PDF: 21st Annual Corporate Survey Complete Results - Area ...
PDF: 21st Annual Corporate Survey Complete Results - Area ...
PDF: 21st Annual Corporate Survey Complete Results - Area ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
mid-size or large in terms of employment. More than 40<br />
percent employ 100–499 people at all facilities, 14 percent<br />
have 500–999 employees, and more than a quarter<br />
employ 1,000 or more (Figure 3).<br />
FIGURE 6<br />
Primary reasons for decreasing number of facilities:<br />
Consolidation of existing operations — 63%<br />
Decrease in product sales — 38%<br />
Need to lower operating/labor costs — 75%<br />
Outdated facility — 38%<br />
Other — 13%<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />
FIGURE 7<br />
Primary role in company’s location decisions:<br />
FIGURE 8<br />
Title of respondents:<br />
Final decision — 45%<br />
Preliminary decision — 29%<br />
Information gathering — 21%<br />
Not involved — 5%<br />
Chairman, President, Partner, CEO,<br />
or Owner — 41%<br />
V.P., Treasurer, Secretary, or<br />
Other <strong>Corporate</strong> Officer — 32%<br />
Real Estate Mgr./Dir.; Facility Mgr./Dir.;<br />
Dev. Mgr./Dir.; V.P. Real Estate — 16%<br />
<strong>Corporate</strong> Manager — 7%<br />
Other — 4%<br />
There has been a decline in the number of respondent<br />
firms increasing their number of facilities. This year,<br />
25 percent said they had increased their number of<br />
facilities over the past 12 months, as compared with 29<br />
percent citing an increase in facilities in the 2004 and<br />
2005 surveys. However, only 10 percent of this year’s<br />
respondents reported a decrease in their number of<br />
facilities over the past 12 months — fewer than the 13<br />
percent in 2005 and 17 percent in 2004 making such a<br />
claim (Figure 4).<br />
Nearly three-quarters of the respondents reporting<br />
an increase in their number of facilities said it was due to<br />
increased sales/production. More than half said they<br />
were serving new markets, and nearly half had new<br />
product lines (Figure 5).<br />
Of those who said they had decreased their number<br />
of facilities, nearly two thirds said this was in response to<br />
a consolidation of existing operations. Importantly, a full<br />
three quarters said they needed to lower operating and<br />
labor costs (Figure 6).<br />
Forty-five percent of the respondents to our 2006<br />
<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> are involved in their companies’ final<br />
location decision. And another 50 percent are either<br />
involved in the preliminary location decision or information<br />
gathering (Figure 7). These respondents are at high<br />
levels within their firms: 41 percent are the chairpersons,<br />
CEOs, or owners; and a third are corporate officers (Figure<br />
8). Knowing the respondents’ level of involvement in<br />
the site selection process makes their facilities projections<br />
for the coming years — which follow below —<br />
quite credible.