Workshop Report - Pervasive Technology Institute - Indiana University
Workshop Report - Pervasive Technology Institute - Indiana University
Workshop Report - Pervasive Technology Institute - Indiana University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• other users<br />
• our own indisciplinary group<br />
• peer networks (eg im and social networking)<br />
• Productive graduate students<br />
• public web sites<br />
• quick responses to questions<br />
• The HELP buttons<br />
• Trial and error<br />
• use cases, examples, tutorials<br />
• well-defined user interface<br />
• word of mouth<br />
The respondents were asked about barriers to using CI. Specifically, they were presented with a list<br />
of seven potential barriers and asked to rank them from most important (1) to least important (7).<br />
The table below indicates that 51 respondents noted “allocation policies of remote resource” as the<br />
number 1 barrier to using CI, and that for 75 respondents, this particular barrier was not in their list<br />
of top 3 (i.e., 24+29+17+5).<br />
Answer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />
Allocation policies of remote resource 51 30 27 24 29 17 5<br />
Access control/ identity management issues<br />
(e.g., keeping track of accounts and passwords,<br />
different accounts and passwords<br />
Ability to get support for remote resources<br />
locally<br />
Ability to get support for remote resources from<br />
the resource provider<br />
36 54 23 25 24 20 1<br />
34 24 65 26 24 8 2<br />
7 31 29 74 20 21 1<br />
Local network throughput 17 16 16 11 56 55 12<br />
Software compatibility with remote resource 18 23 19 22 30 61 10<br />
Other (explain) 20 5 4 1 0 1 152<br />
30