29.10.2014 Views

alternative lecture notes - Rational points and algebraic cycles

alternative lecture notes - Rational points and algebraic cycles

alternative lecture notes - Rational points and algebraic cycles

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A functorial obstruction is given by specifying a subset X(A) obs between X(k) <strong>and</strong> X(A)<br />

for each X such that for any morphism f : X → Y , we have f(X(A) obs ) ⊆ Y (A) obs .<br />

Examples: X(A) Br , X(A) desc , X(A) fin , X(A) fin-Ab , X(A) conn , . . . .<br />

Suppose that we have f : Y → X a G-torsor over X, where G is a finite étale group.<br />

Given x 0 ∈ X(k), let c(x 0 ) be the class of f −1 (x 0 ) in H 1 (k, G). Then we can twist to obtain<br />

f c(x 0<br />

: Y c(x0) → X. We obtain<br />

X(k) =<br />

∐<br />

f σ (Y σ (k)) ⊆ ⋃ f σ (Y σ (A)) ⊆ X(A).<br />

σ∈H 1 (k,G)<br />

Define X f (A) := ⋃ f σ (Y σ (A)). Given an obstruction obs, define<br />

X f,obs (A) := ⋃ f σ (Y σ (A) obs ) ⊆ X(A) obs .<br />

For example, taking obs = Br gives the étale-Brauer obstruction set, which in our notation<br />

is X(A) fin,Br .<br />

X(A) fin <br />

X(A) fin-Ab <br />

X(A)<br />

X(k) <br />

X(A) fin,Br <br />

<br />

X(A) Br<br />

Let p: E → B be a fiber bundle with nonempty connected fiber F (the spaces are CWcomplexes,<br />

simplicial sets, or manifolds): i.e., B is covered by open sets U such that p −1 (U) ≃<br />

F × B over B. We can lift any point of B to a point of E. After lifting <strong>points</strong>, given a<br />

path in B connecting two <strong>points</strong>, we can lift it to a path between their lifts (first lift without<br />

worrying about the end of the path, <strong>and</strong> then modify a small piece of the end so that it ends<br />

where it should).<br />

We may assume that B is triangulated so that each simplex is contained in some U. Let<br />

be a solid triangle; then a section of F × → is a map → F . We are given the<br />

section above the boundary of the triangle; to fill in the lift, the obstruction lives in π 1 (F ).<br />

We get a 2-cochain in C 2 (B, π 1 (F )). But this is not exactly the obstruction to the existence<br />

of a section, because we could also change the choices made along the way.<br />

C 1 (B, π 1 (F )) → C 2 (B, π 1 (F )) d → C 3 (B, π 1 (F ))<br />

The kernel modulo image at the center is the definition of cohomology H 2 (B, π 1 (F )). In fact,<br />

the 2-cochain we constructed above lies in ker d. Also, changing the choice of lifts of paths<br />

corresponds to modifying it by an element of C 1 (B, π 1 (F )), <strong>and</strong> its differential measures the<br />

change in our 2-cochain. Thus we obtain a canonical obstruction lying in H 2 (B, π 1 (F )).<br />

After lifting the 2-skeleton, to lift the 3-skeleton, we obtain an obstruction in H 3 (B, π 2 (F )).<br />

Thus we get a sequence of obstructions, in H 2 (B, π 1 (F )), H 3 (B, π 2 (F )), H 4 (B, π 3 (F )),<br />

. . . , each one defined if the previous ones vanish (<strong>and</strong> one makes a choice).<br />

We would like to do the same for X → Spec Q, <strong>and</strong> even for arbitrary morphisms of<br />

schemes X → S.<br />

Let Sec(E → B) be the space of all sections, which is a topological space. We would<br />

like to compute the homotopy groups π ∗ Sec(E → B). These will be computed by a second<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!