Workshop Report - Pervasive Technology Institute - Indiana University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Workshop participants The 32 workshop participants and their affiliations are listed below. Guy Almes, Texas A&M U. William Barnett, Indiana U. David Chaffin, U. of Arkansas Tom Cheatham, U. of Utah Gary Crane, SURA Kim Dillman, Purdue U. Dan Fraser, Open Science Grid Brandon George, U. of Oklahoma Andrew Grimshaw, U. of Virginia Gary Jung, LBNL Rajendar Kanukanti, LONI Daniel S. Katz, U. of Chicago/TeraGrid Ken Klingenstein, Internet2 Bill Labate, UCLA Dale Lantrip, Indiana U. Cliff Lynch, CNI Miron Livny, U. of Wisconsin Man Luo, U. of North Carolina John McGee, RENCI Amit Majumdar, SDSC/TeraGrid Jonathan Morrison, Indiana U. Michael Mundrane, UC-Berkeley Jan Odegard, Rice University Vani Panguluri, Southern U. Jim Pepin, Clemson University John-Paul Robinson, U. of Alabama-Birmingham/SURA Traci Ruthkoski, U. of Michigan Ray Sheppard, Indiana U. Steve Simms, Indiana U. Martin Swany, U. of Delaware David Walker, UC-Davis Von Welch, Independent Organizing committee The workshop organizing committee consisted of John McGee (RENCI), Craig Stewart (Indiana U.), and Von Welch (independent consultant). Bill Barnett (Indiana U.) helped moderate the workshop. Dale Lantrip (Indiana U.) handled logistics for the workshop. iii
Page 1 and 2: Campus Bridging Software & Software
Page 3: Acknowledgments The workshop organi
Page 8 and 9: Executive Summary
Page 10 and 11: Importance of campuses in CI educat
Page 12 and 13: 1. Introduction
Page 14 and 15: 2. CI user survey
Page 16 and 17: Perhaps the most surprising result
Page 18 and 19: 3. Workshop findings
Page 20 and 21: • The reward system for faculty d
Page 22: Increasing CI expertise of local ca
Page 25 and 26: The goals of the workshop, reiterat
Page 27 and 28: 4.3. The NSF should encourage matur
Page 29 and 30: CI has made significant advances in
Page 31 and 32: A survey of NSF scientists was cond
Page 33 and 34: Large scale data analyses Visualiza
Page 35 and 36: The respondents were asked to ident
Page 37 and 38: • other users • our own indisci
Page 39 and 40: Table A.1.2. 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 2
Page 41 and 42: • clickers, podcast • Clusters
Page 43 and 44: • Collect additional information
Page 45 and 46: Workshop participants and members o
Page 47 and 48: Researchers from the Center for Rem
Page 49 and 50: Dr. Richard Durisen is currently us
Page 51 and 52: 9. Make sure technology trickles do
Page 53 and 54: Appendix 2.3. Barriers to Inter-Cam
Page 55 and 56:
work remains to build curated colle
Page 57 and 58:
the grid? On the OSG the answer is
Page 59 and 60:
A number of prior works with regard
Page 61 and 62:
The workshop was held in Denver, CO
Page 64 and 65:
Appendix 5. Student participants
Page 66 and 67:
Appendix 6. References
Page 68:
Appendix 7. Workshop presentations
Page 71 and 72:
Welcome to Students Workshop Backgr
Page 73 and 74:
(Proposed) Definitions • Campus B
Page 75 and 76:
Agenda: Friday • Breakfast @ 7:15
Page 77 and 78:
NSFACCICBTF CampusBridgingTechnolog
Page 79 and 80:
PercentageUseofCItype:averageacross
Page 81 and 82:
WhatOTHERtypesoffunctionalitydoyouo
Page 83 and 84:
Arethere barrierstoyourusingremoteC
Page 85 and 86:
TeraGrid Usage Modalities Slides pr
Page 87 and 88:
Who Uses TeraGrid (2009) (2008) 480
Page 89 and 90:
Usage Modalities • Why do we want
Page 91 and 92:
When-to-run • Definition - When t
Page 93 and 94:
Support • Definition - Are we (TG
Page 95 and 96:
88
Page 97 and 98:
• - • • • -
Page 99 and 100:
• - - • 92
Page 104:
The cover image is based on Joachim
show all

Workshop Report - Pervasive Technology Institute - Indiana University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?