05.11.2012 Views

open access: Nature Reviews: Key Advances in Medicine

open access: Nature Reviews: Key Advances in Medicine

open access: Nature Reviews: Key Advances in Medicine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

UROLOGY<br />

Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of<br />

Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333<br />

Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA<br />

(M. C. Smaldone, R. G. Uzzo).<br />

Correspondence to: R. G. Uzzo<br />

r_uzzo@fccc.edu<br />

Compet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terests<br />

The authors declare no compet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terests.<br />

1. Go, A. S., Chertow, G. M., Fan, D.,<br />

McCulloch, C. E. & Hsu, C. Y. Chronic kidney<br />

disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular<br />

events, and hospitalization. N. Engl. J. Med.<br />

351, 1296–1305 (2004).<br />

2. Campbell, S. C. et al. Guidel<strong>in</strong>e for<br />

management of the cl<strong>in</strong>ical T1 renal mass.<br />

J. Urol. 182, 1271–1279 (2009).<br />

Don’t miss out!<br />

Sign up to free e-ALERTS and be notified when new articles are published<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Nature</strong> <strong>Reviews</strong> Urology. Research Highlights, News & Views, <strong>Reviews</strong>,<br />

and Perspectives—you won’t miss a th<strong>in</strong>g!<br />

http://www.nature.com/register<br />

3. Van Poppel, H. et al. A prospective, randomised<br />

EORTC <strong>in</strong>tergroup phase 3 study compar<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

oncologic outcome of elective nephron-spar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage<br />

renal cell carc<strong>in</strong>oma. Eur. Urol. 59, 543–552<br />

(2011).<br />

4. Simhan, J. et al. Objective measures of renal<br />

mass anatomic complexity predict rates of<br />

major complications follow<strong>in</strong>g partial<br />

nephrectomy. Eur. Urol. 60, 724–730 (2011).<br />

5. D<strong>in</strong>do, D., Demart<strong>in</strong>es, N. & Clavien, P. A.<br />

Classification of surgical complications: a new<br />

proposal with evaluation <strong>in</strong> a cohort of 6336<br />

patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg.<br />

240, 205–213 (2004).<br />

6. Kutikov, A. & Uzzo, R. G. The R.E.N.A.L.<br />

nephrometry score: a comprehensive<br />

standardized system for quantitat<strong>in</strong>g renal<br />

tumor size, location and depth. J. Urol. 182,<br />

844–853 (2009).<br />

7. Holl<strong>in</strong>gsworth, J. M., Miller, D. C., Daignault, S. &<br />

Hollenbeck, B. K. Ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cidence of small renal<br />

masses: a need to reassess treatment effect.<br />

J. Natl Cancer Inst. 98, 1331–1334 (2006).<br />

8. Chawla, S. N. et al. The natural history of<br />

observed enhanc<strong>in</strong>g renal masses: metaanalysis<br />

and review of the world literature.<br />

J. Urol. 175, 425–431 (2006).<br />

9. Jewett, M. A. et al. Active surveillance of small<br />

renal masses: progression patterns of early<br />

stage kidney cancer. Eur. Urol. 60, 39–44 (2011).<br />

10. Smaldone, M. C. et al. Small renal masses<br />

progress<strong>in</strong>g to metastases under active<br />

surveillance: A systematic review and pooled<br />

analysis. Cancer http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/<br />

cncr.26369.<br />

S86 | JANUARY 2012 www.nature.com/reviews

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!