11.11.2014 Views

Homework 1 (pdf) - Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

Homework 1 (pdf) - Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

Homework 1 (pdf) - Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

for the city of Charleston (in the Charleston seismic region). These are the two principal<br />

“eastern U.S.” seismic zones. Plot both spectra on the same plot.<br />

(d) Now consider Charleston a bit more closely. Plot approximate Equal Hazard Spectra for<br />

Charleston for both the 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years (~475 year return<br />

interval) level, and the 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years (~2,500 year return<br />

interval) level [Plot these both on the same figure.] Using the 1996 “deaggregation”<br />

option, deaggregate these spectra by Magnitude (M) and Distance (R). Note that the<br />

deaggregation will be different at shorter and longer periods, so you will want to<br />

deaggregate for PGA and for the various spectral ordinates separately.<br />

• Using your Equal Hazard Spectrum for 10% in 50 years, and the<br />

deaggregation, recommend the approximate initial characteristics (a max , M w<br />

and R) for a “design basis” earthquake for use in design of an 2 to 3-story<br />

apartment complex and shopping center in Charleston.<br />

• Using your Equal Hazard Spectrum for 2% in 50 years, and the deaggregation,<br />

recommend the approximate initial characteristics characteristics (a max, M w<br />

and R) for a “design basis” earthquake for use in design of a major earth dam<br />

(with a crest height of approximately 350 feet, and a predominant period of<br />

about 0.8 seconds) near Charleston.<br />

Part II:<br />

3. Find the location where you live (while attending U. C. Berkeley.) Again, find the PGA, and<br />

the S A values for T = 0.2, 0.3 0.5 and 1.0 seconds, and plot the Equal Hazard Spectrum (5%<br />

damped, elastic) for a probability of exceedance of 10% in 50 years (the presumed UBC<br />

building code level.) On the same figure, plot the actual response spectrum from the current<br />

UBC for Site Class C conditions. (Don’t forget to apply the near field factors if appropriate.)<br />

Does this worry you? Remember, if your building is more then about ten years old, it was<br />

probably designed for even lesser levels of shaking.<br />

Part III:<br />

Now, on your own volition, and despite a rigorous schedule of competing priorities and<br />

conflicting assignments from other courses, access another web site (still under construction)<br />

sponsored by CDMG at http://www.consrv.ca.gov/cgs/, and explore a bit. This site is dedicated<br />

more locally to California, and presents similar information to that presented by the USGS site,<br />

but it is not yet as well along.<br />

4. Repeat the First part of Question #3 above. Is the strong shaking hazard mapping of this site<br />

the same (same basis, and same values) as the USGS site? (Don’t spend a long time on this<br />

one….just make a few quick checks.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!