17.11.2014 Views

Study of student costs using activity based costing methodology - aair

Study of student costs using activity based costing methodology - aair

Study of student costs using activity based costing methodology - aair

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. Accounts Analysis and Creation <strong>of</strong> Cost Pools<br />

After the activities <strong>of</strong> the support departments had been identified, the accounts were reviewed to<br />

determine the extent to which these activities are identified in the UTS Chart <strong>of</strong> Accounts. Where activities<br />

were reflected in the accounting system, cost pools could be clearly determined by reference to the<br />

corresponding department in the account. Where the activities were not reflected in the Chart <strong>of</strong> Accounts<br />

it became necessary to create cost pools. Where some organisational units were involved in several distinct<br />

activities, but all financial information was combined under the one unit, eg, Student Administration Unit,<br />

it was necessary to breakdown these units into their constituent activities <strong>based</strong> on a staff activities<br />

analysis. In the final analysis, it was crucial to the validity <strong>of</strong> the study that all operating expenditure <strong>of</strong><br />

UTS was recognised.<br />

3. Establishment <strong>of</strong> Cost Drivers<br />

Under the ABC <strong>methodology</strong>, once the activities undertaken by an organisation are established, it is<br />

necessary to determine the events that give rise to, or ‘drive’ the <strong>activity</strong>. This event is termed the cost<br />

driver. In some instances it is necessary to develop a two stage basis <strong>of</strong> cost allocation <strong>using</strong> primary and<br />

secondary drivers. Secondary drivers are those events which give rise to activities being undertaken that<br />

are directly attributable to the product or service being supplied. Primary drivers are those not directly<br />

attributable to the product or the service being supplied. It is necessary to ensure that non-financial data<br />

collected regarding cost driver volumes is related to the level <strong>of</strong> <strong>activity</strong> as reflected in the financial data.<br />

Where hard numerical data is not available, management estimates, or information from surveys, or data<br />

from group consensus may be required.<br />

Following the interviews with departmental heads, cost drivers were determined in order to allocate <strong>costs</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> support departments to faculties. The pattern <strong>of</strong> resource consumption for each <strong>activity</strong> was analysed<br />

and possible cost drivers were evaluated. The final choice <strong>of</strong> cost drivers depended upon the availability <strong>of</strong><br />

reliable information. An example <strong>of</strong> the cost drivers used in the study is shown in the following table. 18<br />

Activities<br />

Security<br />

Communications<br />

Insurance<br />

Cleaning<br />

Heating & lighting<br />

Rates and rent<br />

Estates<br />

Financial services<br />

Primary cost driver<br />

Floor space<br />

# <strong>of</strong> staff FTE<br />

Tech estimate<br />

Floor space<br />

Floor space<br />

Actual<br />

Floor space<br />

% <strong>of</strong> total budget<br />

Primary allocation<br />

Facs & Dept<br />

Facs & Dept<br />

Facs & Dept<br />

Facts & Dept<br />

Facts & Dept<br />

Facts & Dept<br />

Facts & Dept<br />

Faculties<br />

Secondary cost driver<br />

# <strong>of</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />

Time <strong>of</strong> academic staff<br />

# <strong>of</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />

# <strong>of</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />

# <strong>of</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />

# <strong>of</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />

# <strong>of</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />

# <strong>of</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />

Secondary allocation<br />

Students<br />

Students<br />

Students<br />

Students<br />

Students<br />

Students<br />

Students<br />

Students<br />

4. Survey <strong>of</strong> Faculty Costs<br />

The preceding phase details the process used to allocate the cost <strong>of</strong> support activities to <strong>student</strong>s, which<br />

amount to approximately 35% <strong>of</strong> the total University <strong>costs</strong>. The remaining 65% is accounted for by faculty<br />

<strong>costs</strong>, which include faculty part-time academic salaries, full-time academic salaries, faculty support staff<br />

salaries, and non salary <strong>costs</strong>. Research grants were also treated as faculty <strong>costs</strong> although the accounting<br />

system treats them as a centralised expenditure. With such a large proportion <strong>of</strong> University expenditure<br />

occurring within the faculties, it was crucial to review these <strong>costs</strong> and determine a means <strong>of</strong> allocating<br />

them to the <strong>student</strong> categories (full-time, part-time, undergraduate and postgraduate <strong>student</strong>s). One <strong>of</strong> the<br />

difficulties the consultants experienced in <strong>costing</strong> university education was related to the diversity <strong>of</strong><br />

activities undertaken by academic staff. Whilst part-time academic staff are paid only for direct lecturing<br />

hours, permanent academics only lecture for approximately 30% <strong>of</strong> their working time. To establish a basis<br />

for determining faculty <strong>costs</strong>, a faculty <strong>activity</strong> survey was developed and its results used as a critical<br />

component in the study.<br />

18 Ibid., Appendix C.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!