3 4 CHAIRMAN: Good morning, Ms. Dillon. 5 6 - The Tribunal of ...

28
11:16:39
1 case, isn't that right?
2 A. Absolutely.
3 Q. 157 Now, what were the merits of the Monarch case that entitled them to four houses
4 to the acre as opposed to the rest of the Carrickmines Valley?
11:16:47
5 A. I wasn't talking in terms of merits to them. I was talking -- I was in the
6 context that I thought it was a good compromise at the time. I thought that
7 they would balance four houses to the acre and in one section and one house to
8 the acre in the other section. That was the way I read it.
9 Q. 158 Do you know why you voted four houses to the acre for the Monarch lands?
11:17:08
10 A. No. Only in what I've said to you.
11 Q. 159 The end result of the vote as a result of your motion, Ms. Ormonde, is at 2720
12 and on the final 1993 plan in the Carrickmines Valley you see the yellow lands?
13 A. Yes, I do.
14 Q. 160 Do you see within that the lands that are outlined in red?
11:17:29
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. 161 You see a portion of them are blue, a portion are pink and a portion are
17 hatched red?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. 162 The Monarch lands had a density of four to the acre and the balance of the
11:17:42
20 residentially zoned lands had one house to the acre.
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. 163 And that was as a result of your motion, isn't that right?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. 164 And you can't explain to the Tribunal --
11:17:51
25 A. No.
26 Q. 165 Any sound planning or zoning reason as to why that would have happened, isn't
27 that right?
28 A. That's true. That's true.
29 Q. 166 Now, in relation to the second motion that took place on that date. Which was
11:18:08
30 the C zoning. You again signed a motion in relation to the C zoning, at 7228.
Premier Captioning & Realtime Limited
www.pcr.ie Day 645