04.11.2014 Views

Summer 2013 - The Independent Schools' Modern Language ...

Summer 2013 - The Independent Schools' Modern Language ...

Summer 2013 - The Independent Schools' Modern Language ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Letter to Glenys Stacey, Ofqual<br />

23 May <strong>2013</strong><br />

Dear Glenys<br />

You will recall that ISMLA was in correspondence with you in the Autumn of<br />

2011 (your last letter to us was dated 16 December 2011) over the severe<br />

and unpredictable nature of grading in modern languages and, in particular,<br />

the issue of the awarding of A*.<br />

We note that you have, as was your stated intention in that letter, launched<br />

a survey of teachers' experience of public examination marking. We hope<br />

that you will be interested in our own collection of comments, made by heads<br />

of department in independent schools –which, you will note, we have anonymised<br />

to reassure participants and which we attach.<br />

This survey is specifically to do with the A* issue at A level in modern languages.<br />

We have attached the comments of all respondents, so that this is in<br />

no way a selection. You will also be aware of the existing synopses of previous<br />

surveys, available at www.ismla.co.uk, which led to our meeting with<br />

both you and Nick Gibb, at that time Minister of State for Schools.<br />

Our experience over the current Ofqual survey has been that teachers appear<br />

to be unaware of the opportunity you have provided to make their comments<br />

known. Heads of department and individual teachers seem not to know of the<br />

existence of the survey. <strong>The</strong>re is in addition the problem of its timing. Many<br />

teachers who one might expect to contribute are involved in the final preparation<br />

of A level candidates; a deadline one week later than the one you have<br />

targeted would have allowed respondents to provide useful and accurate information,<br />

given that examination candidates would by then be on study<br />

leave and teachers would have more time. If we had been informed, we<br />

would have been better able to encourage schools to respond.<br />

We would welcome the opportunity to meet either formally or informally<br />

since, as you will see from the contents of this letter, we believe we can provide<br />

constructive input in this area. Such a meeting might include independent<br />

schools - or, we would prefer, state schools and grammar schools too.<br />

Yours sincerely<br />

Nick Mair Chairman<br />

Geoffrey Plow Vice Chairman<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!