07.11.2014 Views

PDF: 21st Annual Corporate Survey Complete Results - Area ...

PDF: 21st Annual Corporate Survey Complete Results - Area ...

PDF: 21st Annual Corporate Survey Complete Results - Area ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

mid-size or large in terms of employment. More than 40<br />

percent employ 100–499 people at all facilities, 14 percent<br />

have 500–999 employees, and more than a quarter<br />

employ 1,000 or more (Figure 3).<br />

FIGURE 6<br />

Primary reasons for decreasing number of facilities:<br />

Consolidation of existing operations — 63%<br />

Decrease in product sales — 38%<br />

Need to lower operating/labor costs — 75%<br />

Outdated facility — 38%<br />

Other — 13%<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />

FIGURE 7<br />

Primary role in company’s location decisions:<br />

FIGURE 8<br />

Title of respondents:<br />

Final decision — 45%<br />

Preliminary decision — 29%<br />

Information gathering — 21%<br />

Not involved — 5%<br />

Chairman, President, Partner, CEO,<br />

or Owner — 41%<br />

V.P., Treasurer, Secretary, or<br />

Other <strong>Corporate</strong> Officer — 32%<br />

Real Estate Mgr./Dir.; Facility Mgr./Dir.;<br />

Dev. Mgr./Dir.; V.P. Real Estate — 16%<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> Manager — 7%<br />

Other — 4%<br />

There has been a decline in the number of respondent<br />

firms increasing their number of facilities. This year,<br />

25 percent said they had increased their number of<br />

facilities over the past 12 months, as compared with 29<br />

percent citing an increase in facilities in the 2004 and<br />

2005 surveys. However, only 10 percent of this year’s<br />

respondents reported a decrease in their number of<br />

facilities over the past 12 months — fewer than the 13<br />

percent in 2005 and 17 percent in 2004 making such a<br />

claim (Figure 4).<br />

Nearly three-quarters of the respondents reporting<br />

an increase in their number of facilities said it was due to<br />

increased sales/production. More than half said they<br />

were serving new markets, and nearly half had new<br />

product lines (Figure 5).<br />

Of those who said they had decreased their number<br />

of facilities, nearly two thirds said this was in response to<br />

a consolidation of existing operations. Importantly, a full<br />

three quarters said they needed to lower operating and<br />

labor costs (Figure 6).<br />

Forty-five percent of the respondents to our 2006<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> are involved in their companies’ final<br />

location decision. And another 50 percent are either<br />

involved in the preliminary location decision or information<br />

gathering (Figure 7). These respondents are at high<br />

levels within their firms: 41 percent are the chairpersons,<br />

CEOs, or owners; and a third are corporate officers (Figure<br />

8). Knowing the respondents’ level of involvement in<br />

the site selection process makes their facilities projections<br />

for the coming years — which follow below —<br />

quite credible.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!