Review Incident Shin.. - authority for electricity regulation, oman
Review Incident Shin.. - authority for electricity regulation, oman
Review Incident Shin.. - authority for electricity regulation, oman
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Executive Summary<br />
On 27 August 2007, at 22.07h a fault on the 132 kV-line of the Oman Electricity Transmission<br />
Company SAOC (OETC) from Wadi Jizzi to <strong>Shin</strong>as led to an interruption of the power<br />
supply in the <strong>Shin</strong>as area. This area was completely without power until 07.35 h the following<br />
day, when the supply was partly restored via the 33 kV feeders of Majan Electricity<br />
Company SAOC (MJEC) using a rota load shedding scheme. The <strong>Shin</strong>as 132 kV grid station<br />
was energized again by OETC at 23.55 h on 28 August 2007. After that MJEC restored<br />
the supply to all customers, which was completed at 01.34 h on 29 August 2007.<br />
The Authority <strong>for</strong> Electricity Regulation, Oman (the Authority) asked KEMA to identify the<br />
technical reasons <strong>for</strong> the interruption and investigate the overall management of the incident<br />
by OETC. The Authority is of the view that the time taken by OETC to restore supplies<br />
was unduly excessive.<br />
We have studied several documents, including the incident reports/sequence of events of<br />
both OETC and MJEC. Furthermore, we have interviewed representatives of both OETC<br />
and MJEC, including both General Managers, OETC’s maintenance manager, representatives<br />
of OETC’s Load Dispatch Center and responsible people on-site, such as OETC’s operation<br />
engineer and MJEC’s local staff in the Sohar area.<br />
The conclusions of our review can be summarized as follows:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
the duration of the outage was influenced by a number of factors: the most important<br />
being that the Wadi Jizzi – <strong>Shin</strong>as line was not (n-1) compliant as required by Oman<br />
Transmission Security Standards and international best practice;<br />
OETC was aware the Wadi Jizzi – <strong>Shin</strong>as line was not (n-1) compliant but did not have<br />
a comprehensive plan in place to detect faults. Fault distance indicators installed at the<br />
Wadi Jizzi grid station could have reduced the time taken to locate the fault and reduce<br />
the duration of the supply interruption;<br />
Since we have only seen an expired maintenance contract, we are unable to confirm<br />
that a maintenance contract <strong>for</strong> the Wadi Jizzi – <strong>Shin</strong>as line was in place at the time of<br />
the incident;<br />
spare parts were not immediately available on site and had to be transported from remote<br />
locations. This contributed to the supply interruption being longer than necessary.<br />
The fault was located at 1.00 am whereas spare parts arrived on-site at 4.30 pm. Some<br />
14 hours was lost by not having spare parts available close to the site;<br />
organization of the emergency response ef<strong>for</strong>t was ad-hoc and poorly organized - it was<br />
not always clear who was in charge <strong>for</strong> coordinating the restoration activities and some<br />
<strong>Review</strong> <strong>Incident</strong> <strong>Shin</strong>as August 2007 2 09.10.2007<br />
vs. 2 (final)