The Innovative
The Innovative
The Innovative
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Educational Forum for SME<br />
My question relates to big companies planning<br />
investments supported within measure 4.4. I understand<br />
that big companies will not be able to<br />
purchase used fixed assets. Does it also relate<br />
to properties, so buildings that are not new?<br />
This rule applies to fixed assets other than buildings.<br />
Could you specify how within measure 4.4 a<br />
new product is defined since this definition of<br />
investment has changed – now there is a requirement<br />
that within implementation a new or<br />
significantly changed product should be created.<br />
For whom the product is to be new – for<br />
the market or the enterprise?<br />
With regard to the target market for the product being<br />
the result of an investment.<br />
I already have a ready project. Since when the<br />
expenses planned in it will be qualified? Can<br />
I start to realize the project and count on the<br />
support just after applying?<br />
Unfortunately you can do it only after receiving the<br />
confirmation about project qualification. <strong>The</strong> solution<br />
to the problem may be a different way of announcing<br />
a contest. If you are informed that e.g. the application<br />
round is to be announced in four months, you<br />
will have enough time to conduct analyses and gain<br />
the confirmation of project qualification.<br />
My question relates to the implementation system.<br />
It has been mentioned that project promoters<br />
would be introduced into the system. What does<br />
this situation look like today and who will have<br />
the role of a promoter and on what grounds?<br />
This conception is still being compiled. PARP has<br />
passed its suggestions and we are waiting for the<br />
decision of the Managing Authority and the Intermediate<br />
Bodies. Such promoters are projected in<br />
measure 4.2 and 4.4. <strong>The</strong>re would be several dozen<br />
promoters all around the country and the system<br />
of assessment of their qualifications in specific<br />
realms would function. <strong>The</strong>y should be people who<br />
would be able to assess on the basis of a project<br />
card and conversations with an entrepreneur<br />
whether a given technology is new and whether<br />
projects fit in a measure. After receiving a positive<br />
project assessment on the basis of the project card<br />
the entrepreneur would be able to bear qualified<br />
costs and realize the project. <strong>The</strong> promoter would<br />
give green light. He or she would also possibly state<br />
that a project does not fit in a given Programme as<br />
a whole or it does not meet the criteria; or it would<br />
be pointed out that after some corrections or updates<br />
the project might qualify.<br />
When will we get to know the dates of applying?<br />
Will we have enough time to search innovative<br />
technologies and confirm project qualification?<br />
We do not know that yet. Probably some measures<br />
for enterprises will be launched in the first quarter of<br />
2008. We are already well prepared institutionally.<br />
Proper legal acts taking into account all changes of<br />
the Detailed priority description still have to appear.<br />
We understand your impatience but we would not<br />
like to give dates on spec.<br />
<strong>The</strong> minimum project value: 8 million zlotys<br />
– what does it mean? Does it apply to the stage<br />
of projecting, applying or final settlement? If I<br />
know that the assessing people are aware of<br />
the fact that I can be wrong, then I can be seriously<br />
wrong. I can write a project for 8.2 million<br />
but in reality it would be 3.5 million because I<br />
was wrong. Can I be wrong like that?<br />
An entrepreneur estimates costs at the stage of<br />
preparing the application and they should be based<br />
on a solid market analysis. If at the stage of settlement<br />
it turns out that the real costs were lower than<br />
8 million zlotys, each such a project will be individually<br />
analyzed. If it turns out that changes of prices,<br />
rates of exchange or other factors were independent<br />
of the entrepreneur and could not be projected,<br />
we will recommend that such problems should be<br />
solved in favour of the beneficiary. If it however<br />
turns out that an entrepreneur already at the stage<br />
of projecting overestimates costs on purpose, and<br />
then spends less in reality and it could have been<br />
projected, the support may not be granted in such<br />
situations.<br />
Will you oblige the experts assessing innovative<br />
applications to justify negative decisions in writing<br />
– with at least one page long opinion?<br />
Of course. We would not like to be in such a situation<br />
when an expert will tell us that this project is<br />
no good because it is not. We will have a problem<br />
as we would not be able to justify it to you. We will<br />
expect from experts a justification of every opinion.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y cannot be arbitral decisions.<br />
Noted by: KR and JG<br />
When will we get to know the<br />
dates of applying? We do not<br />
know that yet. Probably some<br />
measures for enterprises will be<br />
launched in the first quarter of<br />
2008.<br />
19