Course Handbook - Faculty of History
Course Handbook - Faculty of History
Course Handbook - Faculty of History
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Training and Taught <strong>Course</strong>s, or, if these are not available, by the Director <strong>of</strong> Graduate<br />
Studies. The <strong>of</strong>ficer attending in this capacity will be present at the viva only as an observer<br />
and will not participate in the discussion. The viva will either confirm the fail or marginal fail<br />
or generate an upward revision <strong>of</strong> the mark to a passing grade. In either case, a joint report will<br />
be supplied by the two examiners.<br />
Leave to continue to the PhD<br />
An agreed dissertation mark <strong>of</strong> 67 will normally be required for a recommendation that the<br />
student be allowed to proceed to the PhD or the MLitt degrees. Examiners should give detailed<br />
reasons in their reports if they would wish to recommend that a candidate be allowed to<br />
continue to the PhD to whom they have awarded a mark below 67.<br />
Distinctions<br />
‘Distinctions’ are not awarded by strict numerical average but, as in <strong>History</strong> Tripos<br />
classification, by the number <strong>of</strong> marks <strong>of</strong> 75 or higher obtained. The qualifying mark for the<br />
dissertation must be at least an agreed mark <strong>of</strong> 68 in order for the candidate to receive the<br />
designation <strong>of</strong> ‘Distinction’ in the MPhil as a whole. Further, a candidate needs a majority <strong>of</strong><br />
marks to be <strong>of</strong> 75 or above, OR for him/her to have two marks <strong>of</strong> 75 or above and an overall<br />
scaled average <strong>of</strong> 75+. For purposes <strong>of</strong> calculating this average, the marks are scaled as<br />
follows: palaeography: at 60; bibliography and historiographical essay: at 80; subject essay: at<br />
100; dissertation: at 300. Candidates should note that the scaling <strong>of</strong> palaeography does not<br />
indicate that it is taken less seriously than the other components, but that the wide range <strong>of</strong><br />
marks attainable in this subject necessitates scaling at this level to prevent it having much<br />
greater weight than any <strong>of</strong> the other elements.<br />
Students will be provided with details <strong>of</strong> their marks through their supervisors, after both Part<br />
I (including, if necessary, a ‘danger <strong>of</strong> fail’ warning) and Part II. After Part I the copies <strong>of</strong><br />
their bibliography will be returned to them with examiners’ corrections, so that such<br />
corrections may be incorporated into the bibliography in the dissertation. Anonymised<br />
examiners’ reports will be sent to candidates once the marks/results for each Part have been<br />
confirmed by the relevant committees. Candidates will be notified by the Board <strong>of</strong> Graduate<br />
Studies whether they have passed or not but notification <strong>of</strong> a distinction will come from the<br />
Secretary <strong>of</strong> the MPhil Sub-Committee.<br />
This document is supplied to supervisors, examiners and candidates.<br />
August 2010<br />
32