3hPlSq
3hPlSq
3hPlSq
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Effective Facilitation<br />
WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010<br />
Spokane Convention Center, 10:15 – 11:45<br />
Vickie Shea (VickieSh@spokaneschools.org) and Sue Vingelen<br />
(SuzanneV@spokaneschools.org)<br />
Big Ideas<br />
How can effective facilitation promote & support professional growth?<br />
Planning with the purpose and group (colleague) in mind helps the facilitator<br />
make choices regarding helpful structures and strategies.<br />
Learning is socially constructed but individually integrated. Reflection is key.<br />
Teachers are worthy; not needy.<br />
Facilitators are neutral.<br />
Facilitation Goal and Most Important Point<br />
“Effective Facilitation” WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010
Notes or Journal Reflections<br />
“Effective Facilitation” WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010<br />
Page 2
Effective Facilitation: Agenda<br />
• Activate and Engage<br />
– Overview: What, Why, How<br />
– Activate Prior Knowledge/Build Community<br />
– Norms<br />
• Explore and Discover<br />
– Planning, Problem Solving, Reflecting<br />
– Support, Challenge, Professional Vision<br />
– Goal Setting<br />
– Inviting Thinking with Language<br />
• Organize and Integrate<br />
– Most Important Point<br />
– Feedback & Questions<br />
Page 3<br />
“Effective Facilitation” WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010
Learning-<br />
Focused<br />
Conversations<br />
A Continuum of Interaction<br />
________________________________________<br />
Consult Collaborate Coach<br />
Activating and Engaging<br />
• Contextual information<br />
• Information about event or situation<br />
• Presenting issues and concerns<br />
• Perspectives and perceptions<br />
Exploring & Discovering<br />
Planning/Problem Solving<br />
• Goals and outcomes<br />
• Indicators and evidence<br />
of success<br />
• Approaches, strategies<br />
and resources<br />
• Potential choice points<br />
and concerns<br />
Fully Attend<br />
Toolkit<br />
Pausing<br />
Paraphrasing<br />
Inquiring<br />
Probing<br />
Extending<br />
Exploring & Discovering<br />
Reflecting<br />
• Weigh priorities<br />
• Search for patterns<br />
• Compare/contrast<br />
• Analyze cause-effect<br />
relationships<br />
Organizing & Integrating<br />
• Connections<br />
• Generalizations<br />
• Applications<br />
• Personal Learning<br />
Based on the model of Cognitive Coaching developed by Art Costa & Robert Garmston [Costa, A. & Garmston, R. (2002) Cognitive<br />
Coaching: A Foundation for Renaissance Schools, Norwood MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishing along with Laura Lipton and Bruce<br />
Wellman's Mentoring Matters: A Practical Guide to Learning-Focused Relationships, Sherman CT: MiraVia (2003).<br />
“Effective Facilitation” WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010
Effective Facilitation<br />
Structures and Strategies for Promoting Growth<br />
Why Facilitate?<br />
Facilitation is becoming a core competency for anyone who’s on a team, heading up a<br />
committee or teaching. Effective meetings happen when proper attention has been paid to<br />
the process elements and the proceedings are skillfully facilitated. Leaders must know how<br />
to create buy-in, generate active participation and empower people to take charge. At the<br />
core of instructional coaching, collaborating, mentoring, and teaching is the skill of<br />
facilitation. With its focus on asking instead of telling, as well as listening and building<br />
consensus, facilitation is the essential skill for working with others.<br />
--Ingrid Bens (2005)<br />
How is Facilitation unique?<br />
Whether a teacher leader takes the stance of Presenter, Collaborator, or Facilitator when<br />
working with a group depends upon the function that is needed for the task. (Examples: a<br />
presenter might present the improvements of a new curriculum and give steps for<br />
implementation; a collaborator might brainstorm or co-plan with colleagues; and a<br />
facilitator might help a group analyze their math curriculum or make decisions on how to<br />
begin the process of curriculum mapping.)<br />
A group facilitator may need to transition to presenter or collaborator to meet the needs<br />
of the group; whereas a mentor/growth agent may need to transition from coach, to<br />
consultant to collaborator depending upon the needs of their colleague in a 1:1<br />
conversation.<br />
To facilitate means to ―make easier.‖ Facilitators maintain focus on the goal while<br />
managing the energy and pacing for the group. The group generates the information.<br />
Facilitators remain neutral. On the other hand, collaborators work alongside the group,<br />
co-creating information, and presenters bring expertise of the topic to the group.<br />
--L. Lipton & B. Wellman (2003 & 2010)<br />
Content vs. Process<br />
Presenting is about the content; and facilitating is about the process. The content is what<br />
is being discussed. The process is the how things are run—the format, structures,<br />
procedures, strategies, and tools used to engage with the content and work toward the<br />
goal(s). Facilitators plan for both the content and the process when developing their<br />
agenda.<br />
--Ingrid Bens (2005)<br />
Page 5<br />
“Effective Facilitation” WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010
What’s Good Facilitation?<br />
A facilitator…<br />
• Acts more like a referee than a player<br />
• Provides leadership or invites thinking without taking the reins<br />
• Offers methods for groups/individuals to develop their own answers<br />
• Helps members define and reach their own (clear) goals<br />
• Remains neutral, nonjudgmental<br />
--Ingrid Bens (2005)<br />
An effective facilitator . . .<br />
• Implements procedures to help a group reach their goal.<br />
• Manages the energy, focus, and communications of the group.<br />
• Invites thinking through creating a safe place for reflection, planning, problem<br />
solving, brainstorming, collaboration, etc.<br />
• Stays neutral on the content and focuses on the process elements.<br />
• Listens actively to understand, using attentive body language and eye contact.<br />
• Asks questions to test assumptions, invite participation, and probe for additional<br />
information.<br />
• Paraphrases to make sure members know they’re being heard and to clarify key<br />
ideas.<br />
• Summarizes periodically to check for understanding, revive a stalled discussion or<br />
to bring a group to consensus and wrap it up.<br />
• Ends with final reflections or next steps.<br />
Facilitator Functions:<br />
A facilitator simultaneously balances support, cognitive challenge, and professional vision<br />
for a group or colleague to promote their professional growth.<br />
We offer Support by establishing rapport, providing a non-judgmental sounding<br />
board, paraphrasing, providing information and resources, offering organization and<br />
structures that support thinking.<br />
We Challenge cognitively by asking questions, considering possibilities, analyzing<br />
values and beliefs.<br />
We facilitate professional Vision by developing clear goals and promoting exemplars<br />
and ideals.<br />
Support without challenge and vision offers only comfort but no growth. Challenge and<br />
vision without support can lead to anxiety and frustration. Support and challenge without<br />
Vision can leave us wandering, looking at the ground beneath us but not the road ahead.<br />
--Lipton & Wellman (2003)<br />
Page 6<br />
“Effective Facilitation” WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010
Best/Worst Facilitator Practices<br />
Some of the best things that facilitators can do include:<br />
• Assess the needs of the members<br />
• Create an open and trusting atmosphere<br />
• Help people understand why they are there<br />
• View yourself as servant of the group’s needs<br />
• Make participants the center of attention<br />
• Speak in simple and direct language<br />
• Encourage everyone to participate<br />
• Stay neutral<br />
• Display energy and appropriate levels of assertiveness<br />
• Treat all participants as equals<br />
• Protect participants and ideas from attack<br />
• Stay flexible and ready to change direction if necessary<br />
• Take public notes that reflect what participants mean<br />
• Listen intently to understand what’s being said<br />
• Help the group communicate<br />
• Paraphrase<br />
• Periodically summarize related ideas<br />
• Know how to use a wide range of discussion tools<br />
• Provide feedback so the group can assess their progress and make adjustments<br />
• Teach and empower others to facilitate<br />
• End each gathering with clear next steps<br />
• Insure that members feel ownership for agreed-to actions<br />
• End on a positive and optimistic note<br />
Some of the worst things that facilitators can do include:<br />
• Remain oblivious to what the group thinks or needs<br />
• Fail to listen carefully to what’s being said<br />
• Lose track of key ideas<br />
• Take notes that change the meaning of what is said<br />
• Try to be the center of attention<br />
• Get defensive<br />
• Get into personality battles<br />
• Put people down<br />
• Ignore or avoid conflict<br />
• Let a few people dominate<br />
• Never check how it’s going<br />
• Be overly passive on process<br />
• Push ahead on an irrelevant agenda<br />
• Have no alternative approaches<br />
• Let discussions get badly<br />
sidetracked<br />
• Let discussions ramble without<br />
proper closure<br />
• Be oblivious about when to stop<br />
• Be insensitive to cultural diversity<br />
issues<br />
• Use inappropriate humor<br />
“Effective Facilitation” WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010<br />
--Ingrid Bens (2005)<br />
Page 7
Benefits of Public Recording<br />
Public Recording, when using participant’s own words or asking permission to paraphrase:<br />
• Helps the group focus on the task<br />
• Supports visual learners<br />
• Depersonalizes ideas<br />
• Creates a third point—a depersonalized document. Also used with data. It<br />
becomes safer to discuss the data when it is an object separate from the person.<br />
• Enhances memory<br />
• Frees participants from taking notes<br />
• Develops shared ownership<br />
• Prevents repetition<br />
• Respects individuals’ ideas<br />
• Enables each participant to check for accuracy<br />
• Increases sense of accomplishment<br />
--R. Garmston & B. Wellman (1999)<br />
Characteristics of Adult Learners<br />
Know your group. Begin by acknowledging their expertise, even if it is only years of<br />
experience. Know their history with the topic. Surface their questions. They will engage<br />
in learning activities if they know the purpose for them.<br />
Adults . . .<br />
1. need to know the goal and why it is important.<br />
2. want to be self-directed and are reluctant to give up control.<br />
3. will use their wide experience base for learning.<br />
4. readily see application of new learning.<br />
5. are practical. They are mostly interested in skills and knowledge. Be sure to provide<br />
the underlying principles and theory, but provide plenty of knowledge and skills to<br />
go with it.<br />
--A. Sandvold & M. Baxter<br />
Paraphrasing<br />
Paraphrasing is a powerful tool—it helps folks know they have been heard and helps us<br />
move forward. We no longer say ―I heard you say…‖ or ―I think I heard you say…‖ because<br />
if the paraphrase is not accurate, our colleagues would need to tell us that we are wrong<br />
(rather than the paraphrase being wrong). When paraphrasing:<br />
Attend fully—Pay attention to body language, expressions, breathing.<br />
Listen with the intention to understand.<br />
Reflect the essence of the message rather than all of the details.<br />
Pause to ensure that the speaker is finished talking before paraphrasing.<br />
Use ―you‖ rather than ―I.‖<br />
Paraphrase before asking a question.<br />
Page 8<br />
“Effective Facilitation” WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010
Effective Facilitation: 3-Circle Audit<br />
Worth being familiar with<br />
Data<br />
Discussions<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Tools<br />
Planning<br />
Framework<br />
Agenda<br />
Norms<br />
Etc.<br />
Knowledge & Skills<br />
Engagement Strategies<br />
Just Like Me<br />
Public Timer<br />
Public Recording<br />
Third Point<br />
Etc.<br />
Consensus<br />
Building<br />
Planning<br />
Clear Goals<br />
Know Audience<br />
3 Phases of<br />
Learning<br />
Communication Tools<br />
Verbal & Nonverbal<br />
Listening for<br />
Understanding<br />
Inviting Thinking<br />
<br />
<br />
What, Why,<br />
How<br />
3 Functions<br />
<br />
Adult Learning<br />
Big Ideas<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
How can effective facilitation promote & support<br />
professional growth?<br />
Planning with the purpose and group (colleague) in<br />
mind helps the facilitator make choices regarding<br />
helpful structures and strategies.<br />
Learning is socially constructed but individually<br />
integrated. Reflection is key.<br />
Teachers are worthy; not needy.<br />
Facilitators are neutral.<br />
--from Wiggins<br />
& McTighe,<br />
Understanding<br />
by Design<br />
Page 9<br />
“Effective Facilitation” WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010
Planning Framework<br />
Date:<br />
Group: Recorder: Time and Place:<br />
Facilitator(s):<br />
Purpose:<br />
Topic & Time Content, Learning Activities and Purpose Resources<br />
Activate & Welcome<br />
Engage<br />
Introductions<br />
Norms Activity Posted Norms<br />
Activate &<br />
Engage<br />
<br />
<br />
Agenda<br />
Goals<br />
o What, Why, How<br />
o Big Ideas/Essential Question(s)<br />
<br />
Posted Agenda<br />
Explore &<br />
Discover<br />
<br />
<br />
Strategies for Interacting with Information<br />
Discussions, Sharing<br />
<br />
Information<br />
Organize &<br />
Integrate<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Summarize/Synthesize Information<br />
Most Important Points<br />
Next Steps<br />
Feedback<br />
<br />
<br />
Exit/Feedback<br />
Slips<br />
Chart next<br />
steps<br />
Page 10<br />
“Effective Facilitation” WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010
Language Choices for Facilitation<br />
To invite thinking, use positive presuppositions. The use of plurals and tentative language<br />
also help questions be more invitational for thinking rather than to provoke. Below are<br />
examples that show the positive presuppositions in italics. The plurals and tentative<br />
language have been underlined.<br />
Negative Example: Have you been able to write a lesson plan?<br />
Positive Presupposition: Thinking about that lesson plan that you are writing, how’s it<br />
going?<br />
Negative Example: Why didn’t that go well?<br />
Positive Presupposition: As you reflect on that event (or lesson), what might be some<br />
reasons that it didn’t go as planned?<br />
Negative Example: What do you need to be successful?<br />
Positive Presupposition: Keeping the goals of the meeting in mind, what are some possible<br />
road blocks that you might want to keep in mind during your planning?<br />
Practice: Please select one question from below and modify it to add positive<br />
presuppositions, plurals and tentative language where possible. Feel free to write a<br />
question for your own context.<br />
1. Why did you do that?<br />
2. Why aren’t you finished on time?<br />
3. Why aren’t you managing your classroom?<br />
Page 11<br />
“Effective Facilitation” WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010
References<br />
*Bens, Ingrid. (2005). Facilitating with ease! San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.<br />
Burgoon, J., Buller, D., & Woodall, W. (1989). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken<br />
dialogue. NY: Harper and Row.<br />
Costa, A., & Garmston, R. (1993). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance<br />
schools—Syllabus (3 rd ed.). Berkley, CA: Institute for Intelligent Behavior.<br />
Garmston, R., & Wellman, B. (1999). The adaptive school: A sourcebook for developing<br />
collaborative groups. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.<br />
Garmston, R., & Wellman, B. (2002). Syllabus: The adaptive school: A developing<br />
collaborative groups (4 th ed., revised printing). El Dorado Hills, CA: Robert<br />
Garmston and Bruce Wellman.<br />
Hoffman, C., & Ness, J. (1998). Putting sense into consensus: Solving the puzzle of making<br />
team decisions. Tacoma, WA: VISA Associates.<br />
*Lipton, L., & Wellman, B. (1998). Pathways to understanding: Patterns and practices in the<br />
learning-focused classroom. Sherman, CT: MiraVia LLC.<br />
*Lipton, L., & Wellman, B. (2003). Mentoring matters: A practical guide to learning-focused<br />
relationships (2 nd ed.). Sherman, CT: MiraVia LLC.<br />
Lipton, L., & Wellman, B. (June 25, 2010) Booklet used at work session in Spokane School<br />
District. Leading groups: Effective strategies for building professional community.<br />
Sherman, CT: MiraVia LLC.<br />
McDonald, J., Mohr, N., Dichter, A., & McDonald, E. (2003). The power of protocols. New<br />
York: The Teachers College Press.<br />
Sandvold, A., & Baxter, M. The fundamentals of literacy coaching.<br />
Wellman, B., & Lipton, L. (2004). Data-driven dialogue: A facilitator’s guide to collaborative<br />
inquiry. Sherman, CT: MiraVia LLC.<br />
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (expanded 2 nd ed.). Alexandria,<br />
VA: ASCD.<br />
Page 12<br />
“Effective Facilitation” WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010
Reflecting on the<br />
roadblocks that you have<br />
encountered with the<br />
project, what are your<br />
Considering the goals for<br />
this event, in what ways<br />
When you think about<br />
your students, what are<br />
Some responses to<br />
language activity:<br />
1. Why did you do that?<br />
were your actions in<br />
alignment with the goals?<br />
2. Why aren’t you<br />
finished on time?<br />
hunches about why it is<br />
more time consuming than<br />
predicted?<br />
3. Why aren’t you<br />
managing your<br />
classroom?<br />
some ideas for classroom<br />
management routines that<br />
could support their<br />
academic achievement?<br />
Quotations:<br />
• Relationships grow when: shared norms and values ensure psychological<br />
safety for all group members, group members behave congruently with<br />
agreed upon norms and filter choices and decisions through agreed upon<br />
values.<br />
--Laura Lipton & Bruce Wellman, Data Driven Dialogue<br />
• When different talents and ideas rub up against each other, there is<br />
friction, yes. But also sparks, fire, light and – eventually – brilliance!<br />
--Nancie O’Neal<br />
Page 13<br />
“Effective Facilitation” WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010
Feedback<br />
I<br />
expected<br />
to<br />
receive:<br />
I received:<br />
I valued:<br />
A suggestion I<br />
have:<br />
A question I still have:<br />
If you would like to receive a response to your question(s), please give your e-<br />
mail address. Thank you, Vickie and Sue<br />
“Effective Facilitation” WSASCD Conference, October 15, 2010