21.11.2014 Views

CASE SUMMARY - Office of Indiana State Chemist

CASE SUMMARY - Office of Indiana State Chemist

CASE SUMMARY - Office of Indiana State Chemist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Complainant:<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>SUMMARY</strong><br />

<strong>Office</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Indiana</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Chemist</strong> (OISC)<br />

175 South University Street<br />

West Lafayette, IN 47907-2063<br />

Case #2005/0308<br />

Business: Charles Heller (F31759)<br />

Heller’s Unlimited<br />

(B28288)<br />

Heller’s Lawn Treatment Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals (B31758)<br />

P.O. Box 761<br />

Washington, IN 47501-0761<br />

812-254-3220<br />

1. According to OISC records, Charles Heller did not renew the business license for either <strong>of</strong> the<br />

two above listed businesses for 2005. Mr. Heller is the only certified applicator associated with<br />

the businesses and his certification expired 12-31-2004. OISC records indicate two notification<br />

letters were sent after several attempts were made to contact Mr. Heller by phone.<br />

2. On 7-21-2005, I finally spoke with Mr. Heller on the phone. He indicated that he had to re-take<br />

the Category 3b (lawn care) certification exam, but he assumed his secretary sent in the<br />

appropriate forms and fees. OISC records indicated that application and fees were received, but<br />

the Certificate <strong>of</strong> Insurance did not list the business correctly. Mr. Heller indicated he did not<br />

know there was a problem, but he would cooperate fully to resolve the issue immediately.<br />

3. On 7-27-2005, I met with Mr. Heller at his shop. He stated that he has a part-time secretary who<br />

works from her home and that he had not seen the letters from OISC. Mr. Heller indicated he did<br />

not wish to renew the business licenses for either <strong>of</strong> the previously licensed businesses. He stated<br />

he wanted to combine the two businesses and obtain a pesticide business license for the new<br />

business, “Lawn Pro”. I informed Mr. Heller that if he was making for-hire pesticide<br />

applications, he was doing so without an active business license. Mr. Heller admitted he has been<br />

making applications. .<br />

4. Mr. Heller completed a business license application for Lawn Pro, which I later submitted to<br />

OISC. Since the fees had been received by OISC and the Certificate <strong>of</strong> Insurance was correct,<br />

Mr. Heller was issued a pesticide business license for Lawn Pro (B217823).<br />

Disposition: Charles Heller, the certified applicator, and Heller’s Lawn Pro were cited for violation <strong>of</strong><br />

section 14(9) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Indiana</strong> Pesticide Use and Application Law for applying pesticides for hire without<br />

having an <strong>Indiana</strong> pesticide business license. A civil penalty in the amount <strong>of</strong> $250.00 was assessed for<br />

this violation. Consideration was given to the fact that Mr. Heller cooperated during the investigation and<br />

there appeared to be a good faith effort to comply.<br />

Andrew R. Roth Date: September 20, 2005<br />

Pesticide Investigator

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!