12.11.2014 Views

OPI-Dick Gochnauer Interview - Ussco.com

OPI-Dick Gochnauer Interview - Ussco.com

OPI-Dick Gochnauer Interview - Ussco.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the big interview<br />

He’s absolutely right of course. We’ve<br />

got to focus on how to service dealers<br />

and make them successful so that the<br />

end user sees that there is a seamless<br />

integration of all these groups behind<br />

the scenes so the customer has a very<br />

pleasant and a low cost experience.<br />

<strong>OPI</strong>: In other words classic <strong>com</strong>promise<br />

and negotiation - give a<br />

little, take a little.<br />

DG: Yes, and focusing on if your customer<br />

is healthy and successful - contribute to that and<br />

you’ll be healthy.<br />

<strong>OPI</strong>: Last year, I attended the OPMA meeting where<br />

Jim Fahey (SVP merchandising) and John Kreidel spoke<br />

from is.group and there was some friendly banter in<br />

terms of their relationships with the dealers. How are<br />

your relations with the dealer groups?<br />

DG: Well, they’re not where they should be and we’re trying<br />

to reach out and say “let’s see if we can’t put the past<br />

behind us”. And so I would say we’re at the very start of<br />

trying to build trust with dealer groups, and it doesn’t<br />

happen without a lot of effort - it’s going to take a lot of<br />

willingness on both sides. I really don’t know the history<br />

of how we got to this point and I actually don’t spend a<br />

whole lot of time trying to figure it out. I’d rather spend<br />

time focusing on where we could help each other.<br />

“We’re at the very start of trying to build<br />

trust with dealer groups, and it doesn’t<br />

happen without a lot of effort - it’s going<br />

to take a lot of will on both sides”<br />

<strong>OPI</strong>: You said quite recently, since Daisytek went, that<br />

a lot of the business you picked up is low margin <strong>com</strong>puter<br />

consumables. Why exactly is it low margin?<br />

DG: Partly because there are fewer manufacturers to choose<br />

from and it’s treated more like a <strong>com</strong>modity product. And<br />

it’s sold less on service and more on price differentiation.<br />

It’s just a very <strong>com</strong>petitive side of the business. It’s not too<br />

dissimilar from paper products.<br />

<strong>OPI</strong>: Can it be changed or is it a fundamental mind shift?<br />

DG: I don’t know. I think it could if the manufacturers<br />

worked to support a change. Such low margins on some<br />

of these products are actually not healthy for the manufacturers<br />

either, because they’ve got a salesforce out there<br />

selling their products and the more they sell, the more<br />

trouble they are in financially.<br />

<strong>OPI</strong>: You also said product mix is a challenging issue.<br />

Why is that?<br />

DG: When the economy is tight, people cut discretionary<br />

spends. Instead of buying the more expensive pen or pencil<br />

we’ll buy a cheaper pencil. And so the industry shifts to<br />

lower margin products and away from some of the higher<br />

margin more discretionary items. Our<br />

industry lives on selling a mix and<br />

you have to have the right mix. The<br />

challenge is that the higher margin<br />

products and the discretionary products<br />

haven’t been purchased as they<br />

have in the past.<br />

The second trend is that <strong>com</strong>puter<br />

products are driving a higher percentage<br />

of sales, and I don’t see that<br />

trend changing. You’ve got those<br />

two trends. So obviously a healthier economy in tandem<br />

with the hope that offices begin to purchase more discretionary<br />

items again will benefit everyone in our industry.<br />

<strong>OPI</strong>: When it <strong>com</strong>es to cost-cutting, how do you do it?<br />

DG: I purposefully labelled ours a war on waste, because the<br />

first thing people think is, “OK, we’re going to cut people”.<br />

In reality, our industry has a great deal of waste. That<br />

would probably be one of the deltas between this industry<br />

and food. It has been much more cost conscious for a much<br />

longer period of time, and so a lot of the waste has already<br />

been removed. For example, we put over $20 million a<br />

year of product on distress trailers. That doesn’t include the<br />

cost of shipping, picking the order, wrapping it, shipping<br />

it to a dealer, shipping it to the customer, the paperwork of<br />

getting it back from the customer and back to us. We lose<br />

a lot of money on that.<br />

<strong>OPI</strong>: What scope is there for you or SP Richards to<br />

expand the international network?<br />

DG: Well, United is in both Mexico and Canada. For us,<br />

it’s via the Azerty businesses. But in Canada for example,<br />

we are now offering office supplies as well as the <strong>com</strong>puter<br />

product lines that Azerty has. So North America makes<br />

some sense. We haven’t been able to determine the value<br />

we could create by going to Europe or Asia.<br />

<strong>OPI</strong>: Would you pick up Daisytek’s Australia baton?<br />

DG: We’re not sure. Logistics and marketing skill sets are<br />

unique to some extent by market. You have to learn those.<br />

If we don’t think we can <strong>com</strong>e with any unique business<br />

proposition or anything that we could do that will benefit<br />

the industry, then it doesn’t make sense for us to go.<br />

<strong>OPI</strong>: <strong>Dick</strong>, on that note, thank you. Your time has<br />

been much appreciated.<br />

Office Products International • December 2003<br />

Reprinted with kind permission from <strong>OPI</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!