3.04 Gravimetric Methods – Superconducting Gravity Meters
3.04 Gravimetric Methods – Superconducting Gravity Meters
3.04 Gravimetric Methods – Superconducting Gravity Meters
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
84 <strong>Superconducting</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Meters</strong><br />
(a)<br />
Earthquake data (5 Dec.1997)<br />
140<br />
120<br />
nm s <strong>–</strong>2<br />
100<br />
JH<br />
JPB<br />
DC 2<br />
80<br />
SR<br />
312.0 312.5<br />
313.0<br />
Time (days since 1 Jan. 1997)<br />
313.5<br />
(b)<br />
100<br />
Spikes or transient disturbance without offset<br />
raw res<br />
JPB<br />
nm s <strong>–</strong>2<br />
80<br />
DC 2<br />
JH<br />
SR<br />
215.0 215.5<br />
Time (days since 1 Jan. 1997)<br />
216.0<br />
(c)<br />
Offset problem due to helium refill (25 Jun. 1997)<br />
35<br />
JPB<br />
DC 2<br />
nm s <strong>–</strong>2<br />
30<br />
raw res<br />
25<br />
SR<br />
JH<br />
176.0 176.5 177.0<br />
Time (days since 1 Jan. 1997)<br />
Figure 9 Examples of the data corrections done independently by different operators (identified by initials) for the removal/<br />
interpolation of (a) an earthquake, (b) disturbances without offsets, and (c) an offset caused by a helium refill. From Hinderer J,<br />
Rosat S, Crossley D, Amalvict M, Boy J-P, and Gegout P (2002a) Influence of different processing methods on the retrieval of<br />
gravity signals from GGP data. Bulletin d9Informations des Marées Terrestres 123: 9278<strong>–</strong>9301.<br />
Long gaps in a record make determination of offsets<br />
difficult, if not impossible. There are two saving<br />
strategies <strong>–</strong> either to rely on the co-location of AG<br />
measurement to anchor the SG record at the ends of<br />
a long gap, or possibly use a fit to the polar motion<br />
when there is a suspected large offset within the