10.11.2014 Views

NE Resilience Report - Conservation Gateway

NE Resilience Report - Conservation Gateway

NE Resilience Report - Conservation Gateway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sites (1000 Acre Hexagons): We attributed each hexagon with information and scores for the resilience<br />

factors described in the previous chapters: landform variety, elevation range, wetland density, local<br />

connectedness, regional flow concentrations, and the integrated variables of landscape complexity and<br />

estimated resilience. For each factor, we calculated the minimum, maximum, range, mean, standard<br />

deviation, sum, variety, majority, minority, and median for each hexagon using zonal statistics in ArcGIS<br />

Toolbox. Additionally, we overlaid point locations of rare species and natural communities compiled<br />

from the 13 State Natural Heritage program’s ongoing inventory.<br />

Individual Geophysical Settings: For each geophysical setting we identified the area with the highest<br />

resilience scores by calculating the mean estimated resilience score for all cells of each setting, and then<br />

identifying those hexagons that scored above the mean OR that were above the mean for the entire<br />

region. The end of this chapter presents each setting individually with a list of the associated communities<br />

and rare species, the geophysical characteristics, the securement status, and the final resilience scores<br />

(Maps 5.1 - 5.17). The content and structure of each page is shown below.<br />

____________________________________________________________________________________<br />

LAYOUT AND CONTENT OF THE SETTINGS PAGES<br />

ABREVIATION: NAME OF SETTING<br />

Description: Short description of key characteristics of this setting<br />

Figure: a map of the distribution of the setting, exaggerated to make it easy<br />

to see single cell (compare with the map below).<br />

Example: Current Communities<br />

Examples of natural communities located primarily within this setting, and<br />

that are inventoried and monitored by the State Natural Heritage Programs<br />

Securement status: The total amount of this setting that falls on secured land (GAP 1, 2 or3, top row),<br />

and the percentage of each resilience category that falls on each type of secured land (Rows 4-8). In this<br />

example the 4 percent secured as Gap 1 or 2 is composed of 1 percent on far above average sites.<br />

<strong>Resilience</strong> Score Category Percents Acres<br />

GAP1 or 2 GAP3 Unsecured Total Acres<br />

L:COARSE 4% 6% 90% 9,653,844<br />

1: Far Below Average 0% 1% 18% 1,782,104<br />

2: Below Average 0% 1% 13% 1,298,121<br />

3: Average 2% 2% 34% 3,663,419<br />

4: Above Average 1% 1% 12% 1,316,133<br />

5: Far Above Average 1% 2% 14% 1,594,067<br />

Map: A map of the setting with each cell colored by its resilience score category, either above or below<br />

the average for the setting.<br />

____________________________________________________________________________________<br />

42 Resilient Sites for Terrestrial <strong>Conservation</strong> in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Region<br />

The Nature Conservancy • Eastern <strong>Conservation</strong> Science • Eastern Division • 99 Bedford St • Boston, MA 02111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!