- Page 3 and 4:
The following persons may be contac
- Page 5 and 6:
S.7 Evaluation of the Alternatives
- Page 7 and 8:
3.8 Ecosystems ....................
- Page 9 and 10:
5. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATIO
- Page 11 and 12:
Technical Results Reports Air Quali
- Page 13 and 14:
LIST OF TABLES Table S-1 Summary of
- Page 15 and 16:
Table 3.11-2 Estimated Regional Ave
- Page 17:
Table 5.1-8 Capital Funding Plan fo
- Page 21:
S.1 PORTLAND-MILWAUKIE CORRIDOR The
- Page 24:
S.3.1 Project Goals and Objectives
- Page 28 and 29:
The light rail alignment then would
- Page 30 and 31:
LPA Phasing Option The LPA Phasing
- Page 32 and 33:
Table S-1 Summary of Transit and Ro
- Page 34 and 35:
S.5 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS This sec
- Page 36 and 37:
Festival have higher clearance requ
- Page 38 and 39:
The project supports the regional 2
- Page 40 and 41:
S.6.9 Water Quality, Hydrology, and
- Page 42 and 43:
Pile driving or drilling Concrete c
- Page 44 and 45:
S.7.2.2 Capital Funding Conclusions
- Page 46 and 47:
The light rail project would includ
- Page 49:
1. PURPOSE AND NEED CHAPTER CONTENT
- Page 53 and 54:
transportation system, is environme
- Page 56 and 57:
1.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PORTLAND-MIL
- Page 59 and 60:
1.4 GROWTH IN THE REGION AND THE PR
- Page 61:
and classrooms. Zidell Companies is
- Page 66:
1.6 STATE, REGIONAL, AND LOCAL PLAN
- Page 70:
2.1 DEFINITION OF ALTERNATIVES The
- Page 73 and 74:
Table 2.1-1 Summary of Transit and
- Page 78:
The Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail P
- Page 81 and 82:
UPRR to the Clinton Station. Under
- Page 84:
The project would modify intersecti
- Page 87 and 88:
A new pedestrian overcrossing at th
- Page 89 and 90:
2.1.1.5 Ruby Junction Maintenance F
- Page 93 and 94:
2.1.1.7 Other Light Rail Facilities
- Page 95 and 96:
From approximately 250 feet south o
- Page 97 and 98:
ack at Union Station, or would cont
- Page 99 and 100:
Light Rail Early Operations The lig
- Page 101 and 102:
Construction Duration and Timing Co
- Page 103 and 104:
constructed north of Kellogg Lake b
- Page 105 and 106:
Barges and temporary work bridges w
- Page 107 and 108:
noise requirements as required by l
- Page 109 and 110:
2.2 COST ESTIMATES This section pro
- Page 111:
2000 South Corridor Transportation
- Page 116 and 117:
Elevated station in South Waterfron
- Page 118 and 119:
Loss of over 100 parking spaces Con
- Page 122 and 123:
comparison for the options describe
- Page 124 and 125:
composite bridge types were elimina
- Page 126 and 127:
Require fewer impacts to traffic an
- Page 128 and 129:
Current land uses and zoning do not
- Page 130:
must also provide approvals for the
- Page 133 and 134:
Noise and vibration - the operation
- Page 135:
addition, TriMet is a municipal gov
- Page 138 and 139:
Road to SE Park Avenue, including s
- Page 140 and 141:
Ruby Junction Maintenance Facility
- Page 142 and 143:
3.2.1 Affected Environment This sec
- Page 146 and 147:
Growth Concept and the Regional Fra
- Page 148 and 149:
South Waterfront Plan (2002) The So
- Page 150:
Boulevard and residential neighborh
- Page 155 and 156:
3.2.2.1 Compatibility with Adopted
- Page 157 and 158:
LPA Phasing Option Compatibility wi
- Page 159 and 160:
subsequently provides the opportuni
- Page 161 and 162:
acquisition would be from the UPRR
- Page 163 and 164:
Table 3.2-1 Current Zoning and Pote
- Page 165 and 166:
Table 3.2-1 Current Zoning and Pote
- Page 167 and 168:
Table 3.2-2 Assessments of Redevelo
- Page 169 and 170:
Ruby Junction Maintenance Facility
- Page 171 and 172:
Special Tax Districts - Urban Renew
- Page 173 and 174:
with the expansion of the Ruby Junc
- Page 175 and 176:
Since the project runs beside the T
- Page 177 and 178:
temporary jobs over the constructio
- Page 179 and 180:
Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail Proje
- Page 181:
and property owners are fully infor
- Page 184:
Neighborhood Portland Table 3.3-2 S
- Page 188 and 189:
Table 3.3-3 Percentages of Homes wi
- Page 190 and 191:
were on transit. Another group that
- Page 192 and 193:
Station, but they can be mitigated.
- Page 194 and 195:
The LPA to Park Avenue would have l
- Page 196 and 197:
access route, while at the Rhine St
- Page 198 and 199:
streetcar for travelers using SW Mo
- Page 200 and 201:
3.3.4 Environmental Justice Complia
- Page 202 and 203:
state levels. This is a very low le
- Page 204 and 205:
The project team surveyed the prope
- Page 206 and 207:
Therefore, according to the definit
- Page 209 and 210:
Inner Eastside Portland Visual Anal
- Page 211 and 212:
Topography - The visibility and sca
- Page 213 and 214:
SW 4 th Avenue and SW 1 st Avenue,
- Page 215 and 216:
Inner Eastside Portland Visual Anal
- Page 217 and 218:
on SE 16 th Avenue and small busine
- Page 219 and 220:
ut would be less visible from other
- Page 221 and 222:
Downtown Milwaukie Visual Analysis
- Page 223 and 224:
Unincorporated Clackamas County/Oak
- Page 225 and 226:
The overall area includes a mix of
- Page 227 and 228:
Alternative LPA to Park Ave. (cont.
- Page 229 and 230:
Alternative LPA to Park Ave. (cont.
- Page 231 and 232:
may be unavoidable, particularly wh
- Page 233 and 234:
extended the APE, and FTA submitted
- Page 235 and 236:
Table 3.5-1 Historic Resources and
- Page 237 and 238:
Map ID # Address Name/Type 39 40 41
- Page 240 and 241:
An area where there is a reasonable
- Page 242 and 243:
Table 3.5-1 identifies the specific
- Page 244 and 245:
Ruby Junction Maintenance Facility
- Page 246 and 247:
Ruby Junction Maintenance Facility
- Page 248 and 249:
it could be built into the retainin
- Page 250 and 251:
As defined in the MOA, geotechnical
- Page 252:
Table 3.6-1 Summary of Potential Pa
- Page 255 and 256:
Table 3.6-2 Summary of Direct Impac
- Page 257 and 258:
Dogwood Park This small park in dow
- Page 259 and 260:
The amount of property needed to de
- Page 261 and 262:
following planned or existing park
- Page 263 and 264:
Unconsolidated Sedimentary Aquifer
- Page 266 and 267:
Hazardous Soil Properties Two soil
- Page 268 and 269:
LPA Phasing Option The LPA Phasing
- Page 270 and 271:
3.7.3 Mitigation The project incorp
- Page 272 and 273:
Table 3.8-1 Summary of Potential Na
- Page 274 and 275:
Site/Wetland PM 0 PM 1 Table 3.8-2
- Page 277 and 278:
Table 3.8-4 Summary of Existing Con
- Page 280 and 281:
In addition to these general vegeta
- Page 282 and 283:
lackberry, Himalayan blackberry, sw
- Page 284 and 285:
Section 7 of the federal ESA ensure
- Page 286 and 287:
Native Species Table 3.8-7 Fish Spe
- Page 288 and 289: 3.8.2.2 Locally Preferred Alternati
- Page 290: and/or waterways located within the
- Page 293 and 294: In-water habitat impacts due to the
- Page 295 and 296: time. Section 3.9, Water Quality an
- Page 297 and 298: Vegetation Type Table 3.8-11 Potent
- Page 299 and 300: Short-Term Impacts (Construction) S
- Page 301 and 302: driving, and other construction act
- Page 303 and 304: to these species and their habitats
- Page 305 and 306: Fish and Wildlife Resources (ODFW 2
- Page 307 and 308: Work Area Isolation. Any action, ex
- Page 309 and 310: Where native vegetation removal is
- Page 312 and 313: Table 3.9-1 summarizes the baseline
- Page 314 and 315: (COP 2008a; DEQ 2009). The DEQ also
- Page 316 and 317: Stream 1 Table 3.9-3 Project Area S
- Page 318 and 319: Consequently, adverse water quality
- Page 320 and 321: Ruby Junction Maintenance Facility
- Page 322 and 323: than five percent of the average an
- Page 324 and 325: approximately 200 square feet. As w
- Page 326 and 327: 3.9.2.3 Cumulative Impacts Past and
- Page 328 and 329: and water quality impacts also may
- Page 330 and 331: sound level (L dn ) is an L eq over
- Page 332 and 333: Moderate. In this range, other proj
- Page 334 and 335: For roadways that meet the above re
- Page 336 and 337: The proposed light rail alignment w
- Page 340 and 341: planned Robert Kronberg Park, and c
- Page 342 and 343: The analysis of potential noise imp
- Page 344 and 345: Traffic noise analysis using FHWA c
- Page 346 and 347: SE Roswell Street and SE Olsen Stre
- Page 348 and 349: 34TH AVE 37TH AVE 50TH AVE NSET BLV
- Page 350 and 351: Rec.# 1 Type 3 Area Description 2 U
- Page 352 and 353: Rec.# 1 Type 3 Area Description 2 U
- Page 354: Rec. # 1 TR15 TR16 SE Rhone SFR on
- Page 357 and 358: 3.10.5.4 Vibration Impacts Since th
- Page 359 and 360: Rec. # Area Description 1 Land Use
- Page 361 and 362: weekday and Saturday, daytime hours
- Page 363 and 364: Table 3.10-7 Summary and Comparison
- Page 365 and 366: A noise wall will be used to mitiga
- Page 367 and 368: Table 3.10-8 Summary of Noise Mitig
- Page 369 and 370: 3.10.8 Light Rail Vibration Mitigat
- Page 371 and 372: Table 3.10-9 Light Rail Vibration M
- Page 373 and 374: Carbon Monoxide Table 3.11-1 Federa
- Page 375 and 376: Qualitative analysis for projects w
- Page 377 and 378: among the alternatives. Also, regar
- Page 379 and 380: Greenhouse Gas Emissions The light
- Page 381 and 382: impacts during construction and ope
- Page 383 and 384: Table 3.12-2 Summary of Daily Corri
- Page 385 and 386: 3.13.1 Affected Environment 3.13.1.
- Page 387 and 388: Type of database listing. Identifie
- Page 390 and 391:
Industrial activities have been con
- Page 392 and 393:
The Miller Products Company operate
- Page 394 and 395:
3.13.2 Environmental Impacts 3.13.2
- Page 396 and 397:
The No-Build Alternative would not
- Page 398 and 399:
The degree to which existing contam
- Page 400 and 401:
egulations. Characterizing, managin
- Page 402 and 403:
Focused site assessments conducted
- Page 404 and 405:
the advanced engineering phase of t
- Page 406 and 407:
Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA)
- Page 408 and 409:
Underground Electrical Utilities: E
- Page 410 and 411:
At Kellogg Lake, a power line will
- Page 412:
law enforcement, fire and emergency
- Page 415 and 416:
Station 4: Serves the Lake Road, We
- Page 417 and 418:
Portland-Milwaukie corridor grow, t
- Page 419 and 420:
if a train is passing at the same t
- Page 421 and 422:
Mitigation Related Facilities Relat
- Page 423 and 424:
Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office
- Page 425 and 426:
Clackamas County crime statistics a
- Page 427 and 428:
In general, the majority of crimes
- Page 429 and 430:
environments with high degrees of v
- Page 431 and 432:
locations for security personnel in
- Page 433 and 434:
3.17.2.2 Historic and Cultural Reso
- Page 435:
The LPA to Park Avenue would provid
- Page 438 and 439:
4.1.1.1 Public Transportation Provi
- Page 440:
4.1.3.2 Local Street Network Motor
- Page 443 and 444:
SE 17 th Avenue/SE Tacoma Street -
- Page 445 and 446:
hour. The highest bicycle volumes a
- Page 447 and 448:
Table 4.1-2 Existing Portland-Milwa
- Page 449:
Boulevard/SE Ochoco Street has the
- Page 453 and 454:
4.2.1.2 Service Growth Service grow
- Page 455 and 456:
average weekday passenger miles in
- Page 457 and 458:
Corridor and Total System-wide Ride
- Page 459:
4.2.1.7 Work and Nonwork Transit Tr
- Page 462 and 463:
Table 4.2-8 Milwaukie LRT Average W
- Page 464 and 465:
ODOT’s access spacing standards a
- Page 466 and 467:
4.3.2.1 Pedestrian Facilities The f
- Page 468 and 469:
following table summarizes proposed
- Page 470 and 471:
Table 4.3-5 Off-Street Parking Redu
- Page 472 and 473:
In addition to the intersections li
- Page 474 and 475:
Non-Intersection Impacts Delays fro
- Page 476 and 477:
Table 4.3-8 Sub-area A - Portland S
- Page 478 and 479:
Table 4.3-8 Sub-area A - Portland S
- Page 480 and 481:
Sub-area B - SE Powell Boulevard to
- Page 482 and 483:
Table 4.3-10 Sub-area B - SE Powell
- Page 484 and 485:
Sub-area C - SE Tacoma Street to Hi
- Page 486 and 487:
Table 4.3-13 summarizes the interse
- Page 488 and 489:
Table 4.3-14 Sub-area C - SE Tacoma
- Page 490 and 491:
Intersection/Location Table 4.3-15
- Page 492 and 493:
signal timing. This results in queu
- Page 494 and 495:
Table 4.3-17 Sub-Area D - Highway 2
- Page 496 and 497:
Table 4.3-18 Sub-Area D - Highway 2
- Page 498 and 499:
Heavy trucks that currently access
- Page 500 and 501:
describes the types of areas where
- Page 503 and 504:
5. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATIO
- Page 505 and 506:
• Operations Cost Inflation. The
- Page 507 and 508:
Table 5.1-2 Portland-Milwaukie Ligh
- Page 509 and 510:
Table 5.1-4 Required Local Matching
- Page 511 and 512:
Up to $164.9 million in Committed S
- Page 513 and 514:
State Payroll “In-Lieu” Revenue
- Page 515 and 516:
5.1.3 Existing Revenue Shortfalls T
- Page 517 and 518:
Additional Budgeted TriMet Contribu
- Page 519 and 520:
In years when less New Starts funds
- Page 521 and 522:
5.2 EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT This
- Page 523 and 524:
Table 5.2-2 Households and Employme
- Page 525 and 526:
Transit Ridership Table 5.2-5 summa
- Page 527 and 528:
5.2.1.4 Transit Network’s Ability
- Page 529 and 530:
Milwaukie will be in or near single
- Page 531 and 532:
Measures Displacements and Acquisit
- Page 533 and 534:
The No-Build Alternative would avoi
- Page 535 and 536:
measure of user benefits per passen
- Page 538 and 539:
6. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION, AGENCY
- Page 540 and 541:
Lloyd District Transportation Manag
- Page 542 and 543:
Table 6.1-1 Stakeholder Meetings Da
- Page 544 and 545:
meetings were open to the public, w
- Page 546 and 547:
Table 6.1-2 Project Briefings to Es
- Page 548 and 549:
Table 6.1-2 Project Briefings to Es
- Page 550 and 551:
Table 6.1-2 Project Briefings to Es
- Page 552 and 553:
Table 6.1-2 Project Briefings to Es
- Page 554 and 555:
SDEIS Public Comment and Responses.
- Page 556 and 557:
Project events and meetings Project
- Page 558 and 559:
Table 6.3-1 Federal, State, and Loc
- Page 560 and 561:
Table 6.3-1 Federal, State, and Loc
- Page 562 and 563:
Section 401 Water Quality Certifica
- Page 564:
Building Permits - Department of Tr
- Page 567 and 568:
The project also received over 51 c
- Page 569 and 570:
7.2.3.1 Comments Related to Design
- Page 571 and 572:
elicited significant support. Comme
- Page 573 and 574:
Noise and Vibration Fifty-two peopl
- Page 575 and 576:
ail line’s influence on other tra
- Page 577 and 578:
treatments will be designed to meet
- Page 579:
Transit-oriented development - The