International Coaching Psychology Review, 4.2, September 2009

More documents

Recommendations

Info

John Franklin & Justin Doran Passmore, J. & Gibbes, C. (2007). The state of executive coaching research: What does the current literature tell us and what’s next for coaching research? International Coaching Psychology Review, 2(2), 116–128. Peterson, S.J. & Byron, K. (2008). Exploring the role of hope in job performance: Results from four studies. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 29, 785–803. Peterson, S.J. & Luthans, F. (2003). The positive impact and development of hopeful leaders. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 24, 26–31. Poglinco, S.M., Bach, A.J., Hovde, K., Rosenblum, S., Saunders, M. & Supovitz, J.A. (2003). The heart of the matter: The coaching model of America’s choice schools. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education. Prochaska, J.O., Johnson, S. & Lee, P. (1998). The transtheoretical model of behaviour change. In S.A. Shumaker & E.B. Schron (Eds.), The handbook of health behaviour change (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. Richard, J.T. (1999). Multimodal therapy: A useful model for the executive coach. Consulting Psychology Journal, 51, 24–30. Richard, J.T. (2003). Ideas on fostering creative problem solving in executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal, 55, 249–256. Robbins, S.B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, J., Langley, R. & Carlstron, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skills predict college outcomes? A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261–288. Schunck, D.H. & Pajares, F. (2001). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation. San Diego: Academic Press. Schwarzer, R. & Scholz, U. (2000). Cross-cultural assessment of coping resources: The general perceived self-efficacy scale. Paper presented at the Asian Congress of Health Psychology 2000: Health Psychology and Culture, Tokyo, Japan, 28–29 August. Snyder, C.R. (2000). The handbook of hope. San Diego: Academic Press. Snyder, C.R., Irvine, L. & Anderson, J. (1991). Hope and health: Measuring the will and the ways. In C.R. Snyder &D.R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology (pp.285–305). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon. Snyder, C.R., Susie, C.S., Ybasco, F.C., Borders, T.F., Babyak, M.A. & Higgins, R.L. (1996). Development and validation of the state hope scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 321–335. Steinhardt, M. & Dolbier, C. (2008). Evaluation of a resilience intervention to enhance coping strategies and protective factors and decrease dymptomatology. Journal of American College Health, 56, 445–453. Spence, G.B. & Grant, A.M. (2005). Individual and group life coaching: Initial findings from a randomised, controlled trial. In M. Cavanagh, A.M. Grant & T. Kemp (Eds.), Evidence-based coaching Vol 1: Theory Research and Practice from the Behavioural Sciences (pp.143–158). Bowen Hills Queensland: Australian Academic Press. Stajkovic, A. & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 44, 580–590. Stober, D. (2005). Approaches to research on executive and organisational coaching outcomes. International Journal of Coaching in Organizations, 3, 6–13. Stober, D.R. & Grant, A.M. (2006). Evidence based coaching handbook. Putting best practices to work for your clients. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Sue-Chan, C. & Latham, G.P. (2004). The relative effectiveness of external, peer and self-coaches. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 260–278. Thalheimer, W. & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: A simplified mythology. Retrieved 16 June 2009 from: http://work_learning.com/effect_sizes.htm Toll, C. (2007). Lenses on literacy coaching: Conceptualisations, functions and outcomes. Norwood MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc. Tugade, M.M. & Fredrickson, B.L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 320–333. Twenge, J.M. (2006). Generation Me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled – and more miserable than ever before. New York: Free Press. Willms, J.-F. (2004). Coaching zur Umsetzung personlicher Ziele. Entwicklung, Durchfuhrung und Evaluation. Univesitat Osnabruck: Biplomarbeit im Fachgebiet Arbeits und Organisationspsychologie, Germany. 144 International Coaching Psychology Review ● Vol. 4 No. 2 September 2009
Super-vision, extra-vision or blind faith? A grounded theory study of the efficacy of coaching supervision Jonathan Passmore & Susan McGoldrick Objectives: Coaching supervision has become the dominant model of reflective practice in the UK. This study sought to explore coach and supervisor perceptions of supervision, and critically observe supervision practice. Design: The study utilised an observational design and semi-structured interviews. Methods: The study involved an observation of a coaching session, which was filmed, followed by interviews with the participants. This data was transcribed. In the second part of the study a series of semistructured interviews were undertaken with coaches and supervisors. The data was transcribed and analysed using Grounded Theory methodology until saturation was achieved. The transcribed data was combined in the development of a theoretical framework for coaching supervision. Results: The study outlines a number of perceived benefits of the coaching supervision process. These outcomes include: raised awareness, coaching confidence, perseverance, sense of belonging, increased professionalism and the development of an ‘internal supervisor’. The research also highlighted the need for a greater understanding of what coaching supervision involves for coaches. Conclusions: The paper questions the dominant mindset that supervision is the only intervention for reflective practice and argues for multiple models of continuous professional development, alongside calling for further research to identify the benefits from alternative model of CPD within coaching. Keywords: coaching, coaching supervision, reflective practice, grounded theory study, efficacy of supervision. COACHING is fast gaining popularity and credibility and the coaching sector as a whole continues to experience significant growth. A recent estimate put this at $2 billion worldwide (Fillery-Travis & Lane, 2006). Given this figure the UK coaching market may be estimated to be worth approximately £150 million per annum, although such estimates are extremely difficult to substantiate given the diversity of coaching practice, and with the growth of in-house coaching. The reality is that coaching has moved from a niche to a core personal development activity within the UK and US. This growth has been supported by a growth in the number of coaching professional bodies such as the British Psychological Society’s SGCP, which have acted as catalysts, stimulating research and bringing together professionals to share knowledge. This has been matched by a growth in coach training provision, from short courses over a few days or a week to the more recent development of longer accredited courses, and full-time Masters programmes. Alongside this growth in coaching practice, there has been a growth in the advocacy for coaching supervision (Hawkins & Smith, 2006; Hawkins & Schwenk, 2006). This has been largely supported by the emerging professional bodies, such as Association for Coaching (AC), European Coaching & Mentoring Council (EMCC) and Association for Professional Executive Coaches & Supervisors (APECS). It has been argued that supervision is an important part of maintaining professional standards. Such calls have, however, been made largely without reference to any clear evidence that supervision contributes to enhanced coaching practice. International Coaching Psychology Review ● Vol. 4 No. 2 September 2009 145 © The British Psychological Society – ISSN: 1750-2764
Page 1 and 2: Interest Group in Coaching Psycholo
Page 3 and 4: The British Psychological Society S
Page 5 and 6: Contents 124 Editorial: To be or no
Page 7 and 8: Editorial ● Can still use the tit
Page 9 and 10: Editorial seeing you in December at
Page 11 and 12: Coaching and objective performance
Page 25: Coaching and objective performance
Page 29 and 30: Super-vision, extra-vision or blind
Page 45 and 46: Literature review of coaching super
Page 57 and 58: Coaching Hypnosis (or altered state
Page 59 and 60: Coaching Hypnosis Table 1: Age Prog
Page 61 and 62: Coaching Hypnosis ● Yep, it certa
Page 63 and 64: Coaching Hypnosis Culture and conte
Page 65 and 66: Coaching Hypnosis Sanders, S. (1997
Page 67 and 68: Co-creating an optimal coaching all
Page 77 and 78:
Does coaching psychology need the c
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Keynote Paper Coaching as a reflect
Page 93 and 94:
Coaching as a reflective space nica
Page 95 and 96:
Coaching as a reflective space How
Page 97 and 98:
Coaching as a reflective space may
Page 99 and 100:
Coaching as a reflective space towa
Page 101 and 102:
Coaching as a reflective space Refe
Page 103 and 104:
SGCP & IGCP News Update Interest Gr
Page 105 and 106:
SGCP & IGCP News Update experience
Page 107 and 108:
Volume 4, No. 2, September 2009 124
Page 109 and 110:
The objectives of this workshop are
Page 111 and 112:
4. Online submission process (1) Al
show all

International Coaching Psychology Review, 4.2, September 2009

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?