CASE SUMMARY - Office of Indiana State Chemist
CASE SUMMARY - Office of Indiana State Chemist
CASE SUMMARY - Office of Indiana State Chemist
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
applied a herbicide for-hire, as his customer notification indicated, he was in<br />
violation <strong>of</strong> the state pesticide law. Similarly, if he applied only fertilizer, yet<br />
claimed to have applied herbicide, he had committed fraud. Chad McPheeters<br />
stated he only applied fertilizer, but did claim to have applied Dimension<br />
herbicide because his customers were expecting it. He stated that, after talking to<br />
me, he understood he could not apply herbicide since he is not licensed to do so,<br />
but when the sale <strong>of</strong> the business fell through, he was left with customers awaiting<br />
applications. The only product on the van on 3-16-2005 was granular fertilizer.<br />
10. The lab report for the sample I submitted indicates no herbicide was detected,<br />
confirming Chad McPheeters admission that he applied only fertilizer to the<br />
lawns on 3-15-2005. As <strong>of</strong> 4-21-2005, Chad McPheeters had not taken the<br />
Category 3b (turf) certification examination.<br />
Disposition: Marty McPheeters, Chad McPheeters and Master Lawn were cited for six<br />
(6) counts <strong>of</strong> violation <strong>of</strong> section 14(1) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Indiana</strong> Pesticide Use and Application Law<br />
for making false claims about a herbicide being in the lawn applications. A civil penalty<br />
in the amount <strong>of</strong> $1,500.00 was assessed for these violations. This case was forward to<br />
the <strong>Indiana</strong> Attorney General for collection <strong>of</strong> the civil penalty.<br />
Andrew R. Roth Date: September 14, 2005<br />
Pesticide Investigator<br />
6