04.11.2014 Views

TCAS II V7.1 Intro booklet

TCAS II V7.1 Intro booklet

TCAS II V7.1 Intro booklet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The <strong>TCAS</strong> Solution<br />

After many years of extensive analysis,<br />

development, and flight evaluation by the<br />

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA),<br />

other countries’ Civil Aviation Authorities<br />

(CAAs), and the aviation industry, Traffic<br />

Alert and Collision Avoidance System or<br />

<strong>TCAS</strong> was developed to reduce the risk of<br />

mid-air collisions between aircraft. In the<br />

international arena, this system is known<br />

as the Airborne Collision Avoidance<br />

System or ACAS.<br />

<strong>TCAS</strong> is a family of airborne devices that<br />

function independently of the ground-based<br />

air traffic control (ATC) system, and<br />

provide collision avoidance protection for a<br />

broad spectrum of aircraft types. All <strong>TCAS</strong><br />

systems provide some degree of collision<br />

threat alerting, and a traffic display. <strong>TCAS</strong> I<br />

and <strong>II</strong> differ primarily by their alerting<br />

capability.<br />

<strong>TCAS</strong> I provides traffic advisories (TAs) to<br />

assist the pilot in the visual acquisition of<br />

intruder aircraft. <strong>TCAS</strong> I is mandated for<br />

use in the U.S. for turbine powered,<br />

passenger-carrying aircraft having more than<br />

10 and less than 31 seats. <strong>TCAS</strong> I is also<br />

installed on a number of general aviation<br />

fixed wing aircraft and helicopters.<br />

<strong>TCAS</strong> <strong>II</strong> provides TAs and resolution<br />

advisories (RAs), i.e., recommended escape<br />

maneuvers, in the vertical dimension to<br />

either increase or maintain the existing<br />

vertical separation between aircraft.<br />

<strong>TCAS</strong> <strong>II</strong> is mandated by the U.S. for<br />

commercial aircraft, including regional<br />

airline aircraft with more than 30 seats or a<br />

maximum takeoff weight greater than<br />

33,000 lbs. Although not mandated for<br />

general aviation use, many turbine-powered<br />

general aviation aircraft and some<br />

helicopters are also equipped with <strong>TCAS</strong> <strong>II</strong>.<br />

The <strong>TCAS</strong> concept makes use of the same<br />

radar beacon transponders installed on<br />

aircraft to operate with ATC’s ground-based<br />

radars. The level of protection provided by<br />

<strong>TCAS</strong> equipment depends on the type of<br />

transponder the target aircraft is carrying.<br />

The level of protection is outlined in<br />

Table 1. It should be noted that <strong>TCAS</strong><br />

provides no protection against aircraft<br />

that do not have an operating<br />

transponder.<br />

Target Aircraft Equipment<br />

Table 1. <strong>TCAS</strong> Levels of Protection<br />

Mode A<br />

XPDR<br />

ONLY<br />

Mode C<br />

or Mode S<br />

XPDR<br />

Own Aircraft Equipment<br />

<strong>TCAS</strong> I <strong>TCAS</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />

TA TA<br />

TA<br />

TA and<br />

Vertical RA<br />

<strong>TCAS</strong> I TA TA and<br />

Vertical RA<br />

<strong>TCAS</strong> <strong>II</strong> TA TA and<br />

Coordinated<br />

Vertical RA<br />

Early Collision Avoidance<br />

Systems<br />

The 1956 collision between two airliners<br />

over the Grand Canyon spurred both the<br />

airlines and aviation authorities to initiate<br />

development of an effective collision<br />

avoidance system that would act as a last<br />

resort when there is a failure in the ATCprovided<br />

separation services. During the<br />

late 1950’s and early 1960’s, collision<br />

avoidance development efforts included an<br />

emphasis on passive and non-cooperating<br />

systems. These concepts proved to be<br />

impractical. One major operational problem<br />

that could not be overcome with these<br />

designs was the need for non-conflicting,<br />

complementary avoidance maneuvers which<br />

require a high-integrity communications link<br />

between aircraft involved in the conflict.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!