Study of student costs using activity based costing methodology - aair
Study of student costs using activity based costing methodology - aair
Study of student costs using activity based costing methodology - aair
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2. Accounts Analysis and Creation <strong>of</strong> Cost Pools<br />
After the activities <strong>of</strong> the support departments had been identified, the accounts were reviewed to<br />
determine the extent to which these activities are identified in the UTS Chart <strong>of</strong> Accounts. Where activities<br />
were reflected in the accounting system, cost pools could be clearly determined by reference to the<br />
corresponding department in the account. Where the activities were not reflected in the Chart <strong>of</strong> Accounts<br />
it became necessary to create cost pools. Where some organisational units were involved in several distinct<br />
activities, but all financial information was combined under the one unit, eg, Student Administration Unit,<br />
it was necessary to breakdown these units into their constituent activities <strong>based</strong> on a staff activities<br />
analysis. In the final analysis, it was crucial to the validity <strong>of</strong> the study that all operating expenditure <strong>of</strong><br />
UTS was recognised.<br />
3. Establishment <strong>of</strong> Cost Drivers<br />
Under the ABC <strong>methodology</strong>, once the activities undertaken by an organisation are established, it is<br />
necessary to determine the events that give rise to, or ‘drive’ the <strong>activity</strong>. This event is termed the cost<br />
driver. In some instances it is necessary to develop a two stage basis <strong>of</strong> cost allocation <strong>using</strong> primary and<br />
secondary drivers. Secondary drivers are those events which give rise to activities being undertaken that<br />
are directly attributable to the product or service being supplied. Primary drivers are those not directly<br />
attributable to the product or the service being supplied. It is necessary to ensure that non-financial data<br />
collected regarding cost driver volumes is related to the level <strong>of</strong> <strong>activity</strong> as reflected in the financial data.<br />
Where hard numerical data is not available, management estimates, or information from surveys, or data<br />
from group consensus may be required.<br />
Following the interviews with departmental heads, cost drivers were determined in order to allocate <strong>costs</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> support departments to faculties. The pattern <strong>of</strong> resource consumption for each <strong>activity</strong> was analysed<br />
and possible cost drivers were evaluated. The final choice <strong>of</strong> cost drivers depended upon the availability <strong>of</strong><br />
reliable information. An example <strong>of</strong> the cost drivers used in the study is shown in the following table. 18<br />
Activities<br />
Security<br />
Communications<br />
Insurance<br />
Cleaning<br />
Heating & lighting<br />
Rates and rent<br />
Estates<br />
Financial services<br />
Primary cost driver<br />
Floor space<br />
# <strong>of</strong> staff FTE<br />
Tech estimate<br />
Floor space<br />
Floor space<br />
Actual<br />
Floor space<br />
% <strong>of</strong> total budget<br />
Primary allocation<br />
Facs & Dept<br />
Facs & Dept<br />
Facs & Dept<br />
Facts & Dept<br />
Facts & Dept<br />
Facts & Dept<br />
Facts & Dept<br />
Faculties<br />
Secondary cost driver<br />
# <strong>of</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />
Time <strong>of</strong> academic staff<br />
# <strong>of</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />
# <strong>of</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />
# <strong>of</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />
# <strong>of</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />
# <strong>of</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />
# <strong>of</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />
Secondary allocation<br />
Students<br />
Students<br />
Students<br />
Students<br />
Students<br />
Students<br />
Students<br />
Students<br />
4. Survey <strong>of</strong> Faculty Costs<br />
The preceding phase details the process used to allocate the cost <strong>of</strong> support activities to <strong>student</strong>s, which<br />
amount to approximately 35% <strong>of</strong> the total University <strong>costs</strong>. The remaining 65% is accounted for by faculty<br />
<strong>costs</strong>, which include faculty part-time academic salaries, full-time academic salaries, faculty support staff<br />
salaries, and non salary <strong>costs</strong>. Research grants were also treated as faculty <strong>costs</strong> although the accounting<br />
system treats them as a centralised expenditure. With such a large proportion <strong>of</strong> University expenditure<br />
occurring within the faculties, it was crucial to review these <strong>costs</strong> and determine a means <strong>of</strong> allocating<br />
them to the <strong>student</strong> categories (full-time, part-time, undergraduate and postgraduate <strong>student</strong>s). One <strong>of</strong> the<br />
difficulties the consultants experienced in <strong>costing</strong> university education was related to the diversity <strong>of</strong><br />
activities undertaken by academic staff. Whilst part-time academic staff are paid only for direct lecturing<br />
hours, permanent academics only lecture for approximately 30% <strong>of</strong> their working time. To establish a basis<br />
for determining faculty <strong>costs</strong>, a faculty <strong>activity</strong> survey was developed and its results used as a critical<br />
component in the study.<br />
18 Ibid., Appendix C.