26.11.2014 Views

Human Dignity, Justice, Fairness, Youth - Eubios Ethics Institute

Human Dignity, Justice, Fairness, Youth - Eubios Ethics Institute

Human Dignity, Justice, Fairness, Youth - Eubios Ethics Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

36 <br />

Macer, DRJ and Saad-Zoy, S. eds., Asia-Arab Interregional Philosophical Dialogues:<br />

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Dignity</strong>, <strong>Justice</strong>, <strong>Fairness</strong>, <strong>Youth</strong>, Democracy and Public Policy (UNESCO, 2011)<br />

<strong>Human</strong>ity and Divinity<br />

Always referring to the Greeks, in the same final third of the same letter, our philosopher defined<br />

philosophy as an “amount to acts of God, to the extent of human capacity." In two other letters,<br />

the Letter of the soul and the Letter on the quiddity of sleep and vision, where Kindi analyzes the<br />

issue of the soul not as it animates the body, but rather isolated and distant from him, our author<br />

defined it (the soul) in the following manner: “the soul is simple, it has nobility and perfection,<br />

its rank is high.”<br />

It has two main different faculties: that of the senses and the intellect. His salvation “is in<br />

knowledge, it succeeds in purifying himself and makes him worthy of entering world of the<br />

intellect.” Thus, we face two kinds of souls: 1) the intellectual soul (or rational nafs 'aqliyya),<br />

rusty and dirty and that breeds ignorance, 2) The intellectual soul (or rational nafs' aqliyya)<br />

purified and generates knowledge of all things appear in it. The first is attached to the senses and<br />

thus to the sensible world, however, the second is detached completely in order to "make it<br />

capable of receiving the forms that use the senses do not offer [...] [and] “will ascend like the<br />

creator” and thereby becoming a virtuous soul, nafs fadila.<br />

The fact of the “separate body” is nothing more than death. But what is death? It is, in our<br />

dictionary, that is to say, according to the letter, two types of definitions: one natural and the<br />

other intellectual. In both cases, the body is the target. The natural is the cessation of the soul of<br />

the use of the body. The intellectual is that to kill desire, that is to say, the pleasures of the body.<br />

This is the second death as the wise “is offered to kill desire as the path to virtue. This is why<br />

many among the largest Veterans said, the pleasure is evil. And that necessarily - that the soul<br />

has two jobs, one sensitive, the other intelligent, and that what men call pleasure in the sensation<br />

occurs - because to be distracted by sense pleasures is abandoned the use of the intellect.”<br />

The use of the intellect is the solution to become virtuous, to ensure the passage of bestial<br />

humanity to humanity angelic or should I say to humanity divine.<br />

From the Divinity to <strong>Human</strong>ity<br />

But what is the purpose of this second death? Is it material or immaterial? Is there a connection<br />

with this world or beyond? What is assimilated to acts of God? And why the soul wants to be<br />

virtuous and approach the likeness to God with no intention of joining God but to care about his<br />

world?<br />

One of two things: either the purpose of death is immaterial and intellectual world of the afterlife<br />

is also immaterial, or the objective of the world if material. Two figures represent the first case:<br />

the mystic and the philosopher out of the cave, or the philosopher isolated from the world.<br />

However, the former is represented by the Man concerned with his daily life. This man may be<br />

the philosopher, the philosopher in the cave among the prisoners, or just an ordinary man.<br />

Thus, we arrive at two types of intellectual death: vertical or horizontal. The first goes to God or<br />

heaven or the ideal world that we limit ourselves to call it the divine world. The second goes to<br />

our world, this world we call the human world.<br />

a) <strong>Justice</strong><br />

As for the maxim, “to go like God”, which is borrowed from a passage in the dialogue<br />

Theaetetus (176 a) where Socrates, having said that “it is impossible that evil disappears and the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!