29.10.2014 Views

April 2011 - Control Global

April 2011 - Control Global

April 2011 - Control Global

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE HIDDEN FIELDBUS<br />

NETWORK<br />

THE RIGHT TOOL FOR TRICKY<br />

MEASUREMENT JOBS<br />

ANALYZER SAMPLE<br />

SYSTEMS BASICS<br />

CT1102_01_CVR.indd 3<br />

EXCLUSIVE TO<br />

THE WEB<br />

HOW MUCH THREAT INFO<br />

DO USERS REALLY NEED?<br />

EUROPEAN PROCESS NEWS<br />

1/27/11 9:06 AM<br />

555 W. PIERCE RD., SUITE 301 • ITASCA, ILLINOIS 60143<br />

administrative team<br />

President & CEO: JOHN M. CAPPELLETTI<br />

Vice President: JULIE CAPPELLETTI-LANGE<br />

VP, Circulation: JERRY CLARK<br />

publishing team<br />

Group Publisher/VP Content: KEITH LARSON<br />

klarson@putman.net<br />

Midwest/Southeast Regional Sales Manager: GREG ZAMIN<br />

gzamin@putman.net<br />

630/551-2500, Fax: 630/551-2600<br />

Western Regional Sales Manager: LAURA MARTINEZ<br />

310/607-0125, Fax: 310/607-0168<br />

lmar tinez@putman.net<br />

Northeast/Mid-Atlantic Regional Sales Manager: DAVE FISHER<br />

Inside Accounts Manager: POLLY DICKSON<br />

Ad Traffic Supervisor: ANETTA GAUTHIER<br />

508/543-5172, Fax 508/543-3061<br />

dfisher@putman.net<br />

pdickson@putman.net<br />

agauthier@putman.net<br />

Subscriptions/Circulation: JERRY CLARK, JACK JONES<br />

foster reprints<br />

Reprints Marketing Manager: JILL KALETHA<br />

888/64 4-1803<br />

1-866-879-914 4 ex t. 168, Fax 219.561.2019<br />

jillk@ fosterprinting.com<br />

editorial team<br />

Editor in Chief: WALT BOYES<br />

Executive Editor: JIM MONTAGUE<br />

wboyes@putman.net<br />

jmontague@putman.net<br />

Digital Managing Editor: KATHERINE BONFANTE<br />

Managing Editor: NANCY BARTELS<br />

Senior Technical Editor: DAN HEBERT<br />

kbonfante@putman.net<br />

nbar tels@putman.net<br />

dheber t@putman.net<br />

Contributing Editor: JOHN REZABEK<br />

Columnists: BÉLA LIPTÁK, GREG MCMILLAN, STAN WEINER<br />

Editorial Assistant: LORI GOLDBERG<br />

design & production team<br />

Group Art Director: STEVE HERNER<br />

sherner@putman.net<br />

Art Director: DEREK CHAMBERLAIN<br />

dchamberlain@putman.net<br />

Associate Art Director: BRIAN HERTEL<br />

bher tel@putman.net<br />

JESSE H. NEAL AWARD WINNER<br />

ELEVEN ASBPE EDITORIAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS<br />

TWENTY-FIVE ASBPE EXCELLENCE IN GRAPHICS AWARDS<br />

ASBPE 2009 MAGAZINE OF THE YEAR FINALIST<br />

FOUR OZZIE AWARDS FOR GRAPHICS EXCELLENCE<br />

T E C H N I C A L LY S P E A K I N G<br />

F E E D B A C K<br />

Fieldbus Errors<br />

I enjoyed reading the article “Fieldbus<br />

Jungle,” (www.controldesign.com/industrynews/<strong>2011</strong>/018.html),<br />

but I found a<br />

number of factual errors connected with<br />

Profibus and Foundation fieldbus (FF):<br />

1. Comparing the cost of Profibus PA<br />

and 4-20mA, the author uses the example<br />

of 5 to 10 valves or transmitters for non-<br />

IS. In my experience, most non-IS designs<br />

will use 15 to 20 valves and transmitters.<br />

By the article’s argument, increasing the<br />

number of valves and transmitters would<br />

make Profibus more economical than<br />

4-20mA.<br />

2. The author states that the lead time<br />

for fieldbus devices is longer than for 4-20<br />

mA devices. This is not true for Siemens.<br />

The published lead times for Profibus PA,<br />

HART, FF and 4-20 mA option for Siemens<br />

instruments are the same.<br />

3. When designing a network the author<br />

states that you need to know within<br />

a few feet where devices are installed for a<br />

fieldbus network. The design rules in the<br />

IEC standard state a maximum limit on<br />

the spur lengths based on the number of<br />

instruments. For the most part, this is either<br />

30 or 60 meters, which gives designers<br />

a large range to work from<br />

4. The author states that troubleshooting<br />

fieldbus networks is very hard. A number<br />

of diagnostic tools are available to<br />

troubleshoot fieldbus networks. Several<br />

manufacturers—Procentec, Softing, P+F,<br />

MTL—make them and have case studies<br />

showing how easy they are to use.<br />

5. According to the author, fieldbus lifecycle<br />

costs are high because people do not<br />

understand the technology. Furthermore,<br />

it is implied that it is hard to train instrumentation<br />

people. I have been a technical<br />

trainer at Siemens for more than 10 years<br />

and have seen things change. There is no<br />

doubt that 4-20 mA is easier to teach, but<br />

people of all ages are catching on to the<br />

new technology.<br />

6. The author states that the bus wars<br />

are over and that Profibus and FF are<br />

merging. It is true that FF and Profibus<br />

organizations are now cooperating; however,<br />

I am not aware of any move to a common<br />

control bus. Given the technical differences,<br />

I am not sure if this would even<br />

be possible.<br />

7. The author stated that GSD files<br />

change often. It is possible that the author<br />

is confusing GSD files and EDD files. If<br />

you look at the case of Siemens transmitters<br />

and actuators, GSD files do not tend<br />

to change, while<br />

EDD files tend to<br />

change with each<br />

firmware revision.<br />

What that means is<br />

that you can take an<br />

old instrument and<br />

replace it with a new<br />

one without touching<br />

the control system,<br />

although you will have to update the<br />

engineering station.<br />

JAMES POWELL, P.ENG<br />

SIEMENS MILLTRONICS<br />

james.powell@siemens.com<br />

Why We Can’t All Tweet That<br />

I read with interest your recent article in<br />

the February issue of <strong>Control</strong> magazine<br />

(“What the Tweet!!?,” www.controlglobal.<br />

com/articles/<strong>2011</strong>/AutomationTweet1102.<br />

html). I agree that many social media tools<br />

can have a powerful positive effect on being<br />

able to keep up with current trends in<br />

the profession. However, there are many<br />

of us that are actively prevented from using<br />

these tools during our professional<br />

time at the office. Many companies, mine<br />

included, block any access to YouTube,<br />

Twitter and Facebook. Even LinkedIn is<br />

blocked since all “social networking” sites<br />

are not allowed. Yes, I do use my smart<br />

phone to view training videos on You-<br />

Tube, but it is not nearly as convenient as<br />

the large screen on my computer. Please<br />

don’t forget about those of us that are not<br />

able to use these tools.<br />

DEWIGHT REA<br />

ASCEND PERFORMANCE MATERIALS<br />

adrea@ascendmaterials.com<br />

[Editor’s Note: Don’t worry. We never forget<br />

here that we still have a lot of “treeware”<br />

readers. We won’t abandon you for the<br />

“shiny” of social media.]<br />

FEBRUARY <strong>2011</strong><br />

A P R I L / 2 0 1 1 www.controlglobal.com 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!