21.11.2014 Views

Download - National Environmental Services Center - West Virginia ...

Download - National Environmental Services Center - West Virginia ...

Download - National Environmental Services Center - West Virginia ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L E G A L V I E W S<br />

cute and collect fines from Mother<br />

Nature when the background<br />

water is not as clean as the treated<br />

effluent? What if the AT system<br />

does not produce effluent that<br />

meets the design standards, but<br />

there is no ponding? Is that “failure”?<br />

Is it really only “failure” if<br />

the effluent quality is poor and<br />

there is ponding? Does an AT system<br />

“fail” if some mechanical<br />

component breaks, but it can be<br />

replaced? What if the system no<br />

longer produces effluent after the<br />

expiration of its design life? Isn’t<br />

that really “failure”? Maybe you<br />

have to compare performance<br />

“failure” to hydraulic “failure,”<br />

and component “failure” to system<br />

“failure.” Maybe “failure” is an incredibly<br />

vague concept that<br />

should never be used to describe<br />

the performance of<br />

any type of wastewater system,<br />

unless it is used with<br />

great specificity. If I tried to<br />

argue the meaning of failure<br />

in front of a judge based<br />

on its common usage in the<br />

wastewater field, I would<br />

probably be held in contempt<br />

of court. I think it is<br />

easier to define “pornography”<br />

than “failure.” I am<br />

reminded of Justice Stewart’s<br />

comment concerning<br />

pornography, when he said<br />

that that he couldn’t define<br />

tem, then how can you possibly determine<br />

whether or not “failure” is<br />

occurring?<br />

When you throw advanced<br />

treatment (AT) systems into the<br />

mix, it becomes even more confusing.<br />

It seems at first glance that<br />

you could define “failure” pretty<br />

easily. AT systems are designed to<br />

meet certain effluent limits. A sample<br />

can be taken at the pipe leading<br />

from the tank to the drainfield.<br />

Specific water quality parameters<br />

such as five-day biochemical oxygen<br />

demand, total suspended<br />

solids, organic carbon, pH, coliform<br />

bacteria count, nitrogen species,<br />

phosphorus, etc., can be measured<br />

and the effectiveness of the AT system<br />

can be evaluated. Unfortunately,<br />

the final step is discharge into<br />

the soil. So is it “failure” if an AT<br />

system produces effluent that meets<br />

design or permit standards, but the<br />

effluent surfaces in the drainfield?<br />

What if the nearby surface water<br />

(that is, surface water that is upslope<br />

of the “failing” system) has<br />

more E. coli than the effluent that<br />

is surfacing? Is that “failure”? As a<br />

thought, where is the “failure” anyway<br />

if the treated effluent is cleaner<br />

than the surrounding surface<br />

water? If the water standing over<br />

the drainfield is cleaner than background<br />

water ponded in the lawn<br />

after a rain, was there a “failure”<br />

and whose was it? Can we prosepornography,<br />

but he knew it when<br />

he saw it. Well, half the time you<br />

can’t even see the “failure”! Maybe<br />

we are taking the wrong approach—<br />

maybe we need to take a more spiritual<br />

approach and think about “failure”<br />

the way the Inuit think about<br />

snow. I read in Smilla’s Sense of<br />

Snow that they have over two hundred<br />

words for snow, because there<br />

are that many kinds of snow.<br />

So there you have it. No answers,<br />

just more questions. As someone<br />

once said, “I fear that I have not<br />

fully answered any of your questions,<br />

but have merely succeeded in<br />

raising more questions. I feel that<br />

now we are as confused as ever,<br />

however we are now confused at a<br />

higher level and about more important<br />

things.”<br />

Elizabeth Dietzmann, J.D.,<br />

is a consultant in the<br />

planning, development,<br />

and management of<br />

decentralized wastewater<br />

systems. As an attorney, she<br />

focuses on coordinating the<br />

legal, political, and financial<br />

aspects of using<br />

decentralized technology as<br />

an alternative to central<br />

sewer systems. Although<br />

she consults with clients across the country,<br />

Elizabeth is happy to live in a small town in<br />

Missouri, with her dogs, cats, and horses.<br />

She can be reached at edietzmann@earthlink.net.<br />

Small Flows Quarterly, Fall 2004, Volume 5, Number 4<br />

Related Products For ordering information, see page 55.<br />

A Manual for Managing Septic<br />

Systems (Item #WWBKOM41)<br />

The Greeley-Polhemus Group, Inc.<br />

This 179-page manual explains how a<br />

septic system works and why a management<br />

program is needed. Based<br />

on experiences in Sussex County,<br />

New Jersey, this manual describes<br />

what a homeowner should or shouldn’t<br />

do in the daily operation of a septic<br />

system. The manual also provides<br />

guidance to local entities for periodic<br />

inspections and discusses potential institutional<br />

and financing arrangements.<br />

Although this manual targets<br />

New Jersey, it can serve as a guide for<br />

other states in the U.S. The price of<br />

this manual is $28.35<br />

Maintaining Your Septic<br />

System: A Guide for<br />

Homeowners (Item<br />

#SFPLNL03)<br />

<strong>National</strong> Small Flows Clearinghouse<br />

The Fall 1995 Pipeline focuses on<br />

educating homeowners about<br />

proper septic system operation<br />

and maintenance. Topics include<br />

groundwater pollution, system<br />

inspections, and the use of additives<br />

and cleaners. The newsletter<br />

includes a handy list of important<br />

septic system do’s and don’ts.<br />

The cost of this 8-page newsletter<br />

is 40 cents.<br />

Why Do Septic Systems<br />

Malfunction? (Item #WWFSGN205)<br />

K. Mancl, B. Slater; The Ohio State<br />

University Extension<br />

This two-page fact sheet discusses not<br />

only the signs of septic system malfunction,<br />

but also why a system malfunctions,<br />

and how the malfunction can be avoided.<br />

A distinction is made between system<br />

malfunction and system failure, that is,<br />

when a system cannot be fixed to bring it<br />

back into compliance. Three reasons for<br />

system failure are noted along with ways<br />

that the property owner can avoid system<br />

failure. The information here is easily accessible<br />

and could be a good tool for<br />

community or public education. The price<br />

of this fact sheet is 40 cents.<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!