16.11.2014 Views

'THE GOVERNMENT'S ABSOLUTELY AWARE ... - Rail Professional

'THE GOVERNMENT'S ABSOLUTELY AWARE ... - Rail Professional

'THE GOVERNMENT'S ABSOLUTELY AWARE ... - Rail Professional

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NEWS<br />

Extending peak fares will drive<br />

passengers back to their cars<br />

With the media outrage at the New Year<br />

fare increases not far behind us, South<br />

West Trains have unexpectedly sold their<br />

passengers down the river by launching a<br />

tier of ‘just off-peak’fares – which actually<br />

span most of the day (see page 6).<br />

The strategy appears to be aimed at<br />

spreading the rush that happens straight<br />

after the peak, by retaining the old fares<br />

as ‘super off peak’ and introducing a<br />

higher band to bridge the gap.<br />

But it will almost certainly drive some<br />

passengers off trains altogether, as it will<br />

now only be possible to get the cheapest<br />

fares in the afternoon and evening. For<br />

most people within driving distance of<br />

London, it’s a toss up whether to drive to<br />

a Tube station on the outskirts of the city<br />

and catch the underground or get the<br />

train straight to the centre, particularly<br />

when it comes to leisure travel. For some<br />

SWT passengers, the price increase will<br />

make that decision a lot easier.<br />

The timing of SWT’s<br />

announcement about its<br />

fare increases is also bad<br />

planning.The national<br />

PROFESSIONAL<br />

place and that private<br />

companies have no<br />

business making fat<br />

profits out of public<br />

press has picked up on the<br />

transport.<br />

increased dividends which COMMENT<br />

Stagecoach – the franchise<br />

holder – is paying out to its shareholders,<br />

with Brian Souter and his sister getting the<br />

lion’s share (see page 10).<br />

If the new fares are about spreading<br />

out the peak and Stagecoach appears to<br />

have money to throw around, passengers<br />

are bound to wonder why off-peak fares<br />

were not reduced and the new tier<br />

brought in at the old level, which would<br />

have had a similar effect of spreading the<br />

rush, but without penalising passengers.<br />

Rather like First Capital Connect’s<br />

extending of peak fares last year, these<br />

increases simply play into the hands of<br />

those who believe the railway never<br />

should have been privatised in the first<br />

ON A lighter note,<br />

Clive James spoke for many passengers,<br />

and a fair few railway professionals, when<br />

he parodied the confusion caused by the<br />

more ill-thought-out of the franchise<br />

names on Radio 4’s A Point of View.<br />

He is particularly irked by the name<br />

First Great Western, which, as he pointed<br />

out, wrongly implies that there must be a<br />

Second Great Western too. He relates<br />

how he cursed the brand when he found<br />

it difficult to locate a second-class<br />

carriage on a train that was about to pull<br />

off, where every carriage bears the word<br />

‘First’.<br />

One railway was also ripe for his jibes<br />

and he is not alone in finding the name<br />

perplexing. Early on in the days of the<br />

East Anglian franchise, passengers found<br />

it difficult to tell whether the station<br />

announcer was talking about ‘the 10.31<br />

train’ or the ’10.30 One train’.<br />

It begs the question as to how much<br />

companies think through their brand<br />

names.While ‘First’ and ‘One’ might<br />

sound trendy and quirky when<br />

presented to the board of a newly<br />

formed company, in an environment like<br />

a train station – which can be confusing<br />

and chaotic at the best of times –<br />

adding further ambiguities to the mix<br />

does little to curry favour with<br />

passengers.<br />

Clive James sums up:‘If the first One<br />

train leaves at 20 to one it’s the 20 to one<br />

One train and if the other one leaves at<br />

10 to one it's 10 to one on that it's the<br />

one One train one actually wanted but<br />

one couldn't understand the<br />

announcement.’<br />

Train fuel emissions are<br />

falling faster than cars’<br />

Carbon dioxide emissions from<br />

trains have fallen by 22 per cent per<br />

passenger kilometre over the past<br />

10 years, according to the<br />

Association of Train Operators.<br />

But average emissions from cars<br />

have fallen just 8 per cent, while<br />

carbon dioxide from domestic air<br />

travel has dropped by 5 per cent.<br />

Atoc director General George<br />

Muir said: ‘Obviously the railway<br />

can’t replace the car but to the<br />

extent reasonably possible, Britain<br />

will meet its environmental<br />

objectives more readily if rail<br />

carries a greater share of the<br />

national traffic. Notwithstanding<br />

technical advances within the car<br />

industry, rail is likely to retain its<br />

environmental advantage.’<br />

Atoc has put together a Baseline<br />

Energy Statement setting out the<br />

diesel and electric traction energy<br />

used by the passenger railway in<br />

2006-6, estimating the carbon<br />

dioxide emissions arising from it.<br />

The figures show that, on<br />

average, rail travel generates just<br />

over half the emissions per<br />

passenger kilometre of car and<br />

approximately one quarter that of<br />

domestic air. The EU aims to<br />

reduce carbon emissions by 20<br />

per cent by 2020.<br />

A spokesman for Friends of the<br />

Earth said: ‘These figures<br />

demonstrate again that rail has<br />

significantly lower carbon<br />

emissions compared to both air<br />

and car travel. But the rail industry<br />

mustn’t rest on its laurels. We need<br />

technology improvements on all<br />

fronts if we are to prevent the<br />

worst impacts of climate change,<br />

and that includes the development<br />

of more efficient rail vehicles.’<br />

London Underground to trial<br />

mobile phone coverage<br />

The tube may not be a sanctuary<br />

from other people’s mobile phones<br />

for much longer. London<br />

Underground is to begin a sixmonth<br />

trial of mobile phone and<br />

new technology services on the<br />

Waterloo & City line.<br />

If the trials are successful, they<br />

could pave the way for DAB and<br />

wi-fi access even in the deepest<br />

parts of the tube network.<br />

During the trial, passengers will<br />

be able to make calls on platforms<br />

at Bank and Waterloo stations and<br />

in tunnels between the two<br />

stations. It is hoped the experiment<br />

will begin in April 2008 – contractors<br />

are currently being sought.<br />

Richard Parry, LU strategy and<br />

service development director, said:<br />

‘The below-ground sections of the<br />

Underground are one of the few<br />

places in London where you are<br />

unable to use a mobile phone. We<br />

recognise there is a growing demand<br />

for coverage to be extended<br />

to deep-level sections of the Tube.<br />

He added: ‘If the trial is not a<br />

success then London<br />

Underground will not proceed with<br />

plans to extend mobile phone<br />

coverage to the Tube.’<br />

A passenger survey found 56 per<br />

cent of people would support the<br />

idea of being able to use mobile<br />

phones at stations and on Tubes.<br />

Aside from making personal calls,<br />

passengers could potentially<br />

receive up-to-the-minute travel<br />

information via a mobile phone or<br />

other device while on the Tube.<br />

Passengers can and do use<br />

mobile phones on the sections of<br />

the tube network that are above<br />

ground, which represents 55 per<br />

cent of the Tube network.<br />

4 RAIL PROFESSIONAL : APRIL 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!