24.11.2014 Views

February 2012 Issue - Target Shooter Magazine

February 2012 Issue - Target Shooter Magazine

February 2012 Issue - Target Shooter Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sorting a Savage Part 2<br />

THE CONCLUSION By Laurie Holland<br />

groups mind you but the four batches covering 24.9<br />

to 25.2gn ran at 0.15” to 0.4” (figure 3). Wow! Cracked<br />

it (again!). All I needed was a long-range match in<br />

reasonable conditions to prove I was back in business.<br />

...and Dashed!<br />

The PSSA competition calendar fixtures allied to long<br />

bouts of stormy weather denied me that opportunity<br />

until the second Saturday of the new year, which saw a<br />

600 yard F-Class match coincide with cold but settled<br />

weather – only 600 yards but enough distance to show<br />

if the ‘verticals’ had gone.<br />

New load or not they hadn’t, or at least not in the<br />

first half of the event. If anything, things were worse<br />

with the corrected elevation graph jumping up and<br />

down the paper between shots to produce a 2.5-MOA<br />

overall spread and more often than not a ‘minute’ of<br />

movement between shots. Then at shot 13 everything<br />

appeared to settle down and things were much<br />

improved to shot 19 - five of the seven hits displaying<br />

really impressive consistency. A glimmer of hope<br />

appeared – if my final shot stayed within a quarter<br />

minute variation, things were maybe on the up. Sadly<br />

not – along with my hopes, the strike went way, way<br />

down again, now at the very bottom of the four-ring,<br />

a drop of around 0.8-MOA on the PSSA 500/600yd ‘F’<br />

target.<br />

So, what is going on? I wish I knew! I feel I’m just on<br />

the edge of getting it back together again. Maybe<br />

checking and re-tuning the cartridge overall lengths,<br />

looking at neck tension, retrying some of the powders<br />

originally rejected, switching from the 90gn VLD<br />

to the 80.5gn and 90gn Berger BT designs will get<br />

it shooting well again. However, national GBFCA<br />

League rounds are approaching fast and getting loads<br />

sorted for my newly rebarrelled .308 Win F/TR rifle<br />

looks a lot less risky at the minute!<br />

Lots of people did warn me when I started out with<br />

long-range .223 Rem that the cartridge is incredibly<br />

finicky with 90gn bullets and often just goes ‘out of<br />

tune’ for no apparent reason. I think the lesson for me<br />

as well as others is just how ‘high-maintenance’ this<br />

combination is. If everything isn’t perfect, it simply<br />

doesn’t work.<br />

Figure 1: rear screw tension set at 5 – 20 in/lb<br />

Figure 2: rear screw tensions above 20 in/lb<br />

made groups considerably larger<br />

18 19<br />

I did say before that I’d pass a little more load data on.<br />

Late last year after a new barrel went on, I decided to<br />

give Viht N150 a try. I’d avoided the powder previously<br />

after hearing from Jerry Tierney over in California<br />

that he’d had some worrying pressure spikes with it,<br />

Figure 3: With the tension at just under 15 in/lb, a return to the 90gn VLD / Re15<br />

ammunition combination appeared to have got the rifle shooting well again<br />

getting a huge rise in MV and pressure signs from a<br />

0.2gn charge weight increase. I’ve always liked this<br />

powder with heavy bullets in the cartridge and decided<br />

to give it a try, albeit acting very warily.<br />

Five batches in well-used Lapua match brass, CCI-450<br />

SR Magnum primer and charges of N150 rising from<br />

23.6 to 24.0gn in 0.1gn steps (weighed on Acculab<br />

high-quality electronic scales to accurately allow such<br />

small differentiations) produced 0.2 to 0.7” groups,<br />

only one exceeding the half-inch. The top load<br />

produced a modest MV of 2,641 fps with a small ES of<br />

9 fps, so there is scope for working it up a bit higher.<br />

Before shooters scoff at such ‘low performance’, run<br />

the 90gn Berger BTLR’s external ballistics on a decent<br />

G7 based program. The 800 yard wind-drift for a 2,640<br />

fps load is 6.7-MOA in the classic 10 mph 90-degree<br />

crosswind which is better than that of the NRA’s RWS<br />

.308W / 155gn SMK ammunition, assuming that the<br />

latter produces a full 3,000 fps MV from a ‘tight-bore’<br />

30 inch barrel.<br />

Retained velocities and wind-drift values for this load<br />

fall between those of the ‘old’ and ‘new’ 155gn Sierra<br />

‘Palma’ MKs at a full 3,000 fps MV in fact. I wouldn’t<br />

Sorting a Savage Part 2<br />

THE CONCLUSION<br />

By Laurie Holland<br />

tout this as a 1000 yard load but it shows a great deal<br />

of promise for the shorter-range club shooter, has no<br />

recoil to speak of and will probably give 4,000-5,000<br />

rounds barrel accuracy<br />

life. The 80.5gn Berger<br />

BT at 2800-2900 fps is<br />

gaining a good reputation<br />

too and I’ll try this bullet<br />

later on in the year in<br />

my F/TR rifle as well as<br />

another Savage .223 we’re<br />

working on – a rebarrelled<br />

‘sporter’ designated as ‘an<br />

affordable clubman’s F/TR<br />

rifle’.<br />

Figure 4: Graphed<br />

elevations of the 20 shots in the 600yd Diggle F Class<br />

competition corrected to a common elevation setting<br />

on the riflescope. Despite the use of the Re15 load,<br />

the problem has not been solved! 0 = perfect elevation<br />

with a strike on the V-Bull centreline; low shots have<br />

minus values; high shots have plus values. Shots 13-<br />

19 suggest a solution may be close

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!