3 4 CHAIRMAN: Good morning, Ms. Dillon. 5 6 - The Tribunal of ...

16
10:59:11
1 Q. 96 You see, you have previously told the Tribunal --
2 A. That's right.
3 Q. 97 -- in answer to Judge Faherty in the Ballycullen Module --
4 A. That's right.
10:59:17
5 Q. 98 And Judge Faherty pressed you on this and she asked you twice about this on day
6 613, as to whether you had ever signed a motion outside of your electoral area
7 and you replied and the page is, day 613 page 90, please.
8
9 And Judge Faherty says:
10:59:40
10
11 "That's what I'm asking you. Do I take it you wouldn't sign a motion that
12 wasn't in your electoral area?
13 A: No I wouldn't".
14 A. Well I would have interrupted perhaps and maybe clarify it now. I wouldn't
11:00:01
15 propose anything but in fact, to be supportive of a motion is different than
16 signing one. I wasn't going to make a contribution. But I just thought that
17 was a good compromise.
18 Q. 99 Just to look at the answer you gave Judge Faherty and we'll see where there
19 could have been any room for ambiguity in the question that you were asked.
11:00:09
20 If we look at the bottom of the page 90. Judge Faherty says to you
21 "That's what I'm asking you. Do you I take it that you wouldn't sign?"
22 Judge Faherty did not say "support" Ms. Ormonde.
23 A. I know.
24 Q. 100 "Do I take it you wouldn't sign a motion that wasn't in your elector area."
11:00:22
25 And the next page.
26 "A: No, I wouldn't".
27
28 Are you saying now that you didn't understand Judge Faherty's question?
29 A. Well it's a play on words. Thank perhaps -- I mean sign is supporting. I
11:00:36
30 had obviously I wouldn't say it now in that sense. Now that it's brought to my
Premier Captioning & Realtime Limited
www.pcr.ie Day 645