29.10.2014 Views

April 2011 - Control Global

April 2011 - Control Global

April 2011 - Control Global

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a s k t h e e x p e r t S<br />

cations state if the sensors were individually tested (or only<br />

sampled), and state that the drift was measured, say, “for a<br />

period of X hours and was found to be Y% of output span.”<br />

Also. as I have illustrated in Figure 1, the total error (inaccuracy)<br />

of a measurement is the sum of its systematic and its<br />

random errors.<br />

The error caused by drift (some also call it shift), illustrated<br />

in Figure 2, is the difference between the specified<br />

and the actual performance of a sensor over a time period.<br />

The total drift error is the sum of two error components: the<br />

zero and the span shifts over some time period. When running<br />

a test to determine these values, one has to be careful<br />

to evaluate the whole system, not only the transmitter electronics.<br />

Let me illustrate that point by a recent experience:<br />

In connection with a lawsuit I, as an expert witness, was<br />

asked to evaluate the performance of a flow loop that was<br />

periodically calibrated only by checking the electronics of<br />

the transmitter using a simulator (not the actual signal from<br />

the sensor). Based on the simulated input signal to the analog<br />

transmitter (the secondary), the calibration appeared to<br />

be fine; the transmitter was generating a 4-mA output when<br />

the simulated input corresponded to a zero flow signal, and<br />

20 mA at a simulated 100% measurement signal. Yet, while<br />

the transmitter correctly measured the simulated input signal,<br />

the actual signal from the sensor (because of zero and<br />

the span shift) has drifted so much over the decades of uncalibrated<br />

operation of the primary that the total system error<br />

amounted to 50% when the flow averaged about 20% of<br />

span. (Naturally, as shown in Figure 2, this error percentage<br />

becomes a smaller fraction of the total flow.)<br />

Therefore, the evaluation of the drift should also be based<br />

on testing the primary and the secondary together using the<br />

actual measurement signal and not a simulated one.<br />

Stability is a more general term, as it can include not only<br />

drift (which is a function of the passage of time), but also<br />

the environmental effects (pressure, temperature, humidity,<br />

vibration), process effects (coating, corrosion, aging) and<br />

other factors, such as cycling, hysteresis, linearity, noise, etc.<br />

Offset (some also call it droop) is a term used in connection<br />

with proportional-only controllers because such devices<br />

(thermostats, pressure regulators, etc.) start making a correction<br />

only after an error has already developed. The amount<br />

of offset rises as the gain of the controller drops (proportional<br />

band increases).<br />

Bias occurs when a constant amount is added to or subtracted<br />

from a signal. For example, zero shift can bias the<br />

output of a sensor. A positive bias of a sensor output results<br />

in over- reporting and a negative bias in underreporting the<br />

variable measured.<br />

Béla Lipták<br />

liptakbela@aol.com<br />

100<br />

% Output y<br />

0<br />

0 % Input x<br />

100<br />

the drift test<br />

Actual calibration curve<br />

Figure 2. The results of a drift test should state the time period of<br />

testing and should report the errors caused by both the zero and<br />

the span shift that was measured at the end of that period over the<br />

full range (span) of the sensor.<br />

Q<br />

I read your article on steam quality measurement<br />

with great interest. I am working in a thermal project<br />

pilot plant and would like to measure the steam<br />

quality at the injection well where the line size is 3 ins.<br />

Can you give me some information on “throttling calorimeters”?<br />

Also please recommend a steam quality measurement<br />

device that is not cumbersome to measure SQ in the<br />

3-in. line.<br />

Vijay Ramlal<br />

VRamlal@kockw.com<br />

A<br />

Standard technique in large power plants in the United<br />

States to assure steam quality on super heated steam is<br />

to measure sodium ion concentration, usually in ppb<br />

in two or more locations. Particular attention should be paid<br />

to obtain representative samples before and after the mud<br />

flow cycle. Several companies offer products, but sample<br />

conditioning is difficult. After several manufacturers’ trial<br />

application, I found one English company’s product to be<br />

easy to maintain and reliable. You can write to me directly if<br />

you need more information.<br />

Ram.G.Ramachandran<br />

ramacg@cox.net<br />

Specified characteristic curve<br />

Span<br />

Span shift<br />

Zero shift<br />

Elevation<br />

A p r i l / 2 0 1 1 www.controlglobal.com 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!