16.11.2014 Views

'THE GOVERNMENT'S ABSOLUTELY AWARE ... - Rail Professional

'THE GOVERNMENT'S ABSOLUTELY AWARE ... - Rail Professional

'THE GOVERNMENT'S ABSOLUTELY AWARE ... - Rail Professional

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LETTERS<br />

No room for manoeuvre<br />

The high level of complaints about<br />

poor service provision by South<br />

West Trains over the last few<br />

months culminated in a huge online<br />

Q&A session on 12 February when<br />

the SWT managing director Stewart<br />

Palmer answered over 700<br />

questions, mostly from passengers<br />

on the Portsmouth and Reading<br />

lines.<br />

He also received a petition with<br />

over 1,000 signatures from<br />

disgruntled passengers. In an open<br />

letter to its customers, Stewart<br />

summarised SWT’s response to<br />

these important issues and I would<br />

like to offer some thoughts from the<br />

passenger viewpoint.<br />

Stewart made a point about the<br />

current overcrowding being the<br />

result of an increase of 40 per cent<br />

in passenger numbers over the last<br />

10 years. However, when you look<br />

at the impact of this you find an<br />

inner suburban problem, not one<br />

anywhere near Portsmouth or<br />

Reading.<br />

Longer distance travellers are<br />

suffering much reduced quality of<br />

service due to lack of capacity in<br />

and around the capital. As the SWT<br />

fleet manager has mentioned<br />

recently, there is a requirement for a<br />

purpose-built, high-acceleration,<br />

inner suburban train to deal with<br />

this problem, together with<br />

extended platforms and improved<br />

signalling. Passengers do not accept<br />

that their inter-city trains should<br />

perform this function as it does<br />

now.<br />

Stewart quoted from the new<br />

franchise, saying: ‘The Department<br />

for Transport in its invitation to<br />

tender for the new South Western<br />

franchise made it very clear that it<br />

was asking all bidders to cater for<br />

significant further growth without<br />

the provision of additional<br />

infrastructure.’<br />

How can SWT square this circle?<br />

It is obvious that by accepting this<br />

as a pre-condition to the franchise it<br />

accepts that customer service must<br />

fall and fares must rise significantly.<br />

Even so, there is an increasing<br />

realisation amongst informed<br />

observers that SWT were perhaps in<br />

no position to fight this, however<br />

unrealistic it appeared.<br />

The real fight is now for the<br />

future development and financing<br />

of Britain’s rail system. The rail<br />

companies, passenger groups,<br />

unions and staff throughout the<br />

industry should now work together<br />

to reject Treasury dictat that can<br />

only result in a steady increase in<br />

overcrowding, increasing fares and<br />

stress for the hard pressed<br />

passenger.<br />

And perhaps a more strident<br />

rebellion by those caught in the<br />

crush on Britain’s trains.<br />

Mike Johnson<br />

Wokingham<br />

Berkshire<br />

Ian J Turnbull,<br />

Alderley Edge, Cheshire<br />

Toilet conundrum<br />

You report on the National Passenger<br />

Survey in the March issue and highlight<br />

the fact that 75 per cent of Merseyrail<br />

passengers find our on-train toilets<br />

unsatisfactory.<br />

It would have been far more<br />

newsworthy to report that 10 per cent<br />

think they are ‘satisfactory or good’<br />

and another 15 per cent think they are<br />

neither one nor the other.<br />

Why is this more newsworthy? We<br />

don’t actually have any toilets on our<br />

trains at all as our average journey<br />

length is just 6.5 miles!<br />

Rudi Boersma<br />

Media & corporate affairs<br />

Merseyrail<br />

And another thing…<br />

Some time has elapsed since the<br />

publication of my ‘Emperor’s new<br />

clothes’ letter in <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Professional</strong>, but<br />

still the railway companies blunder on<br />

with cramped uncomfortable seats on<br />

ever shorter trains.<br />

Only now there are less seats per<br />

passenger and the passengers are<br />

beginning to get rather fed up. FGW is<br />

coming under fire, commuters on the<br />

Portsmouth Line are already fed up<br />

with their ‘new’ suburban trains and<br />

standards have not increased on routes<br />

such as the franchise formerly known<br />

as Thameslink.<br />

Passenger unhappiness has existed<br />

for some time and the railway<br />

continues to, for the most part, ignore<br />

it. But now it is becoming more vocal<br />

as the numbers continue to swell.This<br />

is obvious.<br />

And yet like the emperor with his<br />

new clothes, the railway industry has<br />

still to accept that in the eyes of<br />

most passengers, their ‘service’ is<br />

unravelling through threadbare to<br />

nakedness!<br />

Marie Brume<br />

Schoolteacher, former long distance<br />

rail user and new motorist!<br />

Manchester<br />

Germany beat us to it<br />

I have just read the February edition of<br />

<strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Professional</strong>. Much of interest as<br />

usual, but one point. In the news section<br />

in the story ‘Coming soon to a tunnel<br />

near you’, you mention the ads in<br />

Heathrow’s tunnels as being the first of<br />

their kind in Europe.<br />

Not so, there is a system operating in<br />

a section of tunnel of the Munich S-bahn<br />

network which shows an older lady<br />

apparently running alongside the train.<br />

Exactly what she was advertising I<br />

cannot remember, but the system is in<br />

place, working, and quite entertaining!<br />

Neil Kendall<br />

Route freight manager<br />

Network <strong>Rail</strong><br />

APRIL 2007 : RAIL PROFESSIONAL<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!