04.11.2014 Views

Review Incident Shin.. - authority for electricity regulation, oman

Review Incident Shin.. - authority for electricity regulation, oman

Review Incident Shin.. - authority for electricity regulation, oman

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Executive Summary<br />

On 27 August 2007, at 22.07h a fault on the 132 kV-line of the Oman Electricity Transmission<br />

Company SAOC (OETC) from Wadi Jizzi to <strong>Shin</strong>as led to an interruption of the power<br />

supply in the <strong>Shin</strong>as area. This area was completely without power until 07.35 h the following<br />

day, when the supply was partly restored via the 33 kV feeders of Majan Electricity<br />

Company SAOC (MJEC) using a rota load shedding scheme. The <strong>Shin</strong>as 132 kV grid station<br />

was energized again by OETC at 23.55 h on 28 August 2007. After that MJEC restored<br />

the supply to all customers, which was completed at 01.34 h on 29 August 2007.<br />

The Authority <strong>for</strong> Electricity Regulation, Oman (the Authority) asked KEMA to identify the<br />

technical reasons <strong>for</strong> the interruption and investigate the overall management of the incident<br />

by OETC. The Authority is of the view that the time taken by OETC to restore supplies<br />

was unduly excessive.<br />

We have studied several documents, including the incident reports/sequence of events of<br />

both OETC and MJEC. Furthermore, we have interviewed representatives of both OETC<br />

and MJEC, including both General Managers, OETC’s maintenance manager, representatives<br />

of OETC’s Load Dispatch Center and responsible people on-site, such as OETC’s operation<br />

engineer and MJEC’s local staff in the Sohar area.<br />

The conclusions of our review can be summarized as follows:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

the duration of the outage was influenced by a number of factors: the most important<br />

being that the Wadi Jizzi – <strong>Shin</strong>as line was not (n-1) compliant as required by Oman<br />

Transmission Security Standards and international best practice;<br />

OETC was aware the Wadi Jizzi – <strong>Shin</strong>as line was not (n-1) compliant but did not have<br />

a comprehensive plan in place to detect faults. Fault distance indicators installed at the<br />

Wadi Jizzi grid station could have reduced the time taken to locate the fault and reduce<br />

the duration of the supply interruption;<br />

Since we have only seen an expired maintenance contract, we are unable to confirm<br />

that a maintenance contract <strong>for</strong> the Wadi Jizzi – <strong>Shin</strong>as line was in place at the time of<br />

the incident;<br />

spare parts were not immediately available on site and had to be transported from remote<br />

locations. This contributed to the supply interruption being longer than necessary.<br />

The fault was located at 1.00 am whereas spare parts arrived on-site at 4.30 pm. Some<br />

14 hours was lost by not having spare parts available close to the site;<br />

organization of the emergency response ef<strong>for</strong>t was ad-hoc and poorly organized - it was<br />

not always clear who was in charge <strong>for</strong> coordinating the restoration activities and some<br />

<strong>Review</strong> <strong>Incident</strong> <strong>Shin</strong>as August 2007 2 09.10.2007<br />

vs. 2 (final)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!