17.11.2014 Views

The Innovative

The Innovative

The Innovative

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Educational Forum for SME<br />

My question relates to big companies planning<br />

investments supported within measure 4.4. I understand<br />

that big companies will not be able to<br />

purchase used fixed assets. Does it also relate<br />

to properties, so buildings that are not new?<br />

This rule applies to fixed assets other than buildings.<br />

Could you specify how within measure 4.4 a<br />

new product is defined since this definition of<br />

investment has changed – now there is a requirement<br />

that within implementation a new or<br />

significantly changed product should be created.<br />

For whom the product is to be new – for<br />

the market or the enterprise?<br />

With regard to the target market for the product being<br />

the result of an investment.<br />

I already have a ready project. Since when the<br />

expenses planned in it will be qualified? Can<br />

I start to realize the project and count on the<br />

support just after applying?<br />

Unfortunately you can do it only after receiving the<br />

confirmation about project qualification. <strong>The</strong> solution<br />

to the problem may be a different way of announcing<br />

a contest. If you are informed that e.g. the application<br />

round is to be announced in four months, you<br />

will have enough time to conduct analyses and gain<br />

the confirmation of project qualification.<br />

My question relates to the implementation system.<br />

It has been mentioned that project promoters<br />

would be introduced into the system. What does<br />

this situation look like today and who will have<br />

the role of a promoter and on what grounds?<br />

This conception is still being compiled. PARP has<br />

passed its suggestions and we are waiting for the<br />

decision of the Managing Authority and the Intermediate<br />

Bodies. Such promoters are projected in<br />

measure 4.2 and 4.4. <strong>The</strong>re would be several dozen<br />

promoters all around the country and the system<br />

of assessment of their qualifications in specific<br />

realms would function. <strong>The</strong>y should be people who<br />

would be able to assess on the basis of a project<br />

card and conversations with an entrepreneur<br />

whether a given technology is new and whether<br />

projects fit in a measure. After receiving a positive<br />

project assessment on the basis of the project card<br />

the entrepreneur would be able to bear qualified<br />

costs and realize the project. <strong>The</strong> promoter would<br />

give green light. He or she would also possibly state<br />

that a project does not fit in a given Programme as<br />

a whole or it does not meet the criteria; or it would<br />

be pointed out that after some corrections or updates<br />

the project might qualify.<br />

When will we get to know the dates of applying?<br />

Will we have enough time to search innovative<br />

technologies and confirm project qualification?<br />

We do not know that yet. Probably some measures<br />

for enterprises will be launched in the first quarter of<br />

2008. We are already well prepared institutionally.<br />

Proper legal acts taking into account all changes of<br />

the Detailed priority description still have to appear.<br />

We understand your impatience but we would not<br />

like to give dates on spec.<br />

<strong>The</strong> minimum project value: 8 million zlotys<br />

– what does it mean? Does it apply to the stage<br />

of projecting, applying or final settlement? If I<br />

know that the assessing people are aware of<br />

the fact that I can be wrong, then I can be seriously<br />

wrong. I can write a project for 8.2 million<br />

but in reality it would be 3.5 million because I<br />

was wrong. Can I be wrong like that?<br />

An entrepreneur estimates costs at the stage of<br />

preparing the application and they should be based<br />

on a solid market analysis. If at the stage of settlement<br />

it turns out that the real costs were lower than<br />

8 million zlotys, each such a project will be individually<br />

analyzed. If it turns out that changes of prices,<br />

rates of exchange or other factors were independent<br />

of the entrepreneur and could not be projected,<br />

we will recommend that such problems should be<br />

solved in favour of the beneficiary. If it however<br />

turns out that an entrepreneur already at the stage<br />

of projecting overestimates costs on purpose, and<br />

then spends less in reality and it could have been<br />

projected, the support may not be granted in such<br />

situations.<br />

Will you oblige the experts assessing innovative<br />

applications to justify negative decisions in writing<br />

– with at least one page long opinion?<br />

Of course. We would not like to be in such a situation<br />

when an expert will tell us that this project is<br />

no good because it is not. We will have a problem<br />

as we would not be able to justify it to you. We will<br />

expect from experts a justification of every opinion.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y cannot be arbitral decisions.<br />

Noted by: KR and JG<br />

When will we get to know the<br />

dates of applying? We do not<br />

know that yet. Probably some<br />

measures for enterprises will be<br />

launched in the first quarter of<br />

2008.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!