Download full report - English version - ProAct Network

In relation to the third component of this review, several opportunities were identified where
progress could be made. One of the underlying problems regarding the provision of firewood
to camps as is the current practice is that there are no baseline data on a) the amount of
firewood needed at a household level and b) the amount of wood actually consumed. What is
apparent by the scale and extent of charcoal making in at least two of the camps is that too
much wood is being delivered to the camps.
In addition, the wood supplied is neither stored nor dried, which is extremely energy
inefficient. Households have no incentive to themselves split or dry wood as it is currently so
freely available.
Manufactured briquettes have been introduced together with a fuel-efficient stove to
Gihinga camp, but people do not care to use the briquettes, though they are known to burn
them on some occasions. The actual fuel-efficiency rate of the current stove needs to be
checked by an independent evaluation.
Firewood appears to remain the firm favourite source of cooking energy and heat for
households, based on feedback during this Mission as indeed it is in much of Africa.
Several alternative solutions to firewood have been considered in this report, but no one
stands out at this point in time as being either economically, culturally or practically feasible
in the current Burundian context. However, there are several measures that NRC can take to
reduce firewood consumption in camps, which are detailed in this report.
Significant reductions can almost certainly already be made in the camp context, with
relatively little effort or cost. A series of baseline assessments urgently need to be carried out
as a first step, otherwise any further intervention will have no reference point as to its
effectiveness. This may require some external guidance and training of local staff and
selected representatives from the communities to undertake the initial work and subsequent
periodic assessments.
At the same time, however, the Mission strongly recommends that discussions are held
between NRC, UNHCR, government counterparts and local community leaders to develop
sound management and harvesting plans for plantations in the vicinity of camps. This would
have environmental, economic and social benefits for local host communities.
Reducing the current levels of firewood to camps is a challenge and should not be
approached lightly. Finding a solution that accommodates all stakeholders will take
some additional time but, in the meantime, some practical actions are highlighted that
would already serve as an important step towards the overall goal. These include:
The use of fuel-efficient stoves, combined with the adoption of good cooking practices
can result in between a 25-30 per cent reduction in firewood consumption. This is
currently not happening.
Regular and consistent use of kitchens and cooking shelters which can also be used to
dry wood should result in firewood saving of between 5-10 per cent.
The use of dry wood will result in lower rates of firewood consumption (between 10-15
per cent). This is extremely limited and related to lack of awareness, combined with ready
access to firewood.
The combination of several approaches as outlined in the report below, together with a
responsible reduction of the amount of firewood provided should bring about a
significant and lasting stable reduction in energy demands. Key to achieving this,
however, rests on another combination of activities, namely assessments, capacity
building, awareness raising and monitoring.
2