21.11.2014 Views

CASE SUMMARY - Office of Indiana State Chemist

CASE SUMMARY - Office of Indiana State Chemist

CASE SUMMARY - Office of Indiana State Chemist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Complainant:<br />

<strong>CASE</strong> <strong>SUMMARY</strong><br />

<strong>Office</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Indiana</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Chemist</strong> (OISC)<br />

175 S. University<br />

West Lafayette, IN 47907<br />

800-893-6637<br />

Case #2005/0388<br />

(see Case #2005/0390)<br />

Business: Helena Chemical (B-11403)<br />

63239 SR 13 (D-1956)<br />

Goshen, IN 46528<br />

574-642-4963<br />

Manager: Todd Hostetler (unlicensed)<br />

1) On June 8, 2005, I performed a routine facility inspection at the above location.<br />

Agent J. Kelley, also <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Office</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Indiana</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Chemist</strong> (OISC), accompanied<br />

me.<br />

2) I initially spoke with the company secretary, Megan Erb and inquired about the<br />

restricted use pesticide (RUP) sales records that the company is required to<br />

maintain and have available for inspection. The records that Ms. Erb had available<br />

were incomplete, in that they were lacking the name <strong>of</strong> the license holder, EPA<br />

registration number and manufacturers name. Helena Chemical is to provide the<br />

complete sales records within 7 days <strong>of</strong> the inspection.<br />

3) I also spoke with Todd Hostetler, the facility manager. I conducted a WPS<br />

inspection as part <strong>of</strong> the facility inspection. Mr. Hostetler stated that the company<br />

had made a pesticide application on 6-7-05. The application consisted <strong>of</strong> “Honcho<br />

Plus”, EPA Reg. #524-454, active ingredient glyphosate. I obtained a copy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

application record. When I inquired about the customer notification requirement,<br />

Mr. Hostetler stated that they had tried to “set something up last year for<br />

notification, but we could not find anything that really worked.” Mr. Hostetler<br />

stated that the customer has “a general idea <strong>of</strong> when we are going to come out to<br />

spray.” During the facility inspection, Tex Eisenhorn (F-39276) returned from<br />

making a pesticide application <strong>of</strong> “Baythroid 2”, EPA Reg. #264-745, active<br />

ingredient cyfluthrin. I asked to inspect Mr. Eisenhorn’s decontamination supplies.<br />

Mr. Eisenhorn had a soiled tyvex suit (change <strong>of</strong> clothes); he did not have fresh<br />

water, soap or eye flush.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!