PRS User Community - European GNSS Agency
PRS User Community - European GNSS Agency
PRS User Community - European GNSS Agency
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>PRS</strong> <strong>User</strong> <strong>Community</strong><br />
Jean-Christophe MARTIN<br />
Chairman of WG <strong>PRS</strong><br />
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. DG ENTR. GP3
Responsabilities<br />
Under Regulation 683/2008 from <strong>European</strong> Parliament &<br />
Council, <strong>European</strong> Commission is responsible of the<br />
program management & of the security of GALILEO.<br />
EC is advised by GSB (<strong>GNSS</strong> Security Board) & WG<br />
<strong>PRS</strong><br />
EC is supported by GSA (« EGA » )<br />
Jean-Christophe MARTIN DG TREN GP 3
<strong>PRS</strong> <strong>User</strong> Communities<br />
Characterisation<br />
Law Enforcement, Internal Security & Customs<br />
Police, Coast Guards, Special Units etc.<br />
Emergency Services<br />
Fire Brigades, Civil Protection, Ambulances etc.<br />
Critical Energy, Critical Telecom<br />
Network operators, Energy Suppliers<br />
Critical Transport<br />
Mass, high-value & hazardous goods transporters<br />
Strategic, Economic & Commercial activities<br />
Banks, Commercial ports, Space Agencies etc.<br />
Defence<br />
Army, Navy, Air Force, Joint Forces<br />
Survey in all EU Member States & Norway<br />
Wide coverage of potential <strong>PRS</strong> <strong>User</strong> Communities & Applications
State of the art<br />
<strong>PRS</strong> <strong>User</strong> Communities<br />
Characterisation<br />
On going activities<br />
PROJECT PILOT<br />
Review of last Studies<br />
Identification of <strong>PRS</strong> UCs<br />
Awareness & Interaction Plan<br />
PILOT PROJECT &<br />
PACIFIC studies<br />
<strong>User</strong> <strong>Community</strong><br />
National Support<br />
Workshops<br />
Awareness Actions<br />
+<br />
MS Bilateral Sessions<br />
(10 MS)<br />
Identify & characterise potential <strong>PRS</strong> UCs<br />
across EU-27 & Norway<br />
Inform about <strong>GNSS</strong>, Galileo, <strong>PRS</strong><br />
technologies & services (Malta October<br />
2010, France November...)<br />
Interact with MS on applications,<br />
operational scenarios, requirements &<br />
expectations (10 MS are involved in Pilot<br />
Project at this stage)<br />
» Synthesis & Recommendations for the<br />
introduction of <strong>PRS</strong> into <strong>User</strong><br />
Communities to WG <strong>PRS</strong> & EC<br />
(Program Management & security)<br />
Synthesis & Recommendations<br />
WG <strong>PRS</strong><br />
Focus on and interact with potential <strong>PRS</strong> <strong>User</strong> Communities
<strong>PRS</strong> <strong>User</strong> Communities<br />
Norway<br />
Navy & Coast Guards -<br />
Denmark<br />
Economic Activities -<br />
Netherlands<br />
Customs -<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Health Services -<br />
Telecom Operator -<br />
Energy Supplier -<br />
Police -<br />
France<br />
Defence -<br />
Fire Brigades -<br />
Space <strong>Agency</strong> -<br />
Spain<br />
Health Services -<br />
Portugal<br />
Defence -<br />
Economic Activities -<br />
Finland<br />
- Defence<br />
- Border Police<br />
Germany<br />
- Police<br />
- Mass Transport<br />
Poland<br />
- Special Operations<br />
Czech Republic<br />
- Search & Rescue<br />
Austria<br />
- Defence<br />
Italy<br />
- Defence<br />
- Civil Protection<br />
- Energy Supplier<br />
Greece<br />
- Police<br />
- Emergency Services
Application Domains<br />
<strong>PRS</strong> <strong>User</strong> Communities<br />
Characterisation<br />
Main operational scenarios and applications<br />
• Law Enforcement<br />
– Police<br />
– Special Ops<br />
– Customs<br />
• Emergency Services<br />
– Fire Brigades<br />
– Ambulances<br />
– Civil Protection<br />
• Defence<br />
– Army<br />
– Marine<br />
– Air Force<br />
• Day to day patrolling coordinated by a control centre<br />
– Navigation/Positioning for Land vehicles & Handsets<br />
• Particular security measures enforcement<br />
– During particular events (Olympics, G8 Summit...)<br />
– Involving various kind of platforms<br />
– Tracking of suspects’ profiles, dangerous goods<br />
• Coordination of land vehicles<br />
– Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL)<br />
– poss. Navigation<br />
• Location of emergency personnel<br />
– Navigation information for the unit<br />
– Reporting of position & status for the control centre<br />
• Various types of applications & platforms<br />
– As a backup: Navy vessels, some aircraft…<br />
– As a Sole Mean: Infantryman equipment, some synchronisation<br />
applications…<br />
– As a setting mean for other PNT systems: Helicopters...<br />
Note: This list of potential applications is based on inputs from users.<br />
Each Member State will be responsible for authorising its users and applications for <strong>PRS</strong>.
Application Domains<br />
<strong>PRS</strong> <strong>User</strong> Communities<br />
Characterisation<br />
Main operational scenarios and applications<br />
• Critical Telecom<br />
– Network Operators<br />
• Critical Energy<br />
– Energy Suppliers<br />
• Critical Transport<br />
– Civil Aviation<br />
• Network synchronisation and timing<br />
– <strong>GNSS</strong> as primary reference clocks<br />
(backed with atomic clocks)<br />
– Frequency calibration of radio signals (GSM base stations)<br />
• Network monitoring and control<br />
– Internal oscillator management<br />
– Time stamping of incident<br />
– Synchronised measurements<br />
• None applications identified for <strong>PRS</strong> due to<br />
certification & security constraints (except 1)<br />
• Strategic Activities<br />
– Commercial Ports<br />
– Space Agencies<br />
• Commercial ports<br />
– Vessel traffic management<br />
– Container tracking & tracing<br />
• Space agencies<br />
– Positioning of spacecraft (orbit control & restitution)<br />
– Synch. of on board clocks & comm. links<br />
Note: This list of potential applications is based on inputs from users.<br />
Each Member State is sovereign and will be responsible for authorising its users and applications for <strong>PRS</strong>.
<strong>PRS</strong> <strong>User</strong> Communities<br />
Characterisation<br />
Commonalities<br />
• Interferences & Jamming are possible and increasing threats<br />
• Consequence of the loss of <strong>GNSS</strong> capabilities is critical<br />
Positioning<br />
Navigation<br />
Timing<br />
• Coordination centre no longer<br />
receive the position of units<br />
Degraded capabilities (e.g.<br />
voice communication)<br />
Automated coordination<br />
process not possible<br />
Degraded or No capability<br />
• No reliance on <strong>GNSS</strong> only for<br />
critical applications<br />
• Degraded mode for other<br />
applications<br />
Degraded capability<br />
• Probably the most critical<br />
• Some networks synchronised<br />
with <strong>GNSS</strong> stop within hours<br />
• Spoofing of <strong>GNSS</strong> Rx is critical<br />
for ground stations<br />
No capability
Receiver Types<br />
<strong>PRS</strong> <strong>User</strong> Communities<br />
Characterisation<br />
<strong>User</strong>s<br />
Platforms<br />
Receiver Types <strong>User</strong>s Platforms<br />
• Handheld<br />
• Law<br />
Enforcement<br />
• Emergency<br />
Services<br />
• Defence<br />
• Pedestrian<br />
• Land vehicle<br />
• Helicopters<br />
• Small boats<br />
• Tracking<br />
(Medium Size)<br />
• Law Enforcement<br />
• Commercial Ports<br />
• Containers<br />
• Road Navigation /<br />
Positioning<br />
• Law Enforcement • Land vehicle<br />
• Emergency<br />
Services<br />
• Synchronisation<br />
• Law Enforcement<br />
• Critical Telecom<br />
• Critical Energy<br />
• Space Agencies<br />
• Defence<br />
• Infrastructure<br />
• Truck, shelters<br />
• Airborne • Defence • Fighters<br />
• Transport Aircrafts<br />
• Space borne • Space Agencies • Spacecraft<br />
• Tracking<br />
(Small Size)<br />
• Law<br />
Enforcement<br />
• Small devices<br />
• Pedestrian Mobile<br />
phones<br />
• Ship borne<br />
• Commercial Ports<br />
• Defence<br />
• Commercial<br />
Ships<br />
• Military Ships
<strong>PRS</strong> <strong>User</strong> Communities<br />
Characterisation<br />
<strong>PRS</strong> performances & features<br />
• Accuracy:<br />
– GPS/SPS performances fulfil current requirements<br />
– Augmentation services used in particular cases.<br />
• Integrity:<br />
– Overall, no particular requirements expressed by the UCs<br />
– Defence platforms: level of integrity requirements to be<br />
studied on a case-by-case basis<br />
– Space applications: lack of integrity limits the use of<br />
<strong>GNSS</strong> sole means.<br />
• Continuity:<br />
– Not fully satisfactory today, main issue being in urban &<br />
mountain canyons<br />
• Availability:<br />
– Poor availability of the GPS satellites is an issue at high<br />
latitudes and in urban environment<br />
• Time to First Fix:<br />
– Improvement would be welcome in case of cold and<br />
even hot start of the receiver in particular in urban<br />
environments.<br />
• Robustness/Security:<br />
– Interferences/jamming not been clearly experimented<br />
so far -> Not a strong requirement today<br />
– Security of <strong>GNSS</strong> will be a critical issue in the future due<br />
to increasing threats<br />
– Some Defence UCs have highlighted that as civilian<br />
<strong>User</strong> Communities will access to <strong>PRS</strong> signals, Need for a<br />
better definition of the <strong>PRS</strong> receiver’s denial policy<br />
• Interoperability:<br />
– NATO Nations Defence UCs could use Galileo <strong>PRS</strong> as a<br />
useful civil system in combination with GPS/PPS.<br />
• Position & time-stamping:<br />
• Need to provide proof in front of court of justice, e.g.<br />
proving time of rescue.
Cost Aspects<br />
•Expected cost of a <strong>PRS</strong> receiver<br />
<strong>PRS</strong> <strong>User</strong> Communities<br />
Characterisation<br />
•1rst generation receiver : Target is 1000€ for Low end <strong>PRS</strong> receiver<br />
5000<br />
Example of price of <strong>GNSS</strong> civil based<br />
equipments today and the expected<br />
increase due to <strong>PRS</strong> (€)<br />
• Most critical part of the receiver is the security module (SM), which is<br />
of the highest priority for EC. A high knowledge and a long process of<br />
development (+- 3 years) are needed. The SM is a driver in the cost of<br />
the receiver (mid term target : +- 100 € for production of 10 000/ year<br />
in 2016)<br />
• Security Module studies will be welcomed and analysed carefully in<br />
FP7 3 rd call (+- 3 to 5 M€), depending on the quality of the proposals<br />
4500<br />
4000<br />
3500<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
Security Aspects<br />
• Management of keys and control of access:<br />
– shall be compatible with existing procedures (in particular for PMR users or<br />
Defence organisations) therefore as “invisible” as possible for the users.<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
• Accountability of receivers<br />
– Accountability/Report of loss is in most cases an usual procedure<br />
– Interest for a “kill” capability such as used for communication Receiver<br />
Note: The considerations presented on this slide are based on inputs from users.<br />
<strong>PRS</strong> Cost of Service & Security Management are still to be defined at <strong>European</strong> and Member State level.<br />
GPS Rx for Goods<br />
Tracking<br />
GPS vehicle Rx without<br />
display<br />
GPS vehicle Rx with<br />
display<br />
GPS built-in TETRA<br />
handset<br />
GPS Rx for Timing<br />
Complete in-vehicle<br />
system
<strong>PRS</strong> Market – Addressable Market<br />
Market Figures (EU & Norway)<br />
Analysis<br />
• <strong>PRS</strong> may bring benefits for numerous <strong>User</strong>s<br />
in various Applications Domains<br />
• Market Boosters are:<br />
Defence<br />
– Defence<br />
0,4%<br />
0,2%<br />
0,3%<br />
43,4%<br />
Law Enforcement<br />
Emergency Services<br />
– Law Enforcement & Emergency Services<br />
(especially PMR users)<br />
• 80% Low End Core receiver<br />
18,3%<br />
37,5%<br />
Critical Transport<br />
Critical Energy &<br />
Critical Telecom<br />
• 20% High/Medium End Core Receiver<br />
Strategic, Economic &<br />
Commercial Activities<br />
Large addressable market for <strong>PRS</strong><br />
Defence & PMR <strong>User</strong>s are market<br />
drivers
<strong>PRS</strong> Market<br />
Key drivers for <strong>PRS</strong> Penetration<br />
• <strong>PRS</strong> Market Boosters:<br />
– Defence<br />
– PMR users (Law Enforcement &<br />
Emergency Services)<br />
• Main criteria for <strong>PRS</strong> Use:<br />
– Increase of cost is limited<br />
– Combination of PMR & <strong>PRS</strong> will be of great benefit for many users (police, custom…)<br />
who will use a secured communication and a secured navigation<br />
– For PPS users, increase capability to 60 satellites instead of 30 (even if GALILEO is a civil<br />
system under civil control, MS will be sovereign to decide for its use).
Combined Use<br />
• Combined GPS/SPS, Galileo <strong>PRS</strong> & PMR Rx<br />
• Combined GPS/PPS and Galileo <strong>PRS</strong> Rx<br />
(Defence users)<br />
<strong>PRS</strong> <strong>User</strong> Communities<br />
Key <strong>PRS</strong> Enablers<br />
> <strong>PRS</strong> envisaged as an added value to<br />
existing systems (due in particular to<br />
signals compatibility GALILEO <strong>PRS</strong> &<br />
GPS PPS)<br />
Communication link<br />
• Need for a reliable communication link<br />
to take full benefits of <strong>PRS</strong><br />
• Use of the TETRA secured network<br />
could improve benefit for the user<br />
Improved communication &<br />
positioning capability<br />
Compliance with existing environment<br />
• Use of <strong>PRS</strong> to be compatible with the<br />
NATO NAVWAR policy and technical<br />
principles<br />
• Compliance with procedures existing for<br />
PMR key management & accountability<br />
Facilitate <strong>PRS</strong> acceptability<br />
<strong>PRS</strong> SUCCESS<br />
<strong>PRS</strong> Performances & Features<br />
• <strong>PRS</strong> will be higly secured and compatible<br />
with <strong>GNSS</strong> augmentations/local elements<br />
to cover future applications<br />
Authentication provided by <strong>PRS</strong> may<br />
facilitate the position and time-stamping<br />
Development of certain capability as a<br />
strategic choice (anti-jamming…)<br />
<strong>PRS</strong> higly secured and compatible<br />
with future applications & needs