Workshop Report - Pervasive Technology Institute - Indiana University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Average across responses: Percentage Use of CI type 26% 37% 13% By you or your team 34% Local campus By another campus 37% State or Regional National International government-funded Commercial 32% 35% Figure A.1.2. The respondents were then asked to characterize their usage of CI by an additional dimension of type of CI (data storage, simulation HPC/HTC, etc) and by the type of CI provider as in the previous question. Question You and team Local campus Another campus State/ Regional Natl. Intl. Commercial Data storage 30.4% 20.7% 6.3% 1.9% 4.5% 1.3% 10.7% Data movement 22.5% 15.0% 4.4% 1.8% 3.7% 1.5% 7.6% Remote instrument access 10.6% 6.4% 2.4% 0.6% 1.0% 0.6% 1.7% Workflows 5.1% 2.3% 0.6% 0.1% 0.5% 0.4% 1.7% Collaboration 18.8% 14.1% 6.6% 1.1% 3.1% 2.2% 11.7% Simulation HPC/HTC 13.3% 11.0% 3.7% 1.2% 4.9% 0.9% 1.3% Large scale data analyses 13.0% 8.0% 2.9% 0.8% 4.1% 1.2% 2.2% Visualization 17.9% 6.2% 2.3% 0.8% 3.0% 1.1% 4.3% Table A.1.1. 25
Large scale data analyses Visualization Data storage 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% Data movement Data management Simulation HPC/HTC Remote instrument access Collaboration Workflows You and team National Local campus International Another campus Commercial State/Regional Figure A.1.3. 26
Page 1 and 2: Campus Bridging Software & Software
Page 3 and 4: Acknowledgments The workshop organi
Page 6: 1 Executive Summary 5 1. Introducti
Page 9 and 10: The NSF Advisory Committee on Cyber
Page 11 and 12: challenges in selecting an appropri
Page 13 and 14: As laid out in the National Science
Page 15 and 16: To help guide the workshop discussi
Page 17 and 18: As indicated in Figure 3, the most
Page 19 and 20: Here we present workshop findings o
Page 21 and 22: esearch computing. Additionally, me
Page 24 and 25: 4. Workshop recommendations
Page 26 and 27: 4.2. The NSF should lead the establ
Page 28 and 29: 5. Conclusion
Page 30 and 31: Appendix 1. User CI survey
Page 34 and 35: Large scale data analyses Visualiza
Page 36 and 37: 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50
Page 38 and 39: 100.00% 90.00% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00%
Page 40 and 41: Respondents were asked about specif
Page 42 and 43: • Multiple resources on campus an
Page 44 and 45: Appendix 2. Submitted workshop pape
Page 46 and 47: time we created a bridge between ca
Page 48 and 49: Dr. Chuck Horowitz is a professor o
Page 50 and 51: Appendix 2.2. Position Paper on Cam
Page 52 and 53: Maintainability This software stack
Page 54 and 55: these shortcomings. Services critic
Page 56 and 57: Appendix 2.4. Campus Bridging as an
Page 58 and 59: Appendix 3. Prior work
Page 60 and 61: Appendix 4. Workshop agenda
Page 62: August 27th • 8:00 am: Campus Per
Page 65 and 66: To broaden impact and include an ed
Page 67 and 68: 1. Indiana University Pervasive Tec
Page 70 and 71: Workshop on Campus Bridging Softwar
Page 72 and 73: Workshop Goals • First, some work
Page 74 and 75: Workshop Goal • Try to answer the
Page 76 and 77: Over to John McGee Survey results b
Page 78 and 79: SurveyDetails • Morecompletedetai
Page 80 and 81: Datastorage 60.00% Youandteam local
Page 82 and 83:
• FTP • SQL • SVN • VNC Wha
Page 84 and 85:
Whatstate,regional,national,orinter
Page 86 and 87:
Governance • 11+ Resource Provide
Page 88 and 89:
Science Gateways • A natural exte
Page 90 and 91:
Current Draft Set of Modalities •
Page 92 and 93:
Resources • Definition - What res
Page 94 and 95:
Going further • Do these modaliti
Page 96 and 97:
• - - • - - • - -
Page 98 and 99:
• - - - • - - - - -
Page 100:
• - - - - - - • - -
show all

Workshop Report - Pervasive Technology Institute - Indiana University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?