NE Resilience Report - Conservation Gateway
NE Resilience Report - Conservation Gateway
NE Resilience Report - Conservation Gateway
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Sites (1000 Acre Hexagons): We attributed each hexagon with information and scores for the resilience<br />
factors described in the previous chapters: landform variety, elevation range, wetland density, local<br />
connectedness, regional flow concentrations, and the integrated variables of landscape complexity and<br />
estimated resilience. For each factor, we calculated the minimum, maximum, range, mean, standard<br />
deviation, sum, variety, majority, minority, and median for each hexagon using zonal statistics in ArcGIS<br />
Toolbox. Additionally, we overlaid point locations of rare species and natural communities compiled<br />
from the 13 State Natural Heritage program’s ongoing inventory.<br />
Individual Geophysical Settings: For each geophysical setting we identified the area with the highest<br />
resilience scores by calculating the mean estimated resilience score for all cells of each setting, and then<br />
identifying those hexagons that scored above the mean OR that were above the mean for the entire<br />
region. The end of this chapter presents each setting individually with a list of the associated communities<br />
and rare species, the geophysical characteristics, the securement status, and the final resilience scores<br />
(Maps 5.1 - 5.17). The content and structure of each page is shown below.<br />
____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
LAYOUT AND CONTENT OF THE SETTINGS PAGES<br />
ABREVIATION: NAME OF SETTING<br />
Description: Short description of key characteristics of this setting<br />
Figure: a map of the distribution of the setting, exaggerated to make it easy<br />
to see single cell (compare with the map below).<br />
Example: Current Communities<br />
Examples of natural communities located primarily within this setting, and<br />
that are inventoried and monitored by the State Natural Heritage Programs<br />
Securement status: The total amount of this setting that falls on secured land (GAP 1, 2 or3, top row),<br />
and the percentage of each resilience category that falls on each type of secured land (Rows 4-8). In this<br />
example the 4 percent secured as Gap 1 or 2 is composed of 1 percent on far above average sites.<br />
<strong>Resilience</strong> Score Category Percents Acres<br />
GAP1 or 2 GAP3 Unsecured Total Acres<br />
L:COARSE 4% 6% 90% 9,653,844<br />
1: Far Below Average 0% 1% 18% 1,782,104<br />
2: Below Average 0% 1% 13% 1,298,121<br />
3: Average 2% 2% 34% 3,663,419<br />
4: Above Average 1% 1% 12% 1,316,133<br />
5: Far Above Average 1% 2% 14% 1,594,067<br />
Map: A map of the setting with each cell colored by its resilience score category, either above or below<br />
the average for the setting.<br />
____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
42 Resilient Sites for Terrestrial <strong>Conservation</strong> in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Region<br />
The Nature Conservancy • Eastern <strong>Conservation</strong> Science • Eastern Division • 99 Bedford St • Boston, MA 02111