3 4 CHAIRMAN: Good morning, Ms. Dillon. 5 6 - The Tribunal of ...

18
11:02:21
1
2 MS. DILLON: What your vague idea.
3 A. My vague idea is that I was in the council around that time. I was listening
4 to the debate and I thought a compromise is good for this area. And it's on
11:02:34
5 that basis that I thought that this should be pushed.
6 Q. 106 Can you explain what compromise you are talking about, Ms. Ormonde?
7 A. Well the compromise is that all of the land would not be rezoned. Part of the
8 land would be rezoned at one house to the acre. And then portion of the land
9 would be rezoned at four houses to the acre.
11:02:53
10 Q. 107 If we just look at the map for a moment. At 7217, Ms. Ormonde.
11 A. I have no signalling.
12 Q. 108 It'll come in a second. Now, these lands were already zoned residential in
13 1983.
14 A. Yes.
11:03:13
15 Q. 109 So in term of rezoning, there's no rezoning going know on here. What's being
16 discussed is density, isn't that right?
17 A. That's right.
18 Q. 110 So we're not talking about rezoning these lands.
19 A. All right. Okay.
11:03:25
20 Q. 111 Nobody is suggesting that they would be anything other than residential.
21 Isn't that the position?
22 A. Yeah.
23 Q. 112 What is being discussed here is density. How many houses to the acre, isn't
24 that the position?
11:03:34
25 A. Yes.
26 Q. 113 Now, I asked you about seven minutes ago. Looking at that map to identify any
27 reason as to why the northern portion of those lands would have one density and
28 the southern portion would have another. And I don't think you gave any
29 explanation or answer to the Tribunal. Isn't that right?
11:03:51
30 A. Well I'm not very clear on it, to be quite honest with you.
Premier Captioning & Realtime Limited
www.pcr.ie Day 645