05.11.2014 Views

Intravitreal corticosteroid MWS 2012 Han.ppt (Read-Only)

Intravitreal corticosteroid MWS 2012 Han.ppt (Read-Only)

Intravitreal corticosteroid MWS 2012 Han.ppt (Read-Only)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12/12/11<br />

Disclosure<br />

<strong>Intravitreal</strong> Corticosteroid<br />

Therapy for Retinal Disease:<br />

How and When<br />

Dennis P. <strong>Han</strong>, M.D.<br />

Ø Investigator or co-investigator in<br />

clinical trials for which my institution<br />

(MCW) receives research funds<br />

Allergan<br />

Genentech<br />

2<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Objecves <br />

Ø Brian Berger, M.D.<br />

Ø David Callanan, M.D.<br />

Ø Judy Kim, M.D.<br />

Ø Glenn Jaffe, M.D.<br />

Ø Define delivery modalies, indicaons, <br />

and risks of intravitreal corcosteroid <br />

therapy <br />

Ø Perspecve on the problem of glaucoma <br />

Ø Recommendaons <br />

3<br />

1


12/12/11<br />

Case presentation<br />

Ø 54 year old man with non-ischemic<br />

CRVO OD, negative systemic workup<br />

Ø s/p Trental 400 mg; VA worsened<br />

from 20/25 to 20/100 (8/07-11/07)<br />

Ø 11/07: VA 20/100, 4+CME, phakic<br />

5<br />

Ø Elected participation in the SCORE<br />

trial on IVTA for CRVO 6<br />

7/31/08, 4 months after 2 nd IVTA injection (SCORE trial), VA 20/60, IOP 17, lens clear<br />

7<br />

Mechanisms of corcosteroid <br />

acon <br />

Ø Enhances the barrier function of<br />

vascular tight junctions<br />

Ø Prevents leukocyte migration<br />

Ø Inhibits proinflammatory cytokine<br />

synthesis, and VEGF expression<br />

Ø DME and RVO-ME associated ME are<br />

mediated by VEGF induced loss of<br />

tight junctions and inflammation<br />

Kiernan DF, Mieler WF. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2009;10:2511-2525<br />

Leopold IH. In: Surgical Pharmacology of the Eye. New York, NY: Raven<br />

Press; 1985:83-133.<br />

2


12/12/11<br />

<strong>Intravitreal</strong> triamcinolone<br />

acetonide<br />

Ø Treatment effect lasts<br />

3-5 months<br />

Ø Commonly used<br />

dosages 1-4 mg<br />

Ø Preservative-containing<br />

(Kenalog, Bristol-Myers<br />

Squibb) and<br />

preservative-free<br />

(Triescence, Alcon)<br />

Ozurdex (Allergan)<br />

Dexamethasone implant (6<br />

week sustained release, 0.7 mg<br />

total dose : biphasic release<br />

with lower therapeutic levels for<br />

6 months)<br />

10<br />

Retisert (Bausch and<br />

Lomb)<br />

Fluocinolone acetonide: 2.5<br />

year sustained release for 30<br />

months; 0.59 mg (0.6 mcg/day<br />

for 1 month, decreasing to 0.3-.<br />

4 mcg over 30 mo)<br />

Surgically implanted<br />

Iluvien (Alimera Sciences)<br />

11<br />

Fluocinolone acetonide: 2-3 year sustained<br />

release, 0.2 and 0.5 mcg/day dosage; injector<br />

system for delivery<br />

12<br />

3


12/12/11<br />

Glaucoma in perspective:<br />

sustained therapy<br />

Tube vs Trabeculectomy (TVT)<br />

Study (3 year outcomes)<br />

Agent Topical control Surgery<br />

IVTA 20-35% 1% at 2 years<br />

(DRCR.net)<br />

Dexamethasone implant .7 mg 24% 0.7% at 6 months<br />

Retisert fluocinolone implant 70% 37% at 3 years<br />

Iluvien fluocinolone implant 0, 29% (.2 vs .5 mcg/d) 5% at 1 year<br />

Ranibizumab 9% 0.2% at 2 years<br />

(DRCR.net)<br />

13<br />

Ø In POAG patients, compared to<br />

trabeculectomy, aqueous shunts had<br />

Lower failure rate (15 vs 31%)<br />

Lower endophthalmitis rate (1 vs 3%,<br />

N.S.)<br />

Ø Ranibizumab for DME<br />

endophthalmitis rate 1% over 2 yrs<br />

Ø 22% of tube patients lost ≥2 lines VA<br />

14<br />

Implications of the Tube vs<br />

Trabeculectomy (TVT) Study<br />

Ø “if intravitreal <strong>corticosteroid</strong> therapy<br />

is deemed appropriate, the physician<br />

should proceed with the knowledge<br />

that its risks are manageable and<br />

that visual outcome, not IOP, should<br />

be the final arbiter in the decisionmaking<br />

process.”<br />

Evidence-­‐based data on intravitreal <br />

corcosteroids: mulcenter clinical <br />

trials <br />

Ø Diabec macular edema <br />

Ø Renal vein occlusion <br />

<strong>Han</strong> DP and Heuer DK. <strong>Intravitreal</strong> <strong>corticosteroid</strong> therapy: putting the problem of<br />

glaucoma in perspective. Arch Ophth, in press<br />

15<br />

4


12/12/11<br />

Ozurdex for DME (PLACID<br />

trial): one year results<br />

Mean Change From Baseline BCVA in<br />

Patients With Verified DDME (mITT<br />

Population)<br />

P=.002<br />

P


12/12/11<br />

Iluvien for DME: long term<br />

results<br />

Ø Subgroup analysis of duration of<br />

DME at baseline (0.2µg/d, 3 year<br />

results):<br />

If


12/12/11<br />

Mean Change in Visual Acuity*<br />

at Follow-up Visits:<br />

Pseudophakic Eyes at Baseline<br />

Cumulative Probability of<br />

Cataract Surgery Over 2-Years<br />

Change in Visual Acuity from Baseline (letter score)<br />

11<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100104<br />

Visit Week<br />

*Truncated ± 30 letters<br />

Sham+Prompt Laser<br />

Ranibizumab+Prompt Laser<br />

Ranibizumab+Deferred Laser<br />

Triamcinolone+Prompt Laser<br />

N = 205 (52 weeks)<br />

N = 199 (68 weeks)<br />

N = 196 (84 weeks)<br />

N = 206 (104 weeks)<br />

25<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

0 120 4 240 8 360 12 480 16 600 20 720 24<br />

Month<br />

74%<br />

18%<br />

16%<br />

Sham (N = 192)<br />

Ranibizumab (N = 265)<br />

Triamcinolone (N = 124)<br />

26<br />

Iniaon of IOP-­‐lowering <br />

medicaons* or glaucoma surgery <br />

(2 year follow-­‐up) <br />

IOP meds Glauc surgery<br />

Ø TA + prompt laser (n=93): 50% (2 eyes, 1.1%) <br />

Ø Ranibizumab (n=34): 9% (1 eye, 0.2%) <br />

Ø Sham + prompt laser (n=32): 11% (1 eye, 0.3%) <br />

Ø P


12/12/11<br />

Retinal Vein Occlusion<br />

Ø Benefits of IVTA shown in CRVO but not<br />

BRVO (SCORE trial); 1 mg dose with better<br />

risk profile compared to 4 mg dose*<br />

Ø Benefit of Dexamethasone implant in eyes<br />

with BRVO and CRVO combined w/o<br />

subgroup analysis on outcome**<br />

Ø No direct comparisons exist between<br />

<strong>corticosteroid</strong>s and anti-VEGF agents<br />

*Standard Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion. Report 6. SCORE<br />

Study Research Group. Arch Ophthamol 2009;127:1115-1128<br />

**Haller JA, et al. Dexamethasone <strong>Intravitreal</strong> Implant in Patients with Macular<br />

29<br />

Edema Due to Retinal Vein Occlusion. Ophthalmology 2010;117:1134-1146<br />

Mean Change from Baseline in<br />

VA Letter Score<br />

Mean change from baseline<br />

in visual acuity letter score<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

Obs 1mg 4mg<br />

SCORE CRVO Trial<br />

M4 M8 M12 M16 M20 M24<br />

RVO and ranibizumab: CRUISE<br />

and BRAVO studies<br />

Ø Ranibizumab beneficial for CRVO<br />

and BRVO associated ME given<br />

monthly for 6 months<br />

Ø No significant increase in risk of<br />

cataract or IOP elevation<br />

Ø Open label extension study with<br />

lower dosing frequency after 6<br />

months (HORIZON) showed<br />

sustained benefit in BRVO eyes, but<br />

deterioration in CRVO eyes 31<br />

Mean Change from Baseline in<br />

VA Letter Score<br />

Mean change from baseline<br />

in visual acuity letter score<br />

20<br />

16<br />

12<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

D7 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6<br />

Sham 0.3mg 0.5mg<br />

9.3 letters<br />

BRAVO Trial<br />

11 letters<br />

8


12/12/11<br />

CRUISE Trial<br />

Mean Change from Baseline in<br />

VA Letter Score<br />

Case Presentation<br />

D7 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6<br />

Mean change from baseline<br />

in visual acuity letter score<br />

20<br />

16<br />

12<br />

8<br />

4<br />

0<br />

-4<br />

Sham 0.3mg 0.5mg<br />

11.9 letters<br />

14.1 letters<br />

7/31/08, 4 months after 2 nd IVTA injection (SCORE trial), VA 20/60, IOP 17, lens clear<br />

Patient underwent 3 rd injection of IVTA on 7/31/08; 9/2/08 (5 weeks later)<br />

VA was 20/100, residual IVTA in vitreous cavity; observation elected<br />

34<br />

12/21/10 OCT OD; VA 20/150<br />

11/17/08, 3.5 months after IVTA (SCORE); VA 20/160<br />

From 11/17/08 to 11/16/10 Patient received Avastin 1.25 mg every<br />

month for a total of 19 injections<br />

VA 11/6/10 (after 2 years of Avastin) was 20/150<br />

35<br />

Administered intravitreal Lucentis q 1 month x 7, from 1/11/11 to 7/12/11<br />

36<br />

9


12/12/11<br />

1 month after 6 Lucentis<br />

injections, VA 20/125<br />

7/12/11 OCT OD<br />

37<br />

<strong>Intravitreal</strong> <strong>corticosteroid</strong><br />

therapy<br />

Ø IOP and cataract are downsides<br />

Ø Probably second line to ranibizumab<br />

for DME and RVO<br />

Ø A viable option for DME in<br />

pseudophakes: less frequent<br />

injections, IOP control easier with<br />

some modalities vs. others<br />

Ø Sustained release devices show<br />

promise 38<br />

RVO and ranibizumab: CRUISE<br />

and BRAVO studies<br />

(references)<br />

Ranibizumab for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion: six-month primary<br />

end point results of a phase III study.<br />

Campochiaro PA.,et al.Ophthalmology. 117(6):1102-1112, 2010.<br />

Ranibizumab for macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion: six-month primary<br />

end point results of a phase III study.<br />

Brown DM, et al. Ophthalmology. 117(6):1124-1133.e1, 2010.<br />

39<br />

40<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!