'THE GOVERNMENT'S ABSOLUTELY AWARE ... - Rail Professional
'THE GOVERNMENT'S ABSOLUTELY AWARE ... - Rail Professional
'THE GOVERNMENT'S ABSOLUTELY AWARE ... - Rail Professional
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LETTERS<br />
No room for manoeuvre<br />
The high level of complaints about<br />
poor service provision by South<br />
West Trains over the last few<br />
months culminated in a huge online<br />
Q&A session on 12 February when<br />
the SWT managing director Stewart<br />
Palmer answered over 700<br />
questions, mostly from passengers<br />
on the Portsmouth and Reading<br />
lines.<br />
He also received a petition with<br />
over 1,000 signatures from<br />
disgruntled passengers. In an open<br />
letter to its customers, Stewart<br />
summarised SWT’s response to<br />
these important issues and I would<br />
like to offer some thoughts from the<br />
passenger viewpoint.<br />
Stewart made a point about the<br />
current overcrowding being the<br />
result of an increase of 40 per cent<br />
in passenger numbers over the last<br />
10 years. However, when you look<br />
at the impact of this you find an<br />
inner suburban problem, not one<br />
anywhere near Portsmouth or<br />
Reading.<br />
Longer distance travellers are<br />
suffering much reduced quality of<br />
service due to lack of capacity in<br />
and around the capital. As the SWT<br />
fleet manager has mentioned<br />
recently, there is a requirement for a<br />
purpose-built, high-acceleration,<br />
inner suburban train to deal with<br />
this problem, together with<br />
extended platforms and improved<br />
signalling. Passengers do not accept<br />
that their inter-city trains should<br />
perform this function as it does<br />
now.<br />
Stewart quoted from the new<br />
franchise, saying: ‘The Department<br />
for Transport in its invitation to<br />
tender for the new South Western<br />
franchise made it very clear that it<br />
was asking all bidders to cater for<br />
significant further growth without<br />
the provision of additional<br />
infrastructure.’<br />
How can SWT square this circle?<br />
It is obvious that by accepting this<br />
as a pre-condition to the franchise it<br />
accepts that customer service must<br />
fall and fares must rise significantly.<br />
Even so, there is an increasing<br />
realisation amongst informed<br />
observers that SWT were perhaps in<br />
no position to fight this, however<br />
unrealistic it appeared.<br />
The real fight is now for the<br />
future development and financing<br />
of Britain’s rail system. The rail<br />
companies, passenger groups,<br />
unions and staff throughout the<br />
industry should now work together<br />
to reject Treasury dictat that can<br />
only result in a steady increase in<br />
overcrowding, increasing fares and<br />
stress for the hard pressed<br />
passenger.<br />
And perhaps a more strident<br />
rebellion by those caught in the<br />
crush on Britain’s trains.<br />
Mike Johnson<br />
Wokingham<br />
Berkshire<br />
Ian J Turnbull,<br />
Alderley Edge, Cheshire<br />
Toilet conundrum<br />
You report on the National Passenger<br />
Survey in the March issue and highlight<br />
the fact that 75 per cent of Merseyrail<br />
passengers find our on-train toilets<br />
unsatisfactory.<br />
It would have been far more<br />
newsworthy to report that 10 per cent<br />
think they are ‘satisfactory or good’<br />
and another 15 per cent think they are<br />
neither one nor the other.<br />
Why is this more newsworthy? We<br />
don’t actually have any toilets on our<br />
trains at all as our average journey<br />
length is just 6.5 miles!<br />
Rudi Boersma<br />
Media & corporate affairs<br />
Merseyrail<br />
And another thing…<br />
Some time has elapsed since the<br />
publication of my ‘Emperor’s new<br />
clothes’ letter in <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Professional</strong>, but<br />
still the railway companies blunder on<br />
with cramped uncomfortable seats on<br />
ever shorter trains.<br />
Only now there are less seats per<br />
passenger and the passengers are<br />
beginning to get rather fed up. FGW is<br />
coming under fire, commuters on the<br />
Portsmouth Line are already fed up<br />
with their ‘new’ suburban trains and<br />
standards have not increased on routes<br />
such as the franchise formerly known<br />
as Thameslink.<br />
Passenger unhappiness has existed<br />
for some time and the railway<br />
continues to, for the most part, ignore<br />
it. But now it is becoming more vocal<br />
as the numbers continue to swell.This<br />
is obvious.<br />
And yet like the emperor with his<br />
new clothes, the railway industry has<br />
still to accept that in the eyes of<br />
most passengers, their ‘service’ is<br />
unravelling through threadbare to<br />
nakedness!<br />
Marie Brume<br />
Schoolteacher, former long distance<br />
rail user and new motorist!<br />
Manchester<br />
Germany beat us to it<br />
I have just read the February edition of<br />
<strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Professional</strong>. Much of interest as<br />
usual, but one point. In the news section<br />
in the story ‘Coming soon to a tunnel<br />
near you’, you mention the ads in<br />
Heathrow’s tunnels as being the first of<br />
their kind in Europe.<br />
Not so, there is a system operating in<br />
a section of tunnel of the Munich S-bahn<br />
network which shows an older lady<br />
apparently running alongside the train.<br />
Exactly what she was advertising I<br />
cannot remember, but the system is in<br />
place, working, and quite entertaining!<br />
Neil Kendall<br />
Route freight manager<br />
Network <strong>Rail</strong><br />
APRIL 2007 : RAIL PROFESSIONAL<br />
11