Jurisdictional statement - About Redistricting - Loyola Law School
Jurisdictional statement - About Redistricting - Loyola Law School
Jurisdictional statement - About Redistricting - Loyola Law School
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
32<br />
intent.’” Keyes, 413 U.S. at 208. According to the<br />
Keyes Court:<br />
Plainly, a finding of intentional segregation as to<br />
a portion of a school system is not devoid of probative<br />
value in assessing the school authorities’<br />
intent with respect to other parts of the same<br />
school system. On the contrary where, as here,<br />
the case involves one school board, a finding of<br />
intentional segregation on its part in one portion<br />
of a school system is highly relevant to the issue<br />
of the board’s intent with respect to the other<br />
segregated schools in the system.<br />
Id. at 207-08 (citations omitted).<br />
For precisely these same reasons, if the General<br />
Assembly engaged in purposeful racial discrimination<br />
with respect to any districts, then such discrimination<br />
tends to show a consistent pattern of conduct<br />
highly relevant to the legislature’s purpose regarding<br />
other districts. Given that plaintiffs allege their districts,<br />
like others in South Carolina, were the result<br />
of a single, integrated, systematic discriminatory<br />
scheme of purposeful racial segregation, evidence of<br />
such discrimination with respect to other districts is<br />
relevant to the General Assembly’s motivation regarding<br />
the districts in which plaintiffs reside.<br />
For either of these two reasons, the three-judge<br />
court’s standing ruling improperly truncated the<br />
development of a full trial record that would have<br />
permitted plaintiffs to offer evidence about the legislature’s<br />
systematic use of race on a statewide basis.<br />
This Court could summarily reverse on this issue<br />
alone and remand for proper development of a full<br />
trial record under the appropriate constitutional<br />
standards.