02.11.2014 Views

2006 - The Office of Public Accountability

2006 - The Office of Public Accountability

2006 - The Office of Public Accountability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix A, cont.<br />

Savings Identified in <strong>2006</strong><br />

Auditee / Report<br />

Amount<br />

Title<br />

Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Administration's<br />

Dormant and Inactive<br />

Funds<br />

<strong>Office</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Attorney<br />

General Child Support<br />

Enforcement Program<br />

Follow-Up Review<br />

$9,835,025<br />

$456,150<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Guam<br />

Emergency Executive<br />

Orders and<br />

Certificates <strong>of</strong><br />

Emergency<br />

Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Administration's<br />

$5,230<br />

Returned Checks<br />

Follow-Up Review<br />

TOTAL $10,289,151<br />

Savings Identified<br />

• $3,388,410 in 36 dormant and inactive funds, <strong>of</strong> which $347,000 in<br />

revenues can be transferred to the General Fund.<br />

• $2,148,067 for nine funds with minimal activities.<br />

• $2,042,650 for seven funds that have outlived their purposes.<br />

• $1,630,848 for 12 funds that should have been closed by DOA, <strong>of</strong> which<br />

$646,000 were revenues that could be recorded in the General Fund,<br />

$625,050 were recommended for repeal in prior audits for 25 funds.<br />

• $448,708 in stale-dated checks that could be escheated back to<br />

government Guam,<br />

• $214,42 in a dormant bank account that remains open that can revert to<br />

the General Fund. ($207,000 was not included as it was already noted in<br />

the prior audit.)<br />

$64,238 • $64,238 in opportunity savings from emergency-relocation.<br />

• $5,230 savings in returned checks fees in the first year with the transfer<br />

<strong>of</strong> the DOA checking account to another institute.<br />

Waste, Abuse, and Other Questionable Amounts Identified in 2005<br />

Auditee / Report<br />

Title<br />

Amount<br />

Questioned Costs Identified<br />

Council on the Arts<br />

• $53,564 in expenditures made without Board approval.<br />

and Humanities<br />

Agency’s Non-<br />

Appropriated Funds<br />

$ 63,978<br />

• $10,414 in expenditures without supporting documentation.<br />

Guam Economic<br />

Development and<br />

Commerce<br />

Authority’s Credit<br />

Card Program and<br />

Travel Related<br />

Expenditures<br />

Dededo Mayor’s<br />

<strong>Office</strong> Non-<br />

Appropriated Funds<br />

$ 340,005<br />

$2,466,807<br />

Page 3 <strong>of</strong> 9<br />

• $206,549 in questionable and abusive costs from credit cardholders for<br />

charges related to local restaurants and entertainment, travel-related<br />

charges in addition to receiving advanced per diem or without a<br />

supporting travel authorization, and miscellaneous charges.<br />

• $115,858 that would have been saved had GEDCA travelers traveled<br />

economy class rather than business class.<br />

• $17,598 in unsupported costs related to procurement documentation or<br />

the lack <strong>of</strong> expense reports or other supporting receipts.<br />

• $1,300,000 in lost revenue for failing to charge the mandated $20 vender<br />

permit fee.<br />

• $314,807 in procurement exceptions.<br />

• $134,000 in unreconciled cash collections.<br />

• $718,000 in unsupported revenues because <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> prepared<br />

financial reports and checking accounts.<br />

OPA <strong>2006</strong> Annual Report p.30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!