The world's local bank - HSBC
The world's local bank - HSBC
The world's local bank - HSBC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>HSBC</strong> FRANCE<br />
Risk management (continued)<br />
Distribution of not impaired loans and advances<br />
by facility grade, at 31 December 2005<br />
At 31 December 2005<br />
Loans and Loans and<br />
advances to advances to<br />
(in millions of euros) customers <strong>bank</strong>s<br />
Grade 1 – low risk . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 6,227<br />
Grade 2 – satisfactory risk . . . . . 567 5,304<br />
Grade 3 – fair risk . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,432 4,936<br />
Grade 4 – watch list . . . . . . . . . . . 97 89<br />
Grade 5 – sub-standard<br />
but not impaired . . . . . . . . . . . 515 –<br />
36,824 16,556<br />
Grades 1 and 2 represent facilities demonstrating<br />
financial condition, risk factors and capacity to repay<br />
that are good to excellent, residential mortgages with<br />
low to moderate loan to values ratios, and other retail<br />
accounts which are not impaired and are maintained<br />
within product guidelines.<br />
Grade 3 represents satisfactory risk and includes<br />
facilities that require closer monitoring, mortgages with<br />
higher loan to value ratios than grades 1 and 2.<br />
Grade 4 and 5 represent corporate facilities that<br />
require various degrees of special attention and all<br />
retail exposures that are progressively between 30 and<br />
90 days past due.<br />
Grade 6 and 7 indicate impaired status including<br />
all retail accounts that are progressively more than<br />
90 days past due or 180 days for property.<br />
Other securities<br />
Debt securities and treasury bills<br />
<strong>The</strong> following table presents an analysis of debt<br />
securities and treasury bills by rating agency designation<br />
at 31 December 2005, based on Standard and Poor’s<br />
(“S&P”) ratings or their equivalent:<br />
At 31 December 2005<br />
Treasury Debt<br />
(in millions of euros) bills securities Total<br />
AAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,159 3,135 24,294<br />
AA – to AA + . . . . . . . . . 8,262 1,394 9,656<br />
A – to A + . . . . . . . . . . . 485 70 555<br />
Unrated . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 581 663<br />
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,988 5,180 35,168<br />
Of which issued by:<br />
— governments . . . . . . 29,988 – 29,988<br />
— corporates . . . . . . . . – 3,090 3,090<br />
— other . . . . . . . . . . . . . – 2,090 2,090<br />
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,988 5,180 35,168<br />
Of which classified as:<br />
— available-for-sale<br />
securities . . . . . . . . 2,957 266 3,223<br />
— held for trading . . . . 27,031 4,914 31,945<br />
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,988 5,180 35,168<br />
If major rating agencies have different ratings for the<br />
same debt securities, the securities are reported against<br />
the lower rating.<br />
Netting of assets and liabilities<br />
An amount of EUR 11 billion of financial assets which<br />
is subject to a legally enforceable right of set-off against<br />
a financial liability is not presented on the balance sheet<br />
net as there is no intention for settlement to take place<br />
on a net basis or simultaneously.<br />
At 31 December 2005<br />
Amount for<br />
which <strong>HSBC</strong><br />
has a legally<br />
enforceable<br />
Book right to Net total<br />
(in millions of euros) value offset 1 credit risk<br />
Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . 18,030 (11,047) 6,983<br />
1 Against financial liabilities with the same counterparties.<br />
Impairment assessment<br />
It is <strong>HSBC</strong> France policy that each entity makes<br />
allowance for impaired loans promptly and on a<br />
consistent basis in accordance with established Group<br />
guidelines.<br />
<strong>HSBC</strong> France rating process for credit facilities<br />
extended by members of the Group is designed to<br />
highlight exposures requiring greater management<br />
attention based on a higher probability of default and<br />
potential loss. Management particularly focuses on<br />
facilities to those borrowers and portfolio segments<br />
classified below satisfactory grades. Amendments to<br />
risk grades, where necessary, are required to be<br />
undertaken promptly. Management also regularly<br />
evaluates the adequacy of the established allowances<br />
for impaired loans by conducting a detailed review<br />
of the loan portfolio, comparing performance and<br />
delinquency statistics with historical trends and<br />
assessing the impact of current economic conditions.<br />
Group policy requires a review of the level of<br />
impairment allowances that are above materiality<br />
thresholds at least half-yearly, and more regularly<br />
where individual circumstances require. This will<br />
normally include a review of guarantees received<br />
(including re-confirmation of its enforceability) and<br />
an assessment of actual and anticipated cash flows.<br />
For significant commercial and corporate debts,<br />
specialised loan “work-out” teams with experience in<br />
insolvency and specific market sectors are used. This<br />
expertise enables likely losses on significant individual<br />
exposures to be assessed more accurately. Reversals<br />
on individually calculated impairment allowances<br />
are recognised whenever the Group has reasonable<br />
objective evidence that the established estimate of loss<br />
has been reduced.<br />
44