An Introduction to the Theory of Crystalline Elemental Solids and ...

[56] J. Paier, M. Marsman, and G. Kresse, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 154709 (2007).
[57] J. L. F. DaSilva, C. Stampfl, and M. Scheffler, Surf. Sci. 600, 703 (2006).
[58] TPSS values of E coh are not available mainly because this functional is relatively new
(from 2003) and because of the choice of basis set used to evaluate its performance for bulk
metals in ref. [55]. Specifically, a small basis set of atom-centred Gaussian functions was
employed, which although sufficient to describe certain properties of bulk metals would not
be sufficient to describe the (energies) of the atomic reference states that are also needed
for the calculation of E coh .
[59] It has been argued that the problem with cohesive energies computed with PBE0 is that
the energy of the isolated atoms is badly described [56]. For many other properties, such
as adsorption on metals or the size of band gaps in semi-conductors and insulators PBE0
(and hybrid functionals in general) can offer considerably improved performance over LDA,
GGAs, and meta-GGAs [56, 180].
[60] T. Todorova, A. P. Seitsonen, J. Hutter, I. F. W. Kuo, and C. J. Mundy, J. Phys. Chem.
B 110, 3685 (2006).
[61] Functionals that include “LYP” correlation [181] must be viewed with some suspicion when
dealing with metals since LYP fails to recover the LDA uniform density limit. A consequence,
for example, is that the popular B3LYP hybrid functional underestimates the
magnitude of the correlation energy in the uniform gas by 30 %. See refs. [62, 182–185], for
example, for more discussions on the failings of BLYP and B3LYP for metallic systems.
[62] J. Paier, M. Marsman, K. Hummer, G. Kresse, I. D. Gerber, and J. G. Ángyán, J. Chem.
Phys. 124103, 024 (2006).
[63] V. N. Staroverov, G. E. Scuseria, J. Tao, and J. P. Perdew, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 154709
(2006).
[64] A. A. Stekolnikov, J. Furthmüller, and F. Bechstedt, Phys. Rev. B 65, 115318 (2002).
[65] M. W. Finnis and V. Heine, J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 4, 37 (1974).
[66] G. E. Laramore and C. B. Duke, Phys. Rev. B 5, 267 (1972).
[67] D. W. Jepsen, P. M. Marcus, and F. Jona, Phys. Rev. B 6, 3684 (1972).
[68] M. R. Martin and G. A. Somorjai, Phys. Rev. B 7, 3607 (1973).
[69] R. Smoluchowski, Phys. Rev. 60, 661 (1941).
[70] U. Landman, R. N. Hill, and M. Mostoller, Phys. Rev. B 21, 448 (1980).
[71] H. B. Nielsen, J. N. Andersen, L. Petersen, and D. L. Adams, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.
15, 1113 (1982).
[72] G. A. Somorjai, Introduction to Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (Wiley, New York, 1994).
[73] R. I. Masel, Principles of Adsorption and Reaction on Solid Surfaces (Wiley, New York,
1996).
[74] S. Hengrasmee, K. A. R. Mitchell, P. R. Watson, and S. J. White, Can. J. Phys. 58, 200
(1980).
[75] G. Michalk, W. Moritz, H. Pfnür, and D. Menzel, Surf. Sci. 129, 92 (1983).
[76] P. J. Feibelman, Surf. Sci. 360, 297 (1996).
[77] S. Titmuss, A. Wander, and D. A. King, Chem. Rev. 96, 1291 (1996).
[78] M. K. Debe and D. A. King, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 708 (1977).
[79] M. S. Altman, P. J. Estrup, and I. K. Robinson, Phys. Rev. B 38, 5211 (1988).
[80] H. Landskron, N. Bickel, K. Heinz, G. Schmidtlein, and K. Muller, J. Phys. Condens.
Mattter 1, 1 (1989).
[81] G. Schmidt, H. Zagel, H. Landskron, K. Heinz, K. Muller, and J. B. Pendry, Surf. Sci. 271,
416 (1992).
50