Avatar - Audio Media
Avatar - Audio Media
Avatar - Audio Media
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
two, and includes a phase reverse option on channel two. Very handy in MS<br />
working. The FM-4 doesn’t offer any phase reverse options, but has linking<br />
on channels three and four as well as one and two.<br />
Both mixers have comprehensive monitoring options, including MS<br />
decoding. The 442 has two return feeds to the FM-4’s single return, but<br />
the FM-4 has dedicated monitoring for its Aux input. For me the FM-4 has<br />
its headphone monitor switch too near the strap lug, making adjustment<br />
fiddly with banana fingers like mine.<br />
At 2.3kg, the 442 is half a kilo heavier than the aluminium-clad FM-4,<br />
despite taking only four AA cells against eight for the FM-4. In hand to hand<br />
combat the 442 will definitely kill your opponent, while I think the FM-4<br />
will probably just maim them. The build of the 442 is uber pro – at a pinch I<br />
think I could stand on it. I would definitely stand on yours. The FM-4 claims<br />
seven hours running without phantom – I stuck a Rode stereo on there after<br />
running the mixer for about an hour on and off with dynamic mics. I got an<br />
additional hour and a half before the power LED began to flash.<br />
Side by side, I liked the sound of the FM-4 – clean and crisp, and you<br />
can light the channel reds and main overs without nasty distortion. On a<br />
simple AB the 442’s limiters seemed to do a better job of holding back the<br />
waves, but I didn’t test all the FM-4 limiter settings, and just reading the<br />
instructions for changing the settings on the 442 gave me screen envy.<br />
Conclusion<br />
So what’s the verdict? Well in one sense it doesn’t really matter – Sound<br />
Devices has discontinued the 442. I can’t believe it. But it’s true, and good<br />
news for Fostex as its absence leaves the affordable four-channel sector<br />
wide open. The Sound Devices 552, which is currently the replacement<br />
for the 442, is a different beast altogether with built-in recording and<br />
costing £1,000 more than the FM-4. Which makes the FM-4 a very attractive<br />
proposition. It’s professional, it has plenty of features, it shows innovation<br />
while maintaining ease of use, and it sounds good. I like it. ∫<br />
£ GB£2,300.00 (exc.VAT)<br />
...................................<br />
INFORMATION<br />
A Fostex, 3-2-35 Musashino, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan, 196-0021<br />
T +81 42 546 4974<br />
F +81 42 546 9222<br />
W www.fostex.com<br />
E info_sales@fostex.jp<br />
A UK Distributors: SCV London, 40 Chigwell Lane, Oakwood Hill Ind. Estate,<br />
Loughton, Essex, IG10 3NY<br />
T +44 (0) 208 418 0778<br />
F +44 (0) 208 418 0624<br />
W www.scvlondon.com<br />
24 – 27. 3. 2010<br />
discovering<br />
new dimensions<br />
prolight-sound.com<br />
Supported by VPLT – The Professional Lighting & Sound<br />
Association of Germany, and EVVC – European Association<br />
of Event Centers<br />
53223-001 • Messe FFM • Prolight+Sound • KV • “<strong>Audio</strong> <strong>Media</strong>” • 90x262 mm/A • CD Rom • ISO-39 CMYK • co: 16.12.2009 DU: 22.12.2009 GB<br />
AUDIO MEDIA JANUARY 2010 27