01.12.2014 Views

Item 7.1 Att 4 (5) Ex A - Final_EACCS_Oct2010_Print - City of Dublin

Item 7.1 Att 4 (5) Ex A - Final_EACCS_Oct2010_Print - City of Dublin

Item 7.1 Att 4 (5) Ex A - Final_EACCS_Oct2010_Print - City of Dublin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2 Environmental Setting<br />

wildlife linkages. Some species require linkages for periodic migrations among<br />

different habitat types used for breeding, birthing, feeding, or roosting. Wildlife<br />

movement from one important habitat area to another may vary from daily to<br />

seasonal migration depending on the species. The second need for a linkage is<br />

the permanent immigration or emigration <strong>of</strong> individuals among habitat patches,<br />

allowing for gene flow and recolonization after local extinction (Beier and Noss<br />

2000; Hilty et al. 2006; Groom et al. 2006).<br />

Linkage requirements differ greatly from species to species. Specific<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> linkages, such as dimensions, location, and quality <strong>of</strong> habitat,<br />

can influence wildlife use. Wider linkages are more effective than narrower<br />

linkages (Merenlender and Crawford 1998, Hilty and Merelender 2004; Hilty et<br />

al. 2006; Groom et al. 2006). In addition, linkages that do not include adequate<br />

buffers from the urban interface or disturbed areas are not used as <strong>of</strong>ten. A<br />

linkage that does not function properly can become a “death trap” either by<br />

isolating individuals from a core population or by not delivering them to habitat<br />

that meets basic requirements for survival and reproduction (Groom et al.<br />

2006).<br />

All <strong>of</strong> the focal species, to some degree, rely on habitat linkages to maintain<br />

populations and their genetic integrity. However, some <strong>of</strong> the more mobile<br />

focal species rely on habitat linkages extensively for movement. For example,<br />

San Joaquin kit fox moves through the Altamont Hills between populations in<br />

the southern portion <strong>of</strong> its range and Contra Costa County. Golden eagle also<br />

moves extensively through the study area during migration and for local<br />

foraging while resident in the area. The Pacific Flyway, which diverges into east<br />

Alameda County, is an important migration movement corridor for raptors and<br />

other bird species. Bobcat and cougar also commonly traverse this area in<br />

search <strong>of</strong> food. These species are examples <strong>of</strong> relatively long-distance<br />

movement that requires consideration <strong>of</strong> habitat linkages at a larger scale. In<br />

contrast, California tiger salamander and California red-legged frog move over<br />

smaller distances, <strong>of</strong>ten from pond to pond or wetland to stream. Their<br />

movement needs must therefore be considered at a more local scale, within the<br />

study area.<br />

Based on an assessment <strong>of</strong> the movement needs <strong>of</strong> the focal species and in<br />

order to assess and ultimately conserve connections at the scales discussed<br />

above, three categories <strong>of</strong> linkages are discussed below:<br />

• grassland corridors in east Alameda County,<br />

• aquatic-upland connectivity throughout the study area, and<br />

• riparian/stream connectivity throughout study area.<br />

East Alameda County Conservation Strategy 2-77 October 2010<br />

ICF 00906.08

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!