependence parameters (maximum population growth rate and carry<strong>in</strong>g<br />

capacity) as well as the magnitude <strong>of</strong> environmental stochasticity (yearly variation <strong>of</strong><br />

population growth rate).<br />

54


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

• Dispersal parameters (emigration accord<strong>in</strong>g to patch area and dispersal probability<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to patch connectivity) were estimated us<strong>in</strong>g the Virtual Migration model<br />

(Hanski et al. 2000).<br />

• Spatial correlation <strong>of</strong> local population dynamics as a function <strong>of</strong> betweenpopulations<br />

distance was determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g yearly frequentation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual habitat<br />

patches by butterflies as reflected by number <strong>of</strong> captures.<br />

Demographic mechanisms <strong>of</strong> density dependence <strong>in</strong> Black Brant<br />

James S. Sed<strong>in</strong>ger<br />

Density dependence <strong>in</strong> long-lived vertebrates is typically manifested <strong>in</strong> reduced recruitment<br />

<strong>of</strong> young, while adult survival is preserved. <strong>The</strong> Black Brant population<br />

breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> western Alaska decl<strong>in</strong>ed substantially dur<strong>in</strong>g the late 1970s and early<br />

1980s. Coworkers and I have studied Black Brant breed<strong>in</strong>g at the Tutakoke River colony<br />

on the Ber<strong>in</strong>g Sea coast <strong>of</strong> Alaska s<strong>in</strong>ce 1984. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>study</strong> more than<br />

40,000 <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> have been <strong>marked</strong> with uniquely coded plastic leg bands. Us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

observations and captures <strong>of</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals</strong> on the breed<strong>in</strong>g colony, at other breed<strong>in</strong>g locations,<br />

and on w<strong>in</strong>ter<strong>in</strong>g estuaries <strong>in</strong> Mexico, we have monitored a number <strong>of</strong> demographic<br />

parameters as the population <strong>in</strong>creased to near historic levels. Consistent<br />

with general patterns for other long-lived vertebrates, adult survival did not decl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the period <strong>of</strong> population <strong>in</strong>crease. We detected no density-related effects on<br />

breed<strong>in</strong>g probability, based on robust design. Us<strong>in</strong>g a variant <strong>of</strong> Burnham models we<br />

did not detect any density-related variation <strong>in</strong> dispersal rates. Growth rates <strong>of</strong> young<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>ed dur<strong>in</strong>g population <strong>in</strong>crease, which was associated with decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> first-year<br />

survival. <strong>The</strong>re were additional density-related effects on survival, as evidenced by<br />

the fact that survival <strong>in</strong> more recent cohorts decl<strong>in</strong>ed more than would be expected<br />

based on gosl<strong>in</strong>g size alone. Overall, we found no change <strong>in</strong> adult survival or reproductive<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment by adults but we did f<strong>in</strong>d reduced recruitment at higher population<br />

densities.<br />

Relationships between landscape characteristics and duck nest<strong>in</strong>g success <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Missouri Coteau region <strong>of</strong> North Dakota<br />

Scott E. Stephens, Jay J. Rotella, Mark S. L<strong>in</strong>dberg, & Mark L. Taper<br />

For upland-nest<strong>in</strong>g dabbl<strong>in</strong>g ducks, nest<strong>in</strong>g success is the primary determ<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>of</strong><br />

population growth rates. As a result, a great deal <strong>of</strong> activity is focused on understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

factors related to nest<strong>in</strong>g success rates and most conservation programs<br />

seek to affect nest<strong>in</strong>g success rates. We developed models to understand and expla<strong>in</strong><br />

variation <strong>in</strong> nest<strong>in</strong>g success rates across a gradient <strong>of</strong> landscape types <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Missouri Coteau region <strong>of</strong> North Dakota. Ultimately, our goal was to develop statistical<br />

models that could be utilized <strong>in</strong> spatially explicit habitat models to guide strategic<br />

target<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> conservation programs across broad spatial scales. Dur<strong>in</strong>g 2000-2002,<br />

we collected data on the fates <strong>of</strong> over 5,000 duck nests from 18 <strong>study</strong> sites. We developed<br />

a priori models that represented various hypotheses about how landscape-,<br />

patch-, and nest-level habitat covariates <strong>in</strong>fluence nest survival. Because <strong>of</strong> the scaledependent<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> landscapescale metrics, we measured landscape covariates at 5<br />

spatial extents (i.e., 10.4, 23.3, 41.4, 64.7 and 93.2 square km). We also took advantage<br />

<strong>of</strong> variance components methods to estimate the amount <strong>of</strong> spatial process<br />

variation <strong>in</strong> nest<strong>in</strong>g success rates. Based on the results <strong>of</strong> our a priori models, we exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

a limited number <strong>of</strong> exploratory models. Our best models <strong>in</strong>cluded only landscape-level<br />

habitat covariates such as the amount <strong>of</strong> grassland, grassland edge and<br />

wetland density. Additionally, models that measured landscape metrics at multiple<br />

55


Poster abstracts<br />

spatial scales were dramatically better (∆AIC 32.3) than models that measured all<br />

landscape metrics at the same landscape scale. We estimate that the landscape covariates<br />

<strong>in</strong> our best model captured 90% <strong>of</strong> spatial process variation <strong>in</strong> nest<strong>in</strong>g success<br />

<strong>in</strong> our dataset. Thus, our statistical model looks to hold great utility for use <strong>in</strong><br />

spatially explicit landscape models to guide conservation programs. We suggest that<br />

avian researchers <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> relationships between demographic rates and habitat<br />

characteristics measure landscape variables at multiple landscape scales to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

which scales are most relevant.<br />

A unified framework for modell<strong>in</strong>g wildlife population dynamics<br />

Len Thomas, Stephen T. Buckland, Ken B. Newman & John Harwood<br />

We propose a unified framework for def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and fitt<strong>in</strong>g stochastic, discrete time, discrete<br />

stage population dynamics models. <strong>The</strong> biological system is described by a<br />

state-space model, where the true but unknown state <strong>of</strong> the population is modelled <strong>in</strong><br />

a state process, and this is l<strong>in</strong>ked to survey data by an observation process. All<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>puts, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty about model specification,<br />

are readily <strong>in</strong>corporated. We show how the state process can be represented as a<br />

generalization <strong>of</strong> the standard Leslie or Lefkovitch matrix. By divid<strong>in</strong>g the state process<br />

<strong>in</strong>to sub-processes, complex models can be easily constructed from manageable<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g blocks. We illustrate the approach with a model <strong>of</strong> the British grey seal metapopulation.<br />

We use Bayesian sequential importance sampl<strong>in</strong>g with kernel smooth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to fit the model.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>ile likelihood <strong>in</strong>tervals: a new feature <strong>of</strong> program MARK to solve a problem <strong>of</strong><br />

“standard theory”<br />

Gary C. White & Kenneth P. Burnham<br />

If the MLE <strong>of</strong> a parameter (such as a survival probability) lies on, or too near to, the<br />

boundary <strong>of</strong> a parameter space then what people are taught as large sample (i.e.,<br />

standard) frequentist theory for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g an estimated standard error and confidence<br />

<strong>in</strong>terval can fail abysmally. <strong>The</strong>re is for this situation a good non-Bayesian solution for<br />

obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a confidence <strong>in</strong>terval: the pr<strong>of</strong>ile likelihood <strong>in</strong>terval. We will give an explanation<br />

<strong>of</strong> this <strong>in</strong>terval; how it is computed <strong>in</strong> MARK will be noted. <strong>The</strong>re is also the Bayesian<br />

credibility <strong>in</strong>terval as a solution. Under a uniform prior on a probability parameter<br />

the two <strong>in</strong>tervals are very similar. We use the classical female blackkneed capsids<br />

data to give examples <strong>of</strong> different confidence <strong>in</strong>tervals for survival probabilities (S),<br />

with or without the constra<strong>in</strong>t S


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

List <strong>of</strong> participants<br />

Alisauskas Ray Canadian Wildlife Service<br />

Prairie and Northern Wildlife<br />

Research Centre<br />

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan<br />

Canada S7N 0X4<br />

Alpizar-Jara Russell Departamento de Matemática<br />

Universidade de Évora<br />

Rua Romao Ramalho 59<br />

7000-671 Évora, Portugal<br />

Arnason Neil Department <strong>of</strong> Computer Science<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Manitoba<br />

W<strong>in</strong>nipeg, R3T 2N2 Canada<br />

ray.alisauskas@ec.gc.ca<br />

alpizar@uevora.pt<br />

arnason@cs.umanitoba.ca<br />

Baillie Stephen BTO, <strong>The</strong> Nunnery<br />

<strong>The</strong>tford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK<br />

Bairle<strong>in</strong> Franz Institute <strong>of</strong> Avian Research<br />

'Vogelwarte Helgoland'<br />

An der Vogelwarte 21<br />

26386 Wilhelmshaven<br />

Barbraud Christophe Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de<br />

Chizé - CNRS<br />

79360 Villiers en Bois, France<br />

stephen.baillie@bto.org<br />

franz.bairle<strong>in</strong>@ifv.terramare.de<br />

barbraud@cebc.cnrs.fr<br />

Barker Richard University <strong>of</strong> Otago rbarker@maths.otago.ac.nz<br />

Belda Eduardo J. Universidad Politecnica de Valencia<br />

Ctra Nazaret-Oliva s/n 46730<br />

Ganida (Valencia) SPAIN<br />

ebelda@dca.upv.es<br />

Bomberger-Brown Mary University <strong>of</strong> Tulsa mary-brown@utulsa.edu<br />

Bonner Simon Department <strong>of</strong> Statistics and<br />

Actuarial Science<br />

Simon Fraser University<br />

8888 University Dr.<br />

Burnaby BC, V5A 1S6<br />

CANADA<br />

sbonner@stat.sfu.ca<br />

Brooks Steve Statistical Laboratory<br />

CMS<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge<br />

Wilberforce Road<br />

Cambridge CB3 0WB, UK<br />

steve@statslab.cam.ac.uk<br />

Brown Charles R. University <strong>of</strong> Tulsa charles-brown@utulsa.edu<br />

Burnham Kenneth P. USGS, Coop Units Program<br />

Colorado State University<br />

Fort Coll<strong>in</strong>s, CO 80523 USA<br />

kenb@Lamar.ColoState.edu<br />

Calvert Anna Universite Laval<br />

Quebec City, Canada<br />

anna.calvert@bio.ulaval.ca<br />

57


Participants<br />

Cam Emmanuelle Laboratoire Evolution et Diversite<br />

Biologique<br />

Universite Toulouse III, France<br />

58<br />

emmacam@cict.fr<br />

Caswell Hal Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst. hcaswell@whoi.edu<br />

Chernetsov Nikita Biological Station Rybachy<br />

Rybachy 238535, Kal<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>grad<br />

Region, Russia<br />

Nchernetsov@bioryb.koenig.su<br />

Choquet Rémi CEFE / CNRS<br />

1919 Route de Mende<br />

34 293 Montpellier cedex 5<br />

France<br />

Conroy Michael J. Georgia Cooperative Fish and<br />

Wildlife Research Unit<br />

University <strong>of</strong> georgia<br />

Athens GA 30607 USA<br />

Cooch Evan Department <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources<br />

Cornell University<br />

Ithaca, New York<br />

USA 14853<br />

Coppack Tim Institute for Avian Research "Vogelwarte<br />

Helgoland"<br />

Inselstation, D-27494 Helgoland<br />

Dhont André Cornell University<br />

159 Sapsucker Woods Road<br />

Ithaca, NY 14850, USA<br />

choquet@cefe.cnrs-mop.fr<br />

conroy@forestry.uga.edu<br />

evan.cooch@cornell.edu<br />

coppack@vogelwarte-helgoland.de<br />

aad4@cornell.edu<br />

Diefenbach Duane R. Pennsylvania Cooperative Fish drd11@psu.edu<br />

and Wildlife Research Unit<br />

D<strong>in</strong>smore Stephen J. Mississippi State University sd<strong>in</strong>smore@cfr.msstate.edu<br />

Doherty Paul Dept. Fishery and Wildlife Biology<br />

Colorado State University<br />

Fort Coll<strong>in</strong>s, CO 80523-1475<br />

doherty@cnr.colostate.edu<br />

Doligez Bland<strong>in</strong>e Dept. Of Evolutionary Ecology<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Bern<br />

Baltzerstrasse 6, CH-3012 Bern<br />

Switzerland<br />

Drake Kiel University <strong>of</strong> Saskatchewan<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biology<br />

112 Science Place<br />

Saskatoo, Saskatchewan<br />

Canada, S7N 5E2<br />

Drechsler Mart<strong>in</strong> UFZ-Centre for Environmental<br />

Research, Leipzig, Germany<br />

Ebb<strong>in</strong>ge Bart Centre for Ecosystem Studies<br />

Alterra, P.O. Box 47<br />

NL-6700 AA Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen<br />

<strong>The</strong> Netherlands<br />

bland<strong>in</strong>e.doligez@esh.unibe.ch<br />

kiel.drake@ec.gc.ca<br />

mart<strong>in</strong>d@oesa.ufz.de<br />

Bart.Ebb<strong>in</strong>ge@wur.nl


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Edwards Holly H. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation<br />

Commission<br />

111 Eighth Ave. SE<br />

St. Petersburg, FL 33701<br />

Efford Murray Landcare Research<br />

Private Bag 1930<br />

Duned<strong>in</strong>, New Zealand<br />

Ens Bruno Alterra-Texel<br />

P.O. Boix 167<br />

NL-1790 AD Den Burg (Texel)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Netherlands<br />

Fiedler Wolfgang Max Planck Research Centre for<br />

Ornithology<br />

Vogelwarte Radolfzell, Germany<br />

Fletcher David University <strong>of</strong> Otago<br />

Duned<strong>in</strong>,<br />

New Zealand<br />

Fonnesbeck Christopher Georgia Cooperative Fish & Wildlife<br />

Research Unit<br />

Warnell School <strong>of</strong> Forest<br />

Resources<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Georgia<br />

Athens, GA 30602<br />

Francis Charles Canadian Wildlife Service<br />

National Wildlife Research Centre<br />

Orrawa, Ontario, K1A 0H3<br />

Frederiksen Morten Centre for Ecology and Hydrology,<br />

Hill <strong>of</strong> Brathens<br />

Banchory, AB31 5SS, UK<br />

Gauthier Gilles Department <strong>of</strong> Biology and<br />

Centre d' études nordiques<br />

Université Laval<br />

Quèbec, Qc, Canada, G1K 7P4<br />

Gimenez Olivier CEFE / CNRS<br />

1919 Route de Mende<br />

34 293 Montpellier cedex 5<br />

France<br />

Haas Timothy C. School <strong>of</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Milwaukee<br />

P.O. Box 742<br />

Milwaukee, WI 53201<br />

Heynen Iris Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde<br />

Schloss Rosenste<strong>in</strong>, Stuttgart<br />

H<strong>in</strong>es Jim USGS-Patuxent Wildlife Research<br />

Center<br />

USA<br />

59<br />

Holly.Edwards@FWC.state.fl.us<br />

effordm@landcareresearch.co.nz<br />

bruno.ens@wur.nl<br />

fiedler@vowa.ornithol.mpg.de<br />

dfletcher@maths.otago.ac.nz<br />

chris@fonnesbeck.org<br />

charles.francis@ec.gc.ca<br />

mfr@ceh.ac.uk<br />

gilles.gauthier@bio.ulaval.ca<br />

gimenez@cefe.cnrs-mop.fr<br />

haas@uwm.edu<br />

heynen.smns@naturkundemuseum-bw.de<br />

jim_h<strong>in</strong>es@usgs.gov


Participants<br />

Hiroi Tadakazu Yamash<strong>in</strong>a Institute for<br />

Ornithology<br />

Hochachka Wesley M. Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Ornithology<br />

Cornell University<br />

159 Sapsucker Woods Rd.<br />

Ithaca, NY, 14850 USA<br />

Hoyle Simon Inter-American Tropical Tuna<br />

Commission<br />

8604 La Jolla Shores Drive<br />

La Jolla CA 92037-1508, USA<br />

Hunter Christ<strong>in</strong>e M. Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst.,<br />

USA<br />

Jenouvrier Stephanie Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de<br />

Chizé – CNRS<br />

79360 Villiers en Bois, France<br />

Julliard Roma<strong>in</strong> Centre de Recherches sur la<br />

Biologie des Populations<br />

d'oiseaux<br />

55, rue buffon<br />

F-75005 Paris, France<br />

Juvaste Risto North Karelia Polytechnic<br />

Environmental Technology<br />

Karjalankatu 3, 80200 Joensuu,<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Kendall Bill USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research<br />

Center<br />

11510 American Holly Drive<br />

Laurel, MD 20708-4017, USA<br />

hiroit@jcom.home.ne.jp<br />

wmh6@cornell.edu<br />

simon.hoyle@pobox.com<br />

cmhunter@whoi.edu<br />

jenouvrier@cebc.cnrs.fr<br />

julliard@mnhn.fr<br />

Risto.Juvaste@ncp.fi<br />

William_Kendall@usgs.gov<br />

Kery Marc Patuxent Wildlife Research marc_kery@usgs.gov<br />

Center, Laurel, MD 20708<br />

K<strong>in</strong>g Ruth University <strong>of</strong> St. Andrews, UK ruth@mcs.st-and.ac.uk<br />

Lahoreau Gaëlle Laboratoire "Fonctionnement et<br />

Evolution des Systèmes Ecologiques",<br />

Paris.<br />

Lampila Satu University <strong>of</strong> Oulu<br />

Departement <strong>of</strong> Biology<br />

PL 3000<br />

SF-90014 Oulu, F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Le Bohec Cel<strong>in</strong>e CEPE-CNRS<br />

27, Rue Bequerel<br />

67087 Strasbourg cedex 02,<br />

France<br />

Lebreton<br />

Jean-Dom<strong>in</strong>ique<br />

CEFE / CNRS<br />

1919 Route de Mende<br />

34 293 Montpellier cedex 5<br />

France<br />

lahoreau@wotan.ens.fr<br />

satu.lampila@oulu.fi<br />

cel<strong>in</strong>e.lebohec@c-strasbourg.fr<br />

lebreton@cefe.cnrs-mop.fr<br />

60


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Lee Danny C. USDA Forest Service<br />

Pacific Southwest Res. Station<br />

1700 Bayview Drive<br />

Arcata, CA 95521 USA<br />

dclee@fs.fed.us<br />

Lee Derek E. PRBO dlee@prbo.org<br />

L<strong>in</strong>k William A. 11510 American Holly Drive<br />

USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research<br />

Center<br />

Laurel, Maryland 20708 USA<br />

william_l<strong>in</strong>k@usgs.gov<br />

Lokki Heikki University <strong>of</strong> Hels<strong>in</strong>ki<br />

Dept. <strong>of</strong> Computer Science<br />

P.O. Box 26<br />

FIN-00014 University <strong>of</strong> Hels<strong>in</strong>ki<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Lukacs Paul Colorado Cooperative Fish<br />

and Wildlife Research Unit<br />

Colorado State University<br />

Fort Coll<strong>in</strong>s, CO 80523 USA<br />

MacKenzie Darryl Proteus Research &<br />

Consult<strong>in</strong>g ltd.<br />

PO Box 5193, Duned<strong>in</strong><br />

New Zealand<br />

Maunder Mark Inter-American Tropical Tuna<br />

Commission<br />

8604 La Jolla Shores Drive<br />

La Jolla CA 92037-1508, USA<br />

Moore Cl<strong>in</strong>t USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research<br />

Center<br />

Warnell School <strong>of</strong> Forest<br />

Resources<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Georgia<br />

Athens, GA 30602, USA<br />

Morgan Byron Institute <strong>of</strong> Mathematics and<br />

Statistics<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Kent<br />

Canterbury, CT2 7NF, England<br />

Nichols James D. U.S. Geological Survey<br />

Patuxent Wildlife Research<br />

Center<br />

11510 American Holly Dr.<br />

Laurel, MD 20708-4017<br />

Heikki.Lokki@cs.Hels<strong>in</strong>ki.fi<br />

plukacs@cnr.colostate.edu<br />

darryl@proteus.co.nz<br />

mmaunder@iattc.org<br />

cmoore@forestry.uga.edu<br />

B.J.T.Morgan@kent.ac.uk<br />

jim_nichols@usgs.gov<br />

Norris Jim Wake Forest University norris@wfu.edu<br />

Otis David L. Iowa Cooperative Research Unit<br />

Iowa State University<br />

Ames, IA 5011<br />

dotis@iastate.edu<br />

Otto Mark US Fish and Wildlife Service Mark_Otto@FWS.gov<br />

61


Participants<br />

Ozaki Kiyoaki Bird Migration Research Center<br />

Yamash<strong>in</strong>a Institute for<br />

Ornithology<br />

115 Konoyama, Abiko 270-1145<br />

Japan<br />

ozaki@yamash<strong>in</strong>a.or.jp<br />

Peach Will RSPB will.peach@rspb.org.uk<br />

Pledger Shirley School <strong>of</strong> Math. And Comp. Sci.<br />

Victoria University <strong>of</strong> Well<strong>in</strong>gton<br />

P.O. Box 600<br />

Well<strong>in</strong>gton, New Zealand<br />

shirley.pledger@vuw.ac.nz<br />

Pradel Roger Montpellier, France pradel@cefe.cnrs-mop.fr<br />

Pulido Francisco Max Planck Research Centre for<br />

Ornithology<br />

Vogelwarte Radolfzell, Germany<br />

pulido@vowa.ornithol.mpg.de<br />

Rahbek Carsten Copenhagen Bird R<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g Centre<br />

Zoological Museum, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Copenhagen<br />

Universitetsparken 15<br />

DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark<br />

Reed Eric Canadian Wildlife Service<br />

351 St Joseph Blvd.<br />

Hull, Quebec K1A 0H3, Canada<br />

Rivalan Philippe Laboratoire Ecologie, Systematique<br />

et Evolution<br />

Universite Paris-Sud, bat. 362<br />

91405 Orsay, France<br />

Rob<strong>in</strong>son Rob BTO, <strong>The</strong> Nunnery<br />

<strong>The</strong>tford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU, UK<br />

Rodriguez Marco A. Department de chemie-biologie<br />

Universite du Quebec a Trois-<br />

Rivieres<br />

Quebec, Canada<br />

crahbek@zmuc.ku.dk<br />

eric.reed@ec.gc.ca<br />

philippe.rivalan@ese.u-psud.fr<br />

rob.rob<strong>in</strong>son@bto.org<br />

marco_rodriguez@uqtr.ca<br />

Rotella Jay Montana State University rotella@montana.edu<br />

Royle J. Andrew U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service andy_royle@fws.gov<br />

Samtmann Sébastien CEPE-CNRS<br />

27, Rue Bequerel<br />

67087 Strasbourg cedex 02,<br />

France<br />

Saurola Pertti F<strong>in</strong>nish Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural<br />

History, P.O. Box 17<br />

FIN-00014 Univ. <strong>of</strong> Hels<strong>in</strong>ki<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Schaefer Thomas Max Planck Research Centre for<br />

Ornithology<br />

Vogelwarte Radolfzell, Germany<br />

sebastien.samtmann@c-strasbourg.fr<br />

pertti.saurola@hels<strong>in</strong>ki.fi<br />

schaefer@vowa.orbithol.mpg.de<br />

62


EURING 2003 Radolfzell<br />

Schaub Michael Swiss Ornithological Institute<br />

CH-6204 Sempach<br />

Switzerland<br />

Schmidt Benedikt Zoological Institute<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Zurich<br />

Switzerland<br />

Schmutz Joel United States geological Survey<br />

Alaska Science center<br />

1011 East Tudor Road<br />

Anchorage, Alaska 99503, USA<br />

Schtickzelle Nicolas Catholic University Louva<strong>in</strong><br />

Biodiversity Research Centre<br />

Croix du Sud 4-5<br />

B-1348 Louva<strong>in</strong>-la-Neuve<br />

Schwarz Carl J. Statistics and Actuarial Science<br />

Simon Fraser University<br />

Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6<br />

michael.schaub@vogelwarte.ch<br />

bschmidt@zool.unizh.ch<br />

joel_schmutz@usgs.gov<br />

schtickzelle@ecol.ucl.ac.be<br />

cschwarz@stat.sfu.ca<br />

Sed<strong>in</strong>ger Jim University <strong>of</strong> Nevada Reno jsed<strong>in</strong>ger@cabnr.unr.edu<br />

Senar Juan Carlos Natural History Museum<br />

P. Picasso s/n<br />

08003 Barcelona, Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

jcsenar@mail.bcn.es<br />

Siriwardena Gav<strong>in</strong> BTO, <strong>The</strong> Nunnery<br />

<strong>The</strong>tford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU, UK<br />

Smith Barry D. Canadian Wildlife Service<br />

Pacific Wildlife Research Centre<br />

5421 Robertson Road<br />

Delta, B.C., V4K 3N2, Canada<br />

Sokolov Leonid Biological Station Rybachy<br />

Rybachy 238535, Kal<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>grad<br />

Region, Russia<br />

Sp<strong>in</strong>a Fernando Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna<br />

Selvatica<br />

Via Ca' Fornacetta, 9<br />

I-40064 Ozzano Emilia (BO), Italy<br />

Stauffer Howard B. Humboldt State University<br />

Arcata, California 95521, USA<br />

Stephens Scott Ducks Unlimited Inc.<br />

Great Pla<strong>in</strong>s Regional Office<br />

Bismarck, ND 58503 USA<br />

Tavecchia Giacomo IMEDEA<br />

07190 Esporales, Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

Thomas Len Centre for Research <strong>in</strong>to Environmental<br />

and Ecological Modell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(CREEM)<br />

University <strong>of</strong> St. Andrews<br />

gav<strong>in</strong>.siriwardena@bto.org<br />

barry.smith@ec.gc.ca<br />

lsok@bioryb.koenig.su<br />

<strong>in</strong>fsmigr@iperbole.bologna.it<br />

hbs2@humboldt.edu<br />

sstephens@ducks.org<br />

g.tavecchia@uib.es<br />

len@mcs.st-and.ac.uk<br />

Thomson David L. Netherlands Institute <strong>of</strong> Ecology d.thomson@nioo.knaw.nl<br />

63


Participants<br />

Thorup Kasper Zoological Museum<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Copenhagen<br />

Denmark<br />

Traylor Joshua, J. Department <strong>of</strong> Biology<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Saskatchewan<br />

c/o Canadian Wildlife Service<br />

115 Perimeter Road, Saskatoon,<br />

Saskatchewan<br />

S7N 0X4 Canada<br />

van der Greft Janien Centre for Landscape Ecology<br />

Alterra, P.O. Box 47<br />

NL-6700 AA Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen<br />

<strong>The</strong> Netherlands<br />

van Noordwijk Arje Netherland Institute <strong>of</strong> Ecology<br />

Boterhoekse straat 48<br />

NL 6666GA Heteren<br />

Viallefont Anne IUT Lumière<br />

Université Lyon 2<br />

69676 Bron cedex, France<br />

White Gary C. Dept. <strong>of</strong> Fishery & Wildlife Biology<br />

Colorado State University<br />

Fort Coll<strong>in</strong>s, CO, USA<br />

Yoccoz Nigel Norwegian Institute for Nature<br />

Research<br />

Polar Environmental Centre<br />

N 9296 Tromsø, Norway<br />

kthorup@zmuc.ku.dk<br />

joshua.traylor@ec.gc.ca<br />

Janien.vandergreft@wur.nl<br />

a.vannoordwijk@nioo.knaw.nl<br />

aviallef@univ-lyon2.fr<br />

gwhite@cnr.colostate.edu<br />

nigel.yoccoz@n<strong>in</strong>a.no<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!