29.10.2014 Views

Mig-21-Flight Model - Check six

Mig-21-Flight Model - Check six

Mig-21-Flight Model - Check six

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mig</strong>-<strong>21</strong>-FM-Identification-Rev. 14<br />

Maximum After-Burner Power, Altitude of 3,000m<br />

Vcas<br />

(Km/h)<br />

Vcas<br />

(Kts)<br />

Mach<br />

Sustained<br />

Ng<br />

(read)<br />

Sustained<br />

Ng<br />

(computed)<br />

Error<br />

500 270 0.489 2.33 2.64 13%<br />

550 297 0.538 2.70 2.95 9%<br />

600 324 0.587 2.97 3.25 9%<br />

650 351 0.634 3.23 3.53 9%<br />

700 378 0.682 3.50 3.78 8%<br />

750 405 0.730 3.80 4.11 8%<br />

800 432 0.778 4.12 4.52 10%<br />

850 459 0.826 4.41 4.74 7%<br />

900 486 0.874 4.61 4.74 3%<br />

The error relative values are greater for 3,000m/9,843ft than for other altitude, I have no idea why. For<br />

other altitudes (1,000m and 5,000m), thrust law deduced from level flight acceleration combined with<br />

a unique aerodynamic model (independent from altitude) give the same range of values for relative<br />

error.<br />

Please note also that, even in the worst case, sustained load factor error remain less than 0.31G<br />

Let’s try to analyze the solving of one of this configuration (Vcas=650Km/h)<br />

We start from thrust definition by level flight acceleration at 3,000m, assuming that a Vcas of<br />

650Km/h is equivalent to a mach number of 0.634 (ISA at 9,843ft), we will use section b) data (raw)<br />

and the values after curve smoothing (fig.15),:<br />

Mach number Raw Ps Raw Thrust Smoothed Ps Smoothed Thrust<br />

0.600 309 ft/s 11,113 lbs 306 ft/s 11,114 lbs<br />

0.634 317 ft/s 11,118 lbs<br />

0.700 337 ft/s 11,127 lbs 334 ft/s 11,124 lbs<br />

The smoothed thrust values are computed in solving equation (3.3) for Mach=0.634 and Ps=317 ft/s<br />

Page - 28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!