07.11.2014 Views

GhubrahIncidentInves.. - authority for electricity regulation, oman

GhubrahIncidentInves.. - authority for electricity regulation, oman

GhubrahIncidentInves.. - authority for electricity regulation, oman

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Report Number: R 8991<br />

Issue: 1.1<br />

3 PROCESS<br />

Hypochlorite is used during the desalination process to control bacterial growth<br />

within the system. Hydrogen is a by-product of the process. The Hypochlorite<br />

treatment process separates the majority of the hydrogen in separators prior to being<br />

pumped into the hypochlorite storage cylinder. Each cylinder is allowed to vent to<br />

atmosphere, and to assist the ventilation process, three fans, two running and one in<br />

standby are used, common to the four cylinders. Although the majority of the<br />

hydrogen is separated, prior to storage, there still remains a ‘trace’ level. The ‘D’<br />

hypochlorite cylinder was reportedly 80% full (liquid) allowing the remaining head<br />

space to fill with hydrogen separated from the hypochlorite be<strong>for</strong>e venting to<br />

atmosphere. Note, the cylinders vent to atmosphere and are there<strong>for</strong>e not classed as<br />

pressurised vessels.<br />

4 PROBABLE CAUSE<br />

4.1 Inadequate Permit to Work considerations<br />

Permit PTW / LOA No. 10795/L does not state whether it is a hot or cold permit to<br />

work, neither box is ticked. However, the wording on the permit indicates that it was<br />

considered to be a ‘cold’ PTW covering the cylinder painting activity only. Under a<br />

‘cold’ permit to work the painters contacted mechanical maintenance to assess and /<br />

or replace the hooding on the four hypochlorite cylinders. Work order No. LO<br />

42/04/06 was issued and progressed <strong>for</strong> Tanks A, B and D with reference to LOA<br />

No. 10795/L with no Risk Assessment evident. Repair maintenance to Cylinder ‘C’<br />

was completed without incident under a separate Work Order LO 37/03/06 (not<br />

included). During the maintenance activities on the ‘D’ cylinder the two maintenance<br />

fitters were using an electric drill in proximity to the cylinder vent, where the<br />

probability of hydrogen gas being present should have been considered to be the<br />

norm, and there<strong>for</strong>e a significant risk to health and safety given the work involving a<br />

potential source of ignition.<br />

4.2 Probable source of ignition<br />

The electric drill being used at the time of the incident was of a standard ‘DIY’ type<br />

with the original plug removed and ‘taped’ to extension cord with a 13 amp, standard<br />

3-pin domestic plug. The plug was inserted into an extension lead drum (still coiled<br />

(not good practice)) with an industrial plug fitted. An electric drill will always issue<br />

sparks from the brushes and in all probability a spark from the drill brushes (or at<br />

least, some similar <strong>for</strong>m of ignition) ignited the hydrogen gas venting from the<br />

hypochlorite tank which caused the hydrogen within the cylinder to explode (gas was<br />

under the constraints of the cylinder) and hence a ‘fire ball’ issued from the vent<br />

causing the fatal injuries to the two maintenance fitters.<br />

4.3 Related Observations<br />

The explosion was of sufficient <strong>for</strong>ce to lift the entire cylinder c. 100mm from its<br />

anchoring bolts and snap a 200mm drainage pipe with pipe wall thickness of c.<br />

12mm.<br />

Page 6 / 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!