28.10.2014 Views

Avatar - Audio Media

Avatar - Audio Media

Avatar - Audio Media

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

two, and includes a phase reverse option on channel two. Very handy in MS<br />

working. The FM-4 doesn’t offer any phase reverse options, but has linking<br />

on channels three and four as well as one and two.<br />

Both mixers have comprehensive monitoring options, including MS<br />

decoding. The 442 has two return feeds to the FM-4’s single return, but<br />

the FM-4 has dedicated monitoring for its Aux input. For me the FM-4 has<br />

its headphone monitor switch too near the strap lug, making adjustment<br />

fiddly with banana fingers like mine.<br />

At 2.3kg, the 442 is half a kilo heavier than the aluminium-clad FM-4,<br />

despite taking only four AA cells against eight for the FM-4. In hand to hand<br />

combat the 442 will definitely kill your opponent, while I think the FM-4<br />

will probably just maim them. The build of the 442 is uber pro – at a pinch I<br />

think I could stand on it. I would definitely stand on yours. The FM-4 claims<br />

seven hours running without phantom – I stuck a Rode stereo on there after<br />

running the mixer for about an hour on and off with dynamic mics. I got an<br />

additional hour and a half before the power LED began to flash.<br />

Side by side, I liked the sound of the FM-4 – clean and crisp, and you<br />

can light the channel reds and main overs without nasty distortion. On a<br />

simple AB the 442’s limiters seemed to do a better job of holding back the<br />

waves, but I didn’t test all the FM-4 limiter settings, and just reading the<br />

instructions for changing the settings on the 442 gave me screen envy.<br />

Conclusion<br />

So what’s the verdict? Well in one sense it doesn’t really matter – Sound<br />

Devices has discontinued the 442. I can’t believe it. But it’s true, and good<br />

news for Fostex as its absence leaves the affordable four-channel sector<br />

wide open. The Sound Devices 552, which is currently the replacement<br />

for the 442, is a different beast altogether with built-in recording and<br />

costing £1,000 more than the FM-4. Which makes the FM-4 a very attractive<br />

proposition. It’s professional, it has plenty of features, it shows innovation<br />

while maintaining ease of use, and it sounds good. I like it. ∫<br />

£ GB£2,300.00 (exc.VAT)<br />

...................................<br />

INFORMATION<br />

A Fostex, 3-2-35 Musashino, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan, 196-0021<br />

T +81 42 546 4974<br />

F +81 42 546 9222<br />

W www.fostex.com<br />

E info_sales@fostex.jp<br />

A UK Distributors: SCV London, 40 Chigwell Lane, Oakwood Hill Ind. Estate,<br />

Loughton, Essex, IG10 3NY<br />

T +44 (0) 208 418 0778<br />

F +44 (0) 208 418 0624<br />

W www.scvlondon.com<br />

24 – 27. 3. 2010<br />

discovering<br />

new dimensions<br />

prolight-sound.com<br />

Supported by VPLT – The Professional Lighting & Sound<br />

Association of Germany, and EVVC – European Association<br />

of Event Centers<br />

53223-001 • Messe FFM • Prolight+Sound • KV • “<strong>Audio</strong> <strong>Media</strong>” • 90x262 mm/A • CD Rom • ISO-39 CMYK • co: 16.12.2009 DU: 22.12.2009 GB<br />

AUDIO MEDIA JANUARY 2010 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!